Windows processes made EASY !


Recommended Posts

I work with windows every day and I didn't like the quantity of services running (a lot of time to boot, to turn off, a lot of ram and cpu time wasted).

So after trying a lot I've understood which services I MUST have running.

The first image shows which services (just 10 in XP64!) have to set in automatic (loaded at the boot).

The second shows which ones have to be set in manual and started when you wat internet connection (having them down at the boot is also good if you have some viruses).

With this simple (just a bit long) tweaking your performance will boost !!post-187957-1171291699_thumb.jpgpost-187957-1171291710_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/538201-windows-processes-made-easy/
Share on other sites

Look here: http://www.theeldergeek.com/services_guide.htm

The best services guide (imo)

The most complicated guide more like, goign through all them, my god..

Anyways,

Anyone got Windows XP Home SP2 List of Non-Required services for a pc with a router with DHCP!

matty13: You PROBABLY could disable some more services (audio and help for instance) if you really don't need them but I would not recommand it. After all this is not a "barebone" configuration but some settings that allow to use almost everithing is windows and still have it "nice" (the themes).

Al: I know this site and It's really good (even if not for vista or xp64) maybe too much geeky :)) .

Important: The configuration I've proposed is fo Windows XP64 (the OS I actualy use). For XP32 the settings are about the same.

If someone want a more precise explanation, please let me know which services he has on (make a print screen and attach it to a post).

Why do people insist on NOT disabling their services? What is your fear ? Maybe NOT to buy that new OS or NOT to add some RAM or NOT to add a new HD ?

It does absolutely A LOT for performance gains ! Now my windows turn on in 15 (fifteen) seconds, and turn off in 7 (seven) seconds. Plus I have 40 % more RAM available.

Headaches are a part of life (as everyboby in IT knows). Luckily, sometimes you can count on OTHERS headaches to gain a good result for you.

Please, those not interested can simply go somewhere else. So I can answer to REAL questions.

Regards.

i always use a minimal approach as i use only what i need as many of those services when windows is first installed are security risks and bad stuff can use them to get in and do bad things so disabling them not only frees up resources for other stuff to use and it streamlines the system so it will start faster and not have to load all that stuff at startup but also limits the entry points that bad stuff can use to get in and cause havok assuming you keep up with security updates.

Why do people insist on disabling their services? It does absolutely nothing for performance gains, and only leads to headaches later on. DJ-Lizard said it best in this post.

DJ-Lizard is just a ****ed off IT dude. Disabling certain services offers some of the MOST performance gains. Its absolutely recockulous to say it doesnt.

Performance is gained when disabling services as far as I have experienced in over 2 dozen PC's, though some systems have better gains than others.

The best guide to services is the one provided by Black Viper: http://web.archive.org/web/20050410041304/.../servicecfg.htm

Why do people insist on NOT disabling their services?

It does absolutely A LOT for performance gains ! Now my windows turn on in 15 (fifteen) seconds, and turn off in 7 (seven) seconds. Plus I have 40 % more RAM available.

Please, those not interested can simply go somewhere else. So I can answer to REAL questions.

40% more memory available? How much physical RAM you have, 32MB?

I would love to see some proof of "performance gains by disabling services" Sure you can have few MBs of memory but a lot of performance gains?

I don't know what it is, maybe an itch on my back, which tells me that proof will not be seen.

There are obviously no performance gains from disabling services not running. ;)

Many services set to "manual" aren't.

Anyway, the reason people insist on NOT disabling services is probably because it could impair system performance.

Personally, I'd rather recommend people setting "automatic" services to "manual" instead of disabling them. That way, they'll only suck your precious performance if Windows actually needs them. Setting them to "disable" will make Windows unable to run them even if it would need them for something. Well, that's my 2c on this subject anyway.

Thanks for the info, if only I had a PII 300 with 64MB of RAM to see if it enhances system performance at all, because it certainly makes virtually no difference on modern systems.

Of course the best performance gains are for the more dated systems (there are still a lot around). But having a system with just the services one need is the best way to quickly control what windows really do (and turn down many chances of having problems).

Disabling some "manual" services is useful because it makes impossible (more or less) to run them by other then the user. Some are useless (cryptographic) some could be dangerous (many in internet area).

As I said you can even disable more. If you use wifi -wireless configuration- is the only service you have to add.

System restore is a mess. It does't do the half that it should and sometimes simply delete your system. Make a backup of your disk/partition is by far the best advice. I use a disk imager (TrueImage).

  • 2 weeks later...

Let me ask you this - do you ever run into the situation where you run out of RAM? If so - then you need more RAM. Don't strip out services - they're set to automatic for a reason. Let me ask you this question: you have a car with power windows. You figure - I'm always in the drivers seat, so why do I need the rear window motors? I'll just rip them out. Then one day, you're driving some buddies around, and they want to roll down the windows... oops. You've gotta go back and put the motors in again.

I have yet to see any benchmarks provide conclusive evidence that system performance is improved with disabled services. Even most people at ExtremeOverclockers and whatnot use plain, jane, vanilla XP when running their benchmarks.

@Darkon11 - Your statement about the wireless configuration service is wrong. People will think - I don't need the Network Location Awareness service because BlackViper says so. But then, you go and connect to your wireless network... wait for DHCP to give you your IP address... for 2 minutes! But wait... you already got one within a few seconds. What's going on? The NLA service is meant to tell the rest of the system "Yup - I'm connected to the network", but you disabled it. In the meantime, you've got that little icon, blinking it's yellow dot back and forth for two minutes. It's an example of how the "mighty" BV service guide can screw you over.

Edited by Zxian

Let me clear this up and hopefully prevent future ###### battles and who thinks who is right and/or wrong. Some people think it affects performance and others don't. If you think someone else is wasting their time with Service configs, let them waste it. It's their system not yours, so why do you even care? The same goes for those who think others are stupid for not disabling Services. Do what you want on your system and leave the others alone.

How many threads have been made with this question? Which to disable, which to leave alone? There are guides that have recommendations from others' personal experience on their systems, so its not necessarily a good thing to go by another's exact config. Do your own trial and error until you figure it out and then make a REG file. You're not going to kill your system by doing this, so instead of debating and arguing and suggesting, just play with the damn thing until you figure it out.

If you don't have enough RAM, disabling Services is not the answer. A bit of savings and a RAM upgrade is.

@jeremy - I care because people misjudge "public opinion" with fact. If there are enough people who say that disabling services is a good thing, then others will follow (which is a bad thing).

The people who disable services for themselves will probably try to convince others to do the same, and end up causing other people headaches.

Disabling services makes your computer start up faster... theres less for it to boot when loading.

This is benefitial for people with the P3 and lower class processors using XP.. They have no need for wireless internet setup, no need for this that and another thing.

The more you load, the longer it takes.. I am not saying you will see a drastic improvement.. but I did it on an old P266 with 64MB ram.. and let me tell you, it made at least a 1 min startup difference..

On my X2 4200+ I may gain 5 seconds...

  • 8 months later...
I have yet to see any benchmarks provide conclusive evidence that system performance is improved with disabled services. Even most people at ExtremeOverclockers and whatnot use plain, jane, vanilla XP when running their benchmarks.

Then, you haven't seen enough... but, "ask, & ye SHALL RECEIVE":

Go to techpowerup.com forums, & there, I had the testers who applied trimming off services &/or trayicon'd backgrounded tasks/programs as well, gain another 10 - 20% better results on their benchmarks (games & such are what these people are about, & thus, PC performance, matters hugely for):

http://forums.techpowerup.com/showthread.php?t=38293

Quantified improvements in ScienceMark 2.0, which I had to show a whole forum (widely travelled one mind you, tons of users, constantly online @ them) of overclockers & mostly gamers, how much faster you can go, by disabling services &/or other backgrounded/trayicon'd apps... & they agreed, applying it to whatever degree it helped them best for, for their benchmark tests (which DO quantify it for you mind you, what you asked for right?) & tuning for daily usage too.

It works, & for BOTH speed/efficiency, but also security (if done right, you get both & together, more than the sum of both done singly)...

APK

P.S.=> I wrote guides like that, LONG AGO, from 1996 onwards online, & in fact, the very first one (which was NTCompatible.com's "Article #1" for years, circa 1997-2003 (when I had a "falling out" with one of his now partners))... stuff like trimming services, just works... & for BOTH speed, AND security... apk

You don't need the application experience, help and support, logical disk manager (do you put in a new hdd or 2 every time you boot? no? didn't think so :)), IPSEC, and you dont need TCP IP netbios helper (unless you're on an archaic lan).

and i'd like to see you install most applications without having windows instrumentation/+com system in the background. :)

in short this guide kinda sucks.

and as far as performance gains go, it only applies to a few select services: system restore, indexing, fast userswitching (it keeps stuff in your ram pertaining to other users).

Edited by thunderstruck88
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Louis Rossmann suing Samsung over "990 Pro SSD warranty scam" by Sayan Sen Back in 2023, if you recall, Neowin reviewer Robbie Khan had a dispute with Samsung over his 990 Pro SSD, which was rapidly losing its health. After significant back and forth, the tech giant had finally released firmware to "stop" the issue. Interestingly, its previous flagship at the time, the 980 Pro was also facing problems leading to two consecutive sets of firmware fixes. Three years later, it looks like a similar conflict has now broken out between tech repair entrepreneur YouTuber Louis Rossmann and Samsung, as it has escalated into a threatened lawsuit after the company allegedly refused to appropriately replace a failing 990 Pro SSD that remained under warranty. According to Rossmann, a 4TB Samsung 990 Pro NVMe SSD purchased for approximately $330 less than two years ago, began experiencing major hiccups and issues, even though he claims it had been operated under ideal cooling conditions. It was installed in a RAID 1 array and cooled by a heatsink and dual high-speed fans. However the drive reportedly started dropping out of the array, exhibiting controller-level failures that eventually became not useable in any meaningful way. Rossmann said Samsung’s support process was marked by delays and confusion from the very start. After initially contacting the wrong regional support channel, he was redirected to Samsung’s memory support division where he submitted detailed diagnostics, logs, and proof of purchase. Rossmann runs a repair company and owns an ACE Lab PC-3000 machine, which is a professional-grade data recovery equipment. As such, he had been confident in his diagnostics. Samsung even seemingly acknowledged that later. Regardless, Rossmann claims that his initial support ticket was automatically closed before a full 24-hour response window had elapsed, forcing him to reopen the case and resubmit documentation. The controversy however intensified further from here after Samsung accepted the drive for warranty evaluation but later returned it with a repair report stating that the drive had passed its testing and that the SSD had been verified as functional. Rossmann strongly disputed those claims citing that his own independent testing on PC-3000 showed write speeds reducing to as low as 40–60 MB/s before the drive failed entirely. Samsung subsequently informed him that the SSD had been reset and reflashed, passing internal stress tests. However, the company also stated that replacement units were unavailable due to an industry-wide memory shortage and suggested that a refund process could be initiated if further testing confirmed the fault. Thus, to settle, the company offered a refund of $330, the amount that was initially paid by him to make the purchase. Here, Rossmann pointed out the seeming hypocrisy of the tech giant as in how no Samsung drive was apparently allocated for warranty replacements, but they were abundantly available for retail sales especially when using business accounts. As you can see, Rossmann is indeed right, there are Samsung 990 Pro 4TB SSDs on Amazon currently for $950 (shipped and sold by first-party Amazon US itself), and they are also available on Samsung's own store too, albeit for an even higher price of $1100. Thus Rossmann argues that Samsung’s inability or unwillingness to provide a replacement while the same model remains available for purchase at significantly higher market prices reflects a failure to honor its warranty obligations. He has issued a formal 60-day notice and says he intends to file suit in Texas small claims court, asserting that companies should face greater costs for denying legitimate warranty claims than for fulfilling them. You can check out the full video titled "Samsung's 990 Pro SSD warranty policy is a scam; I'm taking them to court," at the link below. Source and image: Louis Rossmann (YouTube) As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases
    • Was it too much to ask to show the icon in this article?
    • Frankly, I blame whoever is writing such articles. "A big improvement/update and/or new feature is now available to everyone! Also, use this unofficial tweak tool to enable it because it actually isn't available to you yet officially and might not in fact even be entirely ready or whatever, hence why it is perhaps not enabled for you*. But it's great and you should enable it!" I mean there's nothing wrong with sharing info about some feature you might need to enable via unofficial means, of course. It's just that these articles tend to essentially end up being two news pieces in one, and one of them tends to be a bit misleading. (*Yes, yes, the "it's a controlled rollout!" thing. Not a fan of that one either. The argument, not the actual rollout.)
    • Thank you. Will do. I read in the release notes that editor config might be at play here.
    • Actually, I think even Microsoft doesn't know how to control it
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      185
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!