A Powerful Humourous Word: Diddums


Recommended Posts

To be frank with you unique, all of what you have said  makes me think you are suffering hysteria or epilepsy. I wouldn't lol for this situation, because of what if you are a real patient, I'll feel guilty for laughing at your ailment. But I suggest you to see doctor, especially to see a psychologist.
The fact that you would stoop to the level you did speaks volumes of your personality. To make fun of such an ailment is a very dispicable thing to do, and I am sure no one finds it relavent let alone appropriate.
P.S. Do you think you are big brother in neowin? Look at your word- "I encourage a mod to close this thread"; couldn't you say "I suggest a mod to close..."? At this point, I'd LOL even ROTFL! Yes, you have been acting like a funny big shot from beginning to end.

  Enough. I hope a mod close this thread ASAP.

I fail to understand...ONCE AGAIN...your point. I am not sure why an individual with such "high english standards" would choose to use such acryonms as LOL and ROTFL. Also, I am not sure you yourself understand the english language. To say "I hope a mod close this thread ASAP" makes about as much sense as saying "I have a sock today, its my dog chip." Please stop trying to act like an important individual, as I, and I am sure others, would note that you and your postings are not worthy of scraping my dog chip's sh!t from off my shoe.

ps. I HIGHLY encourage a mod to close this thread, as it is only serving for a forum of redundancy for dave.

You speak of uniques inability to use grammar, when you yourself seem to be lacking. For a fellow with a phd in english your use of acronyms seems quite weak.

Anyways, You could use a nice glass of STFU.

Yours truly,

MSTRMIND

p.s. Unique owns you. You have yet to provide a valid point in this rediculus thread, nor have you defended yourself, with the exception of grammatical correction.

I don't care any more how you torture/tread on basically thinking logic in our discussion(if this debate could be called a discussion). Because it is destined that you always reply without reasonable or good judgment, instead, you always reply with your fantastic imaginations; because the definition of your "logic" is:

unique's imagination is more eloquent than facts.

Go ahead unique, if you feel happy. :) :cool:

I don't care any more how you torture/tread on basically thinking logic in our discussion(if this debate could be called a discussion).

Must you re-state things I say with your thesaurus? Your tiresome argument, and non-creative posts are a bore. You have already proven that english is not your first language, yet you still TRY to compose sentances with fluidity and FAIL.

Anyways, as I am the better person, I am done with this thread. Anything you say in response will not be read, nor will it be replied to. I will take the existance of any more posts in your name as a true sign of your weakness and imaturity as an individual.

:woot:

  unique, lemme remind you of your declaration-"  

  So, how could readers know you are the better person or you are a bad egg?  ;)

Hahaha, Unique won that one fool.

btw your post makes no sense.

It is not needed for the readers to understand my point."

He meant using his english skills, he covered that earlier. Try reading, it helps.

? unique, lemme remind you of your declaration-" ?

? So, how could readers know you are the better person or you are a bad egg;)?;)

Hahaha, Unique won that one fool.

btw your post makes no sense.

It is not needed for the readers to understand my point."
He meant using his english skills, he covered that earlier. Try reading, it helps.

Let it drop please or I'll have to close the thread.

Examples:

(A) "Our children want to play in the mud." "Diddums!"

(B) They have decided to take part in the marathon in their holiday." "Oh diddums!"

? "The neighbors on the third floor are at it again." "Ah diddums!"

The definition of the word "diddums", see Cambridge International Dictionary of English.

diddums British

interjection

HUMOROUS

an expression which seems sympathetic but which really means the opposite

"I hurt my finger." "Ah diddums!"

In some country dictionary, the definition of "diddums" is described as:

Let them do it! (With sympathy, expressing the word ironically)

In my view, this interjection sounds terse and humourously powerful.

Especially, there has ever been a pop game named "Ah Diddums!", which is still loved by many of gamers. That femous game makes this interjection popular.

Some native Britons know how to use drolly and cannily the word "diddums" in life, for terse purpose, I wouldn't quote their words here. :cool::

nooo.jpg

Examples:

     (A)  "Our children want to play in the mud." "Diddums!"

     (B)  They have decided to take part in the marathon in their holiday." "Oh diddums!"

     ?  "The neighbors on the third floor are at it again." "Ah diddums!"

  The definition of the word "diddums", see   Cambridge International Dictionary of English.

diddums British

interjection

HUMOROUS

an expression which seems sympathetic but which really means the opposite

"I hurt my finger." "Ah diddums!"  

    In some country dictionary, the definition of "diddums" is described as:

    Let them do it! (With sympathy, expressing the word ironically)

 

    In my view, this interjection sounds terse and humourously powerful.

    Especially, there has ever been a pop game named "Ah Diddums!", which is still loved by many of gamers. That femous game makes this interjection popular.

    Some native Britons know how to use drolly and cannily the word "diddums" in life, for terse purpose, I wouldn't quote their words here. &nbsp:cool::

http://www.gummiclan.com/gib/nooo.jpg

Well put mate, well put.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think there will be a 27H1 for actual users of 26H1 The 25h2 supports ARM too : Snapdragon X, Snapdragon X Plus and Snapdragon X Elite
    • Poll: Grand Theft Auto VI price predictions, cast your vote by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe After years of waiting, Rockstar will be solidifying the launch date of Grand Theft Auto VI with the launch of pre-orders next week. While the studio has confirmed a date for this occasion, it is yet to attach a price to the highly anticipated game. So let's see what our readers think it will cost at launch. The Grand Theft Auto VI pre-orders will kick off on June 25 for digital and physical editions. Unless some last-minute changes happen, the release date will be November 19, 2026, across Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5. Unfortunately, there's still no information about a PC version from the developer or the publisher Take-Two. Now the question becomes, how much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost at launch? The game is predicted by some analysts to be the biggest launch of an entertainment product ever. With the amount of hype that has been built behind it and with ballooning development costs, Take-Two may price this Grand Theft Auto entry differently from other AAA titles. The current price of a AAA game is $69.99. That norm almost rose to $79.99 before calming down. But with such a massive release, Grand Theft Auto VI may be the game that pushes the boundary again. It's also possible that Take-Two keeps the price relatively low to increase the number of players that jump in early and keep them hooked on Grand Theft Auto Online to spend on microtransactions for years to come. Keep in mind that the below poll is asking for a prediction of the standard edition price, not a deluxe or any other special edition that Take-Two will introduce for additional benefits. Also, there is the chance of the company splitting up the campaign and online portions. If you think that will happen, put your vote on what you think will be the total cost of the two. Poll Poll: How much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost? $59.99 $69.99 $79.99 $89.99 $100 or more Submit Vote If you have a very specific prediction in mind, sound off in the comments below.
    • Would you please fix your graphics. They are outdated and don't fit the article.
    • The Light of Life? We actually do glow till our Death, study finds by Sayan Sen Image by Rafael Rendon via Pexels A study by researchers at the University of Calgary has found that living organisms produce an extremely faint light known as ultraweak photon emission, and that this glow appears to drop significantly after death. The research was published in the Journal of Physical Chemistry in April 2025 and quickly drew widespread attention, leading to more than 200 news stories about the findings. Ultraweak photon emission (or UPE), sometimes called biophoton emission, refers to tiny amounts of light released by living cells as a result of normal biological activity. A photon is the basic particle of light, and researchers say every living system examined so far, including plants and animals, has been found to emit these photons. The glow is far too faint to be seen by the human eye. “I suppose it has a little to do with people being reminded of auras,” says Dr. Christoph Simon, PhD, one of the authors of the study and a professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy in the Faculty of Science. “It is a fact that living beings glow. It’s a very weak glow, but it’s there and visible with very sensitive cameras.” According to the study, the light involved is extremely weak, ranging from 10 to 1,000 photons per square centimetre per second across a spectral range of 200 to 1,000 nanometres. For comparison, a nanometre is one-billionth of a metre and is commonly used to measure wavelengths of light. Detecting emissions at such low levels requires highly specialized equipment. To study the phenomenon, researchers used electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) and charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras. These imaging systems are designed to detect extremely small amounts of light, including individual photons, while minimizing background noise. The technology allowed researchers to capture signals that would otherwise be impossible to observe. The team worked with the Human Health Therapeutics Research Centre at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) in Ottawa to examine photon emissions in mice. Researchers took two-hour exposure images of the animals before and after death and compared the results. “We saw that the level of light that they emit – this biophoton glow – is distinctly different between living and dead animals,” says Dr. Daniel Oblak, PhD, an associate professor in Physics and Astronomy and the corresponding author of the study. The images showed a clear decrease in photon emissions after death across the entire body of each mouse. According to the researchers, this provided direct evidence that living and dead tissue produce different levels of ultraweak photon emission. “It’s a very small amount and it’s, of course, very tricky to detect,” Oblak says. The study grew out of discussions between Simon, whose research interests include quantum biology, and Oblak, whose work focuses on detecting light for quantum communication experiments. Quantum biology is a field that explores whether processes described by quantum physics, which studies matter and energy at very small scales, may also play a role in living systems. “Since I work as a quantum physicist on light detection for quantum communication, I thought that experimentally we have a lot of the tools to be able to detect the light,” Oblak explains. The researchers also investigated UPE in plants and found that the light changed in response to stress. When plants were exposed to higher temperatures or physically injured, their photon emissions increased. Chemical treatments also affected the glow. Among the substances tested, the local anesthetic benzocaine produced the strongest emission response when applied to injured plant tissue. These findings suggest that ultraweak photon emission is closely linked to biochemical and metabolic activity inside living organisms. Metabolism refers to the chemical reactions that allow cells and organisms to stay alive and function. Because these reactions change when an organism experiences stress, injury or disease, researchers believe UPE may provide a way to monitor those changes. The researchers stress that the glow is a physical and biological phenomenon, not a metaphysical one. Oblak says more research is needed to understand exactly how the light is produced and what information it may reveal about the condition of living tissue. “We must understand what that is to figure out what’s happening,” he says. “If we can understand how that relates to certain influences on the body – stress, diseases – then that could be used as a diagnostic tool.” The researchers believe the technique could eventually help scientists study health and disease without invasive procedures. Because UPE can be measured without adding dyes, markers or labels, it may offer a way to monitor whether tissue is healthy, damaged or alive. In plants, it could help researchers better understand how organisms respond to injury, heat and other forms of stress. While the work is still in its early stages, the study demonstrates that ultraweak photon emission imaging can provide a non-invasive and label-free way to observe biological activity. Researchers say the approach could become a useful tool for studying vitality, stress responses and other important processes in both animals and plants. Source: University of Calgary, ACS publication This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      82
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!