How do you disable media view in windows explorer?


Recommended Posts

I really hate it when it does that automatically for you. Even if you go into file options and do a "apply to folders" after changing the view to the one you want. I know this has to do with some registry key that keeps track of how many folder view memory it can hold. But I swear, I have set this to like 7000 and still I end up with that blasted annoying media view.

I know in windows xp you can run something like this from the command prompt to disable media view in windows explorer:

regsvr32 /u /s shmedia.dll

regsvr32 /u /s shimgvw.dll

But it does not work with the vista windows explorer! :cry:

Anyone know of a registry tweak or something else that I can do to get rid of this view?

  • 4 weeks later...

Since no one seem to know, I've found a solution. I've ditched Vista Windows Explorer completely! I now use A43 (v2.52) which remembers all of my column settings (just apply to one folder and it remembers for every other folders).

It does occasionally locks up and crashes (but what software doesn't?). Best of all, it doesn't write or install anything to the registry. So, when you don't want to use it anymore, just delete the A43's folder! I wished more dev would adopt this approach to software development. The less you clutter up your user's system the better!

Anyway, life's good. I no longer have to put up with the annoying media views in explorer when using A43 (geez, they need to change the name of this wonderful windows explorer replacement).

Another promising one is UltraExplorer (v1.2.7). It too suffers from Vista's not remembering the user specified column width and induces media views. And yes, it crashes too. I'll wait until v2.0 before trying it again. Hopefully, it'll be closer to A43's slickness. As is, it's just a tad bit better than the vanilla vista windows explorer.

To turn off the Details Pane:

1) Click on Start Orb then click Control Panel

2) Click on the Control Panel Home in the left hand pane

3) Click on Appeatance and Personalization

4) Click on Folder Options

5) Click the General tab

6) Click the "Use Windows classic folders" Radio button under the Tasks grouping

7) Click OK

Note: to turn the Pane back on click Show preview and filters for step 6 in the instructions above.

::winXpert::

To turn off the Details Pane:

1) Click on Start Orb then click Control Panel

2) Click on the Control Panel Home in the left hand pane

3) Click on Appeatance and Personalization

4) Click on Folder Options

5) Click the General tab

6) Click the "Use Windows classic folders" Radio button under the Tasks grouping

7) Click OK

Note: to turn the Pane back on click Show preview and filters for step 6 in the instructions above.

::winXpert::

Did you even read my original post? When you have music/picture/media file in a folder, windows explorer will switch to the "media" view whether you want to or not. This view has a rating, artist, etc. column. The thing I want to stop is not "details pane" but for windows explorer to never show the "media" view (not preview window or detail window). I hope you get it this time around. :shiftyninja:

I already have the classic folders button selected. That's not the problem. In Windows XP, you have to do what I posted in the original post to stop windows explorer from displaying the "media" view automatically like a stuborn b a s t a r d child. :rolleyes:

Did you even read my original post?

Yes, I misunderstood the question.

When you have music/picture/media file in a folder, windows explorer will switch to the "media" view whether you want to or not. This view has a rating, artist, etc. column.

The shell for Windows Vista has a new feature [iDispatch] that sniffs and remembers the contents of a given folder. In the past this was the good ole desktop.ini file that would scatter the drive. In Vista, the entries have been moved to the registry [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Classes\Local Settings\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Shell\Bags]

If a folder already has a bag you can either:

A) Delete the registry entry --or

B) Open the folder properties (Right-Click the folder choose properties), select the "Customize" tab and select "All Items" from the drop down in the section labeled "What Kind of Folder do you want?" (Hint: there is an option for apply to all subfolders think / here)

If you want to modify the columns for all folders regardless [strict to all - new mounts, etc.] you must override the default FolderType by editing the registry and adding 1 key and 1 string value.

The key: [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Classes\Local Settings\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Shell\Bags\AllFolders\Shell]

The String Value: FolderType

The data for the String: NotSpecified

I've attached the registry file for your pleasure.

I hope you get it this time around. :shiftyninja:

:devil: Oh yeah I get it!! Thats why they call me the ..

::winXpert::

Force_AllItems_FolderView_Windows_Vista_winXpert.zip

Wow, that actually worked! :) I've added the reg key for "...Shell\Bags\AllFolders\Shell" and it worked. I even changed the column width and vista windows explorer actually remembers this time around. It's not forgetful or disobedient like before.

Say, is it safe to delete the 400 keys under "Shell\Bags" if I have the "Shell\Bags\AllFolders\Shell" set?

Aww-c r a p! I spoke too soon. Now, if I exit/close windows explorer and open it again using "WIN+E", it forgets the window postion and size! How about that one? Do you have a registry key for this one too?

Anyway, thanks a bunch for pointing this key out. I take back my nasty tone!

Aww-c r a p! I spoke too soon. Now, if I exit/close windows explorer and open it again using "WIN+E", it forgets the window postion and size! How about that one? Do you have a registry key for this one too?

Anyway, thanks a bunch for pointing this key out. I take back my nasty tone!

Vista Explorer never remembers size and position with me, right from the very beginning even without any modifications.

This, together with other annoying crap (like not being able to costumize the useless toolbar and the media folders view) have made me drop it totally and switch to A43 (http://www.primitus.us/a43/).

Aero Ultimate -- looks like we're not the only ones, here's another thread with the same issue:

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=532849

Well, after deleting the bags registry keys, I've lost my desktop icons. Vista windows explorer did however started to remember the position/size after several reboots/open close. But now it forgets about the detail view and switches back to icon view every now and then. It doesn't seem to have any rhyme or reason. It just decides to make a folder icon.

This is by far the most annoying feature of Vista. :angry:

If anyone else having this problem, I would recommend using A43 like Aero Ultimate.

This seems to work...thanks. Question...

Is it possible to set folder view settings for a parent folder and have it propagate to sub folders? I don't just mean the folder template. I would like settings like column width or added columns to be applied to sub folders

Vista (just like XP) remembers window sizes and locations based on the folder you are launching. So if you want to change the size of the window that's opened by Win+E (the "Computer" namespace) you just need to open that folder (ie. press Win+E), resize the window, and then close the window without browsing to any other folders.

  • 2 months later...
If a folder already has a bag you can either:

A) Delete the registry entry --or

B) Open the folder properties (Right-Click the folder choose properties), select the "Customize" tab and select "All Items" from the drop down in the section labeled "What Kind of Folder do you want?" (Hint: there is an option for apply to all subfolders think / here)

If you want to modify the columns for all folders regardless [strict to all - new mounts, etc.] you must override the default FolderType by editing the registry and adding 1 key and 1 string value.

The key: [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Classes\Local Settings\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Shell\Bags\AllFolders\Shell]

The String Value: FolderType

The data for the String: NotSpecified

I've tried both of these and for me it made zero difference. I added that key in but it only had an effect for a few minutes before it was playing up again. As I navigate through a folder structure the View could literally cycle through "every single" View option from Details, to Large Icons, to Small icons. It's absolutely madness and seems to have zero logic.

It also really annoys me there is no preset view for 9x/XP's Large Icons option, the closed one is medium but that's still way to big. Why would anyone want to use Large or Extra Large? They're huge. I do find the redesign makes it very cluttered and messy, when you get down deep into a folder structure it's easy to get lost where you are exactly.

It doesn't help you can no longer display the "Full path in the title bar". Sure the buttons to quickly go up folders is nice but it prevents you working out what folder you in, that and the new button logic lies to you if you're in some "special folder". You have to click at the end to see the "actual folder path". Personally I find this special folder logic very annoying, it hides what the folders can often actually be called (your media folder for example, if you don't modify the desktop.ini).

I had a look at my Registry Bags and there are hundreds. How on earth do I know which number relates to which folder? I just want it to stick on View.

Is this possible?

Edited by bradavon
  • 2 weeks later...

Man this so called feature is annoying.

I hope MS take note and fix it in SP1 or at least give us an option to turn it off. The web is full of forums of people complaining about this function. I just want the Classic Large icon size back and it to stay, there's no even a Classic Large icon option any more (other than the desktop) Medium is way to big and Small is way to Small. I want back what used to be in period. I'd settle for manually dragging the bar if Vista didn't go and screw it up every two minutes.

It's such a small issue but man it's so annoying. For the past 12 years I used Windows Explorer quite happily, sure it's basic and up until Vista had no "Skip all" option but it did the job. Because of this I've switched to an alternate File Manager.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It STILL has horrid theme support. Hard to look at for me. The white is too bright, and the black too dark. I'm using classic outlook for the Dark Grey theme. It's just right for me.
    • inb4 someone leaves the usual "what an unfortunate name" comment
    • Cuktech 10 Ultra charger review: big display, four ports, 110W total power by Taras Buria Cuktech recently announced a couple of Ultra-branded chargers, including a desktop 300W charger, which I reviewed a few weeks ago. For those who do need that much (or who do not want to spend that much on a charger), Cuktech also offers the 10 Ultra, a traditional wall charger with similar features. Four ports, a big display, and up to 110W of power output. After using it for a few weeks, here are my impressions. Disclaimer: Cuktech provided the review unit without any editorial input or pre-approval. Like the 30 Ultra, the 10 Ultra arrived in a box made of nice cardboard with quality print all over it. Inside, besides the charger, you will find a 240W 6A charger, which, this time, is fully braided. While Cuktech always bundles high-power cables with its chargers and power banks, they are usually regular and unassuming. This time, the cable is much nicer, matching the charger's $59.99 price tag. The charger itself measures 67 x 76 x 33 mm or 2.6 x 3.0 x 1.3 inches and weighs about 250 grams. Considering the charger has four ports and a big display, I would say the compact size is quite impressive, albeit a little hefty. The overall design is similar to other chargers from the manufacturer, minus the chrome Cuktech logo next to the four ports. The Cuktech 10 Ultra has retractable prongs for better portability. Its front side is covered with piano black plastic housing two elements: a capacitive button with backlight and a quite large display for various charging stats. Ports are downward-facing, and I have mixed feelings about such a design. It is not the most convenient when you frequently connect and disconnect cables. It makes you bend over to find the right port to connect, and it is a no-go with outlets mounted closer to the floor. On the bright side, design like this eliminates clutter and sagging, especially when using four cables at once. Plus, you get plenty of space for a big display. Ports include two high-speed USB Type-C ports, one Type-C for less demanding devices, and one classic USB Type-A. The first two ports deliver full 100W, while the third is capped at 45W. As for the Type-A port, its maximum output is 18W. In total, the charger delivers 110W of power, but in my testing, I managed to squeeze 117W when charging two power banks and a tablet. Quite impressive. Type-C1 Type-C2 Type-C3 Type-A Single-port 100W 100W 45W 18W Two ports 80W 20W - - Three ports 65W 20W 20W - Four ports 65W 20W 10W 10W The charger can detect handshake protocols and balance power across all four ports according to each device's needs. As such, power is not limited to the values in the table above. You can have two ports charging at 55W, three ports at 45W + 20W, and more. For some reason, Cuktech is not listing the supported protocols, but a quick test showed that it is compatible with PD3.0, PPS, QC5, DCP, and UFCS. When you connect a compatible device, the charger automatically detects its charging standard and displays it on the screen, for example, Apple 6A or Samsung 3A. Speaking of the screen. The main highlight of the 10 Ultra is its 1.57-inch display with a maximum brightness of 700 nits and 160-degree viewing angles. The display takes up most of the front, and it shows various charging-related information, including total output power, current temperature, power distribution across ports with watts, volts, and amps, a screensaver, and more. You can toggle between the different views by tapping the button, and holding it changes the screen orientation (portrait or horizontal, plus flipped) according to your socket position. The screen is very nice. It is sharp, vivid, and the fonts are easy to read. As for settings, you can change the following: Keep the screen on or off Lock the screen orientation (hold the button to change the screen orientation) Keep the USB Type-A port on Toggle power modes The charger has three power modes: AI: standard mode that automatically allocates power to each connected device. Power Priority: prioritizes power for high-demand devices, such as laptops or power banks. Balanced: splits power evenly across connected devices according to their needs I was skeptical at first, but after testing a few devices in different modes, I can see the benefit of these three modes. The most useful is power priority, which gives the first Type-C port more power. When I was charging a 100W power bank (port 1) alongside a 140W power bank (port 2), Power Priority split the total output about 75-30. Balanced mode, as the name suggests, splits the total output between the two ports more or less equally. As for AI mode, the charger uses its brain to detect which device needs more power. In my testing, it figured out that the 140W power needs a bit more juice. As I said, I expected this to be more of a gimmick, but the three built-in modes turned out quite useful. For example, you can prioritize your laptop while giving other ports a little less power, but still enough to charge at acceptable speeds. Unfortunately, unlike the 30 Ultra, this charger cannot display the battery level of the device being charged. This small feature turned out to be very useful when I was testing the 30 Ultra, as it allowed me to see my phone's battery level without picking it up. Like other Cuktech chargers I tested, the 10 Ultra one proved itself reliable and well-made. It uses Gallium nitride semiconductor technology to reduce the charger's size and improve efficiency. It is also better at dissipating heat, but I have to say that when charging two power banks at 117W total, the charger got hotter than what I would call comfortable (hold it for a few seconds, and you start feeling a burning sensation at your fingertips). However, the built-in thermal indicator remained below the temperature threshold, with the screen reassuring that the device operated at "High performance" (I tested it in a 21 °C / 69 °F room). Overall, the Cuktech 10 Ultra is a solid choice. If you need four ports and you like to nerd out on various stats, it is a very easy recommendation. It will take care of your laptop, phone, tablet, and power bank without breaking a sweat, plus the build, material, and cable quality are top-notch. The mode switcher is handy when charging different devices with different power needs, too. I cannot say a display is a must-have in a charger, especially when it makes you more conscious about where to plug it, but it is a neat addition if you have a socket at your table or bed level, so that you can actually use the display and its features. The more important fact is that despite its size and quality, the display does not make the charger that much more expensive than similarly powerful chargers from competitors. Plus, you can save 10% on the 10 Ultra with a promo code on Amazon. Buy Cuktech 10 Ultra charger - $53.99 on Amazon with a promo code As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Last week I was investigating an issue with contacts and tried using the new Outlook. In the real (Classic) Outlook, you can easily go to any Outlook folder and present it in a Table View, then customize the columns to show/sort any field, which was exactly what I needed. But of course, the new Outlook doesn't have this feature at all. I gave up. Oh, and can we possibly stop claiming the new Outlook has PST support? What it really has is the ability to use the real Outlook in the background to pretend to have PST support. There is no PST support without the real Outlook installed.
    • Honestly just before Panos left it started to feel like MS just wasnt interested in them so they were being less innovative with them, and then when he DID leave for Amazon its kind of clear the direction is gone. It felt like Panos had both goals and drive, and a vision, but it felt like no matter what his title/department was the Surface devices never had the full interest of the rest of management and he was just pushing a bolder up a hill that MS was adding dirt to as he went.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      477
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!