Blu-ray media outselling HD-DVD 2-to-1


Recommended Posts

Personally, I think blu-ray's higher capacity will be more future proof. When the next high-def comes out (whats higher than 1080p? whatever..) then itll be able to hold everything, so it seems..

whatever i dont really care. I'm still waiting for everything to go internet-based (Which i dont think is THAT far off.....)

Personally, I think blu-ray's higher capacity will be more future proof. When the next high-def comes out (whats higher than 1080p? whatever..) then itll be able to hold everything, so it seems..

whatever i dont really care. I'm still waiting for everything to go internet-based (Which i dont think is THAT far off.....)

Not sure about the next High Def. Look how long it took us to get this far. and most broadcasts are in 720p at the moment anyways. I think it will be many years before we see a change in TV's. Atleast I hope so. Hi-Def is becoming a consumer mad-house with all the changes they keep making to it (as in 120Hz support, and 1080p support with 24 fps, then 60 fps.)

You people supporting and believing in this Blu-Ray crap are just funny really. There's absolutely NO WAY Blu-ray will win and all these ESTIMATES are just another desperate attempt from hardcore Blu-Ray supporters and Sony to give some kind of hype to people. HD-DVD will win and not because I say so, but because some significant facts back this standard. Sony and Fox can just blow steam up your behinds with statements like this. Here's why Blu-Ray can't win.

Statistics:

- Blu-Ray is seeing an increase in sold titles simply because the PS3 console has it's highlight during the launch and that excitement is fading out. There was not an electronic store here in Phoenix that doesn't have overstock of PS3 units, while they NEVER have Xbox or Wii or even XBox's HD-DVD player, I had hard time finding one to buy for myself. So you can freely forget about those millions and millions of units to be sold. It's simply not as easy since the PS3's starting price is too high. Now if they went down a $100 or so then it would give Blu-ray a fighting chance. On the other hand we have Xbox360 that is approaching 14 million SOLD units. Let's say 10% of XBox 360 users will have HD-DVD player (this is loose but not unrealistic estimate), that's 1.4 million HD-DVD players. Forget about the fact that a consumer will spend more money for XBox 360 this way..it is psychology. Someone bought an XBox for $299, then 6 months after that they want to buy an HD-DVD player for it. They won't feel the impact as much as shelling out full $600 or whatever, at once. It's a fact and human psychology. So don't worry, the almighty PS3 has a strong fight with catching up ahead.

- Now you will say, oh my, look at all these companies supporting Blu-Ray. True. However the ALMIGHTY God can support it, when the price of these players hovers from $800-$1000 you can bet your behind that not a lot of people will buy it, ESPECIALLY since the MOST expensive super high end unit for HD-DVD is $599 and the lowest (Xbox one) is $199. I mean come on, what reality do you people live in. Especially when you consider that HD-DVD quality is going to be the same as Blu-Ray and that's putting it politely because out of all these movies that are out for Blu-Ray at least 50% are playing CRAP due to bad encoding. HD-DVD just looks better. At the moment, but still looks better RIGHT NOW.

- All of the HOOPLA that Sony marketing is doing about Blu-Ray being superior format are all VERY VERY QUESTIONABLE. Everything that is out there spec wise about capacity is FUTURE IMPLEMENTATION, meaning there's a lot of obsticles to even reach it, again, I HATE it when they talk about something that even they don't know if they can reach without problems. If we remember, Sony was promising 50gb disks last year and we still don't have them. At the moment, dual layer/side HD-DVD has more capacity then Blu-Ray which allows HD-DVD to store not only HD-DVD version of the movie but also a regular DVD version as well. This means that you can watch a HD-DVD version on one side in your HD-DVD player and if you don't have it, you flip it and play it in regular DVD. Out of 15 titles I bought for my HD-DVD player, I have at least 5 that do this. Of course not all of them are encoded like this, but you will see more and more of it. Toshiba has also announced 60gb per layer disks as well in the future, so I hardly think that Blu-Ray has an upper hand. Take in consideration all of the interactive features and backwards compatibility HD-DVD has and it's pretty much clear who has the upper hand here.

- The name, I mean, HD-DVD, sounds normal and clear. For a regular consumer this means a lot. Not to mention all the crap that's been happening with Sony and it's reputation (I know for a fact that I won't give them a single penny anymore). They won't be spying and installing crap on me. If a company can do this to it's consumers, and you still support it, I mean, you need to think long and hard where we are going with everything. I wouldn't be surprised that a year from now you see PS3 consoles phoning home and reporting what movies you watched, what you have in your living room from devices and so on. Just sit and watch, I'm almost definitely certain this will be the case. And let's not forget how this company has the tendency to keep their stuff completely closed down, so you have to buy everything from them. No choices IS NEVER good and they are just simply TOO GREEDY.

In the end, I'm 100% sure that HD-DVD still outsells Blu-Ray and that this announcement is bought to stir more false excitement into the public, and the statistics are sponsored by who? 20th Century Fox HEY! THe only studio that is HARD CORE about Blu-Ray and stand to lose a lot of money since they decided not to sell HD-DVDs like other studios.

Edited by Boz

and btw,

"The numbers are becoming more clear. Without the PS3 and a studio advantage Blu-ray would be dead. They are championing their content advantage whilst HD DVD will be shoring up their players with at least 6 new models coming out this year. As far as the war between Bluray and HDDVD, if you take out PS3 and Xbox 360 add on sales, Bluray has sold about 25k verses HDDVD's 120k stand alone players. " THat's almost 6 times more players in favor of HD-DVD. If Sony's PS3 sales start slowing down, which they are, that's about it for Blu-Ray.

Bwa-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha!!! Oh, man... *breathes* that was really... bwa-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha!!!

Bwa-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha!!! Oh my goodness!!! Just when I catch my breath, there you go again. Man, oh man, too funny. Thanks, though, I really needed a good laugh today.

It's true?! :blink:

and btw,

"The numbers are becoming more clear. Without the PS3 and a studio advantage Blu-ray would be dead. They are championing their content advantage whilst HD DVD will be shoring up their players with at least 6 new models coming out this year. As far as the war between Bluray and HDDVD, if you take out PS3 and Xbox 360 add on sales, Bluray has sold about 25k verses HDDVD's 120k stand alone players. " THat's almost 6 times more players in favor of HD-DVD. If Sony's PS3 sales start slowing down, which they are, that's about it for Blu-Ray.

Yet another one that has never noticed the actual purpose of the Playstation 3 is a multimedia player, not a video game console. Sony will push it to be this so it might as well be added to the total of "stand alone players" in the Blu-ray column. It's not even an "add-on" sale as it is.. it's built in! But hey, to put the nail in the coffin here.. I still don't see how your novel of "facts" really adds up. I can't even rent HD-DVD at my local video rental stores, but Blu-ray I can. They are outselling 2 to 1.. and even giving away free or discounted discs.. it will only add up from here. Whether or not you think they are selling is up to you, but face it.. the studios, Sony and others are clearly pushing this format where it needs to be and it apparently seems to be working. I mean really.. in every commercial for a new movie being released on video I always hear it being touted as "Now available on DVD and Blu-ray disc!" Don't hear much about HD-DVD.. where the hell is the marketing? :whistle:

- Blu-Ray is seeing an increase in sold titles simply because the PS3 console has it's highlight during the launch and that excitement is fading out. There was not an electronic store here in Phoenix that doesn't have overstock of PS3 units, while they NEVER have Xbox or Wii or even XBox's HD-DVD player.

- The name, I mean, HD-DVD, sounds normal and clear. For a regular consumer this means a lot.

Early on when Sony couldn't produce enough units to keep shelves stocked everyone bashed Sony for not meeting demand and now that they actually can meet demand and Microsoft can't with it's HD-DVD addon player its "Oh, look at that HD-DVD is selling like hot cakes." How many stores in your area did you visit? I've been to three recently here and another 2 in Chicago and they all had plenty of PS3s, Wiis, 360s and 360 HD-DVD players. Damn, it must mean nobody is buying anything.

And while I admit that the simple minded will simply move from DVD to HD-DVD on name alone, that didn't mean when they came out with DVDs they had to go off of VHS and call it something like Digital Video Home System or DVHS.

"The numbers are becoming more clear. Without the PS3 and a studio advantage Blu-ray would be dead. They are championing their content advantage whilst HD DVD will be shoring up their players with at least 6 new models coming out this year. As far as the war between Bluray and HDDVD, if you take out PS3 and Xbox 360 add on sales, Bluray has sold about 25k verses HDDVD's 120k stand alone players. " THat's almost 6 times more players in favor of HD-DVD. If Sony's PS3 sales start slowing down, which they are, that's about it for Blu-Ray.

But isn't that the point though? The fact that the PS3 can be used as a standalone player allows more people access to it. Say for example there were two competing radio styles for cars. If Toyota came pre-installed with one and Ford didn't, but you could buy the competing format from the store afterwards, do you just toss out the number of people that bought a Toyota?

Bottom line is that there is too much money invested by both sides. Kind of like the whole DVD+R and DVD-R thing. Dual players and burners made the whole thing moot. While I think that's the way this is going, I really hope not. I think eventually, content will determine a winner. If only HD-DVD is going to release The Matrix, and The Lord of the Rings, and other movies that I like and would like to see in HD then that's where I'll go. If they cave and make it for both formats then well, I'll buy the one of whichever player I've got already.

Yet another one that has never noticed the actual purpose of the Playstation 3 is a multimedia player, not a video game console. Sony will push it to be this so it might as well be added to the total of "stand alone players" in the Blu-ray column. It's not even an "add-on" sale as it is.. it's built in! But hey, to put the nail in the coffin here.. I still don't see how your novel of "facts" really adds up. I can't even rent HD-DVD at my local video rental stores, but Blu-ray I can. They are outselling 2 to 1.. and even giving away free or discounted discs.. it will only add up from here. Whether or not you think they are selling is up to you, but face it.. the studios, Sony and others are clearly pushing this format where it needs to be and it apparently seems to be working. I mean really.. in every commercial for a new movie being released on video I always hear it being touted as "Now available on DVD and Blu-ray disc!" Don't hear much about HD-DVD.. where the hell is the marketing? :whistle:

First of all NO, PS3 is first and foremost a gaming console, if you see it as Blu-Ray player first, then that's your opinion. I guarantee you that at least 80 percent of users who buy PS3 are buying it for gaming and other things and Blu-Ray just comes to them as a bonus. Will they buy Blu-Ray disks? I don't think so, but they feel good that they have it anyways. The numbers we are seeing that spike BD sales is just after people used their $70 rebates on the console to "BUY" BD titles from Sony for FREE.

To be honest, with all the studio support and marketing you are mentioning, PS3 IS THE ONLY THING going for Blu-Ray. If it wasn't for PS3 Blu-Ray would be long gone. So ok, if we have this fact, then let's see, hm, dispite the marketing, the studio support (btw, only Fox and Sony Pictures are EXCLUSIVE BD supporters), Paramount, Universal, WB and others are also publishing movies in HD-DVD. I just so the number of coming soon titles on BD in comparision to HD-DVD. Yes, there are about 60 more titles coming out on BD, but that's pretty much because these are Sony Pictures and Fox movies and there's nothing you can do about it. If they want to lose money by not selling to HD-DVD that has 120k stand-alone players then we can't expect them to. But that's hardly 3.5:1 ratio on released movies. HD-DVD had at least 50 more titles before Jan '07. Sony and Fox will give advantage to BD in terms of number of titles available, well at least until they shoot down BD and start producing HD-DVDs. At that point I think Sony will go bankrupt because Blu-Ray and PS3 are their last chance to come back from serious financial pain.

I don't know where you are getting the info about 2:1..Seriously, if you count movies they GIVE AWAY for free, then ok, but otherwise, BD is still not there with sales no matter how much they want to say it is outselling HD-DVDs.

You hear NOW AVAILABLE ON DVD AND BLU-RAY DISC, because that's what you are listening too only. There are plenty advertisments for movies that say Available on DVD and HD-DVD. The ones you are looking at are mostly Sony Pictures and Fox movies.

I can't even rent HD-DVD at my local video rental stores, but Blu-ray I can

I think you are just plain lying here. I went to Blockbuster, Hollywood Video and there are no HD dvds anywhere to be rented be it HD-DVD or BD. You can order them with NetFlix or Blockbuster online (AND BOTH formats), but I haven't seen any of these in local stores. Tell me, what are those rental stores you are talking about where you can rent BD movies and I'll go today to see it. Please don't tell me you are counting some son and dad dvd rental store that's down the road from your house. We are talking about serious rental chains here, Netflix, Blockbuster, Hollywood.

- If we remember, Sony was promising 50gb disks last year and we still don't have them.

What are you talking about: http://froogle.google.com/froogle?q=blu-ra...eckout-restrict

Statistics:

- Blu-Ray is seeing an increase in sold titles simply because the PS3 console has it's highlight during the launch and that excitement is fading out. There was not an electronic store here in Phoenix that doesn't have overstock of PS3 units, while they NEVER have Xbox or Wii or even XBox's HD-DVD player, I had hard time finding one to buy for myself. So you can freely forget about those millions and millions of units to be sold.d.

You really shouldn't using anecdotal evidence as fact.

The numbers we are seeing that spike BD sales is just after people used their $70 rebates on the console to "BUY" BD titles from Sony for FREE.

I don't know where you are getting the info about 2:1..Seriously, if you count movies they GIVE AWAY for free, then ok, but otherwise, BD is still not there with sales no matter how much they want to say it is outselling HD-DVDs.

They are not giving away free movies, they are giving $10 rebates and no way can you get a blu-ray movie for free with a $10 rebate: http://www.bluraymovierebate.com/ps_movies.html

A blu-ray movie is $20+, you still need to come up with the $10+ after the coupon. That is NOT free.

Edited by Ridley Norfair
I'd bet if the article talked about HD-DVD being ahead in sales you wouldn't be so eager to call BS, but would rather be laughing at sony :whistle:

Personally, I'd be laughing at anyone who promotes something by smudging the figures. Sony can't really claim BD is outselling HD-DVD by 2-1 when they giving coupons for FREE movies. If it were MS doing this I'd laughing at their sorry asses as well but this is after all Sony.

Personally, I'd be laughing at anyone who promotes something by smudging the figures. Sony can't really claim BD is outselling HD-DVD by 2-1 when they giving coupons for FREE movies. If it were MS doing this I'd laughing at their sorry asses as well but this is after all Sony.

So if Sony was actually giving away a coupon for free blu-ray discs (which they are not) and claiming it as sales it would be BS, but Toshiba who is actually giving away 3 free HD-DVD movies and counting it wouldn't be BS?

BTW it is a rebate for a blu-ray movie NOT a free coupon. If I got coupon for a free blu-ray movie when I bought the PS3 I sure as hell would have been happy.

$10 off a blu-ray title != FREE. Blu-Ray movies are $20+

Edited by Ridley Norfair
Anti-Blu-Ray sentiment is getting out of control :no:

Something tells me if it was Toshiba as the main backer of blu-ray and Sony the main backer of HD-DVD there would be many bandwagon jumpers to blu-ray. Or even take Sony out of the equation and make another company like Panisonic\Samsung\Phillip\etc. the main back of blu-ray people would be whistling a different tune. Even though the blu-ray media is technologically superior, people here are more concerned about the company behind it, which is pretty sad.

Edited by Ridley Norfair
So if Sony was actually giving away a coupon for free blu-ray discs (which they are not) and claiming it as sales it would be BS, but Toshiba who is actually giving away 3 free HD-DVD movies and counting it wouldn't be BS?

BTW it is a rebate for a blu-ray movie NOT a free coupon. If I got coupon for a free blu-ray movie when I bought the PS3 I sure as hell would have been happy.

$10 off a blu-ray title != FREE. Blu-Ray movies are $20+

Sales of movies on Blu-ray discs have surpassed sales of motion pictures on HD DVDs in the USA, a market study by a market tracking agency claims. But that is not a surprise: Sony has bundled some PlayStation 3 game machines with a BD movie and included a voucher for another Blu-ray disc, essentially shipping several hundreds of thousands Blu-ray movies for free.
Here's the link from the FP article. https://www.neowin.net/index.php?act=view&id=37840

Here's the original story it was linked to. http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/multimedia/di...0202090024.html

Thank you and come again.

Anti-Blu-Ray sentiment is getting out of control :no:

I sure do hope Blu-Ray wins over the market so all of these anti-BD band wagoners are forced to use Blu-Ray.

It's a Sony format. History of Sony has show that people do not want that crap. Everything they've made format wise (with a few exceptions) have failed badly. They make and try to charge a left and right nut for it. The reson is because it has the Sony name tacked on to it. At one point the name Sony actually meant something. Now all it means is sub par, malfunctioning merchandise with an attitue that they it will take over because it's a Sony product.

Anti-Blu-Ray sentiment is getting out of control :no:

I sure do hope Blu-Ray wins over the market so all of these anti-BD band wagoners are forced to use Blu-Ray.

Reason why i do not participate in sony related discussion topics on neowin.

Anti-Blu-Ray sentiment is getting out of control :no:

Not really, history has proven that most media formats Sony get behind turn to crap, like King Midas but in reverse. They are too caught up in how it would benefit them to realise how expensive and ultimately propietary most of their stuff is.

I sure do hope Blu-Ray wins over the market so all of these anti-BD band wagoners are forced to use Blu-Ray.

If Blu-Ray wins ill just turn to Online Media Distribution, its getting to the point where on demand hi-def is becoming viable, i refuse to buy into anything Sony thats not at least half the price it was when it first came out.

It's a Sony format. History of Sony has show that people do not want that crap. Everything they've made format wise (with a few exceptions) have failed badly. They make and try to charge a left and right nut for it. The reson is because it has the Sony name tacked on to it. At one point the name Sony actually meant something. Now all it means is sub par, malfunctioning merchandise with an attitue that they it will take over because it's a Sony product.

History is just that, history. What makes you think that Sony will fail again? You fail to realize that this isn't only Sony backing it up, this is mostly the major Hollywood studios along with major PC vendors as well. Common sense tells you that if Blu-Ray was doomed to failure, Hollywood wouldn't invest millions to get their movies on to Blu-Ray, now would they?

Blu-Ray's cost has nothing to do with the name Sony. If you had a clue of why it was priced slightly higher compared to HD-DVD you would understand that manufacturing costs are higher at the present time compared to HD-DVD's. Again, this is a format that is being backed up by major corporations, something Sony lacked in their previous history.

Give it another year of total sales and we will see if history matters anymore.

Not really, history has proven that most media formats Sony get behind turn to crap, like King Midas but in reverse. They are too caught up in how it would benefit them to realise how expensive and ultimately propietary most of their stuff is.

If Blu-Ray wins ill just turn to Online Media Distribution, its getting to the point where on demand hi-def is becoming viable, i refuse to buy into anything Sony thats not at least half the price it was when it first came out.

Blu-Ray is not a proprietary format that is strictly for Sony products.

We won't be seeing on-demand HD video distribution anytime soon, so don't get all caught up in that idea. There are barely any on-demand DVD distribution going on let alone HD streaming which will reach the sizes of 20+ gb.

History is just that, history. What makes you think that Sony will fail again? You fail to realize that this isn't only Sony backing it up, this is mostly the major Hollywood studios along with major PC vendors as well. Common sense tells you that if Blu-Ray was doomed to failure, Hollywood wouldn't invest millions to get their movies on to Blu-Ray, now would they?

How old is the UMD format? Not old by a long shot. People didn't want it. It was too expensive. A local general merchandise store near me sold movies on both DVD and UMD. The UMD was smaller video storage of cource with crappy quality and $12-$15 more expansive than the DVD.

Common sense should also tell Sony that they've FUBAR'd almost every attempt to push a format on people and should quit while they're ahead. Just because a format is being backed by a big conglomerate of companies doesn't mean that it will go over well either. People bet on the success of things all the time and they sometimes fail. So, Hollywood is backing it.

Blu-Ray's cost has nothing to do with the name Sony.

Any of the cost on any merchandise has to do with the name on it or behind it. Why do you think Nike shoes sells for so much? Because they're better? No, they're made the same was as most other shoes are (in sweat shops in Mexico and other places) and sold for high prices because people have had it knocked into them over and over that name brands + high prices must mean it's a better quality product.

If you had a clue of why it was priced slightly higher compared to HD-DVD you would understand that manufacturing costs are higher at the present time compared to HD-DVD's. Again, this is a format that is being backed up by major corporations, something Sony lacked in their previous history.

Manufacturing costs for BD are high right now becuase of the low yields being produced. I get the laws of supply and demand.

Give it another year of total sales and we will see if history matters anymore.

Ok. I won't say anything else about BD on these forums until this time next year. If I turn out to be right expect a big TOLD YA SO. :laugh:

Here's the link from the FP article. https://www.neowin.net/index.php?act=view&id=37840

Here's the original story it was linked to. http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/multimedia/di...0202090024.html

Thank you and come again.

The PS3 either comes with Talladega Nights or a $10 voucher, you are getting your information from some random article when the official Sony site even says it is a rebate for $10: http://www.bluraymovierebate.com/ps_movies.html

Even other people mention it who bought a PS3:

http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=800529

http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=796209

http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=776165

Edited by Ridley Norfair
Something tells me if it was Toshiba as the main backer of blu-ray and Sony the main backer of HD-DVD there would be many bandwagon jumpers to blu-ray. Or even take Sony out of the equation and make another company like Panisonic\Samsung\Phillip\etc. the main back of blu-ray people would be whistling a different tune. Even though the blu-ray media is technologically superior, people here are more concerned about the company behind it, which is pretty sad.

very well said.

How old is the UMD format? Not old by a long shot. People didn't want it. It was too expensive. A local general merchandise store near me sold movies on both DVD and UMD. The UMD was smaller video storage of cource with crappy quality and $12-$15 more expansive than the DVD.

I dont think cost is what killed UMD at all but the practical use of the format. To use it you needed a PSP and you had to actually want to watch movies on an ultra small screen. In reality most people arent particully keen on watching videos on such a screen regardless of the cost and the fact the PSP sales while ok but werent GREAT didnt help either. UMD movies was a niche product, its probably not a cost issue at all even if cost didnt help.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!