• 0

Definitive Best Defragmenter 2007

Asked by kinetix63,

 Share

Definitive Best Defragmenter  

1029 members have voted

  1. 1. Your Choice?

    • DirMS/Buzzsaw
      2
    • Diskeeper
      289
    • Norton Speed Disk
      8
    • O&O Defrag
      200
    • PageDefrag
      3
    • PerfectDisk
      303
    • Vopt
      9
    • Windows Disk Defragmenter
      141
    • Other (Please specify below)
      74

Question

224 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Enthusiast

ZIPO

Posted
Posted
my drive never has to spin up and spin down to keep up with the dvd drive. you must have crappy drives :p

No I just have a problem with Windows cache file. It decreases when a large file is being copied so that the system becomes less responsive. And fragmentation only makes things worse.

  • 0

Guest Jeremy of Many

Posted
Posted

When I refer to free space consolidation, I am not interested in having a pretty display or expecting significant improvement over the performance already present, but to reduce future fragmentation. If you have gaps between existing files, a newly written file is more likely to be fragmented moreso than it would be if you had made everything contiguous.

John0877 is correct regarding the mechanical movements of the HDD. FSC helps reduce this.

Another concern is the defragmentation and placement of directories. It is important to have the directories placed next to the MFT because of how file queries are managed. Basically, when you double-click a file, the drive reader has to query for its location in the MFT, then the directories in series (I think, not positive) until it reaches the file(s). If your directories are scattered (which is most likely because few defragmenters do directory placement), it's more work for the drive reader.

Anyway, I'm testing 20 defragmenters and will post the results on my blog and several forums. Negative criticism, comments, discussion/debate, questions are all welcome.

If my understanding is incorrect I welcome anyone with more knowledge to clarify. :)

  • 0

Guest Jeremy of Many

Posted
Posted

Sometime this week, yes. I'm making a simple HTML based chart followed by explanations.

These are the defragmenters I have tested:

Ashampoo Magical Defrag 2

AusLogics Disk Defrag

DirMS

Diskeeper 2007

Diskeeper Lite

HDiskDefrag

IOBit SmartDefrag

JKDefrag

MindSoft Defrag

MST Defrag

O&O Defrag 2000

O&O Defrag Pro 8.6

PCMesh Defrag For Windows (Same as Abexo's Disk Defragmenter)

PerfectDisk 8

Power Defrag

Power Defragmenter + Contig

SpeeDefrag

UltimateDefrag

Vopt

Windows Defragmenter

  • 0
Proficient

[deXter]

Posted
Posted
I was just wondering how does one test a defragmentation software?

For the results to be accurate exactly same data must be present at exactly the same spot on the hard disk for all the software. How are you achieving that?

The first step is to mess up a drive so that it's suitably fragmented. The next step is to ensure that no 'interfering' services/programs are enabled on startup, like antivirus, updaters, services of other defragmenters, programs that create temp files, etc.

Once the drive is ready, it's imaged to another drive using software like Norton Ghost or Acronis True Image. Imaging programs can create an exact sector-to-sector clone of a drive. After the test is done, the image is restored again for the next test.

  • 0
Mentor

Pallab

Posted
Posted

The first step is to mess up a drive so that it's suitably fragmented. The next step is to ensure that no 'interfering' services/programs are enabled on startup, like antivirus, updaters, services of other defragmenters, programs that create temp files, etc.

Once the drive is ready, it's imaged to another drive using software like Norton Ghost or Acronis True Image. Imaging programs can create an exact sector-to-sector clone of a drive. After the test is done, the image is restored again for the next test.

Ok.

Thanks :)

  • 0

Guest Jeremy of Many

Posted
Posted

The results will not be available until next week sometime due to spontaneous circumstances.

I'm doing this virtually in VMware Workstation where the snapshots save file locations on the virtual disk. The fragmentation level in the original snapshot is 29-30% of the virtual disk.

  • 0

Guest Jeremy of Many

Posted
Posted

Hey everyone! Just wanted you all to know that I am progressing well with my results and should hopefully have them out next week sometime. I'm trying to make the information as detailed and thorough as possible. It will also be unbiased; no favoritism whatsoever.

  • 0
Veteran

migo

Posted
Posted

Anyone know how an automatic defragger would contribute to quicker HD failure?

I've got a 4200RPM hard drive, so if it's jumping around too much it can die pretty quickly. Going for empty CPU cycles is fine, but I have a feeling my hard drive might die quicker if it's continuously defragging and doesn't get a break.

  • 0
Mentor

Pallab

Posted
Posted

Well it definitely does increase disk thrashing. It's continuously defragging the drive. I dont like that. I definitely feel its unneccesary.

And without automatic defrag also you should not defrag too often. Not more than once a week. I generally defrag once a month. Thats generally good enough.

  • 0

Guest Jeremy of Many

Posted
Posted
Anyone know how an automatic defragger would contribute to quicker HD failure?

I've got a 4200RPM hard drive, so if it's jumping around too much it can die pretty quickly. Going for empty CPU cycles is fine, but I have a feeling my hard drive might die quicker if it's continuously defragging and doesn't get a break.

Get a Seagate 300GB SATA2 NCQ drive. ;)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to question listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Report: Microsoft to use AWS to help GitHub deal with a major surge in demand

      By +LightEco · Posted

      Who is paying for this 30x scale-up? Its sounds expensive.
    • Millions of users to benefit from Windows 11's new performance boost on Adobe Photoshop

      By hellowalkman · Posted

      Millions of users to benefit from Windows 11's new performance boost on Adobe Photoshop by Sayan Sen Despite the advent of AI-generated imagery, Adobe's Photoshop remains one of the most popular tools on this planet. Adobe does not have a publicly reported total user count but it's probably not wrong to assume there are millions. As of 2025, Adobe Creative Cloud has had approximately 41 million paid subscribers, many of whom likely use Photoshop. In addition, more than 166,000 companies worldwide are apparently also using the app. These figures are according to a very recent report by SQ Magazine. Out of them, it is fair to assume that many are probably running Windows. As such, there is good news for these users as Microsoft has announced Photoshop is getting a big 20% performance boost on x86-64 (AMD64) systems and a 13% bump-up on Arm devices. This is definitely great news for them as many have complained about the slow performance and general sluggishness of Photoshop on Windows 11 ever since the advent of the latter back in 2021. If you are wondering how Microsoft managed to do this, the answer lies in a combination of compiler-level optimizations and a technology called Sample Profile Guided Optimization (SPGO). According to Microsoft, Adobe worked closely with the company’s Visual C++ team and adopted the latest MSVC toolchain enhancements together with SPGO to squeeze more performance out of Photoshop’s CPU-bound workloads. Unlike traditional Profile Guided Optimization (PGO), which requires developers to create special instrumented builds and run lengthy training workloads, SPGO gathers performance data directly from optimized release binaries. This means Adobe could collect real-world usage information which gives a major advantage to this technique, as companies could leverage data collected from actual customer workloads rather than only relying on synthetic benchmark runs. In theory, this should allow optimizations to better reflect how users interact with software in the real world. Thanks to this, there are improvements to code layout, function inlining, hot-and-cold code separation, and other low-level tweaks that help processors execute instructions more efficiently. Essentially the compiler is better able to identify “hot” code paths, those which are most frequently executed, and optimize them accordingly.
    • The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months

      By fernan99 · Posted

      "The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months¨ I'd prefer to see the lowest price in over a year
    • The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months

      By sphbecker · Posted

      Glad these prices are starting to come down, but that is still crazy. I bought the 2TB 9100 Pro (slightly more expensive version with PCIe 5.0) last year for $240.
    • The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months

      By hellowalkman · Posted

      The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months by Sayan Sen Yesterday, we covered a really good deal wherein you can get a 4TB TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 NVMe PCIe Gen4 SSD for a low price of just $400 with a special discount coupon. That's just $100 per TB, making it a very good offer during these hard times. The deal is still live, so you can check it out in its dedicated article here if you do not want to miss out. Meanwhile, if you don't have that kind of budget but still wish to buy an SSD for a good price, the 2TB variant of the TeamGroup SSD at $280 its lowest price in over three months. Meanwhile, those seeking 2TB but faster performance can check out Samsung's 990 PRO, which has hit the lowest price also in the last quarter or so, as it's on sale for $370 (purchase links under the specs table down below). Thus, you want a faster drive, get the 990 Pro, or you want more capacity, grab the TeamGroup 4TB linked in the first para. The 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $500. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The tech specs are given below: Specification TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 2TB Samsung 990 PRO 2TB Interface PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe 1.4 PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 Form Factor M.2 2280 M.2 2280 Controller InnoGrit Controller Samsung In-house Controller NAND Flash 3D TLC 3D TLC DRAM Cache None (HMB supported) 2GB LPDDR4 Sequential Read (Max) 5,000 MB/s 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write (Max) 4,500 MB/s 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4K) Up to 600,000 IOPS Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4K) Up to 700,000 IOPS Up to 1,550,000 IOPS TBW (Endurance) 1,300 TBW 1,200 TBW MTBF 3,000,000 hours 1,500,000 hours Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C 0°C to 70°C Storage Temperature -40°C to 85°C -40°C to 85°C Shock Resistance 1,500G / 0.5ms 1,500G / 0.5ms Heatsink Patented Graphene Heat Spreader No Get them at the links below: Samsung 990 PRO SSD 2TB (MZ-V9P2T0B/AM): $369.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 2TB SSD (TM8FFE002T0C129): $279.99 (Sold by TeamGroup, Shipped by Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      522
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!