• 0

Definitive Best Defragmenter 2007


Definitive Best Defragmenter  

1029 members have voted

  1. 1. Your Choice?

    • DirMS/Buzzsaw
      2
    • Diskeeper
      289
    • Norton Speed Disk
      8
    • O&O Defrag
      200
    • PageDefrag
      3
    • PerfectDisk
      303
    • Vopt
      9
    • Windows Disk Defragmenter
      141
    • Other (Please specify below)
      74


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
I have the same experience as Vettetech. My drives are quieter after using PD7 and if I do an offline defrag, the boot time is faster than it is with bootvis.

I know I thought it was odd at first but after talkin to some more people they also dont hear there drives as much. Diskeeper is the same as windows defrag. Sure Perfectdisk take about 2 hours to defrag both my drives but thats cause it does a "perfect" job.

  • 0
Anyone using UltimateDefrag besides me? I think its a great simple program that gets the job done without a lot of resource usage.

Yes I do, and I love the options they have for specific files or file types or directories to decide where on the hard drive to put those. My vote absolutely goes to UltimateDefrag.

I'm not sure but I think this might be my first post ever on Neowin. I'm a pretty long time lurker.

  • 0

Hi,

it seems there's too much defragmenter tool in the market.

I've been reading many thread, and often arguments are:

I prefer X and someone answer nope I prefer Y,

which you guess is really instructive :whistle:

Personnally I've been using diskeeper for years.

But now I have a seagate 120Gb ,

and despite defragmenting , my hdd looked often busy.

When I tried latest version of diskeeper 2007, things got even worse (as if my hdd was more busy than ever)

I just switched today, to perfect disk, and I got the pleasant surprise to see that my hdd was more silent.

I must also say, that I've disabled a lot of XP services, so maybe it's not just because of perfectdisk. ;)

Also things I like about perfectdisk: compatible with vista & XP,

while for diskeeper you must install a different version depending of your system.

Never tried O&O defragment, but I tried O&O unerase v4 and got the feeling that the product sucks .....

Maybe because I'm just unexperimented. Anyway I don't like having too much option to tweak,

and it seems the "advantage" of their defragment tool.

Speedisk ? Well I hate Norton products ... (too bloated, or crap left on hdd even after uninstall)

Conclusion: I stick for the moment with perfectdisk.

I'm curious to see how good are these defragmenter:

- DirMS/Buzzsaw (ugly website, but some good reviews)

- Vopt (idem: ugly website, but some good reviews)

- Ashampoo Magical defrag (because I liked some ashampoo products)

Edited by bigmehdi
  • 0
Hi,

it seems there's too much defragmenter tool in the market.

I've been reading many thread, and often arguments are:

I prefer X and someone answer nope I prefer Y,

which you guess is really instructive :whistle:

Personnally I've been using diskeeper for years.

But now I have a seagate 120Gb ,

and despite defragmenting , my hdd looked often busy.

When I tried latest version of diskeeper 2007, things got even worse (as if my hdd was more busy than ever)

I just switched today, to perfect disk, and I got the pleasant surprise to see that my hdd was more silent.

I must also say, that I've disabled a lot of XP services, so maybe it's not just because of perfectdisk. ;)

Also things I like about perfectdisk: compatible with vista & XP,

while for diskeeper you must install a different version depending of your system.

Never tried O&O defragment, but I tried O&O unerase v4 and got the feeling that the product sucks .....

Maybe because I'm just unexperimented. Anyway I don't like having too much option to tweak,

and it seems the "advantage" of their defragment tool.

Speedisk ? Well I hate Norton products ... (too bloated, or crap left on hdd even after uninstall)

Conclusion: I stick for the moment with perfectdisk.

I'm curious to see how good are these defragmenter:

- DirMS/Buzzsaw (ugly website, but some good reviews)

- Vopt (idem: ugly website, but some good reviews)

- Ashampoo Magical defrag (because I liked some ashampoo products)

Its not the services. I have most services shut off. I have had Perfectdisk for about 4 months now and my pc has never run better.

  • 0
Harlem39s Finest, I'm afraid there is no decent FREE defragmenter.

Just use Windows Defrag.

JKDefrag. It uses the Windows API like every other defragmenter. It can be run automatically using Windows Scheduling. It's very basic, open-source, no crap. I've switched to it from Diskeeper for a while to see how it compares with commercial products.

  • 0

Just suddenly had to switch to Diskeeper2007 from PD8 due to constant BSOD while defragging lately. I sent the complete memory.dmp file to raxco support for analysis and they replied that culprit is the IdeChnDr.sys driver of IntelApplicationAccelerator. They ask me to upgrade this driver but it's indeed the latest version.

I have no problems with DK2007 yet.

  • 0

OK Diskeeper was giving some problems so was looking for another software. Tried Magical defrag from Ashampoo was ok but not something i wanted. The found a software named DiskTrix Ultimate Defrag and wow it has made my system so damn fast. It took around 1 hour to do the initial defrag and now system running so smooth..

  • 0

And how does UltimateDefrag stand against PerfectDisk or O&O Defrag? I'd like to give it a try if there's a trial available cause I think there are many less known programs which are better than the most popular ones.

I particulary found this to be true in case of antiviruses.

  • 0

Actually i just defragmented my whole system and it feel a whole lot alive. Windows boot a bit faster, icons in downloads folder are generated faster. I have like 200 files in downloads folder all shareware or free ware apps.

So it has made my system and file access much faster.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The reviews you refer to mean nothing. Where there is no journalism there is no reason to call the gaming media's opinion pieces "reviews". For GP games there is indeed a metric for success - increasing subscriptions. Which turns in revenue. The only circumstance in which subs do not rise when great is being released is a Game Pass system where the company is close to fully saturated with customers in a subscription. However, in that case as the theory goes you spend aplenty in all kind of games - from shady live service cash cows and customer offending agitprop crap in purple colours to robust and entertaining single player games. And keep a solid level of profitability. Ignoring the simply innocuous but mid games MGS has released primarily of the second kind.
    • Report: Microsoft to use AWS to help GitHub deal with a major surge in demand by Pradeep Viswanathan Thanks to the surge of coding AI agents, GitHub's usage has skyrocketed over the past 12 months. To meet this demand, GitHub started with a plan in October 2025 to increase capacity by 10x. However, by early this year, the company realized that it needed 30x scale. This rapid growth has caused severe strain on the platform's reliability, resulting in several small outages over the past few months. In April, GitHub published a long blog post explaining the steps it is taking to resolve these reliability issues. In the post, the company also confirmed that it is working toward a multi-cloud architecture for better resilience. Today, Business Insider reported that GitHub is turning to Amazon Web Services to help deal with a major surge in AI-driven coding activity. It is important to note that GitHub is still in the process of moving completely to the Azure cloud. The current plan is to move the platform fully to Azure by 2027 so that it can scale better as per developer demand. Therefore, the current decision to utilize AWS might be part of a short-term plan to meet immediate demand. A Microsoft spokesperson confirmed that GitHub is using multiple cloud providers with the following statement: For Microsoft, the decision highlights the operational pressure behind the AI boom. GitHub has to stay reliable for developers at a time when rivals such as Codex, Cursor, Claude Code, and other AI coding tools are gaining attention. And the decision to use AWS for computing capacity seems practical given the circumstances.
    • It's growing on me, however, your right, it make better usability sense if the tabs were bellow the address bar.
    • Qwen 3.6 is better value per dollar, and you can run it locally for free.
    • I don't believe them that anyone using threads, at least meaningfully. It's the same thing for Facebook, people just don't engage with Meta platforms like they are thinking. This isn't 2006.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Conversation Starter
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      517
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      106
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!