Microsoft HD Photo Plug-in for Adobe Photoshop


Recommended Posts

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details...;DisplayLang=en

This is the Windows BETA release of the HD Photo file format plug-in forAdobe? Photoshop? software. It supports a wide range of pixel formats (including high dynamic range, wide gamut formats) and numerous advanced HD Photo features.

This BETA plug-in is designed for use with the CS2 or CS3 versions of Adobe? Photoshop? software running under Microsoft Windows XP or Microsoft Windows Vista. Any other use is not supported. Because this is a BETA release, we recommend you use careful judgment before using this version of the plug-in for any production work. This BETA version will expire after May 31st, 2007.

NOTE: HD Photo is also known as Windows Media Photo.

"HD Photo Plug-in for Adobe? Photoshop? Software"

Care to explain better what you mean? Because I don't see "windows" anywhere in that name.

windows media photo is the format name, not the plug-in name.

So how do you use this plugin?

You import a JPEG photo file, use this plug-in to convert it to a Higher quality HD format?? (doesn't make sense)

No no, this plug-in allows photoshop to have the ability to read, open, edit, and save this new format. If you're starting with a .jpeg photo you've already lost the battle.

As a follow-up to the front-page article comparing Png, Jpg and HD Photo (https://www.neowin.net/index.php?act=view&id=38679), I decided to do the same comparison with Png, Jpg and Jpg2000.

Unlike with HD Photo, you need neither Vista nor Photoshop for Jpeg2000 - I used the freeware program FastStone Image Viewer 3.0 :)

Settings were (unless otherwise noted)

Png: compression 9 (24bit)

Jpg: Quality 80, Flota, Rgb, optimized Huffman, not progressive

Jp2 (Jpeg2000): Rate 80, Rgb

Here are the individual pics from the comparison (Png, Jpg and Jp2) in one zip file:

http://rapidshare.com/files/20357860/Neowi...arison.zip.html

1. Neowin logo

I've included some text here so we can see how well it fares there as well.

Comparison Png - Jpg - Jp2

neowin-logo-comparison.png

File sizes Png - Jpg - Jp2: 36.5kB - 26.8kB - 30.5kB

2. Colour table

Using maximum quality settings: Jpeg 100% Quality, Jpeg2000 Rate 1000 (lossless)

File sizes Png - Jpg - Jp2: 5.19kB - 178kB - 117kB

3. MS Logo

I downloaded a lossless Tiff logo from the MS Presspass site for comparison purposes.

The original Tiff is 1746x345 and 200kB in size. I resized it to 300x64 for better side-to-side comparison.

The Png file is 17.2kB. Now I want to reduce the file size to roughly a third. With Jpeg, I get a 6,1kB file with 25% quality, and it looks very mushy. With Jpeg2000, even with Rate 100 and great quality, the file size is only 5.6kB.

915 x 61 - Click to view full image

windowsxp2-comparison.png.xs.jpg

4. Bill Gates photo

I got a high res photo of Bill Gates from the Presspass site (2704x4064, 4.5MB Jpg) and resized it to 400x600. As Jpeg with 100% quality, it's 317kB.

To cut down on file size, I reduced the quality to 25%, which gave a 52.1kB Jpg. With Jpeg2000, I can go up to Rate 75, which gives a 51.9kB file, and it doesn't look any different from the Jpeg 100% quality file.

Comparison of Jpeg 100% - Jpeg 25% - Jpeg2000 R75 (the latter two have the same file size!)

1202 x 599 - Click to view full image

billg5web-comparison.png.xs.jpg

5. Microsoft 1978 photo

Finally, I used the Microsoft 1978 image to have a group photo comparison. I had to resize the original photo to 200x158 to get rid of the artifacts.

I again saved this as Jpeg with 25% quality, resulting in a 9.3kB file. With Jpeg2000, I can set it to Rate 100, resulting in a 9.2kB file.

Comparison original resized pic - Jpeg 25% - Jpeg2000 R100

600 x 156 - Click to view full image

Microsoft1978-comparison.png.xs.jpg

Concluding I can say that Jpeg2000 is significantly better than ordinary Jpeg, and it also fares better than the MS HD photo format.

What's more, you need neither Vista nor Adobe Photoshop for Jpeg2000, a freeware program like FastStone Image Viewer 3.0 is already enough. It can even batch-convert your files into Jpeg2000 if you want.

Here are the individual pics from the comparison (Png, Jpg and Jp2) in one zip file:

http://rapidshare.com/files/20357860/Neowi...arison.zip.html

Edited by Aero Ultimate
So how do you use this plugin?

You import a JPEG photo file, use this plug-in to convert it to a Higher quality HD format?? (doesn't make sense)

If I understand correctly, you would take a RAW image file (like from a digital camera) and open it in PS to save to the HD format. You get better quality with a smaller file. I haven't really got into details about the format but I assume that's what it is for.

I've now done a follow-up comparison with Jpg and Jp2, using the uncompressed Tiff files from the new front page article as a basis:

https://www.neowin.net/index.php?act=view&id=38688

You can see my results here:

https://www.neowin.net/index.php?act=view&a...&cid=536332

Aero Ultimate, your maturity level is really something for other members to look up to. :rolleyes:

You re-compressed JPG (JPG is a lossy format) images that you downloaded from the web. Your evaluation of file formats has failed. You're straying even further from the original photos by converting to PNG in addition to other file formats and using the PNG as a control.

It seems that you wouldn't know how to use the scientific process if it bit you in the ***.

Nice try, albeit useless and off-topic.

Whatever the tests may show, we are using a beta plug-in, Who made it btw? Is this one from Adobe or from MS?

I think HD Photo can be good, just need a final version to get a newer test going. And while jpeg2k is also close to the same, it's not being used at all, most if not all digital cameras do RAW/JPEG I don't know of any that do JPEG2k. It's a messy and expensive license.

I think MS could have a winner here if they do it right. Oh, and about having PNG in the tests, while PNG Is good for web gfx like logos and stuff, PNG is not made for Photos, so right now it's best to just stick to JPEG/HDP/JPEG2k and start with a large RAW or TIFF image as your control. This was done in the 2nd artical on the front page and from the looks of it, HDP did do a better job then JPEG, smaller file sizes with the same or better quality. And this with a beta plug-in. HPD might not beet the pants off of JPEG2k right now, but it's cleaner and cheaper (free) license wins hands down.

Meh. I know it doesn't compress anything and that's the purpose of HD Photo, but I still prefer PNG24 over everything else. Why use compression with computers nowadays... and all those fast connections and everything. If they tried this 4 years ago, maybe, but now this picture compression era is kinda dead IMO.

If I understand correctly, you would take a RAW image file (like from a digital camera) and open it in PS to save to the HD format. You get better quality with a smaller file. I haven't really got into details about the format but I assume that's what it is for.
How can you get a better quality than the raw file? The raw file is most of the time an uncompressed file that contain an "image" of your sensor with all the settings without any quality picture loss.

I don't get the idea of how you can get a better picture when compressing from the original.

Meh. I know it doesn't compress anything and that's the purpose of HD Photo, but I still prefer PNG24 over everything else. Why use compression with computers nowadays... and all those fast connections and everything. If they tried this 4 years ago, maybe, but now this picture compression era is kinda dead IMO.

I think you got a point there. HDs are getting cheaper all the time, Dvds as well and HD-Dvd with much higher capacity is just around the corner. Thus, a lossless format like Png is often enough already. If you need more compression while still keeping good quality, you can use Jp2. However, that it is not used widely today only shows that there's obviously no need for it.

@GP007, concerning the "free" argument:

All Jp2 pics in my comparison were created with free software that runs on anything starting with Windows 98. For those who don't even have that and run Linux only, they can use Gimp which supports Jp2 as well (afaik).

For creating Wdp pics (whose performance have been anything but convincing), you must have Adobe Photoshop, a very high-priced app!

Even for just viewing Wdp pics, you must have Vista with Photo Explorer, no chance on previous Windows, much less Linux.

...

For creating Wdp pics (whose performance have been anything but convincing), you must have Adobe Photoshop, a very high-priced app!

Even for just viewing Wdp pics, you must have Vista with Photo Explorer, no chance on previous Windows, much less Linux.

Yeah, that part stinks. As a Linux user with GIMP, it would be nice to try out this new image format (if I can get same quality images at half the filesize of current jpeg). I'm not about to try to keep archives of family pictures on DVDs with .png or other large (but loseless!) formats.

I just wish Microsoft would be less restrictive with this format that they want to make a 'standard'.

I don't know how restrictive the license actually is, but what I mean about jpeg2k is that it's not free from what I remember, it's license costs some thing, correct me if I'm wrong though. So even if it's used in Gimp, somehow the license got paid.

And I can't see why you can't make a HDP plug-in for Gimp also, since I'm sure I read MS isn't charging anything for using it.

I don't know how restrictive the license actually is, but what I mean about jpeg2k is that it's not free from what I remember, it's license costs some thing, correct me if I'm wrong though. So even if it's used in Gimp, somehow the license got paid.

And I can't see why you can't make a HDP plug-in for Gimp also, since I'm sure I read MS isn't charging anything for using it.

It isn't a matter of cost, it is a matter of Microsoft (currently, anyhow) prohibiting use in any application that requires source code to be made available (I think GPL is the only big license to have this requirement).

JPEG2000 allows use of the associated patents without royalties - the only concern is a rogue patent-holder of one of the included technologies suddenly changing their mind.

The up and coming JPEG 2000 standard has been prepared along these lines, and agreement reached with over 20 large organisations holding many patents in this area to allow use of their intellectual property in connection with the standard without payment of license fees or royalties.

And, sadly, Microsoft is no different in suddenly deciding to enforce and charge for patents they hold, such as FAT32.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Last week I was investigating an issue with contacts and tried using the new Outlook. In the real (Classic) Outlook, you can easily go to any Outlook folder and present it in a Table View, then customize the columns to show/sort any field, which was exactly what I needed. But of course, the new Outlook doesn't have this feature at all. I gave up. Oh, and can we possibly stop claiming the new Outlook has PST support? What it really has is the ability to use the real Outlook in the background to pretend to have PST support. There is no PST support without the real Outlook installed.
    • Honestly just before Panos left it started to feel like MS just wasnt interested in them so they were being less innovative with them, and then when he DID leave for Amazon its kind of clear the direction is gone. It felt like Panos had both goals and drive, and a vision, but it felt like no matter what his title/department was the Surface devices never had the full interest of the rest of management and he was just pushing a bolder up a hill that MS was adding dirt to as he went.
    • A roguelike and a 4X strategy game are free to claim on the Epic Games Store by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe The final leg of the Epic Games Store's mystery giveaways promotion just landed, and it brought along two more games to keep. Last week's Lonestar and Calico giveaways have now been replaced with copies of Rogue Waters and Songs of Conquest to claim for PC gamers. As always, the game is yours to add permanently to your Epic Games Store library within the next seven days. Diving into the games, Songs of Conquest is developed by Lavapotion. This is a turn-based 4X strategy experience that has players making tough decisions and participating in tactical combat while also managing their kingdom. "Songs of Conquest is a turn-based strategy game inspired by 90s classics. Lead powerful magicians called Wielders and venture to lands unknown," explains the developer. "Wage battles against armies that dare oppose you, hunt for powerful artifacts and expand your territory. The world is ripe for the taking – seize it." Meanwhile, Rogue Waters comes from developer Ice Code Games. This rogue-lite experience has you taking the role of Captain Cutter as he commands his ship and crew through procedurally generated encounters. You'll be recruiting and training crew, use sea creatures, and battle with other ships and pirates. "Set sail as Captain Cutter, a pirate caught in a deadly struggle for power and vengeance," adds the developer. "Navigate dangerous waters, unleash mythical sea creatures, and outwit enemies as you chase legendary treasure and confront dark secrets." The newly available Rogue Waters and Songs of Conquest giveaways on the Epic Games Store are set to run until June 11, giving PC gamers seven days to claim the latest offer. Once this closes out, a new freebie will take its place on the same day, which is slated to be Warhammer 40K Speed Freeks. Don't forget that mobile gamers can check out the Epic Game Store's weekly giveaways on Android and iOS to grab a freebie there as well.
    • Still using Classic Outlook? Microsoft highlights 15 reasons to switch to New Outlook by Usama Jawad As many of you may know, Microsoft has been trying to get customers to ditch Classic Outlook in favor of New Outlook for quite some time now. To that end, it has added numerous capabilities to the latter, including PST features, and it is working on several more, such as a unified inbox. However, customer response has been a bit lukewarm so far, with many considering the New Outlook to be "hot garbage". Now, Microsoft has highlighted 15 features that users can leverage in New Outlook in yet another attempt to get customers to migrate. Although not all of the 15 capabilities are exclusive to New Outlook, in fact, most of them are available in Classic Outlook as well. But Microsoft hopes that this combination of familiar and fresh features will be able to attract existing users as well as new ones. For ease of readability, we have summarized the 15 features below: Pin an email: This makes it easier to track important emails Snooze an email: You can temporarily snooze an email thread for a specific time frame until it becomes relevant again. This can be very useful in scenarios where you don't feel like actively following a thread or simply want to follow up on a later date Add multiple categories at the same time: You can assign multiple categories to an email through a single, simplified interface Sweep: As the name implies, you can define automated move processes on your inbox to declutter it, rather than cleaning it up manually Schedule send: Does exactly what it says on the tin, and can be useful when accommodating recipients in different timezones Simplified folder sharing: The sharing process has been simplified so permissions are automatically applied on parent folders Follow a meeting: This is an RSVP option that lets people know that you won't be able to join the meeting but would still like to access a recap Save calendar views: You can save different views for the calendar based on different workflows Improved meeting tracking: Organizers have more controls in viewing meeting responses, such as the ability to sort and download them. Typically useful when there is a large audience Meeting recap: The Outlook Calendar surfaces a meeting recap with recordings, transcripts, and shared files Filtered views: Allows you to declutter your Calendar so that it's easier to scan and schedule Change a recurring event: Users can modify future events of a series of meetings while preserving the configuration of previous ones Rename your email account: This labeling makes it easier to identify multiple accounts in Outlook Modern themes: Exactly what the name says, plus Dark Mode Keyboard shortcuts: This facilitates flexible user behavior as customers can choose between Outlook for Windows shortcuts, Outlook for the web, or turn them off completely There you have it. It's a decent list, but it remains to be seen if it will move the needle in a meaningful way for users who are attached to Classic Outlook. Again, a lot of the aforementioned features are already available in Outlook Classic, but for some, native functionality is not present, and people typically resort to workarounds. Microsoft will be hoping that it's primarily those capabilities that get people to finally switch.
    • Please I need help I been trying to find this secure boot on my ColorFul motherboard in the bios But i cant i turned off CSM everything watch every video i cant find it. BATTLE-AX B660M-HD DELUXE V20
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      478
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!