• 0

Definitive Best Defragmenter 2007


Definitive Best Defragmenter  

1029 members have voted

  1. 1. Your Choice?

    • DirMS/Buzzsaw
      2
    • Diskeeper
      289
    • Norton Speed Disk
      8
    • O&O Defrag
      200
    • PageDefrag
      3
    • PerfectDisk
      303
    • Vopt
      9
    • Windows Disk Defragmenter
      141
    • Other (Please specify below)
      74


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I've never used a disk defragmenter.... Not even the one in Windows.

And I've never had any problem before with speed of my HDD or things like that. Should I care?

DK-2007 ProPremier is $99 US or $50 for the Pro.

O&O is $60 CAN

PerfectDisk 8 is $40 US

And I hate Norton products...

Seems like alot of money for something I've never used....

  • 0

I was 'spoon fed' Norton in my early computer years and the SystemWorks Defragger and Optimizer has always seemed a good way to keep my hard drves organized and it was a big surprise when I read this article and other members views. I downloaded the trial version of PerfectDisk yesterday and must admit that so far I am very impressed with the results which outstrip anything that I have seen from Norton or the Windows utility. Looks like both Symantec and Microsoft have fallen behind on this particular area. Thank you to everyone for their views and thoughts and I guess you could say that I have been 'converted'. I am now going to look closely at the thoughts in the antivirus area, as again I have been a Norton devotee for many years and I upgraded my package a few months ago, which was not without it's problems and issues. Thanks again guys for opening up my eyes :)

  • 0

You will achieve the same results with any defragmenter capable of file placement in addition to defragmentation.

In regards to anti-virus, Kaspersky, NOD32, Avast! and AVG are the most popular. However, I don't use anti-virus software.

  • 0

Hi everyone,

Just a little story (which has just happened to myself) for anyone considering buying PerfectDisk. I purchased a licence for PerfectDisk v8 last year. A little while later, they updated it to work with Vista. Anyway, I now have installed Vista on my PC (I was using XP), and wanted to install PerfectDisk. I have the original installer and all the updates (to v8.0.64) released since the original v8.0. I run the installer (for the original 8.0), and it extracts the files, but then pops up a message that it only works on certain operating systems (XP and Server 2003). I then try the latest update - but it wouldn't work because it could not find an installation of PerfectDisk to update. So, I go to the Raxco website, check their knowledge base, and find out from one of their articles that I need to re-download the full PerfectDisk (updated version). I log onto their online store, and click on the download link. I receive a message that I have no downloads available. So, I go back to the knowledge base article and send an email to their sales people as it suggests (if you can't re-download). A few minutes ago I received a reply. They basically told me that the download privileges for an order are only valid for a certain time period after the order, mine are expired, and that they can't help me. So, I have a licenced copy of PerfectDisk v8, and PerfectDisk v8 is now certified for Vista...except I can't use it on Vista because I don't have the updated 8.0.64 installer. I've replied to Raxco's email and told them that I will never use and never recommend one of their products ever again, and told them what they can do with themselves. Anyway, it's too late for me, but for anyone else considering PerfectDisk, think very long and hard about it, as Raxco have demonstrated to me they have no problems with screwing a paying customer over.

Regards,

CM

  • 0

OK, so I downloaded Diskeeper 2007 Professional (30 day trial) and installed it.

I had it defrag my entire drive, and then I even had it do my MFT and Pagefile at boot time.

I don't notice a darn bit of difference in the speed of my computer. NONE! And DK said my drive was "heavily fragmented". It recommended that I let it make my MFT larger and my pagefile had 2 fragments. Afterwards I still had 2 fragments in my pagefile and my drive was no longer "heavily fragmented" it was "Healthy" and had no fragments at all.

The PC is my main box and it's a 1.5GHz P4 with 512MB RAM and 2 80GB 7200RPM hard drives. I'm running Windows XP Pro with SP2 and this box has been built and running since 8-23-2004.

It makes me wonder if this is designed to really help people or just make money. I'm thinking it's just for making money. I also wonder if the people that "notice" a difference are experiencing the placebo effect?

Hmm....

Edited by ServerMechanic
  • 0
OK, so I downloaded Diskeeper 2007 Professional (30 day trial) and installed it.

I had it defrag my entire drive, and then I even had it do my MFT and Pagefile at boot time.

I don't notice a darn bit of difference in the speed of my computer. NONE! And DK said my drive was "heavily fragmented". It recommended that I let it make my MFT larger and my pagefile had 2 fragments. Afterwards I still had 2 fragments in my pagefile and my drive was no longer "heavily fragmented" it was "Healthy" and had no fragments at all.

The PC is my main box and it's a 1.5GHz P4 with 512MB RAM and 2 80GB 7200RPM hard drives. I'm running Windows XP Pro with SP2 and this box has been built and running since 8-23-2004.

It makes me wonder if this is designed to really help people or just make money. I'm thinking it's just for making money. I also wonder if the people that "notice" a difference are experiencing the placebo effect?

Hmm....

Well, fragmented hard drives do have slower read times, but I think you would need to have a VEEEEEERY fragmented HD to notice a difference after defragging.

  • 0

i would recommend iobitsmartdefrag has the ability to defrag as you carry on with the usage of the pc if it is idle if you start using your procsser for more demanding reeaons it stops defragging. hardley notice it even running

http://www.majorgeeks.com/download.php?det=5318 link to iobit defragg free software

  • 0
Well, fragmented hard drives do have slower read times, but I think you would need to have a VEEEEEERY fragmented HD to notice a difference after defragging.

Point is... I haven't defragged my box in about 3 years.

So if it has been fine and even after defragging there is no difference, why even defrag?

I have servers at work that have never been defragged and have been up running Server 2003 for 2-3 years. They are fine, and have awesome performance. We're talking SQL boxes and file and print boxes with 15k RPM SCSI drives.

To me it seems very much like these defrag products are there to make money for the company. I would love to see some real good and solid proof from an outside company that shows noticeable performance gains. I think everyone "thinks" their systems seem faster.

  • 0
I would love to see some real good and solid proof from an outside company that shows noticeable performance gains. I think everyone "thinks" their systems seem faster.

There is plenty of solid documentation out. Both PD and DK have done it. You just have to take the time to go their site and read the PDFs.

So when I went to one of our test machines that was 50% fragmented and took forever to open anything, defragged it with UltimateDefrag, and everything about 3 times faster (GUIs opened significantly faster)... yeah, I just think that happened... *rolls eyes*

Look, just wait 10 years for Solid State RAM and Solid State HDDs to be commercially available to everyone. Then defragmenting will be a thing of the past.

  • 0

I've been using O&O for a while now, but it's starting to bug me that they use a service and a permanent exe (ok, you can kill it but then you have to re-run it every time you want to schedule a defrag, shouldn't be necessary imo).

I'm gonna give PerfectDisk a try.

  • 0

with o&o defrag it does indeed do a good job but afterawhile it seems you gotta repair it to open it,pd is very good,it will work with less free space than dk but pd does not use auto defrag,dk needs a bit more space but has autodefrag.what would be the best choice?

  • 0
There is plenty of solid documentation out. Both PD and DK have done it. You just have to take the time to go their site and read the PDFs.

So when I went to one of our test machines that was 50% fragmented and took forever to open anything, defragged it with UltimateDefrag, and everything about 3 times faster (GUIs opened significantly faster)... yeah, I just think that happened... *rolls eyes*

Look, just wait 10 years for Solid State RAM and Solid State HDDs to be commercially available to everyone. Then defragmenting will be a thing of the past.

Just a tad defensive huh? :)

So how would you explain both of my boxes at home not seeing any difference at all after a full defrag, boot time defrag, pagefile defrag, etc? Especially after they both said that my drives were heavily fragmented and not they are "healthy".

I'm not just making stuff up. I mean it's not hard to tell that my computers are unchanged.

  • 0

PerfectDisk 8.0 for it's speed and options ... especially the offline defrag to fix the pagefile and ntfs attributes.

JKDefrag for everything else (clients and others who don't want to pay for a defragger.)

  • 0

Diskeeper Pro for its low resource, idle sensing, and auto defrag abilities... nothing better then real time defrag when it has no performance hit on your system since it is smart enough to tell when you need to use the HD.... great for servers also!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Who is paying for this 30x scale-up? Its sounds expensive.
    • Millions of users to benefit from Windows 11's new performance boost on Adobe Photoshop by Sayan Sen Despite the advent of AI-generated imagery, Adobe's Photoshop remains one of the most popular tools on this planet. Adobe does not have a publicly reported total user count but it's probably not wrong to assume there are millions. As of 2025, Adobe Creative Cloud has had approximately 41 million paid subscribers, many of whom likely use Photoshop. In addition, more than 166,000 companies worldwide are apparently also using the app. These figures are according to a very recent report by SQ Magazine. Out of them, it is fair to assume that many are probably running Windows. As such, there is good news for these users as Microsoft has announced Photoshop is getting a big 20% performance boost on x86-64 (AMD64) systems and a 13% bump-up on Arm devices. This is definitely great news for them as many have complained about the slow performance and general sluggishness of Photoshop on Windows 11 ever since the advent of the latter back in 2021. If you are wondering how Microsoft managed to do this, the answer lies in a combination of compiler-level optimizations and a technology called Sample Profile Guided Optimization (SPGO). According to Microsoft, Adobe worked closely with the company’s Visual C++ team and adopted the latest MSVC toolchain enhancements together with SPGO to squeeze more performance out of Photoshop’s CPU-bound workloads. Unlike traditional Profile Guided Optimization (PGO), which requires developers to create special instrumented builds and run lengthy training workloads, SPGO gathers performance data directly from optimized release binaries. This means Adobe could collect real-world usage information which gives a major advantage to this technique, as companies could leverage data collected from actual customer workloads rather than only relying on synthetic benchmark runs. In theory, this should allow optimizations to better reflect how users interact with software in the real world. Thanks to this, there are improvements to code layout, function inlining, hot-and-cold code separation, and other low-level tweaks that help processors execute instructions more efficiently. Essentially the compiler is better able to identify “hot” code paths, those which are most frequently executed, and optimize them accordingly.
    • "The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months¨ I'd prefer to see the lowest price in over a year
    • Glad these prices are starting to come down, but that is still crazy. I bought the 2TB 9100 Pro (slightly more expensive version with PCIe 5.0) last year for $240.
    • The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months by Sayan Sen Yesterday, we covered a really good deal wherein you can get a 4TB TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 NVMe PCIe Gen4 SSD for a low price of just $400 with a special discount coupon. That's just $100 per TB, making it a very good offer during these hard times. The deal is still live, so you can check it out in its dedicated article here if you do not want to miss out. Meanwhile, if you don't have that kind of budget but still wish to buy an SSD for a good price, the 2TB variant of the TeamGroup SSD at $280 its lowest price in over three months. Meanwhile, those seeking 2TB but faster performance can check out Samsung's 990 PRO, which has hit the lowest price also in the last quarter or so, as it's on sale for $370 (purchase links under the specs table down below). Thus, you want a faster drive, get the 990 Pro, or you want more capacity, grab the TeamGroup 4TB linked in the first para. The 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $500. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The tech specs are given below: Specification TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 2TB Samsung 990 PRO 2TB Interface PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe 1.4 PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 Form Factor M.2 2280 M.2 2280 Controller InnoGrit Controller Samsung In-house Controller NAND Flash 3D TLC 3D TLC DRAM Cache None (HMB supported) 2GB LPDDR4 Sequential Read (Max) 5,000 MB/s 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write (Max) 4,500 MB/s 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4K) Up to 600,000 IOPS Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4K) Up to 700,000 IOPS Up to 1,550,000 IOPS TBW (Endurance) 1,300 TBW 1,200 TBW MTBF 3,000,000 hours 1,500,000 hours Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C 0°C to 70°C Storage Temperature -40°C to 85°C -40°C to 85°C Shock Resistance 1,500G / 0.5ms 1,500G / 0.5ms Heatsink Patented Graphene Heat Spreader No Get them at the links below: Samsung 990 PRO SSD 2TB (MZ-V9P2T0B/AM): $369.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 2TB SSD (TM8FFE002T0C129): $279.99 (Sold by TeamGroup, Shipped by Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      522
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!