[Review] Norton 360 Full Review


Recommended Posts

Hello fellow Neowinians!

01-tantawi-n360-welcome.jpg

Symantec has officially launched Norton 360 All-In-One Security Suit, a subscription ($79.99/year) based software bundle which includes antivirus, antispyware, firewall, antiphishing filter, system optimization tools, online backup, and more. For full list of features and system requirements please see the product website linked above.

Like most of savvy computer users, I dumped Norton products few years ago because of the silly system resources consumed by it and because there're "better" and cheaper alternatives available, such as NOD32 and Kaspersky. Now with the launch of the supposedly revamped product from Symantec, I thought it's wrong to stick to my old opinion before trying it first to see if things got improved from 2004+ nightmares.

Still, the old frighten boy inside me couldn't risk installing it on my production environment (Windows XP SP2), so I decided to give it a try on my testing hard disk running Windows Vista Ultimate (final), and I find it a good idea since at some point most users will be using Vista anyway.

Test system specs:

- Windows Vista Ultimate (Running as elevated Administrator, with no ReadyBoost drive used).

- MSI Neo2-P Platinum edition (i865PE) motherboard.

- Intel Pentium 4 3.4E w/HT @ 3.7 GHz.

- 2 GB Hynix PC3200 dual channel @ 436 MHz

- 80GB Western Digital Caviar PATA.

Installation:

So I went to Norton 360 trialware page and downloaded it (49.5 MB). The installer started extracting/installing files process showing some of the product's features on the screen, I liked the simplicity and the speed of the process.

After that, the installer asked for my product key, and as I don't have one yet I choose to run it as 15 days trial, then it ran an automatic Live Update and a quick virus/spyware scan on the critical system locations (took around 3 minutes), it also didn't ask for a system restart, very nice!

02-tantawi-n360-installing.jpg 03-tantawi-n360-licensing.jpg 04-tantawi-n360-quick.jpg

(Click on the image for the full size)

The 360:

If we all can agree on something in Norton products line, I guess it'll be the talented graphics/UI usability staff at Symantec. I'm impressed by the nice interface of Norton 360, clean and comprehensive, also pretty responsive (unlike Norton 200x).

The main window provide access to the main 4 features: PC Security, Transaction Security, Backup and Restore, and PC Tuneup. clicking details under each section takes you to the scanning/running process, and from the web-like links on the top right, you can have access to the common scanning features and application settings.

05-tantawi-n360-main.jpg 06-tantawi-n360-tasks.jpg 07-tantawi-n360-account.jpg 20-tantawi-n360-mainsettings.jpg

(Click on the image for the full size)

PC Security:

Before going into the details, SYMANTEC: where's the "selective scanning" had gone?? I spent like 15 minutes trying to find how to scan a folder/file individually with no luck! I tried every single screen in the program, also there's no right-click menu option on folder/files to do so (like every AV program on planet earth). It seems they are sticking to the 360 concept in scanning! as you should do a 360? system scan each time you wanted to scan something manually!

Actually I wanted to select only one folder to scan so I can compare the engine speed with NOD32's (which I have it installed on my other HDD). I had no choice but to do a full system scan. Fairly enough, and not statistically speaking, the scanning speed IS improved! it "seems" a lot faster than old Nortons, but I still think it's a bit slower than NOD32 in scanning some usual folders "like system32", I wish I could backup my observations with numbers, but unfortunately I don't have the time or patience to leave both AVs scan my entire system (350GB+ of data).

I left it to scan 200,000+ of files and guess what,It found a trojan >in my system (in Java folder in my XP HDD), oh my! NOW this is interesting, as NOD32 couldn't detect the threat! The trojan name is: Trojan.ByteVerify, and is identified on (September 10, 2003) what? 2003? *kicking NOD's ass*. The "trojan" seems to be not harmful, and I believe it may be a false positive. It's listed in the program as "High risk", but on Symantec website as "Low risk"! I'll take it as medium then. lol.

The auto-protect and firewall alert window is improved and now it displays a transparent, auto closing, message when a virus is found or something is blocked.

Speaking about firewall, it looks (as in settings and configuration) and works the same as in Norton Personal Firewall.

08-tantawi-n360-security1.jpg 09-tantawi-n360-security2.jpg 13-tantawi-n360-scan2.jpg 14-tantawi-n360-scan3.jpg 15-tantawi-n360-scan4.jpg

16-tantawi-n360-scan5.jpg 17-tantawi-n360-alert.jpg 21-tantawi-n360-avsettings1.jpg 22-tantawi-n360-avsettings2.jpg 26-tantawi-n360-fwsettings4.jpg

Edited by Tantawi
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/542170-review-norton-360-full-review/
Share on other sites

Startup time is not twice the time? Can you test this please... I just don't believe it....

And what is the uninstaller's process? I mean, last time I checked, there where a 3rd Party uninstaller to remove all Norton crap after it's uninstalation and I think that even Symentec made a tool like that...

Anyway, right there, I can say you that it just don't suit me, I can't live without "manual file/folder" scanning.

Startup time is not twice the time? Can you test this please... I just don't believe it....

And what is the uninstaller's process? I mean, last time I checked, there where a 3rd Party uninstaller to remove all Norton crap after it's uninstalation and I think that even Symentec made a tool like that...

Anyway, right there, I can say you that it just don't suit me, I can't live without "manual file/folder" scanning.

Startup time is just normal, nothing like slow down, and I've updated that part in the review.

I didn't uninstall it yet, but I'm testing it since yesterday and actually thinking of keeping it, if I uninstalled it I'll feedback here, but if anything and looking how files/processes are structured, I'd say it'll just uninstall like the way it should be, it doesn't look like the old Norton virus :D

About the manual folder scanning, yes I can't believe it's not there, anyway there's always a possibility that I'm stupid somehow and another user will point it out!

Welcome Milk.

I've lost my faith in Norton when I had to install a plugin in Norton Antivirus 2003 just to get it to work in Windows Security Center. After that, I just moved to Avast! and recently Nod32. I'm happy with what I have and though I may move to Norton in the near future, I'm happy with what I have :D !

Great review though!

Scirwode

Startup time is not twice the time? Can you test this please... I just don't believe it....

Strange, i am getting a slower startup time here with the trial installed contrary to Tantawi's installation. but i did uninstall it and it went fine unlike the older NAV.

btw, nice review there mate!

Great review Tantawi ^^

Norton has indeed vastly improved, but there are a couple of things aside from the cost that make me not want to use Norton 360.

These are:

Backups. I manage backups myself using Acronis TrueImage, and there doesn't seem to be a way to tell Norton 360 that. It keeps reminding me to set my backup schedule.

Phishing toolbar. Whilst the Symantec phishing security is very good, having it enabled results in IE7 taking considerably longer to close when you exit the application. Also a delay is noticable when opening new tabs.

Whether it's just me, but also there was a noticable delay when clicking on links in a Google search to when IE started to resolve the URL.

Aside from these 2 points, I can't fault it really. Although I'd like to be able to see exactly what LiveUpdate is downloading, but heh that's not that important really.

Again, well done on the excellent review :)

Aftershock about the "good" verdict on a Norton AV:

Well, it seems Norton is getting better.

I must try this for future talk with clients and NW members but as I said, I'm not interested.

Thanks Tantawi for the review, with this I will clearly this this out and share my results and benchmark with you.

Backups. I manage backups myself using Acronis TrueImage, and there doesn't seem to be a way to tell Norton 360 that. It keeps reminding me to set my backup schedule.

Phishing toolbar. Whilst the Symantec phishing security is very good, having it enabled results in IE7 taking considerably longer to close when you exit the application. Also a delay is noticable when opening new tabs.

Whether it's just me, but also there was a noticable delay when clicking on links in a Google search to when IE started to resolve the URL.

Schnitzel, I've reinstalled Norton 360 to check those issues.

For the backup, it just nags about configuring it, I opened the configuration screen and set it to manual and now it no longer complain about it "green".

For the fishing toolbar in IE, I opened the "Manage add-ins" window and diasabled the two Norton components, and now I don't have the antiphishing filter enabled in IE ofcourse, but Norton still puts the "green mark" on it and never complain. :) I know that seems not really a solution but I don't use IE anyway :)

Welcome everyone and If you want to test anything just tell me :)

I must say that my experience with norton has been very good since 2003 and my good experience continues even today when i played around with norton-360 for an hour...

it was very light on my pc...no performance drag or something.............i think people should grow-up and use norton's recent version like 2006-7 and find out the difference........ :yes:

I must say that my experience with norton has been very good since 2003 and my good experience continues even today when i played around with norton-360 for an hour...

it was very light on my pc...no performance drag or something.............i think people should grow-up and use norton's recent version like 2006-7 and find out the difference........ :yes:

I did, and I found it horribly slow, and there are better free alternatives -- Not sure about Norton 360 however.

Schnitzel, I've reinstalled Norton 360 to check those issues.

For the backup, it just nags about configuring it, I opened the configuration screen and set it to manual and now it no longer complain about it "green".

For the fishing toolbar in IE, I opened the "Manage add-ins" window and diasabled the two Norton components, and now I don't have the antiphishing filter enabled in IE ofcourse, but Norton still puts the "green mark" on it and never complain. :) I know that seems not really a solution but I don't use IE anyway :)

Welcome everyone and If you want to test anything just tell me :)

Heh, very good of you to go to the effort to test those things! Although I wasn't implying I wanted you to do that in my post, just incase you thought I was :p

Glad to hear that I can get around the backup "Issue".

Just out of interest, I assume when you've disabled the 2 Norton IE Add-ins, and the IE Bar has gone but you still have the green tick, the Norton phishing protection is indeed off, so you'd be able to visit phished sites, although one could always re-enable the default IE7 phishing abilitiy.

I might have another play around with it later inlight of your findings.

One thing I've always wondered about though, is the detection rates of the AntiVirus component.

Fortunately, they now offer the AV updates daily, rather than weekly. But usually (by checking their site) each day only a few definitions are added, sometimes none at all. The list can be viewed here. Currently, I'm using NOD32. There seems to be many more detections added per day, not that this means either are better as Norton probably has less false positives, but it's just a thought :)

I also like the way you cannot terminate the protection offered by the newer Norton products, unfortunately NOD32's protection can be disabled in the current version.

Thanks for testing these extra things, I hope you didn't go to too much trouble ;)

You're most welcome! :)

And you're right, what's important is the actual protection, and I'm a bit happy that it found a trojan on my PC :D "whether it's a false positive or not" but it makes it feels superior than NOD32 in terms of the protection factor.

For Legendkiller, This review is about 360 only :p I can't even be bothered to speak about the whole 2004+ line, even 2007, it's a disaster man! didn't you find a very noticeable difference between 2007 and the new 360? ;)

Edited the review to add a video file for the boot/startup process!

Edited by Tantawi
Excellent read, does the backup act & be used like Norton Ghost 9 & 10?
Q. Does Norton 360 support system recovery like Norton Ghost and Norton Save and Restore?

A. No, in this initial version of Norton 360, system recovery functionality is not available. System recovery functionality is being evaluated for future versions of Norton 360.

From: http://www.symantec.com/norton360/about/n360faq.html

Welcome Amano and MichaelBL :)

Updated to include those links:

- Homepage

- Norton 360 FAQs

- Norton 360 Design Philosophy: User Experience and Performance

- Download a 15 days trial version of Norton 360

Edited by Tantawi

I did install the trial version, problem was it didn't uninstall NIS2007 properly.

It left the protection centre still installed.

I used the Norton Removal tool to totally remove NIS2007 before install.

I would suggest anyone that wants to install the trial, remove windows defender first as Norton 360 prompts to remove it anyway, then use the Norton Removal tool to remove Norton previous versions.

After reboot, I installed 360, it was smooth and didn't require a reboot, updated it, did a quick scan, disabelled backup utility and found my computer system works 20% quicker +

Shame they don't do a 30 day trial rather than a 15 day trial, as I cannot buy this item from my retailer till around March 18th & won't receive it till about the 25th.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AltSendme 0.4.1 by Razvan Serea AltSendme is a minimal, cross-platform application designed for fast, secure, and private peer-to-peer file transfers. It allows users to send files or entire directories directly between devices without relying on cloud servers, accounts, or any personal information. Everything is encrypted end-to-end using modern protocols like QUIC and TLS 1.3, ensuring both strong security and low-latency performance. Transfers are verified with BLAKE3 for data integrity, and interrupted downloads automatically resume, making the experience reliable even on unstable connections. You can transfer anything—images, videos, documents, and more. Integrity checks are performed on both ends, so your files are automatically verified for correctness during both sending and receiving. AltSendme works seamlessly across local networks or long-distance links, capable of saturating multi-gigabit connections for extremely fast delivery. With built-in NAT traversal and encrypted relay fallback, it connects devices almost anywhere. The app integrates with the Sendme CLI and will soon support mobile and web platforms. Fully free and open-source, AltSendme offers a lightweight, privacy-first alternative to traditional cloud-based services, removing size limits, upload costs, and unnecessary data exposure. AltSendme 0.4.1 changelog: Release Highlights Self-hosted relays: Run your own iroh relay so transfers don't rely on public infrastructure. Includes a full deployment template in deploy/relay/ with Docker Compose for a VPS and configuration examples for production use. Fly.io support: One-click deploy template for Fly.io, including a quick-start config (fly.dev.toml) for testing without a custom domain, plus production setup with Let's Encrypt and your own hostname. Relay settings UI: New Settings → Network panel to choose how AltSendme connects: automatic public relays, custom self-hosted URLs (with optional auth token), or disabled. Test connections, verify latency, and see live relay status in the footer. Disable relays: Turn off relay servers entirely when you only need same-network transfers (e.g. LAN). Direct connections only. No relay hop required when devices can reach each other. Android graduates from beta: Android is now part of the regular release cycle alongside desktop. APKs ship with each version (universal, arm64, and armv7). Other improvements Private relay access control via shared auth token Relay fallback notifications when a custom relay is unreachable Broadcast mode toggle in sharing settings Android release build fixes (split-per-ABI APKs, universal APK preservation) UI polish: mobile safe-area insets, dropzone layout, transfer progress animation Bug fixes for minification-related serialization issues and system tray icon loading What's Changed feat(relay): add relay status functionality and settings UI (a120cdf) feat(relay): implement custom relay server configuration and verification (51276c7) feat(relay): add configuration for private relay access and enhance observability features (48fbabf) feat(relay): enhance relay URL validation, display connection status (d4fffa0) feat(relay): add RelayChangeGuard component and enhance relay-related translations (16ba514) feat(broadcast): add toggle setting for broadcast mode in sharing UI (ca6d977) fix(relay): correct QUIC discovery port, pin image, templatize fly.dev (52a2ba5) fix: More broken serialization due to minification (67491a9) fix(android): preserve true universal APK across per-ABI builds (e9f256f) fix(ui): conditional safe-area insets padding on mobile (1182f0e) refactor(transfer): CircularRing component animation fix (944572b) chore(android): drop x86 and x86_64 release APKs, keep universal+arm64+armv7 (34ada0b) Download: AltSendme 0.4.1 | ARM64 | ~9.0 MB (Open Source) Download: AltSendme for MacOS | Android Links: AltSendme Home Page | GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • You are mostly right about the ephemeral nature of it. As I mention in the article, if you dont add a second device or take a backup of your account before uninstalling it, then yes you will lose access to your account. That said, in terms of actual user experience when you sync multiple devices your message history carries across and there's also a Saved Messages chat like there is on Telegram to send messages and attachments between your installs. But yh, what you point out are correct and its not trying to emulate Messenger or Telegram.
    • OK so SearXNG is a meta search engine that you can install locally or use via a public instance. It scrapes other search engines which you choose and then sorts the results. Not as complicated as multiple relays
    • The only difference here is that you think you came up with these reasons. You didn't. These age old fearmongering lies (that were NEVER true) were funded by and the anger stoked by Putin through proxies like Farage (and later in the USA, Trump) and filtered down through the skinheads, Neonazis, etc. until it reached the uninformed, ignorant, and gullible -- never realizing they were being played for fools against their own best interests. Even now, despite all of the EVIDENCE proving that Brexit was a terrible mistake for ALL citizens of the UK and that its supporters were tricked by Putin's proxies into sabotaging their own nation, you're still here defending these well-known lies as if they were ever true. Not only are they not true. They NEVER were. So, when are you going to realize that you were lied to and actually get angry at the liars and charlatans who lied to you, instead of blaming the innocent people they lied to you about?
    • Dupe of "Microsoft further improving Windows 11 Taskbar with latest builds", published <20 minutes apart
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      495
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!