• 0

Definitive Best Defragmenter 2007


Definitive Best Defragmenter  

1029 members have voted

  1. 1. Your Choice?

    • DirMS/Buzzsaw
      2
    • Diskeeper
      289
    • Norton Speed Disk
      8
    • O&O Defrag
      200
    • PageDefrag
      3
    • PerfectDisk
      303
    • Vopt
      9
    • Windows Disk Defragmenter
      141
    • Other (Please specify below)
      74


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I've never used a disk defragmenter.... Not even the one in Windows.

And I've never had any problem before with speed of my HDD or things like that. Should I care?

DK-2007 ProPremier is $99 US or $50 for the Pro.

O&O is $60 CAN

PerfectDisk 8 is $40 US

And I hate Norton products...

Seems like alot of money for something I've never used....

  • 0

I was 'spoon fed' Norton in my early computer years and the SystemWorks Defragger and Optimizer has always seemed a good way to keep my hard drves organized and it was a big surprise when I read this article and other members views. I downloaded the trial version of PerfectDisk yesterday and must admit that so far I am very impressed with the results which outstrip anything that I have seen from Norton or the Windows utility. Looks like both Symantec and Microsoft have fallen behind on this particular area. Thank you to everyone for their views and thoughts and I guess you could say that I have been 'converted'. I am now going to look closely at the thoughts in the antivirus area, as again I have been a Norton devotee for many years and I upgraded my package a few months ago, which was not without it's problems and issues. Thanks again guys for opening up my eyes :)

  • 0

You will achieve the same results with any defragmenter capable of file placement in addition to defragmentation.

In regards to anti-virus, Kaspersky, NOD32, Avast! and AVG are the most popular. However, I don't use anti-virus software.

  • 0

Hi everyone,

Just a little story (which has just happened to myself) for anyone considering buying PerfectDisk. I purchased a licence for PerfectDisk v8 last year. A little while later, they updated it to work with Vista. Anyway, I now have installed Vista on my PC (I was using XP), and wanted to install PerfectDisk. I have the original installer and all the updates (to v8.0.64) released since the original v8.0. I run the installer (for the original 8.0), and it extracts the files, but then pops up a message that it only works on certain operating systems (XP and Server 2003). I then try the latest update - but it wouldn't work because it could not find an installation of PerfectDisk to update. So, I go to the Raxco website, check their knowledge base, and find out from one of their articles that I need to re-download the full PerfectDisk (updated version). I log onto their online store, and click on the download link. I receive a message that I have no downloads available. So, I go back to the knowledge base article and send an email to their sales people as it suggests (if you can't re-download). A few minutes ago I received a reply. They basically told me that the download privileges for an order are only valid for a certain time period after the order, mine are expired, and that they can't help me. So, I have a licenced copy of PerfectDisk v8, and PerfectDisk v8 is now certified for Vista...except I can't use it on Vista because I don't have the updated 8.0.64 installer. I've replied to Raxco's email and told them that I will never use and never recommend one of their products ever again, and told them what they can do with themselves. Anyway, it's too late for me, but for anyone else considering PerfectDisk, think very long and hard about it, as Raxco have demonstrated to me they have no problems with screwing a paying customer over.

Regards,

CM

  • 0

OK, so I downloaded Diskeeper 2007 Professional (30 day trial) and installed it.

I had it defrag my entire drive, and then I even had it do my MFT and Pagefile at boot time.

I don't notice a darn bit of difference in the speed of my computer. NONE! And DK said my drive was "heavily fragmented". It recommended that I let it make my MFT larger and my pagefile had 2 fragments. Afterwards I still had 2 fragments in my pagefile and my drive was no longer "heavily fragmented" it was "Healthy" and had no fragments at all.

The PC is my main box and it's a 1.5GHz P4 with 512MB RAM and 2 80GB 7200RPM hard drives. I'm running Windows XP Pro with SP2 and this box has been built and running since 8-23-2004.

It makes me wonder if this is designed to really help people or just make money. I'm thinking it's just for making money. I also wonder if the people that "notice" a difference are experiencing the placebo effect?

Hmm....

Edited by ServerMechanic
  • 0
OK, so I downloaded Diskeeper 2007 Professional (30 day trial) and installed it.

I had it defrag my entire drive, and then I even had it do my MFT and Pagefile at boot time.

I don't notice a darn bit of difference in the speed of my computer. NONE! And DK said my drive was "heavily fragmented". It recommended that I let it make my MFT larger and my pagefile had 2 fragments. Afterwards I still had 2 fragments in my pagefile and my drive was no longer "heavily fragmented" it was "Healthy" and had no fragments at all.

The PC is my main box and it's a 1.5GHz P4 with 512MB RAM and 2 80GB 7200RPM hard drives. I'm running Windows XP Pro with SP2 and this box has been built and running since 8-23-2004.

It makes me wonder if this is designed to really help people or just make money. I'm thinking it's just for making money. I also wonder if the people that "notice" a difference are experiencing the placebo effect?

Hmm....

Well, fragmented hard drives do have slower read times, but I think you would need to have a VEEEEEERY fragmented HD to notice a difference after defragging.

  • 0

i would recommend iobitsmartdefrag has the ability to defrag as you carry on with the usage of the pc if it is idle if you start using your procsser for more demanding reeaons it stops defragging. hardley notice it even running

http://www.majorgeeks.com/download.php?det=5318 link to iobit defragg free software

  • 0
Well, fragmented hard drives do have slower read times, but I think you would need to have a VEEEEEERY fragmented HD to notice a difference after defragging.

Point is... I haven't defragged my box in about 3 years.

So if it has been fine and even after defragging there is no difference, why even defrag?

I have servers at work that have never been defragged and have been up running Server 2003 for 2-3 years. They are fine, and have awesome performance. We're talking SQL boxes and file and print boxes with 15k RPM SCSI drives.

To me it seems very much like these defrag products are there to make money for the company. I would love to see some real good and solid proof from an outside company that shows noticeable performance gains. I think everyone "thinks" their systems seem faster.

  • 0
I would love to see some real good and solid proof from an outside company that shows noticeable performance gains. I think everyone "thinks" their systems seem faster.

There is plenty of solid documentation out. Both PD and DK have done it. You just have to take the time to go their site and read the PDFs.

So when I went to one of our test machines that was 50% fragmented and took forever to open anything, defragged it with UltimateDefrag, and everything about 3 times faster (GUIs opened significantly faster)... yeah, I just think that happened... *rolls eyes*

Look, just wait 10 years for Solid State RAM and Solid State HDDs to be commercially available to everyone. Then defragmenting will be a thing of the past.

  • 0

I've been using O&O for a while now, but it's starting to bug me that they use a service and a permanent exe (ok, you can kill it but then you have to re-run it every time you want to schedule a defrag, shouldn't be necessary imo).

I'm gonna give PerfectDisk a try.

  • 0

with o&o defrag it does indeed do a good job but afterawhile it seems you gotta repair it to open it,pd is very good,it will work with less free space than dk but pd does not use auto defrag,dk needs a bit more space but has autodefrag.what would be the best choice?

  • 0
There is plenty of solid documentation out. Both PD and DK have done it. You just have to take the time to go their site and read the PDFs.

So when I went to one of our test machines that was 50% fragmented and took forever to open anything, defragged it with UltimateDefrag, and everything about 3 times faster (GUIs opened significantly faster)... yeah, I just think that happened... *rolls eyes*

Look, just wait 10 years for Solid State RAM and Solid State HDDs to be commercially available to everyone. Then defragmenting will be a thing of the past.

Just a tad defensive huh? :)

So how would you explain both of my boxes at home not seeing any difference at all after a full defrag, boot time defrag, pagefile defrag, etc? Especially after they both said that my drives were heavily fragmented and not they are "healthy".

I'm not just making stuff up. I mean it's not hard to tell that my computers are unchanged.

  • 0

PerfectDisk 8.0 for it's speed and options ... especially the offline defrag to fix the pagefile and ntfs attributes.

JKDefrag for everything else (clients and others who don't want to pay for a defragger.)

  • 0

Diskeeper Pro for its low resource, idle sensing, and auto defrag abilities... nothing better then real time defrag when it has no performance hit on your system since it is smart enough to tell when you need to use the HD.... great for servers also!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Snap Inc. launches new SPECS augmented reality glasses (for 'just' $2,195) by Aditya Tiwari Image: Snap Inc. Smartglasses powered by augmented reality are the latest fashion because the smartphone market is slowly reaching saturation. Snap Inc. announced its latest AR-powered smartglasses, called SPECS, that aim to strike a middle ground between underpowered AI glasses and heavy headsets you can't wear all the time. Available in two sizes, Snap SPECS are made from high-performance Swiss TR90 polymer and feature removable inserts to support prescription lenses. Its 47mm model weighs about 132g; the bigger 52mm model weighs 136g. Snap Inc has been spreading the word about the new glasses for a while now. Earlier this year, it even spun off its smart glasses team into a subsidiary called Specs Inc. Its proprietary LCOS (Liquid Crystal on Silicon) display delivers a 51-degree field of view and 16 million colors. Snap says the device gives the feel of a 24-inch desktop monitor when you're working, and of a 115-inch home cinema screen placed about 10 feet away when watching a movie. A pair of custom stereo speakers and 6x high-SNR MEMS microphones are built into the temples of the smartglasses to deliver open-ear audio while you cast a screen, stream content, open a whiteboard, or collaborate with others. Snap Inc. patted itself on the back, saying the smartglasses don't need tethering or a puck to connect to a computer. Under the hood, SPECS draw its power from two Snapdragon processors: one for computer vision and another for running Lenses. The device supports fast hand tracking, low latency, and responsive interactions that help digital content feel anchored in the real world, according to the company, which claims that SPECS can "deliver 7-millisecond motion-to-photon latency." The smartglasses offer up to four hours of battery life on a single charge while providing AI assistance, Bluetooth notifications, Lenses, audio/video playback, and more. The battery life could jump to 20 hours of mixed use when the charging case is included. Image: Snap Inc. You can view and interact with AR Lenses anchored directly to the physical world around you, and an on-board AI assistant uses the camera to see what's around to answer questions or provide real-time help with tasks. Snap Inc. noted that it filed more than 7,000 patents during the development of SPECS. It's trying to build the required digital ecosystem around the smartglasses, and said that developers have already published hundreds of Lenses for SPECS. Moreover, their electrochromic lenses use the same technology available in Boeing 787 Dreamliner windows, enabling them to shift from clear to tinted in just 10 seconds when you walk out of your house. Snap SPECS are now available for pre-order on the official website with a $2,195 price tag ($200 refundable deposit). The smartglasses are expected to ship in the US, UK, and France during the Fall this year.
    • Sound Booster 1.13 Build 575 by Razvan Serea Increase volume on your laptop. Boost the volume of even very quiet speakers. Raise volume above maximum. Letasoft Sound Booster can be used as an extra amplifier when the volume of the program you are listening to is too low for comfortable listening and you feel that your PC’s speakers can produce a louder sound. This can be the case when the audio or video has been recorded at the level below normal. Or, for example, when the other person’s microphone you are talking to on Skype, is not working properly. There can be a plenty of other reasons why the sound is being too quiet and there is not much you can do about it except buy external speakers. Sound of any application that is being played in the system can be amplified up to 500%. Letasoft Sound Booster can raise volume of programs like web browsers, on-line communication software (Teams, Discord, Zoom), any kind of media player or games. Simply put, volume of virtually any program that can play any sound in PC, can be boosted to a comfortable level with Letasoft Sound Booster. You can control current volume with the pop-up slider from the system tray. Alternatively, you can assign system-wide hot keys for increasing and decreasing, and use them when you need to adjust volume Letasoft Sound Booster constantly monitors current gain level and prevents samples from clipping, thus reducing all major sound distortions. Sound Booster 1.13 Build 575 changelog: usability improvements minor bug fixes Download: Letasoft Sound Booster 1.13.0.575 | 5.4 MB (14-Day Free Trial) View: Letasoft Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • I own these and the normal QuietComfort ones from Bose. The QC are amazing and I want to love these, but for the life of me, I have a terrible time getting them attached to my ears.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      184
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      108
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      89
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!