• 0

Definitive Best Defragmenter 2007


Definitive Best Defragmenter  

1029 members have voted

  1. 1. Your Choice?

    • DirMS/Buzzsaw
      2
    • Diskeeper
      289
    • Norton Speed Disk
      8
    • O&O Defrag
      200
    • PageDefrag
      3
    • PerfectDisk
      303
    • Vopt
      9
    • Windows Disk Defragmenter
      141
    • Other (Please specify below)
      74


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
I have the same experience as Vettetech. My drives are quieter after using PD7 and if I do an offline defrag, the boot time is faster than it is with bootvis.

I know I thought it was odd at first but after talkin to some more people they also dont hear there drives as much. Diskeeper is the same as windows defrag. Sure Perfectdisk take about 2 hours to defrag both my drives but thats cause it does a "perfect" job.

  • 0
Anyone using UltimateDefrag besides me? I think its a great simple program that gets the job done without a lot of resource usage.

Yes I do, and I love the options they have for specific files or file types or directories to decide where on the hard drive to put those. My vote absolutely goes to UltimateDefrag.

I'm not sure but I think this might be my first post ever on Neowin. I'm a pretty long time lurker.

  • 0

Hi,

it seems there's too much defragmenter tool in the market.

I've been reading many thread, and often arguments are:

I prefer X and someone answer nope I prefer Y,

which you guess is really instructive :whistle:

Personnally I've been using diskeeper for years.

But now I have a seagate 120Gb ,

and despite defragmenting , my hdd looked often busy.

When I tried latest version of diskeeper 2007, things got even worse (as if my hdd was more busy than ever)

I just switched today, to perfect disk, and I got the pleasant surprise to see that my hdd was more silent.

I must also say, that I've disabled a lot of XP services, so maybe it's not just because of perfectdisk. ;)

Also things I like about perfectdisk: compatible with vista & XP,

while for diskeeper you must install a different version depending of your system.

Never tried O&O defragment, but I tried O&O unerase v4 and got the feeling that the product sucks .....

Maybe because I'm just unexperimented. Anyway I don't like having too much option to tweak,

and it seems the "advantage" of their defragment tool.

Speedisk ? Well I hate Norton products ... (too bloated, or crap left on hdd even after uninstall)

Conclusion: I stick for the moment with perfectdisk.

I'm curious to see how good are these defragmenter:

- DirMS/Buzzsaw (ugly website, but some good reviews)

- Vopt (idem: ugly website, but some good reviews)

- Ashampoo Magical defrag (because I liked some ashampoo products)

Edited by bigmehdi
  • 0
Hi,

it seems there's too much defragmenter tool in the market.

I've been reading many thread, and often arguments are:

I prefer X and someone answer nope I prefer Y,

which you guess is really instructive :whistle:

Personnally I've been using diskeeper for years.

But now I have a seagate 120Gb ,

and despite defragmenting , my hdd looked often busy.

When I tried latest version of diskeeper 2007, things got even worse (as if my hdd was more busy than ever)

I just switched today, to perfect disk, and I got the pleasant surprise to see that my hdd was more silent.

I must also say, that I've disabled a lot of XP services, so maybe it's not just because of perfectdisk. ;)

Also things I like about perfectdisk: compatible with vista & XP,

while for diskeeper you must install a different version depending of your system.

Never tried O&O defragment, but I tried O&O unerase v4 and got the feeling that the product sucks .....

Maybe because I'm just unexperimented. Anyway I don't like having too much option to tweak,

and it seems the "advantage" of their defragment tool.

Speedisk ? Well I hate Norton products ... (too bloated, or crap left on hdd even after uninstall)

Conclusion: I stick for the moment with perfectdisk.

I'm curious to see how good are these defragmenter:

- DirMS/Buzzsaw (ugly website, but some good reviews)

- Vopt (idem: ugly website, but some good reviews)

- Ashampoo Magical defrag (because I liked some ashampoo products)

Its not the services. I have most services shut off. I have had Perfectdisk for about 4 months now and my pc has never run better.

  • 0
Harlem39s Finest, I'm afraid there is no decent FREE defragmenter.

Just use Windows Defrag.

JKDefrag. It uses the Windows API like every other defragmenter. It can be run automatically using Windows Scheduling. It's very basic, open-source, no crap. I've switched to it from Diskeeper for a while to see how it compares with commercial products.

  • 0

Just suddenly had to switch to Diskeeper2007 from PD8 due to constant BSOD while defragging lately. I sent the complete memory.dmp file to raxco support for analysis and they replied that culprit is the IdeChnDr.sys driver of IntelApplicationAccelerator. They ask me to upgrade this driver but it's indeed the latest version.

I have no problems with DK2007 yet.

  • 0

OK Diskeeper was giving some problems so was looking for another software. Tried Magical defrag from Ashampoo was ok but not something i wanted. The found a software named DiskTrix Ultimate Defrag and wow it has made my system so damn fast. It took around 1 hour to do the initial defrag and now system running so smooth..

  • 0

And how does UltimateDefrag stand against PerfectDisk or O&O Defrag? I'd like to give it a try if there's a trial available cause I think there are many less known programs which are better than the most popular ones.

I particulary found this to be true in case of antiviruses.

  • 0

Actually i just defragmented my whole system and it feel a whole lot alive. Windows boot a bit faster, icons in downloads folder are generated faster. I have like 200 files in downloads folder all shareware or free ware apps.

So it has made my system and file access much faster.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AnyDesk 9.7.6 by Razvan Serea AnyDesk is a fast remote desktop system and enables users to access their data, images, videos and applications from anywhere and at any time, and also to share it with others. AnyDesk is the first remote desktop software that doesn't require you to think about what you can do. CAD, video editing or simply working comfortably with an office suite for hours are just a few examples. AnyDesk is designed for modern multi-core CPUs. Most of AnyDesk's image processing is done con­currently. This way, AnyDesk can utilize up to 90% of modern CPUs. AnyDesk works across multiple platforms and operating systems: Windows, Linux, Free BSD, Mac OS, iOS and Android. Just 7 megabytes - downloaded in a glimpse, sent via email, or fired up from your USB drive, AnyDesk will turn any desktop into your desktop in se­conds. No administrative privileges or installation needed. AnyDesk 9.7.6 changelog: Fixed Bugs Added validation feedback for passwords shorter than five characters Fixed an issue in AnyDesk One Meeting where the account name was used instead of the entered username after logging out Fixed crashes related to message editing and context menu interactions Fixed issues affecting message scrolling, text formatting, typing indicators, quoted messages, and community privacy settings Prevented users from editing automated system messages Corrected download status reporting, temporary file naming, and menu overlap issues affecting the Download History and Reactions pop-ups Other Changes Added chat list grouping settings Added keyboard navigation support (Page Up, Page Down, Home, and End) for the message feed Removed Chat language options Updated translations Download: AnyDesk 9.7.6 | 8.0 MB (Free for private use, paid upgrade available) Links: AnyDesk Home Page | Other platforms | Release History | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • It's interesting to hear that AI growth is not investor driven.
    • A few weeks ago, I had this same exact issue. Unfortunately, I didn't think of disabling the Secure Boot option in BIOS. I updated my BIOS to the latest version for my MB and it resolved the issue.
    • I have a partial answer, when I used a multi-port usb hub I had degraded speed performance with 3 large external hard drives connected. I managed to snag a nice (yet older) USB3 based wavelink docking station cheap / used that has x6 usb 3 ports and almost doubled the speed of the external hard drives transfer rate. This looks to be a slightly upgraded model -https://ebay.io/m/LZtjTy
    • Microsoft faces shareholder lawsuit over masking AI costs and slowing Azure growth by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft is facing a class action lawsuit from shareholders who allege that the company intentionally overhyped its artificial intelligence initiatives to distract from slowing cloud revenue and an exploding infrastructure bill. The complaint was filed in a Seattle federal court by the Michigan-based City of St. Clair Shores Police and Fire Retirement System. The plaintiffs argue that Microsoft’s leadership painted an overly optimistic picture of its Copilot rollout and complex OpenAI partnership. They say that the company did this while downplaying the harsh reality that building the data centers required to power these next-generation tools requires a huge amount of capital. Back at the company's Q2 2026 earnings report from late January, Microsoft revealed that its flagship Azure cloud growth had slipped to 39% (down from 40% the prior quarter) and guided investors to expect a further deceleration to 37% or 38% for the first three months of 2026. Now, under normal circumstances, a slight percentage point drop in cloud growth is a minor operational hiccup. But the Redmond giant paired that guidance with $37.5 billion in quarterly capital expenditures. This figure, which is a 66% year-over-year surge, blew past any analyst estimates at that time. Much of this amount went into buying high-priced GPUs and custom silicon that were required to train and run large language models. This is why the market reacted violently and just a day after its earnings call on January 29, the company's stock plummeted 10%, and wiped out $357 billion of capital in just a trading session. Microsoft is doing better now, though. Its Q3 2026 results showed its run rate from its AI business was hitting $37 billion, proving that enterprise demand for its infrastructure is very real and continuing to scale. Microsoft isn't the only company pouring billions into infrastructure for the AI boom. We've seen most Big Tech companies, including Amazon and Google, also get the results of these investments with stronger-than-ever growth and increased income. via Reuters
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      201
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      127
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!