Ati Catalyst 7.1 for Vista OUT NOW!

By edgarf28
in Back Page News

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

theyarecomingforyou

Posted
Posted

Wow, 90MB for the international version and that's just the 32bit version! Well, Vista and my new hard-drive don't arrive until Friday so I guess I've got a bit of a wait, though I'll grab these now to save time later. Now if only the drivers for my soundcard were released I would be sorted.

Mentor

Neonix1

Posted
Posted

FiringSquad has put up a quick review of these drivers here: http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/window...d_catalyst_7.1/

As you can see, the Radeon X1950 XTX actually recorded a performance improvement under Vista, at 1280x1024 the margin is 15%

Looks like a very nice first Vista driver release, although AMD/ATi's OpenGL driver still needs work done apparently.

Rising Star

nautiqueskier

Posted
Posted (edited)

Ok, heres a quick review of these drivers

First of all, DirectX rendering is definitely improved. NFS Carbon runs almost as well on my ATI x1600 as my Nvidia 7800GT (with 97.46 Nvidia drivers, haven't tried Carbon on 100.54 but I'm sure it would run faster)

On the OpenGL side, I can't really compare it to previous drivers (cause OpenGL wasn't present) but I'll say that it runs, but slow... really slow, and it looks like crap (its still many times faster than previous ATI Vista drivers). For the first ATI driver with OpenGL though, I'll give them credit, its pretty stable.

The Catalyst Control Center seems largely functional (unlike Nvidias crumbling control system)

Edited by Ames
Proficient

XPGoD

Posted
Posted

What I'm about to write may sound silly... but I will test these drivers to see if they have the same effect.

This whole weekend, after installing my copy of Vista Business... I installed some games.

Battlefield 2

F.E.A.R. Combat

America's Army

Quite a difference between them, so I boot up my box using the latest Beta Catalyst's. Boot into America's Army.. and my cursor gives me the first indication to the lag I'm about to see.... oh no.

I boot online to SF Hospital and I see this general freaking out on the graphics.. but it's not framerate oriented.

So I shutdown the game and boot into my BIOS and lowered the AGP Aperature Size to 64Mb. Rebooted back into Vista, and went into the Catalyst software and set EVERYTHING to HIGH QUALITY.

Results?

Flies like a dream... BF2 can now be played at 1280x1024 HIGH settings, as with FEAR... FEAR acts like it's on crack... and I played last night with a 59-16 score of 228... WOOT

System:

AMD Athlon XP 2800+ Barton @ 2.315GHz

1GB PC2300 CAS 2.0 RAM

Radeon X700 Pro 256MB AGP 8x

Creative X-Fi XtremeMusic (comeon Creative where are those Vista drivers?)

2x 120GB Maxtor's

I know the system ain't much, but when you work as much as I do, you tend to spend more time on other people's machines than your own.

XPGoD

Neowinian

SethB

Posted
Posted

Sadly, Aero still crashes on my X800 GT. Vista starts with aero running, but the first time you launch an app (even notepad) it crashes and logs this:

The Desktop Window Manager has encountered a fatal error (0x88980406)

Then the display reverts to non-Aero mode.

I'm not alone in having this, as I've found numerous posts by other users, and a colleague at another University has the exact same issue. The only fix I've found is to use drivers from Vista RC-1. I've wiped my machine numerous times, installing only Vista and the graphics driver, in both Vista 32 and 64 bit flavors, and the problem still happens.

How do these things get WHQL certified again? Aren't they tested?

Mentor

DJLunacy

Posted
Posted
Sadly, Aero still crashes on my X800 GT. Vista starts with aero running, but the first time you launch an app (even notepad) it crashes and logs this:

The Desktop Window Manager has encountered a fatal error (0x88980406)

Then the display reverts to non-Aero mode.

I'm not alone in having this, as I've found numerous posts by other users, and a colleague at another University has the exact same issue. The only fix I've found is to use drivers from Vista RC-1. I've wiped my machine numerous times, installing only Vista and the graphics driver, in both Vista 32 and 64 bit flavors, and the problem still happens.

How do these things get WHQL certified again? Aren't they tested?

I have no problems with my AIW X800 except for the tv functions not working yet.

Rookie

Guillaume.Lafrance

Posted
Posted (edited)

This is weird, the installer only lets me install the Control Center and not the drivers. Anyone else getting this? Am I doing something wrong?

post-69682-1170117622_thumb.png

And the Control Center isn't much use, it seems.

post-69682-1170118888_thumb.png

Edited by Guillaume.Lafrance
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • AMD 9070XT

      By Arceles · Posted

      AMD is supported out of the box in linux because of their open source driver. Nvidia does not. All my systems are amd and all of them work nicely on linux arch without doing anything.
    • Nearly 70% of Steam users now run Windows 11

      By WaltC · Posted

      Never had a problem with TPM and started using that many years ago in Win10. Through several motherboards and OS versions, it just does what it does without complaint. My games library doesn't even know it's there. Secure boot does a lot more than support anti-cheat, as it came along long before anti-cheat software. I've used it religiously since before I started using TPM, and I always liked it for being able to nullify virus contagions that try their best to come in underneath the firmware during boot, so that the OS doesn't see them, etc. That is its purpose, imo. I'll never understand why people who elect to use another OS feel compelled to run down Windows... I guess they need to do that to feel secure about their choices? I run Windows because it supports all the software (including games) natively that I want to buy, and I've never had to run down another OS to make me feel better about it. (Although it's certainly possible to do that, of course...) Win10 is on a ventilator atm, and Win11 is very close to being free, and I finally got to stop running StartAllBack as I moved to the Experimental/Dev channel and my 26300.8553 build supports the moveable taskbar and it's running fine at the top of the screen! Finally, my last major dislike of Win11 is being rectified! So, I'm not at all surprised to see Win11's share of the Steam survey hitting 70%.
    • AMD 9070XT

      By Mindovermaster · Posted

      I can answer about the Linux bit. I only used AMD GPUs. I currently have a 9060XT (8GB) that fits my needs, I'm not a gamer, so I don't need that much GDDR. But lately, NVIDIA has grown a lot in the recent years. Oh, the horrors of NVIDIA drivers not working. But they have been getting better. I know a lot of members onm here that are running cachyOS and other distros, and are fine with a 4090/5090 variants. Really, though, I would stick with AMD variants.
    • Microsoft is making Windows 11's context menus faster, simpler, and configurable

      By spacelordmaster · Posted

      Everything they say you can already do yourself on the registry by changing some things.
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along

      By WaltC · Posted

      Artist's renderings are so much nicer to view than the real thing, don't you think?

  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      252
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!