Vista Activation Cracked By Brute Force


Recommended Posts

I'll assume there's around 2^32 (about 4 billion) "valid" keys (in the sense that local activation accepts them). So assuming you can test even 2^30 (1 billion) keys per second, it would still take 2^(111-30-32) = 2^49 seconds = billions of years until you expect to find 1 locally valid key. So the author must be using some math to eliminate certain classes of keys.

well yes isnt that the point of hacking? to find vulnerbilities in the algorithm used?

I'll assume there's around 2^32 (about 4 billion) "valid" keys (in the sense that local activation accepts them). So assuming you can test even 2^30 (1 billion) keys per second, it would still take 2^(111-30-32) = 2^49 seconds = billions of years until you expect to find 1 locally valid key. So the author must be using some math to eliminate certain classes of keys.

They are really going to have problems once someone harnesses the power of using an Nvidia 8800 as a so called "super computer". That could probably generate keys in seconds/minutes.

They go to all this trouble with one time activation schemes... I personally just wouldn't mind buying Windows on a subscription model at say $10/month for a Home Edition, $15 for a Professional Edition even if it required a constant internet connection and regular subscription verification (much like Steam) and then I wouldn't feel so jipped when I wanted to upgrade to the next operating system version or have the flexibility to upgrade/downgrade distributions.

They go to all this trouble with one time activation schemes... I personally just wouldn't mind buying Windows on a subscription model at say $10/month for a Home Edition, $15 for a Professional Edition even if it required a constant internet connection and regular subscription verification (much like Steam) and then I wouldn't feel so jipped when I wanted to upgrade to the next operating system version or have the flexibility to upgrade/downgrade distributions.

hmm 5 years * 12 months = 60 months * 15$ per month = 900$

hmm 5 years * 12 months = 60 months * 15$ per month = 900$

Ok... poor example... assuming that new versions of Windows were available on a three - four year window and not the XP - Vista gap. You could also include all support such as service packs and updates as revisions of current versions that you are getting for free now. Point being I hate to purchase an additional XP licence say in July 2006 with Vista release only 6 months away $250 vs 15*6 = $90 so depends on the case of purchase and use. Appropriate pricing to be determined later, and I'm sure the traditional purchase method would still be available.

So, basically what this program does is find a genuine cd-key that's being sold in stores? If this is the case, Microsoft has a problem of catastrophic dimension in their hands right now. :o

well according to the forum the script can only do 10000 keys in 30 minutes so youd be lucky to find a legit key in your lifetime.

honestly my vista cant stay up long enough without bsod'ing for me to really test it out.

I think this article is being overreacted on.

In my country vista business costs about 160 bux ;) Is it worth it?

i got my ultimate x64 for 159? (SB Version).

that sux, really! hope MS get it fixed for themselfes and for US!!! i think, that not only me was exited about vista and bought it for his hard earned money. i don?t care when they get "new" keys and MS can blacklist them and they have to do it again, but to generate keys that already are on the booklets and the new ones comming to stores, thats bad.

that freak is a sucker*, hope they get him, i dont care, because i payed for my vista:crazy:zy:

i got my ultimate x64 for 159? (SB Version).

that sux, really! hope MS get it fixed for themselfes and for US!!! i think, that not only me was exited about vista and bought it for his hard earned money. i don?t care when they get "new" keys and MS can blacklist them and they have to do it again, but to generate keys that already are on the booklets and the new ones comming to stores, thats bad.

that freak is a sucker*, hope they get him, i dont care, because i payed for my vista:crazy:zy:

I can't stop laughin:laugh:gh:

I have a legal license myself but that must be the dumbest thing I've ever heard.

If Vista wasn't overpriced, why would you care about people getting it for free?

Doom that version of vista is OEM and i think your only allowed to install it on the computer ya using and not allowed any hardware modifications, i think.

But ill be getting the OEM version to and ill change what i want and if microsoft say ya cant ill say well why the **** do ya need 2 OS's on 1 disk, your only gonna use one of em. Then they want to make ya pay ?328 and they call that a good deal, yeah whatever more like forcing both OS's on ya to increase there money cus they know theyve done a **** job with vista.

If they new they couldnt include all the good stuff like the new filesystem they should of ditched that stuff years ago and kept to a decent release date. Instead its us suckers that gotta pay for there mistake

Doom that version of vista is OEM and i think your only allowed to install it on the computer ya using and not allowed any hardware modifications, i think.

But ill be getting the OEM version to and ill change what i want and if microsoft say ya cant ill say well why the **** do ya need 2 OS's on 1 disk, your only gonna use one of em. Then they want to make ya pay ?328 and they call that a good deal, yeah whatever more like forcing both OS's on ya to increase there money cus they know theyve done a **** job with vista.

If they new they couldnt include all the good stuff like the new filesystem they should of ditched that stuff years ago and kept to a decent release date. Instead its us suckers that gotta pay for there mistake

SB is system builder edition, you have to choose bevor you buy in 32bit or 64bit. its one user license, yes, and about that hardware change, they can?t do it here because of the laws (germany), you can change hardware and activate again.

@SBeaver: i dont get you, why you have to laugh and why its dumb what i said? this why i payed 159? and not 499?.

i dont understand you

IT LOOKS LIKE Microsoft's unhackable OS activation malware has been hacked.
Not even MS said it was unhackable, so why do things like this keep being spread. Also, brute force generation is not really a crack; a crack involves bypassing a protection, while brute forcing is really just trying a whole lot of keys. Any protection using keys or passwords is "vulnerable" to that really, the difference is just how long it takes. But that's mostly semantics. What's important to both MS and priates alike is if this method is efficient enough. :)
I always wondered why we were still at a mere 25 digits for cd keys. I wonder how many people will bother trying this, as opposed to the "other methods".

What I'm surprised about is how bruteforcing can be possible even now...

25 characters with 26 (letters) + 10 (digits) combinations each => 25^36 combinations. That number is 50 digits long!

211758236813575084767080625169910490512847900390625 combinations.

I don't really get how they can do this in a viable way still... They have to have figured out a way to reduce the number of permutations far below 26^36 somehow, perhaps by figuring out the key algorithm and not trying *all* combinations. That would just be ridiculous! Perhaps they're able to just try out for a specific Vista Edition, but it still feels like a whole lot! 100 million "valid" keys among all those combinations would still just be a drop in the ocean?

Edited by Jugalator
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think the car analogy is more this: Left hand drive, basic commands on the left side of the infotainment screen. Right hand drive, basic commands on the right side of the infotainment screen. Granted, you're not swapping between the two often so it's doesn't really work. But it's to do with the proximity of you (your mouse, or the driver) to the controls.
    • I mean, the old one was broken and so stupidly complex for many users, so I don't see that as a feasible option. A context menu needs to be simple to use, and for me the Windows 11 style actually worked really well for me, and many others. I used to have to scroll the damn context menu just to get to "file properties" in Windows 10. That was not a good experience, and I'm sure you'd agree. What they're trying to do is make it the best of both worlds, as clearly you'd prefer the Win10 style. I'm curious how they're going to do this.
    • The "Show more options" has its place, as does the simpler context menu, but it should perhaps be a separate fly-out rather than relaunching the entire, old context menu. The old context menu was getting absurd in Windows 10. Often I'd have to make the context menu scroll just to get to "File properties" on my old laptop. Even without much installed, the amount of items was just too much. It's a context menu, not a "do all" menu. Making it configurable is fraught with challenges too, so I'm interested to see how Microsoft tackles this one.
    • I don't hate the new menus, I am not a fan of the lack of features and how they went live when they clearly are not complete. The menu itself presents much better than the previous - but what's lacking (IMO) is: 1) Any kind of automated manipulation such as: "this goes on the new menu because you use this feature more often on this filetype" "this is rarely used and will fall back to the old menu" 2) Any kind of user manipulation such as: "a UI to add/remove/order items to the new menu"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      I2D earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      484
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      260
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      84
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      64
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      63
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!