Valve: PS3 a "total disaster on so many levels"


Recommended Posts

What I mean is Valve could end up not being able to release games on the PS3 thanks to that comment/or similar ones. Yes I realize this is BAD for Sony but you know what sorta grudges get held nowadays.

Yeah, Sony is going to call them up and say " You no likee our playstation 3? NO SOUP FOR YOU!" :rolleyes:

Please....even Sony isn't that stupid. This news will not be news in a few days and Valve will still be making games for the Playstation 3.

Difference being Sony has dominated consistantly since 1996 with the PS brand, beating off numerous consoles

-Dreamcast

-N64

-Xbox

We'll see how they do this round.

Well, Nintendo ruled consistently from 1983 to 1996 with the NES and SNES (13 years vs. Sony's 10). Your point?

Guys knows nothing...I'm waiting till someone from the developing community tells me its crap.

And he's not from the developing community?

Either way, it sounds like he's a bit frustrated with how complicated the system is to program for when compared to the PC and 360.

Well, Nintendo ruled consistently from 1983 to 1996 with the NES and SNES (13 years vs. Sony's 10). Your point?

Also, if Nintendo hadn't turned over the Playstation to Sony to begin with there would be no Sony Playstation.

abandon the millions of people that have already bought one

since when have the sold a million consoles for the ps3

Millions? Hardly. I don't know how accurate NexGen Wars are, but according to them only 1.1 million PS3s have been sold. Even if they are wrong, I still doubt it has been millions since Sony said that it reached its goal of shipping a 1 million PS3s by the end of 2006. More than a million more hasn't been shipped since Jan 1, 2007. So no millions :no:

Well, Nintendo ruled consistently from 1983 to 1996 with the NES and SNES (13 years vs. Sony's 10). Your point?

The PS is still going so it can potentially overtake 13 years :devil:

And he's not from the developing community?

Either way, it sounds like he's a bit frustrated with how complicated the system is to program for when compared to the PC and 360.

The PS and PS2 weren't exactly the easiest to code for as well, and devs still managed to write games. The PS3's biggest problem is price (IMO); $600 is still a fair amount to drop on a system, especially considering the lack of quality games at this point. Drop the system price by even $100, and sales should pick up a little. As it stands, I don't see any reason the PS3 won't become another 3DO.

The PS and PS2 weren't exactly the easiest to code for as well, and devs still managed to write games. The PS3's biggest problem is price (IMO); $600 is still a fair amount to drop on a system, especially considering the lack of quality games at this point. Drop the system price by even $100, and sales should pick up a little. As it stands, I don't see any reason the PS3 won't become another 3DO.

They were difficult, but still, they didn't have the compexity of the PS3, which features multiple processing points. What Sony needs to do is work on their documentation and implementation. I don't want to start a war, but this is one of the few things they need to learn from MS on.

remember they said this about the xbox360? people gotta learn to stop shooting there mouths off and wait to see results.

i'm not a sony fan, infact i own an xbox360.. but from the abuse we (xbox360 owners) took a year ago wasn't cool at all.. stop this BS articles.. nobody really cares.

If the PS3 fails.. so what?! then it means xbox and the wii will go to the final.. and they will bash the wii like they have every other console that comes onto the market.

remember the good old days? when a new console came out like Super Nintendo.. all the great articles about it, and absolutely no bashing.. now everything is completely oposite.. people put new ideas down in order to sit back in a year and say "i was right"

I don't get it...us web developers have been screaming at MS for years for a better browser and it wasn't until recently did IE7 get released (and trust me, getting web sites to look right in IE is hell) (and to be frank I still don't care for the new IE) but you know what? The hard truth is, us developers still needed to continue design and develop sites because we still need to bring the bacon home and technology still need to evolve despite the major draw backs from IE. I mean ok, if you want to design for Firefox, Opera and Safari only, thats fine; but good luck getting hired.

Same concept here isn't it? Scream and kick as much as you want, in the end you'll probably still end up developing something for the platform. Start over? A complete disaster? Give me a break. Sony can't start over if it wanted to. So you know what? If your not gonna program for the platform, sorry to lose you. But in all honesty? YOUR OPINION DOESN'T MATTER BECAUSE GAMERS WILL JUST MOVE TO A ANOTHER COMPANY THAT WILL DESIGN FOR THE PLATFORM

Its your business, your loss..

I don't get it...us web developers have been screaming at MS for years for a better browser and it wasn't until recently did IE7 get released (and trust me, getting web sites to look right in IE is hell) (and to be frank I still don't care for the new IE) but you know what? The hard truth is, us developers still needed to continue design and develop sites because we still need to bring the bacon home and technology still need to evolve despite the major draw backs from IE. I mean ok, if you want to design for Firefox, Opera and Safari only, thats fine; but good luck getting hired.

Same concept here isn't it? Scream and kick as much as you want, in the end you'll probably still end up developing something for the platform. Start over? A complete disaster? Give me a break. Sony can't start over if it wanted to. So you know what? If your not gonna program for the platform, sorry to lose you. But in all honesty? YOUR OPINION DOESN'T MATTER BECAUSE GAMERS WILL JUST MOVE TO A ANOTHER COMPANY THAT WILL DESIGN FOR THE PLATFORM

Its your business, your loss..

No gamers will move to the platform with the most games..... :whistle:

Why r u mad at valve the did not make the PS3 with some crazy hardware......and a suck ass dev kit....and at least microsoft provide decent docs....

The PS and PS2 weren't exactly the easiest to code for as well, and devs still managed to write games. The PS3's biggest problem is price (IMO); $600 is still a fair amount to drop on a system, especially considering the lack of quality games at this point. Drop the system price by even $100, and sales should pick up a little. As it stands, I don't see any reason the PS3 won't become another 3DO.

That pretty much sums up how I feel - except for the 3DO part. No way the PS3 sells that poorly.

As far as Gabe: It's not like he had the nicest things to say about the 360, either (they just weren't as bad as his recent comments about the PS3). I'm pretty sure he criticized MS for going with a triple-core processor and an optional HDD.

Id like to see Valve create a gaming console,all they ever did was come up with half life 2 and thats all.Sony alone already made more money then they have with the ps3 less then 3 monthes.

You do realise that makes absolutely no sense whatsoever, don't you?

First of all, you're comparing console sales to games sales, the hell?

Second, Valve is software, Sony is hardware, two completely different companies there.

Third, you think somehow because Sony have made more money in the last 3 months than Valve (obviously pulled that one off the top of your head), that Gabe's opinion is somehow less valid?

And another thing, "all they ever did was come up with half life 2"? Brilliant. Genius. I'm an in awe.

You do realise that makes absolutely no sense whatsoever, don't you?

First of all, you're comparing console sales to games sales, the hell?

Second, Valve is software, Sony is hardware, two completely different companies there.

Third, you think somehow because Sony have made more money in the last 3 months than Valve (obviously pulled that one off the top of your head), that Gabe's opinion is somehow less valid?

And another thing, "all they ever did was come up with half life 2"? Brilliant. Genius. I'm an in awe.

Yes I do,And also the wii pwns.

Their methods haven't hurt them in the past. PS/PS2 is the best selling console to date.

That doesn't make them right...

And the last two times around, they've only had competition from Nintendo, which was lackluster competition at best.

Now the Xbox franchise is broken in, and Microsoft has a much more friendly way of dealing with giving the developers the tools they need to create great games.

There's a new standard here that Sony sure isn't meeting, and developers are noticing it.

-Spenser

Id like to see Valve create a gaming console,all they ever did was come up with half life 2 and thats all.Sony alone already made more money then they have with the ps3 less then 3 monthes.

Sony hasn't made one penny on the PS3. They've lost vast amounts of money on it. It's not profitable yet.

Its kind of confusing when a lot of people on this thread are asking for facts. What facts could a developer give that we could really relate to? I mean they could go into an depth discussion on why the Playstation 3 development tools are lacking from what has previously came forth. It would be like trying to describe color's to someone that is colorblind, no real frame of reference and more community members trying to call out fakes on stuff they wouldn't have a understanding about.

Besides if a company like Valve that has been around for a long time say that coding for the PS3 is very hard, trust me, it is. They are in the business and don't say things lightly because so. They are practically saying the tools for the PS2 were better then the PS3. Imagine how upset you would be if Visual Studio .net was a leap and bound backwards from Visual Studio 6, you would be upset too.

A lot of game companies are upset because a lot of their programmers time is trying to figure out how the software works, instead of actually creating the game. The developmental tools are lacking and hopefully will be ironed out by Sony before to much longer to assist companies in making great games. Their is an unfair advantage in all this, and that would be that Microsoft is a Software Company. They know how to write good quality software, as they write a ton of development software already. Sony, while isn't new to this, doesn't have the years of development in only the software market.

Give it time, hopefully it will shape up and we will see some really good titles coming from the PS3, if not, then the PS4 is right around the corner. ;-)

-Luke Angel

Now correct me if I am wrong, but didn't Valve hand over the programing of EP2 for the PS3 to another company? Because if they did this shows how hard it is for them to program for the PS3...

it could, or it could mean valve wanted to save money or maybe thier build tools have problems / they can't get them to work with the PS3?

Its kind of confusing when a lot of people on this thread are asking for facts. What facts could a developer give that we could really relate to? I mean they could go into an depth discussion on why the Playstation 3 development tools are lacking from what has previously came forth. It would be like trying to describe color's to someone that is colorblind, no real frame of reference and more community members trying to call out fakes on stuff they wouldn't have a understanding about.

Besides if a company like Valve that has been around for a long time say that coding for the PS3 is very hard, trust me, it is. They are in the business and don't say things lightly because so. They are practically saying the tools for the PS2 were better then the PS3. Imagine how upset you would be if Visual Studio .net was a leap and bound backwards from Visual Studio 6, you would be upset too.

A lot of game companies are upset because a lot of their programmers time is trying to figure out how the software works, instead of actually creating the game. The developmental tools are lacking and hopefully will be ironed out by Sony before to much longer to assist companies in making great games. Their is an unfair advantage in all this, and that would be that Microsoft is a Software Company. They know how to write good quality software, as they write a ton of development software already. Sony, while isn't new to this, doesn't have the years of development in only the software market.

Give it time, hopefully it will shape up and we will see some really good titles coming from the PS3, if not, then the PS4 is right around the corner. ;-)

-Luke Angel

Sony could of hired out a few companies to help with the development tools I suppose.

Well this is just another problem for Sony to deal with, and one they should have thought about when the PS3 concept was being thought of. I think the whole next gen wars thing is completely dumb, and comparing the 3 systems is stupid.

If everyone (not saying everyone in this thread is) took off their fanboy hates for a couple of minutes, (and this is my opinion, it is not fact, its opinion) they would realise exactly why there are so many PS3's still siting on shop floors.

Lets comapre the systems realistically

- X360 - Obviously MS had the lead and released ages ago, games were developed, and its obvious that its easy to develop for. It had the graphics, sond, addons blah blah blah that made the "wow" factor.

- Wii - Simply put, its simple. Its not all that, its built for fun. Thats why its selling.

- PS3 - Well, what exactly does it have thats better than the 360. It is more expensive, and in comparing the console across different websites, some bias towards MS, some Sony. It adds nothing extra to what MS already offers. And its extrememly expensive, and now, we are being told its hard to develop for.

I don't see how people can arue with things, that is clear as day. If it was easy to develop, people would be pumping out games for it as quick as the games are coming out on Xbox. But they arn't.

No games, long development, and a huge price. Is it any wonder its still sitting on store floors?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Go for a Echo Dot or Pop instead. These Echo shows just advertise to you.
    • NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 by Razvan Serea NetSpeedTray is a lightweight, open-source Windows network monitor that shows live upload and download speeds directly on the Taskbar. Designed for efficiency, it quietly sits in the system tray, conserving CPU and battery with dynamic updates. It blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11, adapts to light/dark themes, and auto-positions to avoid overlaps. Features include accurate interface detection, customizable display, optional mini-graph, color coding, granular font and unit control, detailed per-interface history graphs, safe data management, and easy CSV export—bringing the network monitoring Windows forgot. NetSpeedTray key features: Lightweight & Efficient Runs quietly in your system tray without consuming resources. Features a "Dynamic Update Rate" that lowers refresh frequency when the network is idle to save CPU and battery life. Native Look & Feel Blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11 UI. Smart detection for light and dark taskbar themes ensures text is always visible. Intelligent & Adaptive Positioning Automatically finds empty space next to your system tray and shifts to make room for new icons, preventing overlaps. Seamless OS Integration Behaves like a native Windows component. Hides instantly with auto-hiding taskbar Hides when a fullscreen app is active Smart Network Monitoring Accurate by Default: Auto mode identifies your main internet connection and ignores noise from VPNs or virtual adapters. Easy Interface Selection: Switch effortlessly between Auto, All, or Selected network interfaces via intuitive radio buttons. Total Visual Customization Free Move Mode: Unlock and place the widget anywhere on your screen. Optional Mini-Graph: Real-time graph of recent network activity with adjustable opacity. Color Coding: Customize colors and speed thresholds to quickly see network status. Granular Display Control Text & Font: Adjust font family, size, weight, and alignment. Units: Automatic (B/s, KB/s, MB/s) or fixed Mbps display. Precision: Set decimal places and always show them for uniform appearance. Detailed & Intelligent History Graph Smart Scale: Logarithmic scale shows low-level traffic and large spikes clearly. Per-Interface Filtering: View speed history for specific adapters (Wi-Fi, Ethernet, VPN). Safe & Efficient Data Management: Adjustable retention, automatic cleanup, optimized database. Easy Data Export: Export raw data to .csv or save high-quality graphs for reports. NetSpeedTray v1.3.3: The Updater Fix A stabilization release that repairs a critical regression in v1.3.2: the app shipped without OpenSSL, which silently broke every HTTPS request — including the built-in update checker (the "Could not check for updates" error many of you hit). This release restores it, hardens the build so it can't happen again, and fixes a startup crash plus four other reported bugs. Changes: Fixed update checking — Resolved a critical issue that prevented the app from checking for updates ("Could not check for updates"). Fixed startup crash with Auto-Cycling — The app no longer crashes on launch after enabling Cycle display mode. Fixed incorrect network speeds on 10GbE adapters — Multi-gigabit network cards now display speeds correctly instead of being stuck at 0. Improved color coding — Default color is shown when idle, and color/threshold changes now apply immediately without restarting. Fullscreen visibility fix — The widget now correctly stays visible over fullscreen apps when Keep Visible is enabled. Improved AMD Ryzen temperature detection — More reliable CPU temperature monitoring for Ryzen processors. Cleaner upgrades — Installer now removes outdated application files during upgrades, preventing DLL/version conflicts while preserving user settings. Improved stability — Fixed potential DLL loading issues by excluding critical OpenSSL and NumPy components from UPX compression. Better settings window — Scrollbars removed and layout improved for a cleaner experience. Localization improvements — Updated translations and completed missing UI text across all supported languages. More reliable releases — Added regression tests covering recent critical fixes, bringing the test suite to 196 passing tests. [full release notes] Download: NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 | 87.9 MB (Open Source) Download: NetSpeedTray Portable | 101.0 MB View: NetSpeedTray Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      474
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      220
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!