Microsoft HD Photo Plug-in for Adobe Photoshop


Recommended Posts

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details...;DisplayLang=en

This is the Windows BETA release of the HD Photo file format plug-in forAdobe? Photoshop? software. It supports a wide range of pixel formats (including high dynamic range, wide gamut formats) and numerous advanced HD Photo features.

This BETA plug-in is designed for use with the CS2 or CS3 versions of Adobe? Photoshop? software running under Microsoft Windows XP or Microsoft Windows Vista. Any other use is not supported. Because this is a BETA release, we recommend you use careful judgment before using this version of the plug-in for any production work. This BETA version will expire after May 31st, 2007.

NOTE: HD Photo is also known as Windows Media Photo.

"HD Photo Plug-in for Adobe? Photoshop? Software"

Care to explain better what you mean? Because I don't see "windows" anywhere in that name.

windows media photo is the format name, not the plug-in name.

So how do you use this plugin?

You import a JPEG photo file, use this plug-in to convert it to a Higher quality HD format?? (doesn't make sense)

No no, this plug-in allows photoshop to have the ability to read, open, edit, and save this new format. If you're starting with a .jpeg photo you've already lost the battle.

As a follow-up to the front-page article comparing Png, Jpg and HD Photo (https://www.neowin.net/index.php?act=view&id=38679), I decided to do the same comparison with Png, Jpg and Jpg2000.

Unlike with HD Photo, you need neither Vista nor Photoshop for Jpeg2000 - I used the freeware program FastStone Image Viewer 3.0 :)

Settings were (unless otherwise noted)

Png: compression 9 (24bit)

Jpg: Quality 80, Flota, Rgb, optimized Huffman, not progressive

Jp2 (Jpeg2000): Rate 80, Rgb

Here are the individual pics from the comparison (Png, Jpg and Jp2) in one zip file:

http://rapidshare.com/files/20357860/Neowi...arison.zip.html

1. Neowin logo

I've included some text here so we can see how well it fares there as well.

Comparison Png - Jpg - Jp2

neowin-logo-comparison.png

File sizes Png - Jpg - Jp2: 36.5kB - 26.8kB - 30.5kB

2. Colour table

Using maximum quality settings: Jpeg 100% Quality, Jpeg2000 Rate 1000 (lossless)

File sizes Png - Jpg - Jp2: 5.19kB - 178kB - 117kB

3. MS Logo

I downloaded a lossless Tiff logo from the MS Presspass site for comparison purposes.

The original Tiff is 1746x345 and 200kB in size. I resized it to 300x64 for better side-to-side comparison.

The Png file is 17.2kB. Now I want to reduce the file size to roughly a third. With Jpeg, I get a 6,1kB file with 25% quality, and it looks very mushy. With Jpeg2000, even with Rate 100 and great quality, the file size is only 5.6kB.

915 x 61 - Click to view full image

windowsxp2-comparison.png.xs.jpg

4. Bill Gates photo

I got a high res photo of Bill Gates from the Presspass site (2704x4064, 4.5MB Jpg) and resized it to 400x600. As Jpeg with 100% quality, it's 317kB.

To cut down on file size, I reduced the quality to 25%, which gave a 52.1kB Jpg. With Jpeg2000, I can go up to Rate 75, which gives a 51.9kB file, and it doesn't look any different from the Jpeg 100% quality file.

Comparison of Jpeg 100% - Jpeg 25% - Jpeg2000 R75 (the latter two have the same file size!)

1202 x 599 - Click to view full image

billg5web-comparison.png.xs.jpg

5. Microsoft 1978 photo

Finally, I used the Microsoft 1978 image to have a group photo comparison. I had to resize the original photo to 200x158 to get rid of the artifacts.

I again saved this as Jpeg with 25% quality, resulting in a 9.3kB file. With Jpeg2000, I can set it to Rate 100, resulting in a 9.2kB file.

Comparison original resized pic - Jpeg 25% - Jpeg2000 R100

600 x 156 - Click to view full image

Microsoft1978-comparison.png.xs.jpg

Concluding I can say that Jpeg2000 is significantly better than ordinary Jpeg, and it also fares better than the MS HD photo format.

What's more, you need neither Vista nor Adobe Photoshop for Jpeg2000, a freeware program like FastStone Image Viewer 3.0 is already enough. It can even batch-convert your files into Jpeg2000 if you want.

Here are the individual pics from the comparison (Png, Jpg and Jp2) in one zip file:

http://rapidshare.com/files/20357860/Neowi...arison.zip.html

Edited by Aero Ultimate
So how do you use this plugin?

You import a JPEG photo file, use this plug-in to convert it to a Higher quality HD format?? (doesn't make sense)

If I understand correctly, you would take a RAW image file (like from a digital camera) and open it in PS to save to the HD format. You get better quality with a smaller file. I haven't really got into details about the format but I assume that's what it is for.

I've now done a follow-up comparison with Jpg and Jp2, using the uncompressed Tiff files from the new front page article as a basis:

https://www.neowin.net/index.php?act=view&id=38688

You can see my results here:

https://www.neowin.net/index.php?act=view&a...&cid=536332

Aero Ultimate, your maturity level is really something for other members to look up to. :rolleyes:

You re-compressed JPG (JPG is a lossy format) images that you downloaded from the web. Your evaluation of file formats has failed. You're straying even further from the original photos by converting to PNG in addition to other file formats and using the PNG as a control.

It seems that you wouldn't know how to use the scientific process if it bit you in the ***.

Nice try, albeit useless and off-topic.

Whatever the tests may show, we are using a beta plug-in, Who made it btw? Is this one from Adobe or from MS?

I think HD Photo can be good, just need a final version to get a newer test going. And while jpeg2k is also close to the same, it's not being used at all, most if not all digital cameras do RAW/JPEG I don't know of any that do JPEG2k. It's a messy and expensive license.

I think MS could have a winner here if they do it right. Oh, and about having PNG in the tests, while PNG Is good for web gfx like logos and stuff, PNG is not made for Photos, so right now it's best to just stick to JPEG/HDP/JPEG2k and start with a large RAW or TIFF image as your control. This was done in the 2nd artical on the front page and from the looks of it, HDP did do a better job then JPEG, smaller file sizes with the same or better quality. And this with a beta plug-in. HPD might not beet the pants off of JPEG2k right now, but it's cleaner and cheaper (free) license wins hands down.

Meh. I know it doesn't compress anything and that's the purpose of HD Photo, but I still prefer PNG24 over everything else. Why use compression with computers nowadays... and all those fast connections and everything. If they tried this 4 years ago, maybe, but now this picture compression era is kinda dead IMO.

If I understand correctly, you would take a RAW image file (like from a digital camera) and open it in PS to save to the HD format. You get better quality with a smaller file. I haven't really got into details about the format but I assume that's what it is for.
How can you get a better quality than the raw file? The raw file is most of the time an uncompressed file that contain an "image" of your sensor with all the settings without any quality picture loss.

I don't get the idea of how you can get a better picture when compressing from the original.

Meh. I know it doesn't compress anything and that's the purpose of HD Photo, but I still prefer PNG24 over everything else. Why use compression with computers nowadays... and all those fast connections and everything. If they tried this 4 years ago, maybe, but now this picture compression era is kinda dead IMO.

I think you got a point there. HDs are getting cheaper all the time, Dvds as well and HD-Dvd with much higher capacity is just around the corner. Thus, a lossless format like Png is often enough already. If you need more compression while still keeping good quality, you can use Jp2. However, that it is not used widely today only shows that there's obviously no need for it.

@GP007, concerning the "free" argument:

All Jp2 pics in my comparison were created with free software that runs on anything starting with Windows 98. For those who don't even have that and run Linux only, they can use Gimp which supports Jp2 as well (afaik).

For creating Wdp pics (whose performance have been anything but convincing), you must have Adobe Photoshop, a very high-priced app!

Even for just viewing Wdp pics, you must have Vista with Photo Explorer, no chance on previous Windows, much less Linux.

...

For creating Wdp pics (whose performance have been anything but convincing), you must have Adobe Photoshop, a very high-priced app!

Even for just viewing Wdp pics, you must have Vista with Photo Explorer, no chance on previous Windows, much less Linux.

Yeah, that part stinks. As a Linux user with GIMP, it would be nice to try out this new image format (if I can get same quality images at half the filesize of current jpeg). I'm not about to try to keep archives of family pictures on DVDs with .png or other large (but loseless!) formats.

I just wish Microsoft would be less restrictive with this format that they want to make a 'standard'.

I don't know how restrictive the license actually is, but what I mean about jpeg2k is that it's not free from what I remember, it's license costs some thing, correct me if I'm wrong though. So even if it's used in Gimp, somehow the license got paid.

And I can't see why you can't make a HDP plug-in for Gimp also, since I'm sure I read MS isn't charging anything for using it.

I don't know how restrictive the license actually is, but what I mean about jpeg2k is that it's not free from what I remember, it's license costs some thing, correct me if I'm wrong though. So even if it's used in Gimp, somehow the license got paid.

And I can't see why you can't make a HDP plug-in for Gimp also, since I'm sure I read MS isn't charging anything for using it.

It isn't a matter of cost, it is a matter of Microsoft (currently, anyhow) prohibiting use in any application that requires source code to be made available (I think GPL is the only big license to have this requirement).

JPEG2000 allows use of the associated patents without royalties - the only concern is a rogue patent-holder of one of the included technologies suddenly changing their mind.

The up and coming JPEG 2000 standard has been prepared along these lines, and agreement reached with over 20 large organisations holding many patents in this area to allow use of their intellectual property in connection with the standard without payment of license fees or royalties.

And, sadly, Microsoft is no different in suddenly deciding to enforce and charge for patents they hold, such as FAT32.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Glow 26.9 by Razvan Serea Glow provides detailed reporting on every hardware component in your computer, saving you valuable time typically spent searching for CPU, motherboard, RAM, graphics card, and other stats. With Glow, all the information is conveniently presented in one clean interface, allowing you to easily access and review the comprehensive hardware details of your system. Glow provides detailed information on various system aspects, including OS, motherboard, processor, memory, graphics card, storage, network, battery, drivers, and services. The well-organized format ensures easy access to the required information. You can export all the gathered data to a plain text file, facilitating sharing with others for troubleshooting purposes. No installation needed. Just decompress the archive, launch the executable, and access computer-related information. Glow runs on Windows 11 and Windows 10 64-bit versions. Glow 26.9 changelog: New Features The processor hardware detection engine has been significantly enhanced beyond traditional Intel and AMD architectures. Native support is now available for modern platforms such as Apple Silicon (M-Series) and the newly introduced NVIDIA Spark. In addition, all ARM-based processors can now be accurately distinguished between ARM32 and ARM64 architectures, providing precise hardware reporting. This marks a major milestone for Glow's hardware detection capabilities. The RAM manufacturer identification algorithm has been expanded. JEDEC vendor codes for popular brands such as Patriot, PNY, Team Group, GeIL, Lexar (Longsys), and Asgard/Gloway have been integrated into the database. This significantly reduces the likelihood of incorrect or "Unknown Manufacturer" results and improves overall hardware detection accuracy. New Public IP Address and Internet Service Provider (ISP) features have been added to the Network section. To ensure reliability, this information is retrieved from the trusted service ipwho.is. When Hiding Mode is enabled, no requests are sent and these features remain hidden, as they may expose sensitive information. The search engine used in the Installed Drivers, Installed Services, and Installed Applications sections has been enhanced. You can now perform more flexible and accurate searches using initials, partial matches, and loosely arranged character sequences. The TS Preloader loading bar has been rebuilt using our modern TS Custom Controls graphics library, developed entirely in-house. As a result of this infrastructure upgrade, the loading bar now features smooth rendering and rounded corners that align with the visual style of Windows 11. [TS Updater] A new validation algorithm has been added to check whether the target application is currently running before the update process begins. Bug Fixes Resolved a condition that could prevent TS Preloader from shutting down safely during rare application crash scenarios. Fixed a text alignment issue in the Network section affecting the display of DNS addresses. Alignment is now rendered correctly. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue that could prevent the updated application's executable "*.exe" file from being located after the update process. [TS Updater] Fixed a bug that could leave outdated "*.sha256" files in the application directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed a rare issue that could cause subfolders to be moved into the root directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue during the first launch that could cause flickering and a temporary white window appearance due to Windows Defender interactions. Changes A small improvement has been made to the internet connectivity detection algorithm. Connectivity checks are now performed in the background with minimal impact on the user interface thread. The keyboard shortcuts in the top menu have been reorganized and simplified to provide a consistent experience across all Türkaysoft applications and to avoid potential conflicts with standard Windows shortcuts. The TS Preloader splash image has been updated with a Türkiye-themed stadium design to celebrate Türkiye's qualification for the 2026 FIFA World Cup—its first appearance in 24 years. Congratulations, Türkiye! The TS Custom Controls module has been updated to version 26.6, delivering improved stability and a more polished visual appearance. [TS Updater] The application icon has been redesigned to provide a more modern and refined look. Note: Always unzip the program before using it. Otherwise you may get an error. Download: Glow 26.9 | 1.8 MB (Open Source) Links: Glow Homepage | Screenshot | Github Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • DWARF mini review: the world's smallest smart telescope for night and day sky captures by Steven Parker DWARFLAB reached out to me asking if I was interested in checking out the DWARF mini, which is a portable astronomy telescope designed for amateur astronomers. Why do I say it's for amateurs? Well, for starters, it's not what you'd call "high end"; it's more of a professional-grade starting point for amateurs serious about capturing what's up there in our night and day skies. A typical amateur astronomer is most likely thousands of dollars deep into the hobby, and I will make no claims that this DWARF mini (at a fraction of the cost) could replace it all, okay? Well, if you read on, it will be clearer what I am trying to convey. Disclosure: DWARFLAB provided a free sample without any editorial input or review pre-approval. I have always been interested in looking up and observing the night sky. I see satellites crossing the sky above my garden most nights, and I am always looking at the moon. Yeah, I have a 200MP camera on my phone, but at 200X zoom, AI takes over and makes the pretty moon pictures that I snap, the DWARF mini does not, you get an actual true picture of what you can barely see with the naked eye. Before we start, let's share the highlights of the DWARF mini in bite-sized format: Pocket-Sized & Ultra-Lightweight Weighing just 1.85 lbs (840g), the DWARF mini easily fits into a backpack or large pocket. Its all-in-one, compact design makes it the ultimate grab-and-go digital telescope for hiking, camping, or traveling to dark-sky locations. Intuitive App Control & Built-in Sky Atlas Go from unboxing to your first shot in just 3 minutes! The DWARFLAB App provides a seamless experience with an interactive star map. Simply select your target and start exploring without the steep learning curve of traditional setups. Auto GOTO & 360° Pivot Freedom Enjoy pinpoint automated tracking with full 360° rotation. Powered by a high-sensitivity Sony IMX662 sensor (1/2.8-inch, 2.9μm pixels), it captures amazing, low-noise astro details, bringing faint nebulas and star clusters to life with stunning clarity. Pro-Level EQ Mode & Long Exposure Unlock advanced deep-space imaging with Equatorial (EQ) Mode. Supporting impressive single-frame exposures up to 90 seconds and featuring built-in light pollution filters, it easily cuts through city glow to reveal intricate celestial structures. Smart Cloud Processing & All-Ages Fun Effortlessly enhance your raw data with integrated cloud processing for professional-grade results. Perfect for beginners, kids, and adults, this telescope makes exploring and sharing the wonders of the universe an exciting, family-friendly adventure. The packaging is a pretty minimal affair with the outer box opening like a flap to reveal the plastic mould of the DWARF mini sitting in it. Below, the Sun filter, charging cable, cleaning cloth, and documentation can be found. DWARFLAB also provided a Mini Hydraulic Tripod ($89.99), and I highly recommend getting it if you plan on purchasing the DWARF mini, as it fully supports the motorized tracking feature of the telescope; plus, at 840g, the weight of the telescope, you will need a tripod that supports more than the weight of a smartphone anyway. What's in the box DWARF Mini Smart Telescope × 1 Sun Filter x 1 Type-C to Type-C Cord x 1 Cleaning Cloth x 1 User Guide With that out of the way, here are the full specs: DWARF mini Dimensions (DWH): 60.70 mm x 100.38 × 183.61 (2.39" x 3.95" x 7.23") Weight: 840g (1.85lbs) Aperture diameter: 30 mm (telephoto), 3.4 mm (wide angle) Image Sensor: SONY IMX662 1/2.8" (Telephoto) OmniVision OS02K10 1/2.8" (Wide-angle) Focal length: 150 mm (telephoto), 6.7 mm (wide-angle) Equivalent focal length: 1016 mm (telephoto), 45 mm (wide-angle) Shutter Speed: Tele - 1/10000-90s, Wide - 1/10000-30s Maximum exposure time: 90s (telephoto & wide-angle), Both in EQ mode Rotation range: Lens: 225°, Base: 360° Effective Pixels: 2.07M Maximum Resolution: 1920 × 1080 (Telephoto & Wide-angle) Built-in filters: Astro, Dark, Duo-Band (Telephoto), Astro (Wide-angle) Output: JPG, FITS, TIFF, MP4 Shooting Mode: Photos, Videos, Astronomy, Burst Shooting, Time-lapse Photography Storage: 64 GB Battery: Built-in 7000 mAh, supports external USB charging Charging Port: Type-C NPU: 1 TOPS Features: WiFi, NFC NFC One-Touch Connection Astronomy Post-Processing/Appointment Shooting/Astronomy Mosaic Wi-Fi Transmission Range: 15m (open environment) Color: Black Compatibility: iOS & Android smartphones/tablets Warranty: 2-years (24-months) MSRP: $399 Design Charge port On/off button Lens On the DWARF mini itself, it is a pretty minimal affair. On one side, there is a Type-C USB port to charge the non-removable 7000 mAh battery, and on the other side, a large button to power on or off the telescope. The button is flanked by an LED that is green when connected via the DWARFLAB app, or lights up red when being powered off. Below the button, there are four LEDs that indicate battery power. The DWARF mini does not have any sharp edges as all sides are rounded off; it has a good heft to it, but the weight of it feels quite balanced in the hand, so it isn't top or bottom-heavy. On the front there is the DWARFLAB logo which is quite small and there are no other markings on it. The tripod offers full 360° rotation of the motorized base, which allows for tracking for the time-lapse mode, but also for the 90-second captures of nearer objects in the sky, such as the Sun or the moon. Usage To get started, simply power on the DWARF mini and open the DWARFLAB app, tap on Connect, and it will scan for the DWARF mini over the Wi-Fi network. The device supports both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz Wi-Fi, as well as Bluetooth for discovery, so connection issues were minimal in my experience with it. As previously noted in the specs, the DWARF mini will stay connected with a phone or tablet up to 15 meters in an open environment, such as a backyard. Lighting status Powering on: The green circular light will rotate and breathe in turn Powering off: The red circular light is gradually extinguished Connecting: Green light strip rotating Connected: Green light strip solid/always on 4 lights 1= 0-25%, 2= 25-50%, 3= 50-75%, 4= 75-100% battery power To view the full lighting status, such as tracking mode and connection failure, you can check the user guide on the official DWARFLAB page. DWARFLAB app Above, you can see the steps undertaken to connect the DWARFLAB app to my Galaxy S26 Ultra. Weirdly, I got an alert that a firmware update failed to get uploaded to the DWARF mini the first time, but upon retrying, it worked. Then place the DWARF mini outside, make sure your smartphone or tablet is connected to it, and then head back inside, because you can manage it from the comfort of your home. Simply enter the Atlas tab in the app and search for what you want to capture, and then tap on the camera icon; the DWARF mini will then attempt to track the object and give you a live view right on your connected device. Results I've had the DWARF mini since April, but even though my garden is south-facing, I had a lot of trouble trying to capture a good image of the moon. In the end, it was possible after I took it with me on a trip to my parents in Southend, UK, at the end of May. Here is a capture of the moon, resulting from 20 stacked images over a 90-second exposure. What you are seeing here is not AI-assisted. A good example of what I mean is the latest flagships with their 200MP cameras claiming to capture things like closeups of the moon, and while they are not as good as the above example on the DWARF mini, the resulting image on smartphones is actually AI-assisted above 30X zoom. Here is an example of a similar shot at the moon at 200X zoom using an HONOR Magic8 Pro. The difference is clear. Next, here we have a shot of the daytime moon. Here is a shot of Arcturus, the red giant star, which is the fourth brightest in the night sky. As previously mentioned, it could be a bit clearer, but clouds passing in front of it muddied the shot a bit. The Sun The DWARF mini also ships with a sun filter, meaning you can take great shots of the sun as well. Tracking Sun Resulting (stacked) shot Live zoom The pictures themselves are limited to Full HD, and some of the examples actually came out in HD (1280x720), but this is because the standard telescopic result is in 720p while "Wide" is in 1080p. Above you can see how in the app the Sun is tracked, the resulting capture, and Live zoom. I have only scratched the surface of what is possible with this telescope; I found several examples online of shots of the Milky Way, among others, such as nebulae and galaxies. All of this requires patience and knowledge, although if you know what you are looking for, simply enter it in the Atlas tab in the DWARFLAB app, tap the camera icon, and the telescope will attempt to track it. Conclusion The good The DWARF mini definitely places itself in a price point that makes astrology accessible to anyone looking to get started in the hobby. Say you want to have a closer look at the moon, simply enter it in the Atlas, and the Live view also lets you zoom in and snap pictures. The bad Some issues I came across while operating the DWARF mini were that it sometimes failed to connect unless I held my smartphone right next to it, and finding and tracking sometimes took several attempts to get it calibrated. I discovered that it helped if I sort of positioned and pointed the telescope in the general area it was supposed to detect, but this obviously wouldn't work with objects you can't see with the naked eye; more testing is required for that. Another bit of advice is to ensure that the lens is clean. While making the examples of live zooming on the sun, I discovered that the telescope lens and sun filter were not completely clean, and only after cleaning with a microfiber cloth was I able to get a decent shot of the sun. Where to buy and a coupon Okay, $399 is not cheap for a side hobby, but nor is a $1,500 smartphone flagship that you'll most likely have for a couple of years. This is a one-time entrance into astrology, and it won't become obsolete in one year like a smartphone. It's a thumbs up from me. The DWARF mini is available to buy right now in the U.S. and U.K. at the links below. DWARF mini for $399 on the official site DWARF mini for $399 on Amazon U.S. Use the NEOWIN5OFF coupon code for an additional 5% off at checkout (expires June 21) As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Adobe Acrobat Reader Dis Continued
    • The name, you mean? If so, it's actually the objects common name. There's another one called NGC 7293 which is also known as Helix Nebula (because we're looking at a helix structure top down) but other times also known as the Eye of God. You'll understand when you see it
    • Welcome to Neowin! Enjoy your stay!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      505
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      272
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      74
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!