• 0

Definitive Best Defragmenter 2007


Definitive Best Defragmenter  

1029 members have voted

  1. 1. Your Choice?

    • DirMS/Buzzsaw
      2
    • Diskeeper
      289
    • Norton Speed Disk
      8
    • O&O Defrag
      200
    • PageDefrag
      3
    • PerfectDisk
      303
    • Vopt
      9
    • Windows Disk Defragmenter
      141
    • Other (Please specify below)
      74


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
I have the same experience as Vettetech. My drives are quieter after using PD7 and if I do an offline defrag, the boot time is faster than it is with bootvis.

I know I thought it was odd at first but after talkin to some more people they also dont hear there drives as much. Diskeeper is the same as windows defrag. Sure Perfectdisk take about 2 hours to defrag both my drives but thats cause it does a "perfect" job.

  • 0
Anyone using UltimateDefrag besides me? I think its a great simple program that gets the job done without a lot of resource usage.

Yes I do, and I love the options they have for specific files or file types or directories to decide where on the hard drive to put those. My vote absolutely goes to UltimateDefrag.

I'm not sure but I think this might be my first post ever on Neowin. I'm a pretty long time lurker.

  • 0

Hi,

it seems there's too much defragmenter tool in the market.

I've been reading many thread, and often arguments are:

I prefer X and someone answer nope I prefer Y,

which you guess is really instructive :whistle:

Personnally I've been using diskeeper for years.

But now I have a seagate 120Gb ,

and despite defragmenting , my hdd looked often busy.

When I tried latest version of diskeeper 2007, things got even worse (as if my hdd was more busy than ever)

I just switched today, to perfect disk, and I got the pleasant surprise to see that my hdd was more silent.

I must also say, that I've disabled a lot of XP services, so maybe it's not just because of perfectdisk. ;)

Also things I like about perfectdisk: compatible with vista & XP,

while for diskeeper you must install a different version depending of your system.

Never tried O&O defragment, but I tried O&O unerase v4 and got the feeling that the product sucks .....

Maybe because I'm just unexperimented. Anyway I don't like having too much option to tweak,

and it seems the "advantage" of their defragment tool.

Speedisk ? Well I hate Norton products ... (too bloated, or crap left on hdd even after uninstall)

Conclusion: I stick for the moment with perfectdisk.

I'm curious to see how good are these defragmenter:

- DirMS/Buzzsaw (ugly website, but some good reviews)

- Vopt (idem: ugly website, but some good reviews)

- Ashampoo Magical defrag (because I liked some ashampoo products)

Edited by bigmehdi
  • 0
Hi,

it seems there's too much defragmenter tool in the market.

I've been reading many thread, and often arguments are:

I prefer X and someone answer nope I prefer Y,

which you guess is really instructive :whistle:

Personnally I've been using diskeeper for years.

But now I have a seagate 120Gb ,

and despite defragmenting , my hdd looked often busy.

When I tried latest version of diskeeper 2007, things got even worse (as if my hdd was more busy than ever)

I just switched today, to perfect disk, and I got the pleasant surprise to see that my hdd was more silent.

I must also say, that I've disabled a lot of XP services, so maybe it's not just because of perfectdisk. ;)

Also things I like about perfectdisk: compatible with vista & XP,

while for diskeeper you must install a different version depending of your system.

Never tried O&O defragment, but I tried O&O unerase v4 and got the feeling that the product sucks .....

Maybe because I'm just unexperimented. Anyway I don't like having too much option to tweak,

and it seems the "advantage" of their defragment tool.

Speedisk ? Well I hate Norton products ... (too bloated, or crap left on hdd even after uninstall)

Conclusion: I stick for the moment with perfectdisk.

I'm curious to see how good are these defragmenter:

- DirMS/Buzzsaw (ugly website, but some good reviews)

- Vopt (idem: ugly website, but some good reviews)

- Ashampoo Magical defrag (because I liked some ashampoo products)

Its not the services. I have most services shut off. I have had Perfectdisk for about 4 months now and my pc has never run better.

  • 0
Harlem39s Finest, I'm afraid there is no decent FREE defragmenter.

Just use Windows Defrag.

JKDefrag. It uses the Windows API like every other defragmenter. It can be run automatically using Windows Scheduling. It's very basic, open-source, no crap. I've switched to it from Diskeeper for a while to see how it compares with commercial products.

  • 0

Just suddenly had to switch to Diskeeper2007 from PD8 due to constant BSOD while defragging lately. I sent the complete memory.dmp file to raxco support for analysis and they replied that culprit is the IdeChnDr.sys driver of IntelApplicationAccelerator. They ask me to upgrade this driver but it's indeed the latest version.

I have no problems with DK2007 yet.

  • 0

OK Diskeeper was giving some problems so was looking for another software. Tried Magical defrag from Ashampoo was ok but not something i wanted. The found a software named DiskTrix Ultimate Defrag and wow it has made my system so damn fast. It took around 1 hour to do the initial defrag and now system running so smooth..

  • 0

And how does UltimateDefrag stand against PerfectDisk or O&O Defrag? I'd like to give it a try if there's a trial available cause I think there are many less known programs which are better than the most popular ones.

I particulary found this to be true in case of antiviruses.

  • 0

Actually i just defragmented my whole system and it feel a whole lot alive. Windows boot a bit faster, icons in downloads folder are generated faster. I have like 200 files in downloads folder all shareware or free ware apps.

So it has made my system and file access much faster.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This sounds like underneath the nice marketing spin, either someone at Adobe got tired of their lazy devs and asked Microsoft to help them sort at least some of Adobe's ancestral spaghetti code to make it go faster, or Microsoft wanted Adobe's crap to run better on Windows to make it look better when compared to Apple, so they offered to intervene. Either way, GOOD.
    • My favorite file manager for Windows 11 finally gets a long-requested feature by Taras Buria Files is among the best File Explorer alternatives for Windows 10 and 11. This free app is packed with all sorts of features and conveniences, but there is one crucial feature that is still missing—Tree View. Fortunately, the latest update in the Preview channel finally delivers it. With version 4.1.4, which is now available for download in the Preview channel, developers implemented Tree View, a new mode that displays folders in an expandable hierarchy. Windows 11's stock File Explorer always had this feature, but it was nowhere to be found in Files until now. Starting with the latest preview update, you can expand each drive and its nested folders without leaving the current location and then open the folder you need in the main view. To try Tree View in Files, update the app to the latest preview version, then click the small arrow next to a drive to expand its content. The developers say they are rolling out Tree View in Preview first to gather feedback from users and improve the feature before bringing it to all in the stable channel. In addition to Tree View, Files 4.1.14 improves the Windows Fonts folder. You can now preview each font directly in Files with no need to open the built-in font viewer. For now, these two features are only available in the Preview channel. For those using the stable release, developers recently released version 4.1.3, with improvements for the built-in tag system, on-demand folder size calculation, and plenty of various fixes. You can check out the full release notes here. You can download Files from the Microsoft Store (paid version) or its official website (free).
    • Who is paying for this 30x scale-up? Its sounds expensive.
    • Millions of users to benefit from Windows 11's new performance boost on Adobe Photoshop by Sayan Sen Despite the advent of AI-generated imagery, Adobe's Photoshop remains one of the most popular tools on this planet. Adobe does not have a publicly reported total user count but it's probably not wrong to assume there are millions. As of 2025, Adobe Creative Cloud has had approximately 41 million paid subscribers, many of whom likely use Photoshop. In addition, more than 166,000 companies worldwide are apparently also using the app. These figures are according to a very recent report by SQ Magazine. Out of them, it is fair to assume that many are probably running Windows. As such, there is good news for these users as Microsoft has announced Photoshop is getting a big 20% performance boost on x86-64 (AMD64) systems and a 13% bump-up on Arm devices. This is definitely great news for them as many have complained about the slow performance and general sluggishness of Photoshop on Windows 11 ever since the advent of the latter back in 2021. If you are wondering how Microsoft managed to do this, the answer lies in a combination of compiler-level optimizations and a technology called Sample Profile Guided Optimization (SPGO). According to Microsoft, Adobe worked closely with the company’s Visual C++ team and adopted the latest MSVC toolchain enhancements together with SPGO to squeeze more performance out of Photoshop’s CPU-bound workloads. Unlike traditional Profile Guided Optimization (PGO), which requires developers to create special instrumented builds and run lengthy training workloads, SPGO gathers performance data directly from optimized release binaries. This means Adobe could collect real-world usage information which gives a major advantage to this technique, as companies could leverage data collected from actual customer workloads rather than only relying on synthetic benchmark runs. In theory, this should allow optimizations to better reflect how users interact with software in the real world. Thanks to this, there are improvements to code layout, function inlining, hot-and-cold code separation, and other low-level tweaks that help processors execute instructions more efficiently. Essentially the compiler is better able to identify “hot” code paths, those which are most frequently executed, and optimize them accordingly.
    • "The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months¨ I'd prefer to see the lowest price in over a year
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      521
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!