• 0

Definitive Best Firewall 2007

Asked by kinetix63,

 Share

Definitive Best Firewall  

715 members have voted

  1. 1. Your Choice?

    • BitDefender
      23
    • BlackIce
      11
    • Comodo Firewall
      131
    • F-Secure Net Security
      6
    • Hardware Firewall/NAT Router
      139
    • Jetico
      7
    • Lavasoft
      12
    • Linux based Firewall Distro
      22
    • Look 'n' Stop
      14
    • N/A
      350

  2. 2. Your Choice?

    • McAfee
      27
    • Microsoft ISA
      9
    • Netveda Safety.NET
      4
    • Norton
      24
    • Omniquad
      1
    • Outpost
      90
    • Sunbelt Kerio Personal Firewall
      51
    • Tiny
      11
    • Windows Built In Firewall
      138
    • N/A
      360

  3. 3. Your Choice?

    • Windows OneCare
      39
    • ZoneAlarm
      216
    • Other (Please specify below)
      62
    • N/A
      398

Question

Grand Master

kinetix63 Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

A fresh "Best Firewall" poll for 2007. Please use this as a reference when researching Firewall utilities. As time goes on, the poll can be updated to add further options.

Due to limitations of IPB - this will be seen as 3 polls. Select the Firewall program you wish to vote for, and choose N/A in the other polls.

Happy voting!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/526714-definitive-best-firewall-2007/
Share on other sites

185 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Veteran

no-sweat

Posted
Posted

Just want to clear this up. If you use a router like Linksys wireless whatever, it acts as a firewall automatically right? It'll block all odd ports? Then you can just use the forwarding in setup to open them. Do I understand this correctly?

  • 0
Veteran

MrCobra

Posted
Posted
Just want to clear this up. If you use a router like Linksys wireless whatever, it acts as a firewall automatically right? It'll block all odd ports? Then you can just use the forwarding in setup to open them. Do I understand this correctly?

Yes. From my understanding port triggering is better because the ports only stay open as long as needed. Someone correct me if I'm wrong. You'll also want a software firewall as well to filter inbound and outbound traffic on suspect or unknown programs as well.

Hardware Firewall - N/A - Other (AVG Firewall).

  • 0

Guest Jeremy of Many

Posted
Posted
Tried Comodo, didn't like it one bit - seemed like a lot of noise for little action.

It's called thoroughness. Firewalls have to learn what you do before they can properly protect you. They can't both ignore your actions and protect you against attackers and yourself at the same time. What do you expect? What I just mentioned, apparently.

  • 0
Contributor

SonicSam

Posted
Posted
It's called thoroughness. Firewalls have to learn what you do before they can properly protect you. They can't both ignore your actions and protect you against attackers and yourself at the same time. What do you expect? What I just mentioned, apparently.

Don't think so, I've been using Comodo for a month and it is VERY forgetfully. i can understand needing a period of training to your system but when i specifically go in to the config and set a program to allow all communication and ignore parent then next time I go in to the config the setting has be reverted back to default then you get a little P'ed off. And for example repeated prompting to allow IE which is being run using the same icon and opening the default homepage.

Comodo is free so you can forgive I guess and has good potential if they can make it remember better.

That being said there isn't much out there now that I like, Norton Internet Security was okay (if a little slow) until there 2007 version which lost a load of functionality and was actually slower and more or a memory hog then before and zonealarm, what a joke in my book, all the praise in the world from all the review mags but its worse than NIS, hasn't changed much looks wise in god knows how long and looks awful, it's hard to use and breaks lots of web pages.

In a surprise M$ one care 1.5 is actually quite good, its fast, simple to configure (Although limited in what rule detail you can set). Okay so its probably got more holes than a tea strainer but for someone who isn't computer savvy (not me BTW I'm a computer god :D ) it's quite a good solution.

Anyway after NIS, ZoneAlarm and now Comodo I'm once again on the hunt for a good, fast, reliable and logical software firewall. Lets see who's next.

  • 0
Contributor

SonicSam

Posted
Posted

Quick update, I installed Outpost Firewall last night and finally think I have found a firewall the fulfils my requirements and more, feature wise it kinda reminds me of older versions of Norton Internet Security (but without the bloat and with many more features) and it's powerful too, loads of ways to configure access settings but also very user friendly if you decide thats how you like things. Good logging, v.low CPU and Memory usage and and some cool plug-ins for ad blocking and anti-spy-ware etc.

All in all 10 out of 10 so far...

  • 0
Mentor

Joey992

Posted
Posted

I just recently started using Kaspersky Internet Security because my computer is starting to show its age and most of the seperate firewall and AV programs were a little too resource heavy. I find that one solution is much easier for my comp to handle. Plus it really is a great program and from what I've read it is fairly high on the security lists.

  • 0
Proficient

Enzo Marinelli

Posted
Posted
I just recently started using Kaspersky Internet Security because my computer is starting to show its age and most of the seperate firewall and AV programs were a little too resource heavy. I find that one solution is much easier for my comp to handle. Plus it really is a great program and from what I've read it is fairly high on the security lists.

Yeah, it's an excellent applications... it's a shame the forum starter WONT add it as an option even after seven requests... :s

  • 0
Mentor

Sniper101

Posted
Posted

Personally the Best firewall out is a Hardware firewall, no holes no exploites and you can monitor it perfectly and you have more control over software firewalls Software firewalls are useless in my opinion where's the options to block network traffic? where's the option to define IP Access over your router.

Hardware Firewall for a Network

Software firewall if you just surf now and again

  • 0
Contributor

SonicSam

Posted
Posted
Personally the Best firewall out is a Hardware firewall, no holes no exploites and you can monitor it perfectly and you have more control over software firewalls Software firewalls are useless in my opinion where's the options to block network traffic? where's the option to define IP Access over your router.

Hardware Firewall for a Network

Software firewall if you just surf now and again

Don't be an ar$e, a hardware firewall and a software firewall are different beasts and used for different things. Sure for incoming data a hardware firewall is a must, but a hardware firewall can't restrict traffic at the application level, it can only restrict it by protocol. So when it opens a port to allow traffic through, for example port 80 for the web or port 25 and 110 for SMTP/pop3 it does not know what application it is opening it for and so opens the port for all applications on the system/s that need it, not just your web bowser of your email client but any spy-ware, viruses or malware too.

Ideally everyone should have a good software firewall for blocking outbound traffic at the application (and port) level, and a hardware firewall for closing unneeded incoming ports that can be used to gain access to your computer or network and as a secondary protection for when your software firewall is off or broken or just not installed yet.

Both types of firewall have there place and if your running an always on broadband connection then you should have both enabled.

  • 0
Neowinian

chrisg89

Posted
Posted
A fresh "Best Firewall" poll for 2007. Please use this as a reference when researching Firewall utilities. As time goes on, the poll can be updated to add further options.

Due to limitations of IPB - this will be seen as 3 polls. Select the Firewall program you wish to vote for, and choose N/A in the other polls.

Happy voting!

what about panda? :whistle:

  • 0

Guest Jeremy of Many

Posted
Posted
what about panda? :whistle:

Since it isn't even listed on MatouSec's Firewall Comparison, Panda either refused to allow their product to be tested with other products, or they allowed it to be but it wasn't worth it. I'm assuming they didn't allow it because MatouSec reviews even the crappiest of firewalls.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to question listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • The official Funny Pictures thread

      By +Edouard · Posted

    • what other retro software do yall use

      By Som · Posted

      My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC

      By hellowalkman · Posted

      Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • EA Sports UFC 6 review: Brutal, satisfying, and surprisingly accessible to newcomers

      By Nick H. · Posted

      Bugger, you beat me to it!
    • EA Sports UFC 6 review: Brutal, satisfying, and surprisingly accessible to newcomers

      By +Good Bot, Bad Bot · Posted

      I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!