Inhofe vows to put brakes on Gore


Recommended Posts

Inhofe vows to put brakes on Gore?s ?Live Earth? concert at the Capitol

By Elana Schor

March 28, 2007

Fresh from his face-to-face tussle with former Vice President Al Gore, Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.) is vowing to stall Gore?s hotly anticipated Capitol concert to draw attention to global warming.

Inhofe?s belief that climate change is ?the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people? is common knowledge in the capitol, and environmental groups cheered the new prospects for carbon-capping legislation when he ceded the Environment and Public Works Committee gavel this session. But Inhofe?s parliamentary powers can block indefinitely the resolution that would permit Gore to choose the capitol?s West Front for the U.S. leg of his seven-continent Live Earth concert tour ? a collaboration between Gore and promoter Kevin Wall, who masterminded previous blockbuster charity concerts Live Aid and Live 8.

?There has never been a partisan political event at the Capitol, and this is a partisan political event,? Inhofe said yesterday.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) attempted late last week to pass the authorizing measure for Live Earth by unanimous consent. But Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) raised an objection on the floor, seeking more time for his side to look at the resolution.

Inhofe appeared to see little room for an accommodation that could allow the concert to go forward. ?There?s no compromise. Either we change the rules or we don?t.?

Inhofe added that other members share his concerns, including unnamed Democrats as well as Sen. Bob Bennett (R-Utah), ranking member of the Rules Committee, which has jurisdiction over the concert resolution.

Democrats ?may not be willing to stand up to Al Gore, but many of them found it just as objectionable as Republicans do,? he said.

Bennett?s office did not return a request for comment by press time.

Inhofe?s latest challenge to Gore comes after their forceful exchange during last week?s hearing in the environment committee, when Chairwoman Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) stepped in to stop Inhofe from dictating terms of response to the 2000 presidential nominee. Gore declined to sign a personal energy usage pact proffered by Inhofe.

The Mall is already booked during the July 7 date slated for Live Earth, so the exigent need to secure use of the Capitol led Rules Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) to support unanimous passage, Rules staff director Howard Gantman said.

?They have made it clear that they?re opposed to it,? Gantman said of the GOP. ?They?re blocking passage of the bill. As far as next steps, if Republicans wanted to discuss their opposition, we would do so.?

Chad Griffin, an adviser to Live Earth, was taken aback by Inhofe?s objections to using the Capitol to promote environmental health. The West Front was used to inaugurate Earth Day in a 1990 event, for which Gore, a former senator, sponsored the authorizing resolution.

?This is a totally non-partisan event,? Griffin said, noting that Reid cosponsored the concert resolution with Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-Maine).

The Capitol concert would be free of charge, incurring a $5 million cost to Live Earth. Promoters would recoup that amount if they were forced to choose another venue, Griffin said. Reid added language to the resolution ensuring that the Capitol Police would be reimbursed in advance for their estimated $1.5 million in security costs.

?It was a priority for Live Earth that the taxpayers not pay a single dime? for the show, Griffin said. ?Given that, we remain optimistic.?

Snowe, a longtime supporter of carbon emissions curbs who co-chairs an international climate-change group, said yesterday that she was surprised the concert idea had become controversial among her colleagues. She expressed hope that concert organizers would not be forced to move the U.S. performance out of Washington if the Capitol proves impossible.

?That would certainly provide an unfortunate message on behalf of the U.S., that somehow we?re languishing in our desire to combat the problem,? Snowe said. ?We should be a leader in this endeavor.?

Reid remains optimistic that the climate-change fight can come to the Capitol dome, spokeswoman Liz Oxhorn said.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/549788-inhofe-vows-to-put-brakes-on-gore/
Share on other sites

Why the **** would they ever allow a concert at the Capitol? Seems like a stupid idea.

Agreed! "Chad Griffin, an adviser to Live Earth, was taken aback by Inhofe?s objections to using the Capitol to promotenvironmental healthb>. The West Front was used to inaugurate Earth Day in a 1990 event, for which Gore, a former senator, sponsored the authorizing resolution."

I would not be surprised if the right folds...

Your right...let's follow the great Gore...let’s use as much energy as he does...? I do not think anyone has any bragging rights.

Both of your points are questionable, to devalue the environmental movement because of two hack politicians? Either way, I can't wait to see the concert at the vatican! Perhaps in westminster abbey. Oooh the russian and german parliaments next?

Both of your points are questionable, to devalue the environmental movement because of two hack politicians? Either way, I can't wait to see the concert at the vatican! Perhaps in westminster abbey. Oooh the russian and german parliaments next?

Questionable...I do not devalue a clean environment; Pollution is something we must deal with; both side of the aisle must come to terms with that...the extreme side of environmentalism is what is questionable.

Your comment is rather vague. Would you care to list some examples of extremist environmentalism?

Off-Topic: Speaking of environmentalism, the ethical treatment of animals should be high on everyone's list. Please click the ad in my signature and fill out their short form to show your support for stopping the seal hunt -- 300,000 voices for 300,000 seals. You don't have to pay for anything, subscribe to any emails, or anything like that. It'll take less than five minutes of your time. I would appreciate it :)

Your right...let's follow the great Gore...let’s use as much energy as he does...? I do not think anyone has any bragging rights.

I don't see you out there trying to help prevent further pollution of the earth. And so what if he uses energy? You can't reach the masses of America by not using any energy at all. You could call him a hypocrite for using his own private jets and whatnot, but the point is he's out there trying to accomplish something and spread his opinion. If he makes a difference, I think the ends justify the means in his case. This is America after all, and last I knew, free speech was what this country was built on. And even if the whole "global warming" thing isn't so true as many portray it to be, there's nothing wrong at all with preventing pollution to our planet. You can't say it will NEVER affect us.

Your comment is rather vague. Would you care to list some examples of extremist environmentalism?

Off-Topic: Speaking of environmentalism, the ethical treatment of animals should be high on everyone's list. Please click the ad in my signature and fill out their short form to show your support for stopping the seal hunt -- 300,000 voices for 300,000 seals. You don't have to pay for anything, subscribe to any emails, or anything like that. It'll take less than five minutes of your time. I would appreciate it :)

I don't see you out there trying to help prevent further pollution of the earth. And so what if he uses energy? You can't reach the masses of America by not using any energy at all. You could call him a hypocrite for using his own private jets and whatnot, but the point is he's out there trying to accomplish something and spread his opinion. If he makes a difference, I think the ends justify the means in his case. This is America after all, and last I knew, free speech was what this country was built on. And even if the whole "global warming" thing isn't so true as many portray it to be, there's nothing wrong at all with preventing pollution to our planet. You can't say it will NEVER affect us.

Need I say more... :wacko: :woot:

Are you implying that I sound like an "extreme" environmentalist? Or are you implying that you simply do not care at all what happens to the earth because you wont have to be around when we could possibly have problems?

I am not implying anything on you KingBob; I do not know you...I am an animal lover as you appear to be. I have two dogs and two cats...every stray I find I take in and find them a home or take to a non-kill shelter.

But When I read stuff like this...

Fight Global Warming by Going Vegetarian

According to the United Nations, the meat industry ?emerges as one of the top two or three most significant contributors to the most serious environmental problems, at every scale from local to global.?

Global warming has been called humankind?s ?greatest challenge? and the world?s most grave environmental threat.1 The scientific community says that there is no doubt that global warming is real and that humans are largely to blame. Human activities are emitting vast amounts of ?greenhouse gases? that prevent heat from escaping from the Earth?s atmosphere. Scientists report that this phenomenon will increasingly lead to catastrophic natural disasters, such as more frequent and intense droughts, floods, and hurricanes; rising sea levels; and more disease outbreaks. Scientists also warn that global warming threatens the lives of millions of humans and countless other animals. Many conscientious people are trying to help reduce global warming by driving more fuel-efficient cars and using energy-saving light bulbs. Although this helps, science shows that going vegetarian is perhaps the most effective way to fight global warming.

In a groundbreaking 2006 report, the United Nations (U.N.) said that raising animals for food generates more greenhouse gases than all the cars and trucks in the world combined. Senior U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization official Henning Steinfeld reported that the meat industry is ?one of the most significant contributors to today?s most serious environmental problems.?2

Carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide together cause the vast majoRaising animals for food is one of the largest sources of carbon dioxide and the single largest source of both methane and nitrous oxide emissions.ous oxide emissions.

Carbon Dioxide: The burning of fossil fuels (such as oil and gasoline) releases carbon dioxide, the primary gas responsible for global warming. Producing one calorie of animal protein requires more than 10 times as much fossil fuel input?releasing more than 10 times as much carbon dioxide?than does a calorie of plant protein.3 Feeding massive amounts of grain and water to farmed animals and then killing them and processing, transporting, and storing their flesh is extremely energy-intensive. In addition, enormous amounts of carbon dioxide stored in trees are released during the destruction of vast acres of forest to provide pastureland and to grow crops for farmed animals. On top of this, animal manure also releases large quaYou could exchange your ?regular? car for a hybrid Toyota Priusar for a hybrid Toyota Prius and, by doing so, prevent about 1 ton of carbon dioxide from entering the atmosphere each year, but according to the University of Chicago, being vegan is more effective in the fight against global warming; a vegan prevents approximately 1.5 fewer tons of carbon dioxide from entering the atmosphere each year than a meat-eater does.4 The math is simple: You could spend more than $20,000 on a Prius and still emit 50 percent more carbon dioxide than you would if you just gave up eating meat and other animal products.

Methane: The billions of chickens, turkeys, pigs, and cows who are crammed into factory farms each year in the U.S. produce enormous amounts of methane, both during digestion and from the acres of cesspools filled with feces that they excrete. Scientists report that every pound of methane is more than 20 times as effective as carbon dioxide is at trapping heat in our atmosphere.5 The Environmental Protection Agency shows that animal agriculture is the single largest source of methane emissions in the U.S.6

Nitrous Oxide: Nitrous oxide is about 300 times more potent as a global warming gas than carbon dioxide. According to the U.N., the meat, egg, and dairy industries account for a staggering 65 percent of worldwYou Can Help Stop Global Warming!

The most powerful step that we can take as individuals to avert global warming is to stop eating meat, eggs, and dairy products. , eggs, and dairy products.

So with this not only should we stop producing animals...let's get the hunters some ammo, right?

Prius = Dust to Dust maybe worse for the planet then a Hummer >>>>> Source

While your "dust to dust" example may be true, the point is, at least an effort is being made and there can be no harm in that. Doing something is better than doing nothing, and maybe they do use more energy per mile as of now, but the efforts made to get this far as it is will likely improve this with time. We can only hope that the ends will justify the means, that's what change is all about. It might be a small risk, but many times it is for the better.

I don’t quite see the extremist environmentalism in kingbob’s post. Gore may need to take planes to get his message out. So what? You can argue about the pollution caused by a single plane in comparison to all of the reductions that take place because of Gore’s influence on people – not to mention those people who spread the idea to their friends, the children who learn about conserving electricity and stuff when they are young so an entirely new generation of polluters like ourselves won’t sprout up, people who write in to their mayors and representatives, and so on. It can certainly be said that Gore is helping more than hurting.

I also don’t quite see how becoming a vegetarian for environmental reasons constitutes extremism. Vegetarianism is essentially a way to get your energy more directly instead of it going through a long cycle and wasting a lot of the energy. It really isn’t much different from what software programmers do. You find a function in your code that is needlessly consuming CPU cycles and RAM storage space – energy consumption – and reduce it to improve the efficiency of the program. Vegetarianism is also an ethical way of attaining food. I’ve been contemplating the switch myself.

As for the “Hummer is Greener than Prius” stuff, that has been disproven for a while already. It’s not your fault for not noticing though. The media really didn’t report on the rebuttals that have been put forward. I think this article, and many of the comments made to it, gives plenty of good reasons the Hummer study was flawed: http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2007/2/12/115426/732

I don?t quite see the extremist environmentalism in kingbob?s post. Gore may need to take planes to get his message out. So what? You can argue about the pollution caused by a single plane in comparison to all of the reductions that take place because of Gore?s influence on people ? not to mention those people who spread the idea to their friends, the children who learn about conserving electricity and stuff when they are young so an entirely new generation of polluters like ourselves won?t sprout up, people who write in to their mayors and representatives, and so on. It can certainly be said that Gore is helping more than hurting.

I also don?t quite see how becoming a vegetarian for environmental reasons constitutes extremism. Vegetarianism is essentially a way to get your energy more directly instead of it going through a long cycle and wasting a lot of the energy. It really isn?t much different from what software programmers do. You find a function in your code that is needlessly consuming CPU cycles and RAM storage space ? energy consumption ? and reduce it to improve the efficiency of the program. Vegetarianism is also an ethical way of attaining food. I?ve been contemplating the switch myself.

As for the ?Hummer is Greener than Prius? stuff, that has been disproven for a while already. It?s not your fault for not noticing though. The media really didn?t report on the rebuttals that have been put forward. I think this article, and many of the comments made to it, gives plenty of good reasons the Hummer study was flawed: http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2007/2/12/115426/732

That is my point MegamanXplosion; let's slow down and sort fact from fiction....We have all kinds of stories coming out...each side seems to have the truth. From what I can tell the almighty GREEN dollar is the only thing being protected on both sides. We have folks preaching at us to live a better way; while they do want they want... Do not eat meat to save the planet....next hunters will say "Let?s Kill :no:als for the Planet" :no: Let?s get the:)acts and then act accordingly :)

It's not solely aimed at Americans. Does he know that?

I am not sure Joel; I do know that Global Warming is being used to stop third world countries from using fossil fuels...Americans are not yet giving their lives. The biggest proponents will not even curtail their use...they use their wealth to buy carbon credits............phonies. I wonder how much green they make pushing this....

The hunters may claim that we should kill animals for the planet. It wouldn’t surprise me. After all, how different of an argument would that be in comparison to their arguments in favor of hunting seasons? I think their arguments would fail though – rhetoric like that of the Hummer article.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
    • Putin was behind Farage/Brexit and behind Trump/MAGA. Different idiot lying beasts, same fascist master. Same screwed up results for both nations.
    • For me the Final Fantasy games, Langrisser I & II, Hardspace: Shipbreaker, Horizon Forbidden West Complete Edition, Metaphor: ReFantazio and LUNAR Remastered Collection
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      465
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      217
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      155
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!