UPDATED: Sirius, XM set to confirm merger plan today!


Recommended Posts

February 19, 2007 -- Satellite radio operators Sirius and XM are expected to announce their long-awaited merger today, according to a source familiar with the deal.

The two sides were locked in negotiations over the weekend trying to hammer out a final agreement with an eye toward going public with the merger today in Washington, D.C., where XM is based, this source said.

Talks were still going on at press time and the deal could fall apart at any time. With antitrust issues of paramount importance, this source said lawyers for both companies were working overtime to fine-tune the language of the agreement and frame the discussion around the deal itself and not regulatory concerns.

The transaction is expected to be structured as a merger of equals, but given Sirius' higher enterprise value, shareholders in the Mel Karmazin-led firm will likely come away with a larger percentage of a combined company.

According to the source, XM Chairman Gary Parsons will retain that title in the combined entity, with Karmazin likely taking the CEO role. It is unclear what role, if any, XM CEO Hugh Panero will play.

Combining Sirius and XM would result in a single satellite radio operator with more than 12 million total subscribers. A deal would also marry Sirius content, such as Howard Stern, Frank Sinatra and Nascar with XM's Oprah Winfrey, Bob Dylan and Major League Baseball.

Source: NYPost

Update: Now has been confirmed by ABC Business. I think that source is a little more credible.

http://abcnews.go.com/Business/story?id=2887179

Edited by [bear]

I hope everything will work with the current radio. I'm not going to buy a new receiver.... oh no...

And this merger will not fix the number 1 problem XM and Sirius have... crappy sound quality. My FM radio can do better.

I hope everything will work with the current radio. I'm not going to buy a new receiver.... oh no...

And this merger will not fix the number 1 problem XM and Sirius have... crappy sound quality. My FM radio can do better.

No kidding. Sometimes the sound is clear (like on Lucy) but then ethel starts to sound like pure crap.

Are they still going to have the lifetime sign-up?

I'm signing up soon. A local shop was going out of business and I bought a sirius reciver for $10. Looking for a deal on a home-kit now (they were out). $70 Can to hook up to my home stereo is a bit much. I love the idea of commercial free radio and anything like this will be my local radio offerings!

This will go up on the front page as soon as more sources confirm it. I will remain skeptical for now since the last article I wrote up regarding this made it pretty clear the FCC wouldn't allow a merger: https://www.neowin.net/index.php?act=view&id=37324 (Dated February 18, 2007 - over a month ago)

This will go up on the front page as soon as more sources confirm it. I will remain skeptical for now since the last article I wrote up regarding this made it pretty clear the FCC wouldn't allow a merger: https://www.neowin.net/index.php?act=view&id=37324 (Dated February 18, 2007 - over a month ago)

I hear ya Slimy. I am so skeptical myself. I'm hoping that somehow this would help cut operating costs and produce some profitable results. Plus think of all the bandwidth they would have with all those birds in the sky. Maybe the sound quality would finally reach those promises made when the services started.

I doubt the FCC will approve this.

But I can also see the FCC may not have a choice, I'm currently an XM subscriber, I tried Sirius out for a couple weeks at first and the sound quality was terrible, XM has better sound, but the choice of music on a lot of the stations isn't that spectacular, my year long sub expires in April '07

I will wait and see if I'm going to renew it, now if they merge with Sirius It will be very unlikely I will be renewing, I not much of a fan of Sirius or Howard Stern.

I hear ya Slimy. I am so skeptical myself. I'm hoping that somehow this would help cut operating costs and produce some profitable results. Plus think of all the bandwidth they would have with all those birds in the sky. Maybe the sound quality would finally reach those promises made when the services started.

It would be stupid for the FCC to say NO to this merger when we all know that XM and Sirius are loosing the battle and loosing money real fast. Would they prefer the two of them to shutdown their services??

Maybe they should do that. Close all services and restart under one new name. Send a sticker with the new name/logo to all their subscriber (former XM/Sirius users) to stick on your receiver and voil?.... Combine the best of both world, keep it simple and upgrade the bandwidth for a better sound.

Are they still going to have the lifetime sign-up?

I'm signing up soon. A local shop was going out of business and I bought a sirius reciver for $10. Looking for a deal on a home-kit now (they were out). $70 Can to hook up to my home stereo is a bit much. I love the idea of commercial free radio and anything like this will be my local radio offerings!

-One thing, it's not commercial free anymore, especially if you're listening to something like network sports, which has alot of commercials.

To those of you saying that xm or sirius has horrible sound quality . . .

1. How is the XM/Sirius connected to your radio? Fm Transmitter.. if so then DUH it's not going to sound better than a local station.

2. What is the signal strength when it doesn't sound good? Standing under a tree?

There's lots of things to take into account when you judge sound quality.. personally, my SkyFi was direct connected with RCA Cables, and the sound quality was near CD when i had a strong connection.

Granted, going under a bridge or something of the sort, i'd lose my song for about 2 seconds, then get it back. but that was my only complaint.

I'm getting Sirius soon, mainly for SEC Sports and the Jam channel (which is much better than the Music Lab).

so, just trying to put some legit consideration behind the "OMG!1!!1 TEH SERVICE SUX0RS" folks.

To those of you saying that xm or sirius has horrible sound quality . . .

1. How is the XM/Sirius connected to your radio? Fm Transmitter.. if so then DUH it's not going to sound better than a local station.

2. What is the signal strength when it doesn't sound good? Standing under a tree?

There's lots of things to take into account when you judge sound quality.. personally, my SkyFi was direct connected with RCA Cables, and the sound quality was near CD when i had a strong connection.

Granted, going under a bridge or something of the sort, i'd lose my song for about 2 seconds, then get it back. but that was my only complaint.

I'm getting Sirius soon, mainly for SEC Sports and the Jam channel (which is much better than the Music Lab).

so, just trying to put some legit consideration behind the "OMG!1!!1 TEH SERVICE SUX0RS" folks.

Don't be dumb. I'm not a random XM user who uses an FM transmitter. I've had XM since 2003. I don't use an FM transmitter and I never have. I route my cables through my dash to the back of my radio via the aux in port. The sound quality is great for some stations but talk stations are horrible. And ethel has its' bad days. Hopefully Xm launches the fifth bird at somepoint. Maybe they would even need it if the merger goes through. I'm just saying. Things went really downhill after the Rock & Roll sats went bad. Rhythm & Blues has helped things though. Good thing they took out some insurance on the first two.

To those of you saying that xm or sirius has horrible sound quality . . .

1. How is the XM/Sirius connected to your radio? Fm Transmitter.. if so then DUH it's not going to sound better than a local station.

2. What is the signal strength when it doesn't sound good? Standing under a tree?

There's lots of things to take into account when you judge sound quality.. personally, my SkyFi was direct connected with RCA Cables, and the sound quality was near CD when i had a strong connection.

Granted, going under a bridge or something of the sort, i'd lose my song for about 2 seconds, then get it back. but that was my only complaint.

I'm getting Sirius soon, mainly for SEC Sports and the Jam channel (which is much better than the Music Lab).

so, just trying to put some legit consideration behind the "OMG!1!!1 TEH SERVICE SUX0RS" folks.

I have Sirius, and in my car it's with a FM transmitter but at home, it's direct in the AUX of my sound system. And beleive me, they sound just about the same. Signal strength is very good for both sat and land signal. AT BEST, it sound like a badly encoded 96kbps MP3 file. On talk radio, it goes down to what... 32kbps, terrible, worst than AM radio.

I have tested other receiver, thinking that I had a lemon or a too cheap receiver. I tried (in FutureShop, very good signal) the latest receiver only to find that it sound just about the same.

And I'm not the only one, since i've been looking into this sound quality problem. And their's tons of forums with people complaining about sound quality. We are FAR from near CD quality.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It not only looks like a toy, it is a toy...
    • Zen Browser 1.20.2b by Razvan Serea Zen Browser is a privacy-focused, open-source web browser built on Mozilla Firefox, offering users a secure and customizable browsing experience. It emphasizes privacy by blocking trackers, ads, and ensuring your data isn't collected. With Zen Mods, users can enhance their browser experience with various customization options, including features like split views and vertical tabs. The browser is designed for efficiency, providing fast browsing speeds and a lightweight interface. Zen Browser prioritizes user control over the browsing experience, offering a minimal yet powerful alternative to traditional web browsers while keeping your online activity private. Zen Browser’s DRM limitation Zen Browser currently lacks support for DRM-protected content, meaning streaming services like Netflix and HBO Max are inaccessible. This is due to the absence of a Widevine license, which requires significant costs and is financially unfeasible for the developer. Additionally, applying for this license would require Zen to be part of a larger company, similar to Mozilla or Brave. Therefore, DRM-protected media won't be supported in Zen Browser for the foreseeable future. Zen Browser offers features that improve user experience, privacy, and customization: Privacy-Focused: Blocks trackers and minimizes data collection. Automatic Updates: Keeps the browser updated with security patches. Zen Mods: Customizable themes and layouts. Workspaces: Organize tabs into different workspaces. Compact Mode: Maximizes screen space by minimizing UI elements. Zen Glance: Quick website previews. Split Views: View multiple tabs in the same window. Sidebar: Access bookmarks and tools quickly. Vertical Tabs: Manage tabs vertically. Container Tabs: Separate browsing sessions. Fast Profile Switcher: Switch between profiles easily. Tab Folders: Organize tabs into folders. Customizable UI: Personalize browser interface. Security Features: Inherits Firefox’s robust security. Fast Performance: Lightweight and optimized for speed. Zen Mods Customization: Deep customization with mods. Quick Access: Easy access to favorite websites. Open Source: Built on Mozilla Firefox with community collaboration. Community-Driven: Active development and feedback from users. GitHub Repository: Contribute and review the source code. Zen Browser 1.20.2b changelog: Security Mozilla Security Advisory 2026-54 New Features Updated to Firefox 151.0.3 Boosts now support a dark mode UI based on your system dark mode setting. Fixes Fixed auto focus for new windows not working. (#12112) Fixed desktop shortcuts showing zen as 'Nightly'. (#13745) Other minor bug fixes and performance improvements. Download: Zen Browser | 89.8 MB (Open Source) Download: Zen Browser ARM64 | Other Operating Systems View: Zen Browser Home Page | Screenshots 1 | 2 | Reddit Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • (She does look suspiciously like she is AI generated to me but the message still stands) Another from "her" Facebook :
    • Looks the same as the Air, actually. Check it out in person.
    • "This transition will take several years so we shouldn't bother doing it at all" is a naive take. This is completely normal for all specifications that cross-cut software, hardware and multiple industries. Look at the PCI specification for another example, consumers barely have PCI-E 5 yet PCI-SIG is working on PCI-E 8. AV2 will take multiple years to get adoption and even then, even a decade from now people will still have older hardware that doesn't support it. That's fine, because the savings still add up as newer devices add the hardware to deal with it. The goal is never to get 100% on the new spec overnight, but to gradually adopt it.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      482
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      232
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      65
    5. 5
      neufuse
      54
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!