Microsoft HD Photo Plug-in for Adobe Photoshop


Recommended Posts

It isn't a matter of cost, it is a matter of Microsoft (currently, anyhow) prohibiting use in any application that requires source code to be made available (I think GPL is the only big license to have this requirement).

Yeah, that's pretty brain dead and a slap in the face of any amateur developer only trying to provide easily available tools for the community people won't have to pay for. I won't use any technologies licensed this way and I can't imagine why they'd do a thing like this. It hurts free software development and adoption on Windows as well as other platforms.

Edited by Jugalator
What a useless comparison. You do realize that you're re-compressing compressed photo/image formats right? That's not what this format is designed for. You really have brought the Neowin quality bar to an all-time low.

that's the first think i thought, you need raw images first to make that comparison

Again the comparison, Aero Ultimate, you made is crappy, stupid and can not be used as a base. You want a REAL comparison between different formats? Take a RAW image and convert them to each of the format you want. I could give a rats ass about your lossless crap. RAW is the highest, uncompressed quality a image can take.

That is a real comparison.

For creating Wdp pics (whose performance have been anything but convincing), you must have Adobe Photoshop, a very high-priced app!

Even for just viewing Wdp pics, you must have Vista with Photo Explorer, no chance on previous Windows, much less Linux.

Nonsense!

I suggest you take a look at the System.Windows.Media.Imaging namespace that is part of Windows Presentation Foundation. There you will find WmpBitmapEncoder and WmpBitmapDecoder classes (along with encoders/decoders for jpg, png, gif and tiff at least).

Programming a viewer for HD Photo shouldn't be hard from there on. I'd do it myself if i had the time. Do note that it requires the .NET 3.0 Framework (as Windows Presentation Foundation is a part of it).

How can you get a better quality than the raw file? The raw file is most of the time an uncompressed file that contain an "image" of your sensor with all the settings without any quality picture loss.

I don't get the idea of how you can get a better picture when compressing from the original.

I think what he means is better quality than JPEG :)

I can try this with my canon dslr tonight if people want some good examples of how this format impacts digital photos from a RAW/JPEG100%/TIFF comparison.

What say you!

I think what he means is better quality than JPEG :)

I can try this with my canon dslr tonight if people want some good examples of how this format impacts digital photos from a RAW/JPEG100%/TIFF comparison.

What say you!

That would be great and I myself would have no problem doing the convertions if you do not want to.

Post the RAW pictures in a ZIP or something and upload them somewhere.

If I understand correctly, you would take a RAW image file (like from a digital camera) and open it in PS to save to the HD format. You get better quality with a smaller file. I haven't really got into details about the format but I assume that's what it is for.

I'd rather have the raw file. My camera is 10MP and the raw files are only around 7-9megs. Better than a lossy format any day.

So what? Jp2 can save files as lossless too, and you don't need Photoshop for that - freeware apps are fully sufficient.

You don't need Photoshop for HD Photo either. Did you read my response above about the API's being available with the .NET 3.0 Framework?

And i was responding to MrCobra complaining about not wanting to substitute his RAW files with a lossy format which HD Photo doesn't have to be since it supports lossless compression.

That would be great and I myself would have no problem doing the conversions if you do not want to.

Post the RAW pictures in a ZIP or something and upload them somewhere.

Done

Here is the comparison, my conclusion is that for high end photo editing this is not needed, for generic web use this is also not needed considering the vast amount of JPEG scaling available with excellent IQ retained. I saww little to no difference between the HDP format and JPEG format both using the "high" quality setting (JPEG mode 8 and HDP mode 0.75 to get it the same filesize as the JPEG version or as close to as possible)

For the comparison I imported the RAW into Photoshop then saved it to JPEG and WDP separately using the above modes. I then imported the jpeg and HDP and layered them over the RAW keeping the RAW as the background and only leaving the sections in GREEN boxes as HDP and JPG. I kept the original resolution and saved the end file as a TIFF file for lossless quality. The RAW was imported as SRGB for standards on a normal monitor display and each image was saved using this SRGB profile.

Click the thumb below for the TIFF

raw_vsjpgvshdp_th.jpg

RAW with XMP can be found here + here

Anyway for non destructive editing with full RAW support the DNG format is the way forward.

BTW for the RAW debaters upstairs, RAW is not an image format, in order to edit a RAW photo you have to convert it to an editable format such as JPEG / TIF / WDP - RAW cannot be worked with until it has been converted.

Edited by mrk

I converted a RAW (6MP) file to JPG and WDP and uploaded to RapidShare for people to look at. File size (RAR) is 8.41 megs. I used the same quality settings for both pictures. Image dimensions: 3072x2048.

JPG = 2,858,586

WDP = 6,010,817 ( The RAW file is 4,916,782 )

Like I said above, I'd rather keep the RAW files rather than use this new format.

Download link @ http://rapidshare.com/files/20748662/JPG_WDP_TEST.rar.html

I converted a RAW (6MP) file to JPG and WDP and uploaded to RapidShare for people to look at. File size (RAR) is 8.41 megs. I used the same quality settings for both pictures. Image dimensions: 3072x2048.

JPG = 2,858,586

WDP = 6,010,817 ( The RAW file is 4,916,782 )

Like I said above, I'd rather keep the RAW files rather than use this new format.

Download link @ http://rapidshare.com/files/20748662/JPG_WDP_TEST.rar.html

Something tells me that RAW file isn't uncompressed then. If it is a 6MP picture then <1 byte per pixel doesn't make any sense for a RAW file unless it was using some lossless compression that gets a better than 3:1 ratio which would be quite a feat for an image that isn't comprised of large solid blocks of color.

Something tells me that RAW file isn't uncompressed then. If it is a 6MP picture then <1 byte per pixel doesn't make any sense for a RAW file unless it was using some lossless compression that gets a better than 3:1 ratio which would be quite a feat for an image that isn't comprised of large solid blocks of color.

RAW is not an image format, it is the information recorded by the sensor with no image processing in place. WDP/TIFF/JPEG etc are all image formats that save image processing. It's common for a lossless image format to be bigger than the RAW, it contains all the editing that has been done to it and it has been converted to a contained format.

RAW is the highest quality photo you can get but TIFF for example is the highest quality image format there is and in order to print a RAW photo it must be converted to an image format like TIFF and now WDP

<snipped>

Your first and original review of this format was using a lossless PNG; Which is not a RAW and what the original debate and discussion was about.

Personally I think you have done the review simply for us Neowin members to kiss your ass and treat you like god. I for one won't and If i honestly wanted to see real-life situations and conclusions I would take my own digital camera, take some pictures in its RAW format, and then do these conversions.

You should have commented in your review that the .cr2 extension is one of the many extensions that companies use when you use their camera in RAW picture taking mode because certain members may not be aware of it. But of course I didn't know that RAW images have different extensions :whistle:

And also in that review you said yourself that there are no pictures; Why should we believe what you say? For that matter, why should we even trust your "excelent" eyesight? :laugh:

If you want people to kiss your ass, don't flame them when they are stating the truth about you comparing the format to PNG. Make a good review with at least downloadable links (since this format currently cannot be viewed on browsers).

Edited by Chad
RAW is not an image format, it is the information recorded by the sensor with no image processing in place. WDP/TIFF/JPEG etc are all image formats that save image processing. It's common for a lossless image format to be bigger than the RAW, it contains all the editing that has been done to it and it has been converted to a contained format.

RAW is the highest quality photo you can get but TIFF for example is the highest quality image format there is and in order to print a RAW photo it must be converted to an image format like TIFF and now WDP

Exactly, and RAW isn't exactly a standard; Olympus, Nikon, Pentax, Canon, Panasonic, Sigma, etc all use different RAW processing. I use RAW as it allows me to do post-processing without losing information, but you still have to convert the RAW image to some other format in order to easily share or view it, without specialized viewers or the right plug-ins.

There is the Adobe RAW format, but I don't believe many companies use it, other than the Pentax K10D.

I just look at HDPhoto as something that could replace JPEG, and still have acceptable quality and file size.

Exactly, and RAW isn't exactly a standard; Olympus, Nikon, Pentax, Canon, Panasonic, Sigma, etc all use different RAW processing. I use RAW as it allows me to do post-processing without losing information, but you still have to convert the RAW image to some other format in order to easily share or view it, without specialized viewers or the right plug-ins.

There is the Adobe RAW format, but I don't believe many companies use it, other than the Pentax K10D.

I just look at HDPhoto as something that could replace JPEG, and still have acceptable quality and file size.

Raw is a standard as it's viewable with any raw viewer such as the raw image viewer addon for windows created by MS or in Photoshop/adobe bridge or even and the only reason the different brands of camera use different RAW methods is because they all use different digital CCD/CMOS sensors and the encoding used to create that raw information is specific to each manufacturer.

However I do not think HDP will ever replace jpeg, look at previous tries at other file formats that tried this (AAC, OGG etc etc) that tried to be the next mp3 but in the end just not being won over by the well established mp3 format.

The same way JPG has been established for even longer and it is going to take a heck of a lot of work to get HDP supported cross platform and on portable devices.

Edited by mrk
You should have commented in your review that the .cr2 extension is one of the many extensions that companies use when you use their camera in RAW picture taking mode because certain members may not be aware of it. But of course I didn't know that RAW images have different extensions :whistle:

Yes, it was quite obvious that you didn't know it and thus were making uninformed comments :pinch:

And also in that review you said yourself that there are no pictures; Why should we believe what you say? For that matter, why should we even trust your "excelent" eyesight? :laugh:

I never said such nonsense :pinch:

I provided links to the original Raw pics, and I provided a link to an archive containing the resulting Jpg and Jp2 pics right in my article so you can compare for yourself.

Here are the links, once again:

Article with links to all the files: Link

My comparison (comment #12): Link

Cr2 Raw image: http://staff.neowin.net/davelegg/linear.cr2

Orf Raw image: http://www.iol.ie/~fuzzy/images/PC252525.ORF

Archive with the Jpg and Jp2 files created from these files: Download link

Take a look at the images and see for yourself, or download the Cr2 and Raw files from the links above and use FastStone Image Viewer or XnView (both free) to compress them to Jpg and Jp2 and compare the resulting files.

Exactly, and RAW isn't exactly a standard; Olympus, Nikon, Pentax, Canon, Panasonic, Sigma, etc all use different RAW processing. I use RAW as it allows me to do post-processing without losing information, but you still have to convert the RAW image to some other format in order to easily share or view it, without specialized viewers or the right plug-ins.

There is the Adobe RAW format, but I don't believe many companies use it, other than the Pentax K10D.

And that is exactly the market MS is after here. The HD Photo codec was designed to be easily implemented in hardware and to have extensive metadata and ICC support. Wouldn't it be better (although requiring a bit more space) if all cameras simply had the option to deliver lossless HD Photo files as output instead of every manufacturer having their own RAW format as well as being easily viewable on all PC's?

Granted MS have to convince camera manufacturers to implement HD Photo in their camers but i'm pretty they are working very hard on that.

And that is exactly the market MS is after here. The HD Photo codec was designed to be easily implemented in hardware and to have extensive metadata and ICC support. Wouldn't it be better (although requiring a bit more space) if all cameras simply had the option to deliver lossless HD Photo files as output instead of every manufacturer having their own RAW format as well as being easily viewable on all PC's?

Granted MS have to convince camera manufacturers to implement HD Photo in their camers but i'm pretty they are working very hard on that.

No because RAW is not an image format, HDphoto is, RAW iwll never be replaced because it has a primary function no image format can handle, sensor DATA that has to be converted to an image format such as HDP or JPEG or TIFF etc.

Every manufacturer will have their own RAW encryption in their RAW files, this has always been the case and will remain so forever.

People need to understand this will not replace RAW ever as they are two totally different things.

No because RAW is not an image format, HDphoto is, RAW iwll never be replaced because it has a primary function no image format can handle, sensor DATA that has to be converted to an image format such as HDP or JPEG or TIFF etc.

Every manufacturer will have their own RAW encryption in their RAW files, this has always been the case and will remain so forever.

People need to understand this will not replace RAW ever as they are two totally different things.

I'm not sure you understood me correctly. I said "option" as in you could both get the raw data and the raw data converted to the HD Photo format. I know raw isn't a format, it's just pure data from the CCD. HD Photo however is capable of storing that raw data in a lossless standardized format which must be easier for photographers to work with rather then having a separate tool or codec for every camera type right?

How can you not want a standardized format to store the raw data in?

HD Photo was designed to be able to store that sensor data without losing any information (that includes maintaining bit-depth, color information, adding metadata etc.).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hello, Hope all is well. I am in UK.  
    • I'm not happy with myself for it, but I've gone and got hold of it. Just another 45 minutes and I'll be Bond, James Bond. In my defence, IO's Hitman series is awesome, and I'm a sucker for 007. So while it might seem a bit simplified compared to Hitman, I'm sure I'll be right at home.
    • Or just check the script yourself ^^. I hate having a Microsoft account tied to my windows install.
    • 007 First Light review: Satisfying spy adventure that James Bond needed by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe I have fond memories of classic James Bond games from the Electronic Arts era. Using high-tech gadgets, sneaking into parties, and dispatching bad guys were wildly exciting activities for my younger self. In recent years, Bond games have entirely disappeared, alongside the super spy genre. Fast forward to 2020, imagine my surprise when IO Interactive announced it had secured the Bond IP to make a game. Considering the studio’s Hitman history, this project is one I keenly kept an eye on. Six years later, 007 First Light is finally here, and after spending time inside this globe-trotting adventure, I can safely say that my excitement for this developer’s take on this universe was not unfounded. IO has taken lessons it has learned from Hitman and combined them with what I would expect from a directed cinematic experience like James Bond. I have refrained from mentioning major plot points to save you from story spoilers in this review. This is an original story that doesn’t tie into any movies, so there isn’t an expectation of knowing the backstory or the decades of movies either. Bond, James Bond When 007 First Light begins, Bond is just Bond. There isn’t a spy angle, fancy gadgets, or even a secret mission. The introductory mission is framed to show how James Bond handled himself and how he does not care about the odds when it comes to saving lives. It’s a gorgeous level as well, showing off an island scattered with cliffs in the middle of a storm. Looking back, this is probably the best-looking level in the game, with IO showing off all its abilities with its custom engine, Glacier. But my favorite ended up being the follow-up to this level. Once the United Kingdom's foreign intelligence agency, MI6, recruits our daring youngster into its super-spy “00” program, training begins. However, instead of treading through the same tutorial missions where the game teaches you to run and jump and drive, IO opted for a montage, and it’s amazing. The scenes cut between Bond practicing and improving his marksmanship, parkour, hand-to-hand combat, and driving as weeks go by in his training. What impressed me here was the lack of any loading screens or stutters as scenes instantly switched to different locations entirely, as if I was watching a movie. This creativity is a trend I noticed in most levels, where there is some sort of gameplay or choreography mechanic being introduced to keep things interesting. Soon, the rest of the cast is introduced, bringing other agents that our favorite secret agent will be working with, the scientists and engineers that build MI6’s spy gadgets, as well as higher-ranking officers that either appreciate or (at best) tolerate Bond’s rebellious attitude. It’s a tight cast, all with incredibly good voice acting and personalities that quickly grew on me. The casting for Bond himself is also an excellent one. From showing his iconic soft spot for women to the condescending smiles that get a rise out of enemies, I had no issues getting immersed into this universe as this new face of James Bond. The missions take place in a wide range of locations as MI6 sends Bond to tackle dangers that are growing everywhere from the UK to Africa. These aren’t unrelated adventures where MI6 is sending secret agents, which is an angle I would love to see in another game, but a part of a bigger conspiracy affecting the entire world. Some of the twists and turns were all too predictable, and the character that Lenny Kravitz played made me cringe a little too much. But all in all, I enjoyed the campaign’s storyline that sets the stage for this new agent joining the illustrious “00” program. Plenty of Possibilities The third-person style of IO Interactive fits this role quite well. Bond is presented as a master at hand-to-hand combat as well as firearms, while also having a knack for being stealthy when required. Most sections of missions have a lot of freedom. This means I could beat up every goon and security guard on the way to an objective, slip past them without sounding a single alarm, or do a mix of both. My sessions usually end up with the third option because I tend to be impatient about waiting for a patrol to move. Drawing from its Hitman genes, the developer almost always gives multiple routes for going through missions. Levels can be massive, sometimes sporting hundreds of NPCs going their own ways and having conversations. If my objective is to break into a security room on the third floor, I could look around for roof access, eavesdrop on conversations to find out where someone lost a key, create a distraction and pickpocket a guard for a keycard, sneak in through the vents, or simply kick down the offending door. I enjoyed the variety on offer, especially because the same solutions didn’t usually show up in different missions. Before heading out into a secret MI6 escapade, the gadget specialist of the branch walks Bond through the organization's latest and greatest achievements. This can be cool little devices like a laser built into the watch, a phone that fires poison darts, or a camera that emits a powerful shockwave. The choice of what can be taken into the mission is up to the player. I could usually find fresh routes or get out of tough situations with a punch or two, so I never had the feeling of missing out by not choosing the right equipment. It’s still a fun practice. Choosing the armaments before a mission enhanced the super spy feeling quite a bit. As I mentioned, stealth comes in as a very viable option for most of the missions, letting Bond sneak past foes or knock them out silently. While it is satisfying to clear entire areas of goons and walk away without any alarms, the way of accomplishing this could have been done better. Bond can lure enemies, sneak up and knock them out, or use a gadget to disorient them before dealing a nasty blow. Bodies cannot be moved or hidden afterward either. It’s a very simple system, which I wish were more exciting to pull off. Perhaps more stealth-orientated gadgets, distraction options, or multi-takedowns could have helped here, I think. Getting caught while attempting to be in stealth does not mean a game over. Other than getting into a fist fight, an interesting twist of 007 First Light is the bluffing option. While an enemy is confused as to what you are doing in a restricted location, Bond has the option to improvise and persuade them that you are exactly where you’re supposed to be. These are fun little dynamic interactions with unique dialog depending on the mission and location, giving a few extra moments for Bond to go past suspicious guards smoothly. It’s the first time I’ve witnessed this system in a game, and I hope to see more. License to Kill Bond isn’t just dealing with security guards or civilians. From time to time, entire gangs of gun-toting mercenaries show up in levels looking to take down our protagonist. It is then that License to Kill mode is activated for Bond, letting him use firearms with no restrictions. I was surprised by just how tight gunplay is in 007 First Light. The weapons feel powerful and satisfying to fire, with single bullets capable of taking down an enemy with a headshot. Ammo is scarce, and enemies don’t drop weapons with full magazines most of the time. This forces a hectic kind of gameplay where I am always advancing towards enemies to take their weapons after they are downed. Things like shooting legs to immobilize, aiming at the hands to make their weapon go flying, blowing up nearby fire extinguishers for cover, and using gadgets to halt a goon in their tracks while I reload, make up enjoyable levels. I had to hold back my disappointment when the enemy count in these action sequences dropped to zero and I had to go non-lethal again. Speaking of action sequences, First Light isn’t just offering sandbox levels to complete at the player’s own leisure either. Each level comes with specific linear and directed scenes to move the story forward and put Bond in tight situations. These usually end up with high-octane chases or driving sections, offering the chance to witness chaining explosions, hails of gunfire, and scripted parkour scenes that remind me of Mission Impossible movies more than Bond. Elements like seeing James Bond jump out of a plane without a parachute or drive through buildings in London inside a trash truck were fantastic and always left me at a high point when finishing a mission. The classic James Bond theme is sprinkled in here too, which only happens a handful of times in the game, but at just the right moments. Visuals and Performance Compared to Unreal Engine 5 games we are seeing nowadays, 007 First Light isn’t flexing a huge amount of realism when it comes to graphics. The models, textures, and effects all feel a little dated, with the starting mission that I mentioned being the most visually striking. However, the complete lack of stutters, the hundreds of NPCs that can be on screen without a single hitch, massive sandbox levels, and smooth transitions between them all play a part in making this an immensely immersive and complex experience. The in-engine cutscenes are gorgeous as well, offering an upgraded visual style and model detail over the gameplay sections. Animations are one aspect that jumps out at me about any new game, and First Light has nailed what a third-person action game should feel like. Walking, sneaking, and running all have a heaviness to them that I appreciate. Whenever Bond moves past a wall or a ledge, his arms reach out to lightly hold those structures until he moves away. NPCs actually react to my character and move out of the way. Even during melee combat or takedown animations, the fists impacting a body or a head hitting a wall all have that same weight. Even the more frivolous animations, like catching a gun in midair or chucking an empty one at a goon (yes, you can do that), are satisfying to pull off. Of course, the in-engine cutscene animations are remarkably well done too, with facial animations and the upgraded model details improving my engagement with the characters. I have an AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT 16GB paired with an eight-core Ryzen 7 3700X and 32GB of RAM, with the game running at 1440p resolution. Deciding to completely max out all the graphics options gave me a range of frame rates between 60 and 100 depending on the scene and level. While I did try to enable AMD FSR, which bumped up the frame rates by a good 20% at Quality mode, IO Interactive’s implementation of the technology wasn’t that great. Every corner and edge in levels began shimmering, and I was also seeing smearing issues in fast-moving sections. The title seemingly uses the older generation FSR 3.1 and not the machine learning-assisted FSR 4, leading to these artifacts. Unfortunately, there isn't a way to manually upgrade this right now either. I opted to turn off the upscaling and play the game in native 1440p to avoid problems. I would say the FPS range I was getting was an acceptable one for a single-player action game for my setup. I do wish there were an FOV slider option in the settings. While the camera is far enough back for my tastes in most situations in this third-person adventure, at times the perspective is far too close. When trying to look around quickly and spot targets, I realized I was getting a slight headache at times due to the use of an almost over-the-shoulder close-up camera. Conclusion Being James Bond in 007 First Light is a treat. Traveling around the world chasing conspiracies, using high-tech gadgets disguised as everyday accessories, and improvising on the spot to fool foes all give a fantastic feeling of being a super spy. For an origin story, IO Interactive has done a great job at introducing the character and his motives for doing what he does. The satisfying combat animation and fantastic voice acting are definitely high points, with the License to Kill moments being my favorite. Not being able to move bodies and the simplistic stealth of mechanics does hurt its presentation a little. The NPC logic and intelligence is easy to manipulate and trick, repeating the same actions over and over again if I keep making distractions. The lack of an FOV slider was also a pain (quite literally) at times, and the FSR implementation is quite poor. These are things I hope the studio will improve upon with updates. Even with its faults, IO Interactive and James Bond are a match made in heaven. The studio knows how to make a main character that oozes charm and competency while also leaning heavily into its Hitman experience to make gigantic levels with what looks like hundreds of NPCs roaming around. Being an origin story, IO’s Bond has a way to go before he becomes the highly effective agent we see in the movie world. I am hoping the studio will continue this series alongside its Hitman ventures going forward, just so we get to experience the journey for longer. 007 First Light is available on PC (Steam, Epic Games Store, and Xbox PC), Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. This review was conducted on the PC version of the game provided by IO Interactive.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      271
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      75
    4. 4
      Skyfrog
      74
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!