Constant HDD Thrashing in Vista is Affecting Performance


Recommended Posts

With respect, it's difficult to narrow the disk activity down generally like that. The original poster stated that the disk was thrashing while not actually doing anything in Vista. That's probably not a compatibility issue, but more a process issue. I look at my HDD (while I'm touching nothing) and after 10 minutes of churning, think to myself, "ok, something is doing something." It's just a matter of finding out what.

That's what started investigations into what is being read/written to disk, and my VSS service usage as listed above. For users like me who are comparatively new to Vista, and having large HDDs and little if no warning about the disk usage resulting of a simple program install/uninstall, it would appear to all neophytes converted to Vista that it just chews at the HDD. Fair enough, right?

I'm just saying that I've got fully 100% supported hardware and software, and can completely replicate a 20-minute "thrashing" of my HDD just by installing a program. Easily reproduced, and I've demonstrated how anyone here can do it. Not that it's a bad thing, I'm just explaining how it's happening from one point of view.

In my earlier response I pointed out that disk activity during idle time is normal for the first couple days (sometimes more, or less, depending on if you turn your computer off, power settings, etc), as Vista is performing its "moving in" tasks. Once that's completed, you'll normally only have disk activity during idle time during scheduled defrags, anti-virus scans, etc. Of course, if you move thousands of files in or out of indexed locations, it may take a short time for the indexer to catch up. But that shouldn't affect performance of your system at all.

What I was referring to was actual disk "thrashing" that negatively impacts performance of the system. There are lots of possible causes of that, but disabling system services isn't the right solution to any of them.

If running out of RAM is the cause of the hard drive "thrashing" (which I've seen on numerious machines), and consequently Vista starts using more and more page file space, then disabling services would help reduce the amount of system memory required.

I installed a recent newer revision of my chipset driver and enabled SuperFetch again. It seems to be acting properly now. No more constant chaotic hard drive thrashing that impacted performance. Though, during the time I had SuperFetch disabled I may have updated NOD32 to a newer revision, and updated my X-Fi drivers several times as well, so I'm not sure what exactly was causing SuperFetch to go haywire.

On 512MB of RAM, Vista Ultimate Aero Theme, with a few of the tweaks I've made *Tweaks in the system that anybody can do following the guides online*, I've managed to speed up vista...

I have KIS 7.0 running in the background, doing 4 scans right now, the only problem is, explorer, scanning stuff, etc...with normal programs and such is insanely slow and I have to leave the computer and let it do its thing or else it'll freeeze....and the Disk Cleanup problem I have.....which eats away my GB's, with no help from anyone it looks like a system restore for the 15th time is the only solution....

Vista wasn't meant for 512MB, but, with these changes I've made, I could only imagine if I had 1GB of RAM, how much faster everything would be...

if anyone wants, I'd be glad posting a complete guide to what I've done, if I can make this 512MB Vista Ultimate Aero machine fast, then if you have a GB of RAM there's hope for you, you just have to knwo what to do...

My internet pages load in a matter of seconds, but it took many months of system restores and studying Vista, testing out everything people say to see what works and what doesn't....

The thing is, no matter how much cpu and such experience you have it doesn't mean you know anything about what's needed to understand the OS good enough....

I know absolutely nothing about computers except RAM, but I know allot about the Vista OS....

My Vista computer makes absolutely no noise at all, even as I'm typing this, with four scanners in the background, and scanners that are always running on my comp anytime it's turned on, I have no problems at all.....

I just came erlier from playing CS on steam, no slow down at all, no freeezing up or anything...

I always here how 1GB is the minimum, but that's suggested only for experience Vista OS users...if not, I'd say about one GB more..

i found that my hdd thrashing was due to vista attempting to defrag my 3 disks and never finishing it so it was always trying. i did a manual defrag and left it for about a day. now its much better.

also, the indexing service is useless... its for the xp/2000 style indexed search. you can disable it and still have the vista style instant search (thats the searchindexer service)

Don't disable Search, Defender, or SuperFetch. SuperFetch won't cause thrashing of your disk to any significant degree.

If you just upgraded to or installed Vista very recently, give it a couple of days to settle down. During the first day or two (or more if your computer sleeps or is off when idle) Vista has a lot of "moving in" tasks it performs to optimize your system. Indexing is one of them, but there are many others like optimizing your disk, boot-up, and more. Of course, all that stuff should only happen when the computer is idle. If it's actually impacting your usage of the system, you probably have an incompatible application or driver.

Disabling Windows services isn't a very good solution, since it won't identify the real culprit. Vista certainly wasn't designed to have constant disk thrashing happening, so there's probably some external factor causing or contributing to your problem.

I've been using Vista Ultimate since RTM and to this day! it still runs the HDD like CRAZY! and the only apps we have on this system is AOL IM and Photoshop... and when I checked what was doing it in process explorer it went right back to the new search indexer... disable that and all is fine... but re-enable it and run like crazy again... even though there really isnt anything to index on the system... I dont store data files on it... just the system and program files

  • 3 months later...

Had the same problem and tried disabling indexing etc and all services not required but still constant thrashing.

Try checking your hard drive. I found about 4kb of bad sectors. Imaged the data to a slower drive and problem solved

Vista now silent.

Hope this helps.

  • 1 month later...

Superfetch is terrible IMO. Maybe it doesn't work right on my system due to bad drivers (even though I have all the latest installed), who knows. But when it's enabled my HDD starts thrashing like crazy.

When I disable it, programs still load fast, and I experience no thrashing. This is not on a new Vista installation either (it's about one month old).

AMD X2 5000+

2GB RAM

8600 GT

Superfetch is terrible IMO. Maybe it doesn't work right on my system due to bad drivers (even though I have all the latest installed), who knows. But when it's enabled my HDD starts thrashing like crazy.

When I disable it, programs still load fast, and I experience no thrashing. This is not on a new Vista installation either (it's about one month old).

AMD X2 5000+

2GB RAM

8600 GT

SuperFetch makes programs start faster on cold boot. But more importantly, it swaps pages back into memory after they've been paged to disk (when memory becomes available again).

With respect, it's difficult to narrow the disk activity down generally like that.

>snip<

I'm just saying that I've got fully 100% supported hardware and software, and can completely replicate a 20-minute "thrashing" of my HDD just by installing a program. Easily reproduced, and I've demonstrated how anyone here can do it. Not that it's a bad thing, I'm just explaining how it's happening from one point of view.

Wow... you've got 100% supported hardware and software and can replicate 'thrashing' by installing "a program"....

sounds like that "program" may be the culprit... if you subscribe to the 'LOGICAL' train of thought.

I find it odd that people believe that the operating system is at fault when things go wrong when they install a program.

No one seems to think that it could be that 'program' causing the problem.

I disable most of the lousy apps and Vista runs almost like XP.

1. Disable Search Indexer (Good idea that Microsoft ruined)

2. Disable Volume Shadow copy (System Restore) = (Acronis True Image is better)

3. Hibernation (I never Hibernate my desktop)

4. Disable Sleep Mode (Suspend to RAM + 24/7 operation + UPS)

5. Turn off Remote Differential Compression

6. Turn off Automatic Windows Defender

7. Turn off Automatic Disk Defragmentation

8. Disable User Access Control or use TweakUAC

9. Disable Microsoft Transient Multi-Monitor Manager (Annoying delay at boot)

Edited by hardgiant
I disable most of the lousy apps and Vista runs almost like XP.

1. Disable Search Indexer (Good idea that Microsoft ruined)

2. Disable Volume Shadow copy (System Restore) = (Acronis True Image is better)

3. Hibernation (I never Hibernate my desktop)

4. Disable Sleep Mode (Suspend to RAM + 24/7 operation + UPS)

5. Turn off Remote Differential Compression

6. Turn off Automatic Windows Defender

7. Turn off Automatic Disk Defragmentation

8. Disable User Access Control or use TweakUAC

9. Disable Microsoft Transient Multi-Monitor Manager (Annoying delay at boot)

Why not use XP then, you've disabledf half of vista's new features :) The only one i turn off is the disk defrag which sucks because it takes so damn long, I use auslogics and can defrag my whole 250 gb drive in a couple minutes, whereas vista's defrag will take THREE HOURS. I love the instant search and is the main thing I miss in XP, superfetch actualy has a very noticable difference to me, some apps in vista are launching way faster than in XP.

I find the multi monitor thing is something I might want to disable though because I will probably never use to monitors, how do you disable it?

This is a really long thread and you're not going to read this... but do you know what I think really speeds vista up? Leaving your computar on continuously. I think it give all the services the time to do what they want, so they don't have to run when the computer is not idle.

I don't disable any major features on the laptop, and it's only got 1GB ram. But, it runs faster then XP thanks to teh vista technology. I'm guessing, with your complaints, that you turn your computar off.

vista works with alot less than 4 GB,where you got that from is beyond me.

Brandon Live:you are correct,superfetch is a good thing to have enabled,to all those that think superfetch is bad you need to try vista and test it.

To be more precise. I would not run Vista itself with 1Gb of RAM. 2GB of RAM is ok to run Vista itself and simple apps, but then if you have opened 3 instances of Visual Studio 2005/2008 along with Word and IE or you want to play Crysis with high/very high details then 2GB wont cut it.

So I say 4GB + Raid 0 HDD is a way to go with Vista.

To be more precise. I would not run Vista itself with 1Gb of RAM. 2GB of RAM is ok to run Vista itself and simple apps, but then if you have opened 3 instances of Visual Studio 2005/2008 along with Word and IE or you want to play Crysis with high/very high details then 2GB wont cut it.

So I say 4GB + Raid 0 HDD is a way to go with Vista.

Your name is "freak_power" for a reason I guess, haha.

To be more precise. I would not run Vista itself with 1Gb of RAM. 2GB of RAM is ok to run Vista itself and simple apps, but then if you have opened 3 instances of Visual Studio 2005/2008 along with Word and IE or you want to play Crysis with high/very high details then 2GB wont cut it.

So I say 4GB + Raid 0 HDD is a way to go with Vista.

Not everyone can afford 4GB and RAID 0. 2GB works perfectly fine for those tasks, which is how my laptop runs. 1GB works fine too.

512MB works fine for normal app usage and Basic / Classic mode.

I've been running Windows Vista on 2 GB of RAM just fine, I use Photoshop CS3 intensively with very large photographs along with multiple Internet Explorer windows, Windows Live Messenger 8.5, Microsoft Word, EditPlus 2, Dreamweaver CS3, etc and Windows has never slowed down on me, I rarely restart my notebook either, usually just hibernate or sleep. I haven't had hard drive thrashing either, and the indexer works just fine.

  • 1 year later...

I have this same problem and I'm still in the process of getting rid of it. I ran SpinRight on my drive, so I know my drive is 100% ok.

I have Norton 2009 which did remove some viruses a few weeks ago. My belief is that I have some left over from these malware/viruses. Anyway, I figured out through trial and error after trying everything listed in this thread that if I created a new admin profile and logged into that profile the thrashing went away.

So I ran msconfig in the profile that is having the hdd thrashing and shut off all the startup items that I didn't want or didn't know about. After a reboot I realized, by running msconfig again and looking at the startup tab, that there were two rundll32.exe programs running at startup. They were starting dll's in my profile's appdata/local/temp directory. khFWpOHb.dll and opNhFuTm.dll. So I changed these to not start up, logged into my other admin profile and deleted these 2 files from temp. After logging back into my regular profile the noise was gone for about a minute or two. Then the files came back again and the hdd thrashing started up as soon as the files showed up.

I am now in the process of running malwarebytes, which I downloaded from malwarebytes.org. It's definitely found some stuff. I'll let you know what happens when it's done.

If the hdd thrashing doesn't go away after that I will log into my other profile again, delete those files and create empty text files with the same names. I will then make them read only and see if that works.

If that doesn't work I will call it quits and just migrate some of my pictures and stuff to the new profile and delete the bad profile.

Wish me luck. I'll write back later to tell you what happened.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
    • 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD drops to its lowest price in over three months by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the 2TB WD_Black SN7100 internal solid-state drive at its lowest price in over three months, so you may want to check it out, if you have been considering a storage upgrade, before the deal dries up (purchase link is toward the end of the article). Featuring a PCIe Gen 4.0 interface and M.2 2280 form factor, the SN7100 promises to deliver sequential read speeds of up to 7,250MB/s and sequential write speeds reaching 6,900MB/s, offering as much as a 35% improvement in performance compared with the previous generation. It also achieves random read speeds of 1,000,000 IOPS and random write speeds of 1,400,000 IOPS. The drive uses Western Digital’s TLC 3D NAND technology for reliable performance and is further supported by a five-year limited warranty. It also offers strong endurance, rated at up to 1,200TBW, making it suitable for demanding workloads such as gaming, content creation, and high-speed recording. Moreover, its DRAM-less architecture claims to improve power efficiency (the SSD relies on system memory for caching via HMB), while the WD_Black Dashboard software enables users to monitor drive health, install firmware updates, and activate Game Mode for potentially better performance. Finally, it operates within an operating temperature range of 0°C to 85°C, and can withstand storage temperatures from -40°C to 85°C. 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD: $242.96 (Amazon US) Check this deal out if you want a 4TB option. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!