Transparent, see through, blurred, GLASS in VISTA BASIC!


Recommended Posts

This is considered Warez, why? You are trying to circumvent and get access to features that you are not supposed to access! If you want Glass, you should have gotten the correct version.

Discussion of warez on this board is not tolerated. You should be warned and this thread should be closed.

Oh boy. Here comes Neowin's mall security. Watch out...

He is not bothering/attacking you nor is Vista your product so you aren't losing any money. Stop crying like a bitch.

AFAIK, noone has been able to enable Aero on Vista Basic so this would be a Neowin exclusive although I have my doubt on this accually working.

Thats pretty awesome Diesel, it's a wonder it wasn't noticed earlier. Vista Glazz is obviously so close to having an 'Enable Aero' option for Home Basic users. I don't see this as being a problem cos all they'd be doing is extending the dll patching to accommodate this feature.

So just to get the sequence down (I use Business N so it's not exactly for my benefit), I assume you did all three steps to get to where your system is at in the video? How long does the transparency last, eg. does it stop if you wake it from sleep, etc.

Does look a little buggy I suppose though with the window shading cropped right to the edge of each window and only visible at the corners. Have you tried pumping the window border size up and do you have access to transparency settings, etc? If not, try running the Color Transitions app which has an option (in a round about way) to alter transparency of the borders.

What I mean by "trying to circumvent and get access to features that you are not supposed to access", I mean getting features you haven't paid for that you can get by paying more! Vista Ultimate doesn't give you custom theme support that only DLL patching can do, so that's legal.

so no-cd cracks are legal too? seeing as you cant buy the game without copy protection, you're completely free to edit it so it's no longer there?

I dont understand what I'm seeing, your saying that theres some sort of bug that causes aero glass to be enabled with dual screens? (with he VistaGlazz patch)

exactly, but it won't work with just any dual screen setup. I tried to 'turn off' and than unplug the external monitor to try and get the bug to work on the external monitor but it doesn't work on that, so it must be something specific within the laptop's turn off screen thingy.

Thats pretty awesome Diesel, it's a wonder it wasn't noticed earlier. Vista Glazz is obviously so close to having an 'Enable Aero' option for Home Basic users. I don't see this as being a problem cos all they'd be doing is extending the dll patching to accommodate this feature.

So just to get the sequence down (I use Business N so it's not exactly for my benefit), I assume you did all three steps to get to where your system is at in the video? How long does the transparency last, eg. does it stop if you wake it from sleep, etc.

Does look a little buggy I suppose though with the window shading cropped right to the edge of each window and only visible at the corners. Have you tried pumping the window border size up and do you have access to transparency settings, etc? If not, try running the Color Transitions app which has an option (in a round about way) to alter transparency of the borders.

the transparency lasts as long as you leave the window alone, It won't allow me to resize the window and If I maximize it'll turn the aero off(i'm not sure about minimizing though, I'll try that later).

and no It doesn't look buggy at all, I have 1gig ram and a onboard video with ram share and it runs perfectly(even with it over video).

but I'm not sure what you're talking about in regards to the boarder size? and no I do not have access to transparency settings. but thanks for the link I'll try that out later today after I get home from work.

-------------------------

edit:

Okay I just tried to minimize a window with aero, when I restore it it goes back to maximized state. than if I try to put it back into un-maximized state it goes back to normal vista basic.

Basic has aero, hands down. I think vista glazz is somehow triggering it when a maximized window is forced to be resized by the software.

Edited by Lominono

Yeah, I see whats happening. The resolution difference between monitors is keeping the "maximised window properties (transparent bar/border thanks to VistaGlazz)" and dimensions of the window when changing to a higher resolution screen (the notebooks) which in turn means the DWM is still able to keep the 'no aero' restriction in place but only after window manipulation by resizing the window.

I'd say to get this working properly, you'd need to get into hacking other resources that VistaGlazz isn't involved with currently...

Yeah, I see whats happening. The resolution difference between monitors is keeping the "maximised window properties (transparent bar/border thanks to VistaGlazz)" and dimensions of the window when changing to a higher resolution screen (the notebooks) which in turn means the DWM is still able to keep the 'no aero' restriction in place but only after window manipulation by resizing the window.

I'd say to get this working properly, you'd need to get into hacking other resources that VistaGlazz isn't involved with currently...

yup yup.

and I measured the aero window, exactly at 640x480(the resolution of the external monitor when the laptop's monitor is turned off.

---------------

woops my bad, I opened up my mouth too soon,

with the shadow around the boarder, it's at 652x492. and without the shadow it's at 650x490

Wow this is unexpected.

What we do in VistaGlazz, is that we patch your UxTheme, ThemeUI and Shsvcs files to allow custom styles. After that when you hit the transparency button, it patches your Aero.msstyle file to enable transparency in a maximized state.

We've never tested the product on Windows Vista Home Basic.

Did the program tell you that your files were corrupt or just unpatched? If they were unpatched, then they are identical to Home Premium and Ultimate. If they were corrupt and you forced a patch, then I guess that could have some effect on the transparency in Home Basic.

One thing that I should note: VistaGlazz was not intended to work, and has not been tested, for the Home Basic version of Windows, only for Windows Vista versions supporting Aero (both in software as in hardware).

But that doesn't make it less cool :)

Edited by Zyphrax
Wow this is unexpected.

What we do in VistaGlazz, is that we patch your UxTheme, ThemeUI and Shsvcs files to allow custom styles. After that when you hit the transparency button, it patches your Aero.msstyle file to enable transparency in a maximized state.

We've never tested the product on Windows Vista Home Basic.

Did the program tell you that your files were corrupt or just unpatched? If they were unpatched, then they are identical to Home Premium and Ultimate. If they were corrupt and you forced a patch, then I guess that could have some effect on the transparency in Home Basic.

One thing that I should note: VistaGlazz was not intended to work, and has not been tested, for the Home Basic version of Windows, only for Windows Vista versions supporting Aero (both in software as in hardware).

But that doesn't make it less cool :)

I think that it said unpatched.

oh I forgot to mention this, I did this process too, I think I did it after doing the glazz thing(and I have it set to vista standard instead of basic, but the aero works in both)

1. Login as a user with Administrative privileges -or- have Administrative

credentials ready (check under the keyboard for a slip of paper).

2. Navigate to %systemroot%\System32

3. Right-click uxtheme.dll and click properties.

4. Take ownership of the file and close dialogs.

5. Repeat steps 3 and 4 for themeui.dll and shsvcs.dll

6. Right-click uxtheme.dll and click properties.

7. Give yourself (or group) Full Control permissions and close dialogs.

8. Repeat steps 6 and 7 for themeui.dll and shsvcs.dll.

9. Rename uxtheme.dll to uxtheme.old.

10. Rename themeui.dll to themeui.old.

11. Rename shsvcs.dll to shsvcs.old.

12. Copy patched files into %systemroot%\System32

13. Reboot (yes, this is really required)

14. Enjoy!

Zyphrax: It just says they were unpatched, when you patch them transparency is enabled for maximised windows, so its doing exactly what it does on other versions of Vista. Do you think it's possible to patch the themes to allow complete transparency?

If the msstyle part reported unpatched as well, then that would mean that the msstyle file is exactly the same as on the other Windows editions.

I'm not that much of a msstyle guru, more a C#/WPF coder :)

I'm not sure which part of the patching process caused the transparency effect in Vista Home Basic...

Great Find!!!

I knew this would progress with out me. (I have been using Ubuntu lately).

UPDATE: I have singled out the line of code for maximized glass, I think it also contains the settings for the non-maximized state. since I have the whole thing commented out, it acts as it should. I will look for the same color settings in the rest of the file to signify the color/transparency settings for a non-maximized window. I hope.

later.

  • 2 weeks later...

I found another way to generate the Aero windows (translucent window borders) in Vista Home Basic using the tweak utilities Vista Glazz and Pitaschio. This is a very impractical method to get window transparency working on Home Basic in a usable form, it's more of a POC or whatever.

Anyway, first you need to have done both steps in Vista Glazz. With an explorer or similar window open that isn't maximized or minimized, launch Pitaschio and click the "Manage windows" button near the right hand corner. Select an active window from the list and then just click the "Maximize" button from the group of buttons below, then "Change size". This maximizes the window then Pitaschio improperly resizes it back down with the "maximized-mode" borders still in effect.

Download Vista Glazz (220 KB)

Download Pitaschio (55 KB)

Another thing I can tell you, there is absolutley no way to enable glass from within the msstyles, just isn't possible. Enabling maximised glassed is more of a glitch, whatever Microsoft did to disable glass in basic they didn't bother to apply it to maxmised state windows because from there point of view it shouldn't have been visible anyway.

I've got a feeling they did something inside DWM, anyone bothered to check the DWM in Home Basic against the one in Premium?

Just registered to post this...

This is the google gadget menu in vista basic. Not only is it transparent in the central area but even the window frame has become transparent. So google know how to do it. Anyone here work for google? ;)

Looking at the text underneath and beyond the JPEG compression artifacts, it doesn't look very blurred, as I can actually still read the text, like the "showtopic=" part. That would be impossible if it actually was Glass at the text size and JPEG compression. Hence, Google is most likely using the traditional transparency support first introduced in Windows 2000. I also know that transparency applies to the window frame/border as well.

Looking at the text underneath and beyond the JPEG compression artifacts, it doesn't look very blurred, as I can actually still read the text, like the "showtopic=" part. That would be impossible if it actually was Glass at the text size and JPEG compression. Hence, Google is most likely using the traditional transparency support first introduced in Windows 2000. I also know that transparency applies to the window frame/border as well.

Ah right. Thanks for that.

Still, I'd prefer clear glass to smudgy smoked blurry glass. Anyone know whether there any themes that utilise this feature that we can slap into vista basic?

Ah right. Thanks for that.

Still, I'd prefer clear glass to smudgy smoked blurry glass. Anyone know whether there any themes that utilise this feature that we can slap into vista basic?

No, because basic's styles aren't much more capable than those in XP.

I think all is going well in this matter. and this way doesn't infringe on anything that Microsoft has built in. this uses a function that they overlooked.

Here is a screen shot for all of you that still doubt Vista Basic Home can't do transparency.

All we have to do now is build a sidebar widget that maximizes and then changes the maximized size to the windows original size. We need to make this an automated process. that takes every new window and performs this trick. without you having to set it manually.

CHEERS!!

post-165061-1182194805_thumb.jpg

..Here is a screen shot for all of you that still doubt Vista Basic Home can't do transparency.

@Electrik Jesus- how did you get a completely transparent task bar..yours really looks great. did you use a custom msstyle. please let me know. i GOTTTA mhave this . THX in advance.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. What???
    • What part of "you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever" is not clear enough?
    • Nope. That lack of surround sound capability (analog) won't fly with me. Sure, I use headphones most of the time, but still.
    • Creative Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe review: your headphones will love it by Steven Parker If you have been reading Neowin for any length of time, you may remember that I reviewed the Sound Blaster Audigy FX Pro back in April. I found it to be an excellent budget sound card, even though it lacked support for formats such as DTS over the included SPDIF port. Anyway, Creative reached out to me again asking if I was interested in reviewing the Sound Blaster AE-X. It is a card mainly targeted at headphone wearers, which I'll get into a bit later. Before we get underway, here is a disclaimer: Creative Labs provided a free sample without any review pre-approval. Here are the full specs of it: Creative Sound Blaster AE-X Dimensions: 179 x 126 x 18 mm Weight: 263g / 9.28 oz Platform: PCI-e DAC: ESS ES9039Q2M Connectivity Options Side: Rear: 1 x HD Audio Front Panel Connector, 1 x ⅛“ Headphone port, 1 x RCA Line-out (Left) port, 1 x RCA Line-out (Right) port, 1 x Coaxial SPDIF-out port, 1 x ⅛“ Mic in/Line-in port, 1 x TOSLINK SPDIF-in port Surround: No DNR / SNR: THD+N: 0.0001% Dynamic Range 130 dB Recording Resolution: PCM up to 32-bit / 192kHz (Stereo) Direct Mode: Line Out (Stereo): PCM up to 32-bit  384 kHz Coaxial SPDIF Out: PCM up to 24-bit 192.0 kHz Headphone Amp: PCM up to 32-bit / 384kHz (Stereo) Native DSD: DSD64, DSD128, DSD256 Output Impedance: 1Ω, Supported Headphone Impedance: 8–600Ω, IEM: 0.5Vrms, Low: 1.5Vrms, Mid: 3Vrms, High: 6Vrms, Maximum output power: 350mW @ 32Ω (High), Maximum output voltage: 6Vrms (High) Front Panel Headphone Amp: PCM up to 32-bit / 192kHz (Stereo) Native DSD: DSD64, DSD128 Output Impedance: 10Ω, Supported Headphone Impedance: 32–300Ω, Maximum output power: 40mW @ 32Ω, Maximum output voltage: 1.9Vrms ASIO: ASIO 2.3 Total Harmonic Distortion: THD+N: 0.0006% Dynamic Range: 114 dB Scout Mode: Yes EMI shielding: No (but it passed all the FCC emission tests) Operating temperature: 0–45°C Input Power: 12V⎓0.5A Warranty: 1 Year (MSRP) Price: $179.99 / £169.99 The Sound Blaster AE-X was announced at the end of May, and it becomes clear that it is mainly for headphone wearers. I should also note that the card does not support DDL/DTS encoding technology, but it is said to support decoding through the coaxial SPDIF port. I was able to test this working with the classic Windows Sound properties, but I could not get a DTS (decode) signal through my Logitech Z906, it defaulted to 3D sound whenever I played DTS content through Plex or Emby. In addition, this card only supports two channels (stereo) over the speakers. The surround support is limited to the Headphone Amp, so before I get underway, what we have here is a card mostly intended for headphone use, especially with its SPDIF In (Toslink) port where you could connect another device like a console. So what about the highlights of this card? The AE-X is powered by the ESS SABRE DAC (ES9039Q2M), which is capable of a 130 dB dynamic range. In addition, it supports 32-bit/384 kHz playback for deeper detail and clarity. The headphone amplifier delivers up to 350 mW @ 32Ω, which admittedly far surpasses standard onboard audio, offering support for studio-grade headphones. DSD256 and ASIO 2.3 are also supported. What doesn't it have? No support for What-U-Hear, Super X-Fi, or the SmartComms Kit No EMI shielding, but it passed all the FCC emission tests (from the FAQ) I also want to make it clear that I am no audiophile. For me, it's purely subjective and it should just "work" out of the box. First impressions As I said in the introduction, I was a bit sad to see that the AE-X only supports stereo output, meaning it would not be on par with my ALC1220 over my speakers, as I mentioned it seems like this card is marketed toward headphone users. Since I am not an avid gamer that would rule me out as a potential customer, but I can still test its capabilities! The card arrived in a nice-looking box, as shown above. It's quite a bit larger than the Audify FX Pro that I reviewed back in April, and at first I thought the covering meant that it was EMI shielded, but it isn't as mentioned above in the highlights section. What's in the box: 1 x Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe card 1 x 3.5 mm CTIA TRRS to Dual TRS Headset Splitter Cable 1 x Quick Start Guide Aside from the Quick Start Guide, which someone at my age (I guess) needs a magnifying glass to read thanks to the tiny fonts, Creative Labs also has the manual online, which first requires you to prove that you're human in order to access it (so I can't direct link it). Anyway, the box is mostly made up of cardboard, and the only plastic in it is the anti-static bag for the card itself. Design Top Bottom The card itself looks pretty cool and actually wouldn't look out of place in an all-white build. There's only one connector, and for some reason it is awkwardly placed on the side (front-facing) that is for the front panel audio connector, which will let you use the headphones through the front PC audio jack. Since the front panel Headphone Amp has fewer capabilities than the rear headphone port, I decided not to use it. Rear of card PCI-e interface The rear of the card is completely open and is normally where you would find the front panel connector. The PCIe interface side is completely covered, which initially made me think it was EMI shielded. I/O panel Side (front-facing) with Front panel connector On the outer rear bracket side we have the TOSLINK SPDIF in, Coaxial SPDIF out, RCA line out (Right), RCA line out (Left), Headphone out, and Mic/Line in ports. On the front facing portion of the card itself is the F-panel connector. Usage Test System Our test system consists of the following: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D Gigabyte X870E AORUS MASTER (BIOS F12) Corsair RM1000x (2024) Thermal Grizzly Kyronaut (33x33x0,2mm) 2x 32GB Kingston Fury Beast RGB DDR5 6000MT/s CL36-38-38-80 T-Force Z540 2TB (PCIe Gen5) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition (NVIDIA) Creative Sound Blaster AE-X Windows 11 25H2 Pro I installed the card into the Gigabyte X870E AORUS MASTER which includes the RealTek ALC1220 onboard audio. For our subjective listening tests, I used the Coaxial SPDIF port to my Logitech Z906 speakers. For headphone tests I used the OneOdio Studio Max 2 Wireless DJ Headphones that I reviewed last month. After installing the audio driver, I installed Creative Nexus, which is a relatively new app designed for the latest Sound Blaster cards. Then I discovered the AE-X needed both a driver update from 1.00.15.0001 to 1.01.09.000 and a firmware update from 1.00.06.0000 to 1.00.06.0002, then I was set to go. It should be noted that the card did not work without the driver (not Plug and Play). As you can see above, you can manage the firmware, driver, and inputs via Advanced Settings on the Device tab. By default Nexus enabled "Direct Mode". Upon clicking on Acoustic Engine, the Equalizer can be enabled and set to four different presets, which are: Gaming Music Movies Footsteps Enhancer There's also a dedicated Scout Mode for gamers. I mainly used Tidal and Spotify in the past week to listen to some of my Liked Songs (which now total over 700) in Shuffle mode; there were no pops or interference that I could hear. I also found a 5.1 Surround Music playlist on Tidal that sounded really great over Studio Max 2 headphones. When I reviewed the Audigy FX Pro, I went out and purchased a Logitech Z906 set second-hand for €100 specifically to use with the card, but in this instance all I could get on the AE-X was the 3D output of surround sound through Coaxial SPDIF and although it still sounded great, it isn't quite as good as DTS Interactive via my onboard Realtek ALC1220. Conclusion So what have I learned? The AE-X lacks multi-channel support for 5.1/7.1 setups and drops support for modern surround technologies like Dolby or DTS, functioning strictly as a stereo output device. So to really benefit, you will need Studio-grade headphones to "hear" the benefits of this card. With that being said, I can imagine it will appeal to gamers who are switching between console and PC. By utilizing the SPDIF in port, you could just plug your headphones into the AE-X (front or rear port) and then switch between PC and Console without having to move the headphones to a different port. As I said in the Sound Blaster Audigy review, the EQ in the Creative Nexus app offers safe presets, which allows a user to further tweak the lows, mids, and highs for a personal listening experience. Of course it all depends on the headphones you hook up to it. Speaking of headphones, I kind of wish I had higher-quality Studio-grade headphones to really test this card with; I'm not usually wearing headphones in my day to day duties. The only time I will wear them is if I want to listen to music very late at night and I don't want to disturb my neighbors, so my rating (verdict) is based on this fact. Someone with a PC/Console setup and wears headphone religiously to game, and consume media will benefit much more than I from the high-quality Headphone Amps that are included in the AE-X. Once again, I do feel like Creative could have gone the extra mile to support the S/PDIF port a bit more. Why include it if you're not supporting the main popular digital formats? It seems like the decision was more of a legacy-based one, offering uncompressed 2-channel PCM audio, for users with high-fidelity audio systems and external DACs. Maybe I will be lucky enough to review a card that truly includes all these features in the future. I am sure readers with far more knowledge on audio systems than me will correct me in the comments below. I'll just say I am happy to learn what I don't know! Where to buy The Sound Blaster AE-X is available to purchase now in preorder for $179.99 on the U.S. Creative website, or for £169.99 on the Creative UK website and will start shipping to customers from June 25.
    • $80 or 90%, anything else would be financial suicide one way or another.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      165
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!