MS: $4,000 for Daylight Saving Fix


Recommended Posts

As for 4,000$ - what about small businesses with say 25 employees that have a single Windows 2000 small business server and Exchange? 4k$ just so their mail won't go bonkers over it?

They can manually change the time. It's not that difficult. Larger corporations though, it would take a while and they would probably just buy the fix.

This is what happens when you work with an old OS as Win2k, when they didn't do SP5 it was a sign, time to update, PCs are pretty cheap, I know small business with 25 PC's might not have the hardware to run XP or even Vista, but seriouslly, a basic work only oriented PC goes for $400-$500, If you don't have the money to upgrade all 25 of them just do it slowlly over time.

You're a small "business" so you are making money right? And for home users, Win2k is 7 years old, the PC you're running it on is probably older than that, you can upgrade you know, people get a new car around that age also. If you don't want to go all out just get a cheaper one, whole packs with screen and printer go for $500.

I bought my copy at WALMART. Doesnt get much more consumer aimed than that lol.

Totally agree, there were as many home users of 2000 Professional as there are home users of XP Professional. 2000 Professional is the only Microsoft retail boxed operating system that I have ever purchased and did so at the time from Office Depot. A lot of people were tired of the instability of 98/ME and looking for something reliable to game on, Windows 2000 offered that before XP release and a lot of home consumers made the switch.

Well I'd rather pay $4000 than the previous $40,000 cost. It's corporate support pricing people. This to companies would be seen as a bargain, not a rip off.

Well said!

They can manually change the time. It's not that difficult. Larger corporations though, it would take a while and they would probably just buy the fix.
is it so hard to change the date by hand? and for big companies where changing by hand is impossible 4000$ is nothing

Its not the issue of computer time here.. the clock thats displayed in the taskbar is easy to update... but for corporate clients, people use Outlook and professionals take the calender feature seriously because I can send an email as a calendar event and it is automatically added to the calendar... many meetings and whatever else there is will get messed up because it would be VERY unprofessional for a successful company to tell their workers to just keep in their minds that DST started already.. Not everyone is going to remember and what kind of a company is it when they cant afford a $4000 patch?

Oh, please. The differences between XP and 2000 more or less come down to a coat of ugly paint. If 2000 is "legacy" then so is XP.

how do u figure theyre that similar? xp has so much more than a different appearance.

also, i dont understand why xp can be upgraded with multiple hotfixes, security updates, and two service packs, but you cant put some code to change the time/date? maybe i dont completely understand but this doesnt make much sense to me

how do u figure theyre that similar? xp has so much more than a different appearance.

Because XP, especially before SP2, was more or less 2000? XP was a .1 version increase compared to 2000 (NT 5.0 vs. NT 5.1). The actual differences under the hood between the two versions was probably close to nil before SP2, aside from the fact that XP was dumbed-down for computer illiterate people.

lol!

That made my day.

The people that make these decisions at MS are so out of touch with reality.

Are they? How long do you think Microsoft should support, for free, products with updates like this? Especially non-security updates that very few people are ever going to notice or care about.

$4,000 may seem ridiculous, but you've got to consider what it costs to make that patch, test it, distribute it, and support it. It's not worth it for Microsoft to invest in a fix for products that old unless someone is willing to pay the cost of doing it.

Because XP, especially before SP2, was more or less 2000? XP was a .1 version increase compared to 2000 (NT 5.0 vs. NT 5.1). The actual differences under the hood between the two versions was probably close to nil before SP2, aside from the fact that XP was dumbed-down for computer illiterate people.

That's a pretty ridiculous thing to say. Yeah, I'd agree they're more similar than NT4 and 2000, or Windows XP and Windows Vista. But saying the differences under the hood were "probably close to nil" is a completely ignorant comment.

Sounds like extortion to me, a lot of companies run Windows 2k for certain appliance platforms (such as a device to mange/control air conditioners; machines that required absolutely no access to the internet and run for years.

Is it really the customer's fault that the daylight savings time had to be adjusted? I still feel like it was a silly decision in the fist place.

Is it really the customer's fault that the daylight savings time had to be adjusted? I still feel like it was a silly decision in the fist place.

I mean.. if we wanna go around trying to find a party to blame, lets blame the Bush Administration for doing it.. You can't really blame the companies either if you think that its not the customer's fault. Because there is nothing a company could have done in say 2000 to predict that the DST is gonna start like a month early.. So yeah... technically Microsoft doesn't even have to do it, but they are doing it for the customer and if the customer wants it, they have to pay for it... and when I say customer in the last couple of references, I mean companies and not individuals... If an individual is still using Windows 2000, then he/she probably doesn't do enough with times and things that might mess up their schedules and what not..

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The sweet release of death has never looked more appealing.
    • Meh, just another dongle-haven downgrade compared to my Surface Pro 7+. Whenever I decide to upgrade in the next decade or so, it certainly won't be another microslop Surface with this enshitification trend they've been having after the Surface Pro 7+. Hopefully a future generation of the Framework 12 will be a real upgrade...
    • This could exactly be how our Sun ends but it's not as simple by Sayan Sen Image by Drew Rae via Pexels An international team led by Université de Montréal (University of Montreal) PhD student Érika Le Bourdais has found that the ancient white dwarf star LSPM J0207+3331 is still pulling in planetary debris, even though it has been cooling for about three billion years. White dwarfs are dense, Earth-sized stellar remnants left behind when Sun-like stars exhaust their nuclear fuel and shed their outer layers. The star, located 145 light-years away in the constellation Triangulum, is the oldest and coldest white dwarf known to have a surrounding disk of dust. The star was first spotted in 2019 by a citizen scientist through the Backyard Worlds: Planet 9 project. Its cool temperature immediately suggested that it was very old, since white dwarfs gradually lose heat over time. Using the W. M. Keck telescopes in Hawaii, astronomers later confirmed that the star shows infrared signals consistent with dust rings formed by asteroids breaking apart under its strong gravity. Such infrared excesses occur when a star emits more infrared light than expected, often because warm dust surrounding it absorbs and re-radiates energy. “This discovery challenges our understanding of planetary system evolution,” said Le Bourdais. “The fact that we still see planetary debris being accreted three billion years after the star became a white dwarf suggests that asteroids, comets, and even planets can remain in orbit around these stars for a very long time.” Spectroscopic analysis—a technique that studies light to identify the chemical elements present in an object—revealed thirteen heavy elements in the star’s atmosphere: sodium, magnesium, aluminium, silicon, calcium, titanium, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, and strontium. Normally, heavy elements sink quickly in hydrogen-rich white dwarfs, making them hard to detect. “We expected to see only a few elements, but we found dozens!” explained Le Bourdais. The research paper adds more detail. The absence of carbon features suggests the debris came from a carbon-volatile-depleted source. The abundance pattern shows slight deficits of magnesium and silicon compared to iron but otherwise resembles Earth-like material. This points to a differentiated rocky body—one whose materials have separated into distinct layers such as a metallic core and rocky mantle—with a metallic core fraction higher than Earth’s. In other words, the star is accreting the remains of a large rocky object, similar in structure to Earth or the asteroid Vesta. “White dwarfs offer one of the only ways we can directly measure the composition of exoplanets,” said Patrick Dufour, co-author and professor at Université de Montréal. “When planetary debris come too close, they are torn apart by the star’s gravity and end up polluting its atmosphere, leaving a detailed chemical fingerprint of its composition.” The team also detected weak Ca II H & K line core emission, making this only the second known isolated polluted white dwarf to show this feature. These are specific spectral signatures produced by ionised calcium and can indicate unusual physical activity in a star’s upper atmosphere. The finding suggests that extra physical processes may be happening in or above the star’s upper atmosphere. The study stresses the importance of including heavy elements in model atmosphere calculations, since leaving them out can distort the inferred structure and lead to inaccurate stellar parameters. Earlier work suggested the star’s infrared excess came from two dust rings. The new analysis shows that a single silicate dust disk—a ring composed largely of rock-forming minerals rich in silicon and oxygen—can explain the observed signal at 11.6 μm, simplifying the picture of the system’s structure. The question of how debris ended up falling into the star so late remains open. One idea is that giant planets in the system slowly destabilised smaller bodies over billions of years. Another possibility is that a passing star disturbed the orbits of debris. “Future observations with the James Webb Space Telescope or archival data found in the European Space Agency’s Gaia mission could help distinguish between a planetary rearrangement and the gravitational effect of a close stellar encounter,” said John Debes, co-author and researcher at the Space Telescope Science Institute. Dufour noted that hydrogen-rich white dwarfs are the most common type, and the coolest among them are the oldest stars in the galaxy. “We didn't have the habit of looking for signs of accretion in them. This unique case motivates us to expand our search to more of these stars.” The findings show that even after billions of years, planetary systems can remain active and complex. Substantial accretion events—the gradual accumulation of surrounding material onto a celestial object—can still occur long after a star’s death, offering a rare window into the composition and fate of distant worlds. Source: University of Montreal, IOPScience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Doesn't DDG mainly use Bing?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Week One Done
      oliviaexpo earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      485
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      228
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      70
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      58
    5. 5
      neufuse
      56
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!