UPDATED: Sirius, XM set to confirm merger plan today!


Recommended Posts

February 19, 2007 -- Satellite radio operators Sirius and XM are expected to announce their long-awaited merger today, according to a source familiar with the deal.

The two sides were locked in negotiations over the weekend trying to hammer out a final agreement with an eye toward going public with the merger today in Washington, D.C., where XM is based, this source said.

Talks were still going on at press time and the deal could fall apart at any time. With antitrust issues of paramount importance, this source said lawyers for both companies were working overtime to fine-tune the language of the agreement and frame the discussion around the deal itself and not regulatory concerns.

The transaction is expected to be structured as a merger of equals, but given Sirius' higher enterprise value, shareholders in the Mel Karmazin-led firm will likely come away with a larger percentage of a combined company.

According to the source, XM Chairman Gary Parsons will retain that title in the combined entity, with Karmazin likely taking the CEO role. It is unclear what role, if any, XM CEO Hugh Panero will play.

Combining Sirius and XM would result in a single satellite radio operator with more than 12 million total subscribers. A deal would also marry Sirius content, such as Howard Stern, Frank Sinatra and Nascar with XM's Oprah Winfrey, Bob Dylan and Major League Baseball.

Source: NYPost

Update: Now has been confirmed by ABC Business. I think that source is a little more credible.

http://abcnews.go.com/Business/story?id=2887179

Edited by [bear]

I hope everything will work with the current radio. I'm not going to buy a new receiver.... oh no...

And this merger will not fix the number 1 problem XM and Sirius have... crappy sound quality. My FM radio can do better.

I hope everything will work with the current radio. I'm not going to buy a new receiver.... oh no...

And this merger will not fix the number 1 problem XM and Sirius have... crappy sound quality. My FM radio can do better.

No kidding. Sometimes the sound is clear (like on Lucy) but then ethel starts to sound like pure crap.

Are they still going to have the lifetime sign-up?

I'm signing up soon. A local shop was going out of business and I bought a sirius reciver for $10. Looking for a deal on a home-kit now (they were out). $70 Can to hook up to my home stereo is a bit much. I love the idea of commercial free radio and anything like this will be my local radio offerings!

This will go up on the front page as soon as more sources confirm it. I will remain skeptical for now since the last article I wrote up regarding this made it pretty clear the FCC wouldn't allow a merger: https://www.neowin.net/index.php?act=view&id=37324 (Dated February 18, 2007 - over a month ago)

This will go up on the front page as soon as more sources confirm it. I will remain skeptical for now since the last article I wrote up regarding this made it pretty clear the FCC wouldn't allow a merger: https://www.neowin.net/index.php?act=view&id=37324 (Dated February 18, 2007 - over a month ago)

I hear ya Slimy. I am so skeptical myself. I'm hoping that somehow this would help cut operating costs and produce some profitable results. Plus think of all the bandwidth they would have with all those birds in the sky. Maybe the sound quality would finally reach those promises made when the services started.

I doubt the FCC will approve this.

But I can also see the FCC may not have a choice, I'm currently an XM subscriber, I tried Sirius out for a couple weeks at first and the sound quality was terrible, XM has better sound, but the choice of music on a lot of the stations isn't that spectacular, my year long sub expires in April '07

I will wait and see if I'm going to renew it, now if they merge with Sirius It will be very unlikely I will be renewing, I not much of a fan of Sirius or Howard Stern.

I hear ya Slimy. I am so skeptical myself. I'm hoping that somehow this would help cut operating costs and produce some profitable results. Plus think of all the bandwidth they would have with all those birds in the sky. Maybe the sound quality would finally reach those promises made when the services started.

It would be stupid for the FCC to say NO to this merger when we all know that XM and Sirius are loosing the battle and loosing money real fast. Would they prefer the two of them to shutdown their services??

Maybe they should do that. Close all services and restart under one new name. Send a sticker with the new name/logo to all their subscriber (former XM/Sirius users) to stick on your receiver and voil?.... Combine the best of both world, keep it simple and upgrade the bandwidth for a better sound.

Are they still going to have the lifetime sign-up?

I'm signing up soon. A local shop was going out of business and I bought a sirius reciver for $10. Looking for a deal on a home-kit now (they were out). $70 Can to hook up to my home stereo is a bit much. I love the idea of commercial free radio and anything like this will be my local radio offerings!

-One thing, it's not commercial free anymore, especially if you're listening to something like network sports, which has alot of commercials.

To those of you saying that xm or sirius has horrible sound quality . . .

1. How is the XM/Sirius connected to your radio? Fm Transmitter.. if so then DUH it's not going to sound better than a local station.

2. What is the signal strength when it doesn't sound good? Standing under a tree?

There's lots of things to take into account when you judge sound quality.. personally, my SkyFi was direct connected with RCA Cables, and the sound quality was near CD when i had a strong connection.

Granted, going under a bridge or something of the sort, i'd lose my song for about 2 seconds, then get it back. but that was my only complaint.

I'm getting Sirius soon, mainly for SEC Sports and the Jam channel (which is much better than the Music Lab).

so, just trying to put some legit consideration behind the "OMG!1!!1 TEH SERVICE SUX0RS" folks.

To those of you saying that xm or sirius has horrible sound quality . . .

1. How is the XM/Sirius connected to your radio? Fm Transmitter.. if so then DUH it's not going to sound better than a local station.

2. What is the signal strength when it doesn't sound good? Standing under a tree?

There's lots of things to take into account when you judge sound quality.. personally, my SkyFi was direct connected with RCA Cables, and the sound quality was near CD when i had a strong connection.

Granted, going under a bridge or something of the sort, i'd lose my song for about 2 seconds, then get it back. but that was my only complaint.

I'm getting Sirius soon, mainly for SEC Sports and the Jam channel (which is much better than the Music Lab).

so, just trying to put some legit consideration behind the "OMG!1!!1 TEH SERVICE SUX0RS" folks.

Don't be dumb. I'm not a random XM user who uses an FM transmitter. I've had XM since 2003. I don't use an FM transmitter and I never have. I route my cables through my dash to the back of my radio via the aux in port. The sound quality is great for some stations but talk stations are horrible. And ethel has its' bad days. Hopefully Xm launches the fifth bird at somepoint. Maybe they would even need it if the merger goes through. I'm just saying. Things went really downhill after the Rock & Roll sats went bad. Rhythm & Blues has helped things though. Good thing they took out some insurance on the first two.

To those of you saying that xm or sirius has horrible sound quality . . .

1. How is the XM/Sirius connected to your radio? Fm Transmitter.. if so then DUH it's not going to sound better than a local station.

2. What is the signal strength when it doesn't sound good? Standing under a tree?

There's lots of things to take into account when you judge sound quality.. personally, my SkyFi was direct connected with RCA Cables, and the sound quality was near CD when i had a strong connection.

Granted, going under a bridge or something of the sort, i'd lose my song for about 2 seconds, then get it back. but that was my only complaint.

I'm getting Sirius soon, mainly for SEC Sports and the Jam channel (which is much better than the Music Lab).

so, just trying to put some legit consideration behind the "OMG!1!!1 TEH SERVICE SUX0RS" folks.

I have Sirius, and in my car it's with a FM transmitter but at home, it's direct in the AUX of my sound system. And beleive me, they sound just about the same. Signal strength is very good for both sat and land signal. AT BEST, it sound like a badly encoded 96kbps MP3 file. On talk radio, it goes down to what... 32kbps, terrible, worst than AM radio.

I have tested other receiver, thinking that I had a lemon or a too cheap receiver. I tried (in FutureShop, very good signal) the latest receiver only to find that it sound just about the same.

And I'm not the only one, since i've been looking into this sound quality problem. And their's tons of forums with people complaining about sound quality. We are FAR from near CD quality.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A new wallpaper... high définition... I know ! this one really cleared my skin, it boosted my crops and grew my hair an extra inch.
    • All I want is a way to turn off the Copilot AI suggestion crap in OneDrive that doesn't break OneNote, etc. -- as the current Account setting change option does...
    • Here is the new Surface Laptop Ultra wallpaper in high resolution by Taras Buria Earlier this week, Microsoft announced the Surface Laptop Ultra, its brand-new high-end laptop powered by NVIDIA's brand-new RTX Spark processor. As usual, Microsoft gives each new device a unique wallpaper, and the Surface Laptop Ultra is no exception. While the device is not publicly available yet, somebody has already extracted its wallpaper, giving everyone a chance to get a piece of the upcoming laptop in its full-resolution glory. The Surface Laptop Ultra has a very dark, abstract wallpaper that resembles the stock wallpapers in Windows Server, albeit with much less color. Having this dark, grim wallpaper highlights the laptop's mini-LED display and its ability to cut off parts of the screen's backlight to achieve OLED-like black levels. However, if you also like light wallpapers, we made a white version by simply inverting its colors. You can download both wallpapers below (click the image, right-click it, and select "Save as"): The Surface Laptop Ultra is expected to launch later this year. Microsoft is not revealing full details yet, including the price. However, Microsoft confirmed up to 1 petaflop of AI performance and RTX 5070-level of GPU performance. The heart of the laptop has up to 20 CPU cores and 6,144 GPU cores. Additionally, Microsoft and NVIDIA boast high CPU efficiency for all-day battery life. As for the display, it is a 15-inch mini-LED display with a pixel density of 262 ppi and a maximum brightness of 2,000 nits. Of course, not everyone needs this amount of power, and certainly not everyone can afford it. For those who need a more affordable device, Microsoft is also preparing the next-generation Surface Pro powered by the Snapdragon X2 Elite processor. Weeks ahead of the announcement, details about this computer were leaked by a retailer. Do you like the Surface Laptop Ultra's stock wallpaper? Share your thoughts in the comments. Image provided by @nextgenos2026 on X
    • From all that I've read on the subject--not that much, really--it looks to me like companies and parents are trying to protect themselves from children using their parents accounts to run up giant bills, sometimes in the thousands of dollars, and the first the parents know about it is when they get sued... Internet companies have been sued for tailoring their ads to children, which is kind of old news. My belief is that policing starts at home with the parents, and the reason that so many laws that can't be enforced are being passed is because parents are eschewing their responsibilities, claiming not enough time, not enough knowledge, etc. Giving kids cell phones sans Internet connectivity is a good place to start--confine Internet activity to PCs in the home that the parents regulate. My kids are all grown and gone, I'm happy to say... They have their own kids to worry about.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      475
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      233
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      68
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      58
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!