[Review] Norton 360 Full Review


Recommended Posts

Norton 360?!? What were they thinking with that name? Xbox 360, Norton 360 =\.

But oh well.. I haven't been pleased with any Norton products for quite a long time. The main reason is their pricing, why should I have to buy a new box copy of Norton every year? Some of the greatest anti-viruses (meaning better then Norton) only have a subscription fee every year or so, but all program updates/revisions are part of that subscription.

WOW what a review...! I also moved from norton to kaspersky due to the resources but after reading that makes me want to give norton ago :D

I tend to find the most complained about thing to do with Norton is resources.

If you're on the bare minimum r.a.m. installed then it's not advisable to use it, rather though to use AVG

& zone alarm

Nice review. I'll probably give it a try on one of my test machines (have to go to my parents house and let them try it, my family puts computers through hell more then anyone else I know)

I think I'll still stick with Kaspersky.

Hi,

I am a retail tech for a company whom I cannot name.... let's just say thier initials are G.S. :whistle:

I was a fan of Nortons for years but after the 2003 release I felt it started to get way to bloated and I backed off and switched to Zonealarm Free and NOD32 once I became aware of it. I used AVG free between somewhere.

We have done a lot of tests with 360 on many different configurations of XP SP2 and Vista. While I did not find it as stable as some on any of my Vista builds I think the initial release of 360 for XP SP2 is as good as it is going to get. It beat out almost all the other AVs in general tests but when compared to whe footprint and enhanced code the systems ran much smoother under full loads with the client enabled. Overall tests proved at least to me that I will get solid protection in one piece of software and not have to suffer with a laggy system.

And NO I do not work for nor do I endorse Symantec. In fact as I said I stopped using them and recommended against then for a few years. I am going back to Norton with 360 on my next fresh install, and I do recommend a fresh install if you are upgrading from an earlier version.

Cheers,

hmm dunno if i should use it.... :\

Hi Anthony,

Because of the feedback you've contributed to project Genesis (Norton 360), you will be receiving the a Not For Resale (NFR) copy of Norton 360.

If you chose to receive a physical copy of the product, please be patient as this process may take a few months. If you chose to download the Norton 360 NFR, you will be given access to the build shortly. Testers who chose to receive a physically copy will not be given access to the Norton 360 NFR download.

Thanks again for all your help no this project. Your feedback directly contributed to the success of this new Symantec product, and the Norton 360 team is very grateful for all your work.

Cheers,

Tony Weiss

Sr. Beta Test Coordinator

Symantec Corporation

Hey there, I actually helped Beta Test Norton 360 and got the coupon in my email for the $30 off, but I accidentally trashed that email.

I can't even find an email to email Symantec about this, does anyone have a copy of that email? And how does it, will they verify my email address with the email I used to sign up for the beta?

I tried Norton 360 after reading this thread.

Yes it takes very little memory and is far faster than previous Symantec creations. But I double click on "My Computer" and it takes longer than usual to load. I double click on C: Drive and then back "Up" and Explorer is blank, its only for about 3 seconds, but that's long enough for me to think if this is how Norton 360 is meant to impact on a Core 2 Duo with loads of RAM and Fast SATA II Hard Disks. :ermm: I then start browsing through folders, there is a noticeable lag there too.

Norton is only a temporary visitor on my PC. My utility box runs NOD32 and its perfect. My gam3rz r0xx0r b0xx0r runs registered AntiVir and there is no noticeable impact on performance and both of these product score better than Norton.

If I were to write a review I would say that Norton 360 is an improvement over previous resource hogging versions, but its not 100% better at best maybe 30% better than previous Norton Antivirus packages.

  • 2 weeks later...

Currently, am using Rogers Yahoo! Norton Security Online version 10.2.0.30

Uses one process, and it uses less then 800k of ram.

in the processes tab, there are five of them.

  • 1 month later...

I tried the trial version (I was in beta but could'nt install in my system for some reason), the only thing about this program is you cannot customize the firewall and antivirus, backup utility just suks. I bought Internet Security 2007 couple of months ago I think I will stick to that until they come out with better software, don't get me wrong norton has a great concept but just did'nt took as much time to work at it.

Hey there, I actually helped Beta Test Norton 360 and got the coupon in my email for the $30 off, but I accidentally trashed that email.

I can't even find an email to email Symantec about this, does anyone have a copy of that email? And how does it, will they verify my email address with the email I used to sign up for the beta?

Yeah me too :shifty: , can I have that e-mail too.

  • 8 months later...

Like most of u I've used norton products b4& found that the system just clamps up. :crazy:

However 360 is totaly different, it runs smoothly in the background& doesnt interupt my computer use or slow down my browser.

In fact i find even running a full scan it doesnt clog the system2much, i find my spyware doctor uses more system resource.

I also found the right click¬ being able 2scan a single file strange but dont worry, 360 automatically scan that folder/file on entry

and it has picked up trojans&malware issues.

All in all its the best norton product so far &I wont change back2 my old AV&firewall apps.

Throughout 2006 I had a total of three Symantec products running: Norton Anti-Virus, Norton Systemworks, and Norton Firewall. In 2007 I saw that Symantec had released Norton 360 as a consolidation of their main PC security and maintenance components, and was happy to try it out.

I have been using the various Norton suites for several years now and have never really had any major issues with them. In the past, Norton has let you customize just about every setting. You could recieve updates when/if you want, you could schedule your scans or do them manually, and most importantly, you get detailed descriptions of what Norton is doing! With Norton 360, it appears that Symentec is trying to take the term "user friendly" to new levels.

In the previous versions of Norton, during updates you were presented with a little window that had a list of all of the components that were being updated, their file sizes, and the progress of each individual download and installation. You were also able to see if a particular update failed at the moment it failed.

In Norton 360 you are just presented with a progress animation, no details whatsoever other than "downloading" and "installing". You could have had a computer freeze, or an error, and you wouldn't know until it supposedly finished. You also don't know if you are actually downloading updated virus definitions, or just some little miscellaneous Norton update that could have waited until another time.

Also, you have no option regarding automatic updates or scanning on computer startup. Sure, you can turn off various features, but then you will be presented with a scary red X on your system tray icon. Who wants that? You are also forced to enable Automatic Windows Updates for the exact same reason.

I am the kind of user that will happily manually update or scan every day or every couple of days. But I don't like to be forced to do it by a piece of software. The protection that I have recieved from Norton 360 has been top quality as per the usual Symentec standard, but the experience of using the product is making me lean toward alternatives.

The single mistake they made with this product is in not including features for an experienced user who doesn't want to be coddled.

* * * * *

Before going into the details, SYMANTEC: where's the "selective scanning" had gone?? I spent like 15 minutes trying to find how to scan a folder/file individually with no luck!

I was also dissapointed by this. More than once after finding this out have I caught myself right-clicking on a file to scan it.

The usual cleaning stuff and a defragment program.

Hm... coming from using Norton Systemworks for many years, I was somewhat dissapointed with 360's optimization feature. As with the updates, this also does not show any sort of file details, percent fragmented, percent of optimization being completed. The native Windows defrag tool is more useful in terms of the imformation displayed.

I'm totally IMPRESSED with how Norton 360 deals with the system resources issue!

I was as well. Before I uninstalled all of my old Norton programs, I counted the background programs running and I think I had 8-10 (don't recall exactly). With 360 they've managed to integrate several services into one, ccSvcHst.exe, which controlls Live Update notifications and manages other events for the program; and ccApp.exe which I believe is an active session of the antivirus program. There are a couple of others as well, but nowhere near the bloat I had previously.

So, no issues with LUCallBackProxy.exe for you guys?

I uninstalled Norton 360, installed BitDefender, and my computer runs sooooo much faster, especially at boot. And I don't exactly have a slouch machine (Pentium D @ 3.0 Ghz, 3GB RAM, Win XP Pro SP2).

So, no issues with LUCallBackProxy.exe for you guys?

LUCallBackProxy.exe is a process that runs in the background (sometimes multiple instances of it) when the Live Update is connecting to the Symantec web server. This will normally occur after a PC reboot. It should go away after about 10 minutes or so, when the update is complete.

Did you have more specific problems with it?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Ditto that, I have a few Alexa devices around the house to control lighting and such for a disabled person I live with, and it shows a *lot* of ads on the display. The dots are simple but effective. A lot cheaper too.
    • Go for a Echo Dot or Pop instead. These Echo shows just advertise to you.
    • NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 by Razvan Serea NetSpeedTray is a lightweight, open-source Windows network monitor that shows live upload and download speeds directly on the Taskbar. Designed for efficiency, it quietly sits in the system tray, conserving CPU and battery with dynamic updates. It blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11, adapts to light/dark themes, and auto-positions to avoid overlaps. Features include accurate interface detection, customizable display, optional mini-graph, color coding, granular font and unit control, detailed per-interface history graphs, safe data management, and easy CSV export—bringing the network monitoring Windows forgot. NetSpeedTray key features: Lightweight & Efficient Runs quietly in your system tray without consuming resources. Features a "Dynamic Update Rate" that lowers refresh frequency when the network is idle to save CPU and battery life. Native Look & Feel Blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11 UI. Smart detection for light and dark taskbar themes ensures text is always visible. Intelligent & Adaptive Positioning Automatically finds empty space next to your system tray and shifts to make room for new icons, preventing overlaps. Seamless OS Integration Behaves like a native Windows component. Hides instantly with auto-hiding taskbar Hides when a fullscreen app is active Smart Network Monitoring Accurate by Default: Auto mode identifies your main internet connection and ignores noise from VPNs or virtual adapters. Easy Interface Selection: Switch effortlessly between Auto, All, or Selected network interfaces via intuitive radio buttons. Total Visual Customization Free Move Mode: Unlock and place the widget anywhere on your screen. Optional Mini-Graph: Real-time graph of recent network activity with adjustable opacity. Color Coding: Customize colors and speed thresholds to quickly see network status. Granular Display Control Text & Font: Adjust font family, size, weight, and alignment. Units: Automatic (B/s, KB/s, MB/s) or fixed Mbps display. Precision: Set decimal places and always show them for uniform appearance. Detailed & Intelligent History Graph Smart Scale: Logarithmic scale shows low-level traffic and large spikes clearly. Per-Interface Filtering: View speed history for specific adapters (Wi-Fi, Ethernet, VPN). Safe & Efficient Data Management: Adjustable retention, automatic cleanup, optimized database. Easy Data Export: Export raw data to .csv or save high-quality graphs for reports. NetSpeedTray v1.3.3: The Updater Fix A stabilization release that repairs a critical regression in v1.3.2: the app shipped without OpenSSL, which silently broke every HTTPS request — including the built-in update checker (the "Could not check for updates" error many of you hit). This release restores it, hardens the build so it can't happen again, and fixes a startup crash plus four other reported bugs. Changes: Fixed update checking — Resolved a critical issue that prevented the app from checking for updates ("Could not check for updates"). Fixed startup crash with Auto-Cycling — The app no longer crashes on launch after enabling Cycle display mode. Fixed incorrect network speeds on 10GbE adapters — Multi-gigabit network cards now display speeds correctly instead of being stuck at 0. Improved color coding — Default color is shown when idle, and color/threshold changes now apply immediately without restarting. Fullscreen visibility fix — The widget now correctly stays visible over fullscreen apps when Keep Visible is enabled. Improved AMD Ryzen temperature detection — More reliable CPU temperature monitoring for Ryzen processors. Cleaner upgrades — Installer now removes outdated application files during upgrades, preventing DLL/version conflicts while preserving user settings. Improved stability — Fixed potential DLL loading issues by excluding critical OpenSSL and NumPy components from UPX compression. Better settings window — Scrollbars removed and layout improved for a cleaner experience. Localization improvements — Updated translations and completed missing UI text across all supported languages. More reliable releases — Added regression tests covering recent critical fixes, bringing the test suite to 196 passing tests. [full release notes] Download: NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 | 87.9 MB (Open Source) Download: NetSpeedTray Portable | 101.0 MB View: NetSpeedTray Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      474
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      220
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!