Constant HDD Thrashing in Vista is Affecting Performance


Recommended Posts

My HDD activity is at a constant state of thrashing. I have noticed it mostly happens after I installed a program. Immediately after installation the HDD will just thrash on-and-on, like I have never experienced before -- it sounds like its defragging. For instance, I've just installed FEAR Combat and my HDD has been thrashing now for well over 30 minutes quite loudly. I tried playing FEAR but the thrashing lagged the hell out of the game.

I'm using the Process Monitor from Sysinternals to try and identify what is going on, and also using the Task Manager to see the I/O Read and writes. I'm having a hard time identifying what the culprit is, but the most frequently occurring processes are lsass.exe [PID 580], svchost.exe [PID 976], and explorer.exe [PID 1644].

I've disabled indexing service and even Windows Defender because it was suggested that the trashing is due to indexing. I am running no other 3rd party applications that did not come with Vista aside for the latest Nod32 trial edition. All the drivers I have installed are native except for the most recent X-FI and ATI drivers.

This is border line ridiculous and really discouraging because aside from the constant thrashing noise it is lagging the system.

Some specs that might help if anyone is interested:

2GB of RAM

AMD64 x2 3800+

Brand new Seagate Barracuda SATA 500GB 16MB Cache

Could anyone help me out?

I came here looking for a solution to this same problem. I sleep in the same room as my computer. Before it was quite, now that I have Vista, the hard drive runs non stop when im not at it. Disabled Defender and indexing as well. It almost sounds like a defrag running all the time.

I came here looking for a solution to this same problem. I sleep in the same room as my computer. Before it was quite, now that I have Vista, the hard drive runs non stop when im not at it. Disabled Defender and indexing as well. It almost sounds like a defrag running all the time.

How much HD space do you have, and what is running in the background? Even running the 64-bit version of Vista Ultimate, the fact that you have 2 GB of RAM means you should be seeing *less* thrashing unless you have a truckload of background stuff running.

Even with my mere 1 GB of RAM and Vista Ultimate 32-bit, my HD doesn't thrash that much unless it's close to being full.

(And I'm running a mere P4 Northwood-C that is clocked bone-stock.)

Experienced exactly the same problem here, drives thrashed so much it impacted on the OS's performance. However, for me, stopping Windows Defender, ReadyBoost, setting a fixed swap file and disabling scheduled defragmentation has done the trick :)

Edited by ManMountain

I had some problems with Vista causing my sata drives to make a knocking noise, usually related to the increased thrashing over XP. I disabled the automatic defrag and enabled advanced disk performance option in the device properties on each of my drives. Now they are silent.

post-192381-1172924642_thumb.jpg

I've disabled indexing service and even Windows Defender because it was suggested that the trashing is due to indexing. I am running no other 3rd party applications that did not come with Vista aside for the latest Nod32 trial edition.

Indexing service, Windows Defender scanning and Vista Defragmenter run at low I/O priority so they don't disturb the other applications i.e. they don't cause hard disk trashing.

I think your problem is Nod32.

Disabling superfetch is a stupid thing because superfetch is the main Vista's memory managment for the applications.

ReadyBoost service is also used for ReadyBoot and so disabling it is bad! (ReadyBOOT is different than ReadyBOOST, but they share the same service so if you disable readyboost service you'll lost readyboot feature!)

ReadyBoot

Windows Vista uses the same boot-time prefetching as Windows XP did if the system has less than 512MB of memory, but if the system has 700MB or more of RAM, it uses an in-RAM cache to optimize the boot process. The size of the cache depends on the total RAM available, but is large enough to create a reasonable cache and yet allow the system the memory it needs to boot smoothly.

Edited by franzon

Not to argue franzon, and I don't know what is causing the problem, exactly, but NOD32 works without this issue for me. So, it's either not NOD32 or the settings that's being used are messed up. Good info on the readyboost and readyboot, I didn't know they needed the same service running. I'll have to turn that back on as I had wondered why bootup time had increased so much. I disabled readboost (I think that's what it was called) because I don't use that..thanks for that tip. I'll try that and see if it fixes my boot slow down issue. I have been trying to figure out what caused that.

Don't disable Search, Defender, or SuperFetch. SuperFetch won't cause thrashing of your disk to any significant degree.

If you just upgraded to or installed Vista very recently, give it a couple of days to settle down. During the first day or two (or more if your computer sleeps or is off when idle) Vista has a lot of "moving in" tasks it performs to optimize your system. Indexing is one of them, but there are many others like optimizing your disk, boot-up, and more. Of course, all that stuff should only happen when the computer is idle. If it's actually impacting your usage of the system, you probably have an incompatible application or driver.

Disabling Windows services isn't a very good solution, since it won't identify the real culprit. Vista certainly wasn't designed to have constant disk thrashing happening, so there's probably some external factor causing or contributing to your problem.

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 months later...

Same problem here, Vista Premium Home edition, super-fast machine with 2GB RAM. Disabling Superfetch DID NOT fix it so I reenabled it. Same re Defender and ReadyBoost. How do I disable defrag?

Resource Monitor shows one process doing 80 MB of disk writes per second steadily! That process is identified as follows:

C:\System Volume Information\{f76b7329-2519-11dc-935b-0019d102956e}{3808876b-c176-4e48-b7ae-04046e6cc752}

I don't know what that is.

It DOES seem to happen more frequently after installing a program.

Disable(delete) any scheduled task like Windows defender scan, Defrag, Index... Vista is so "smart" that it will fire up those tasks simultaneously and kill Your HD. Marketing technologies included in Vista like superfetch are just that..marketing. Disable everything You don't need, and You certanly wont need thing like superfetch. Serach without indexing is fast enough for everything unless You have terabytes of storage and milions of files, so disable that too.

Pleas Brandon_Live and Franzon, I hear You repeat same lines again and again about transparency of Vista I/O and yet everyone here has expirienced HD trashing except for You two, or are You simply making it up as You go. Do not advertise the faults of Vista as faults of users or 3rd party apps. It was MS responsibility to make included Vista features non-intrusive, and this is what has been delivered a complete nightmare in I/O department. Beside trashing, I think everyone has been introduced to copy/move performance in Vista either through his own expirience or through reading support forums, one more bonus in Vista :)

Nod32 the culprit of HD trashing...ROFL.

Same problem here, Vista Premium Home edition, super-fast machine with 2GB RAM. Disabling Superfetch DID NOT fix it so I reenabled it. Same re Defender and ReadyBoost. How do I disable defrag?

Resource Monitor shows one process doing 80 MB of disk writes per second steadily! That process is identified as follows:

C:\System Volume Information\{f76b7329-2519-11dc-935b-0019d102956e}{3808876b-c176-4e48-b7ae-04046e6cc752}

I don't know what that is.

It DOES seem to happen more frequently after installing a program.

That process is the Volume Shadow (copy) Service, referred to as "VSS".

You can eliminate it entirely by going to Computer -> Properties -> System Protection, and unchecking a drive.

This is a service that is basically new to Windows client OS's (as of Vista). I would recommend keeping it on if you never perform backups -- it is a great way of saving differential changes to a disk at the cost of some thrashing. Yes, it triggers at the installation of programs and windows updates, and significant windows events like a backup. If you're new to the OS, it might seem like it's thrashing a lot because you're installing a lot. Like Brandon said, Vista is basically settling in, and I too recommend you let it.

Before you consider turning off the service, on the same page as the System Protection tab, hit the "System Restore..." button, then choose the option "Choose a different restore point" and analyze your last restore points. When I did this on my system, I've noted that every point was created at an installation or a significant Vista event. It seemed a lot more reasonable what it was doing rather than just arbitrary thrashing.

Granted that didn't help the fact that it takes about 20 minutes to complete the restore point on a 500gb drive. As it was stated earlier, checking the box for "Enable advanced performance" on your disk drive properties might even help that, but that's your own call.

Defrag is pretty benign and actually useful. By default it runs at 1am every Wednesday morning. Just go to task manager and reschedule it, no need to remove it.

Hope that helps.

(Edit: It looks like there are ways to selectively choose what files are backed up using VSS, and I'll research that to see if it increases the time it takes to create the VSS images. It might help those who do back up their systems fairly regularly but still want to leverage this service, while making the "thrashing" as minimal as possible.)

Edited by mram
Disable(delete) any scheduled task like Windows defender scan, Defrag, Index... Vista is so "smart" that it will fire up those tasks simultaneously and kill Your HD. Marketing technologies included in Vista like superfetch are just that..marketing. Disable everything You don't need, and You certanly wont need thing like superfetch. Serach without indexing is fast enough for everything unless You have terabytes of storage and milions of files, so disable that too.

Wrong on all counts.

  • Indexing isn't a scheduled task. Disk maintenance / Defender scans won't be scheduled to run at the same time, and shouldn't run if you're using the machine.
  • SuperFetch has nothing to do with marketing... other than the name, of course. SuperFetch extends the core Windows memory management capabilities and serves two main functions, both with the goal of making better use of memory (especially on high memory systems). First, it works to keep memory pages off the disk by pulling them out of the page file when memory becomes free. Second, it extends the prefetched/disk cache to load things into free memory before you need them.
  • The indexer isn't designed to handle millions of files. Truthfully it works its best in the normal case of less than 100,000 items indexed (my systems tend to have ~50,000 and that's then times larger than most home systems).
  • Disabling the indexer isn't a good idea for most people... disabling it will break or seriously hinder much of Explorer's functionality, both for browse (sorting/filtering/stacking/grouping) and search. It'll also prevent Start Menu search from working over your files and e-mail, and will break or hinder applications that rely on the indexer (Outlook, OneNote, and others).

Pleas Brandon_Live and Franzon, I hear You repeat same lines again and again about transparency of Vista I/O and yet everyone here has expirienced HD trashing except for You two, or are You simply making it up as You go. Do not advertise the faults of Vista as faults of users or 3rd party apps. It was MS responsibility to make included Vista features non-intrusive, and this is what has been delivered a complete nightmare in I/O department. Beside trashing, I think everyone has been introduced to copy/move performance in Vista either through his own expirience or through reading support forums, one more bonus in Vista :)

I work on Windows. The problem described is most likely caused by a third-party application or a compatibility problem. I'm also quite sure that most people aren't having disk thrashing problems with Vista. And in most cases copy/move performance via the Vista shell is significantly faster than XP (there are a few exceptions, which are being addressed).

Nod32 the culprit of HD trashing...ROFL.

That's quite possible and even likely. In fact, the number one cause of disk thrasing on Vista in my experience is a poorly behaved applications (like old versions of eTrust and in some cases NOD32) that flood the USN change journal for no reason, which might explain why lsass.exe is showing up. Another possibility is that the user had just copied a bunch of items and they were being re-ACL'd, although I believe that happens while the progress dialog is still shown.

Vista needs 4Gb of RAM for problem free experience...

vista works with alot less than 4 GB,where you got that from is beyond me.

Brandon Live:you are correct,superfetch is a good thing to have enabled,to all those that think superfetch is bad you need to try vista and test it.

I work on Windows. The problem described is most likely caused by a third-party application or a compatibility problem. I'm also quite sure that most people aren't having disk thrashing problems with Vista. And in most cases copy/move performance via the Vista shell is significantly faster than XP (there are a few exceptions, which are being addressed).

With respect, it's difficult to narrow the disk activity down generally like that. The original poster stated that the disk was thrashing while not actually doing anything in Vista. That's probably not a compatibility issue, but more a process issue. I look at my HDD (while I'm touching nothing) and after 10 minutes of churning, think to myself, "ok, something is doing something." It's just a matter of finding out what.

That's what started investigations into what is being read/written to disk, and my VSS service usage as listed above. For users like me who are comparatively new to Vista, and having large HDDs and little if no warning about the disk usage resulting of a simple program install/uninstall, it would appear to all neophytes converted to Vista that it just chews at the HDD. Fair enough, right?

I'm just saying that I've got fully 100% supported hardware and software, and can completely replicate a 20-minute "thrashing" of my HDD just by installing a program. Easily reproduced, and I've demonstrated how anyone here can do it. Not that it's a bad thing, I'm just explaining how it's happening from one point of view.

Disable(delete) any scheduled task like Windows defender scan, Defrag, Index... Vista is so "smart" that it will fire up those tasks simultaneously and kill Your HD. Marketing technologies included in Vista like superfetch are just that..marketing. Disable everything You don't need, and You certanly wont need thing like superfetch. Serach without indexing is fast enough for everything unless You have terabytes of storage and milions of files, so disable that too.

Pleas Brandon_Live and Franzon, I hear You repeat same lines again and again about transparency of Vista I/O and yet everyone here has expirienced HD trashing except for You two, or are You simply making it up as You go. Do not advertise the faults of Vista as faults of users or 3rd party apps. It was MS responsibility to make included Vista features non-intrusive, and this is what has been delivered a complete nightmare in I/O department. Beside trashing, I think everyone has been introduced to copy/move performance in Vista either through his own expirience or through reading support forums, one more bonus in Vista :)

Nod32 the culprit of HD trashing...ROFL.

Wow. Just... wow. You really have NO idea what you're talking about.

Vista needs 4Gb of RAM for problem free experience...

Yes that is definably not true, runs great on 1 GB here. Just as fast as XP. Vista did some disk thrashing to me for the first day but then it subsided, it may be settling in because you are installing many programs, and you only just installed it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
    • 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD drops to its lowest price in over three months by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the 2TB WD_Black SN7100 internal solid-state drive at its lowest price in over three months, so you may want to check it out, if you have been considering a storage upgrade, before the deal dries up (purchase link is toward the end of the article). Featuring a PCIe Gen 4.0 interface and M.2 2280 form factor, the SN7100 promises to deliver sequential read speeds of up to 7,250MB/s and sequential write speeds reaching 6,900MB/s, offering as much as a 35% improvement in performance compared with the previous generation. It also achieves random read speeds of 1,000,000 IOPS and random write speeds of 1,400,000 IOPS. The drive uses Western Digital’s TLC 3D NAND technology for reliable performance and is further supported by a five-year limited warranty. It also offers strong endurance, rated at up to 1,200TBW, making it suitable for demanding workloads such as gaming, content creation, and high-speed recording. Moreover, its DRAM-less architecture claims to improve power efficiency (the SSD relies on system memory for caching via HMB), while the WD_Black Dashboard software enables users to monitor drive health, install firmware updates, and activate Game Mode for potentially better performance. Finally, it operates within an operating temperature range of 0°C to 85°C, and can withstand storage temperatures from -40°C to 85°C. 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD: $242.96 (Amazon US) Check this deal out if you want a 4TB option. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Hopefully this will fix the issue of no sound I have since last months stupid, and non-removable, Microsoft Corporation AudioProcessingObject Driver Update (1.0.3.56670)
    • It IS confusing! What channel are you in on each device? I'm guessing your 16GB device is on Experimental (formerly known as Dev) and your 128GB is on Beta.
    • 100 for the base game , 120 for pre release with bonus unlocked content (a pair of boil washed underpants for Trevor)
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!