Recommended Posts

LOS ANGELES - New technology designed to thwart DVD theft makes discs unplayable until they're activated at the cash register.

A chip smaller than the head of a pin is placed onto a DVD along with a thin coating that blocks a DVD player from reading critical information on the disc. At the register, the chip is activated and sends an electrical pulse through the coating, turning it clear and making the disc playable.

The radio frequency identification chip is made by NXP Semiconductors, based in the Netherlands, and the Radio Frequency Activation technology comes from Kestrel Wireless Inc., based in Emeryville.

The two companies are talking to Hollywood studios and expect to announce deals this summer, Kestrel Wireless Chief Executive Paul Atkinson said.

The companies said their technology also can be used to protect electric shavers, ink jet cartridges, flash memory drives and even flat-screen TV sets by preventing some critical element from functioning unless activated.

Retail theft of entertainment products, including video games, accounts for as much as $400 million in annual losses, according to the Entertainment Merchants Association.

Many retailers now keep consumer-entertainment products behind glass cases, but that can inhibit browsing. With technology that renders stolen products useless, retailers could display items openly, thus encouraging more sales, said Mark Fisher, vice president for strategic initiatives at the EMA.

"It will also get product into a lot more outlets that are afraid of theft, including grocers," Fisher said.

source

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/559465-chips-on-dvds-could-prevent-theft/
Share on other sites

how many DVDs actually get stolen from shops anyway?

Yeah I was gonna say like what is the point in doing this? I mean if someone is gonna steal a DVD... aren't they more likely to just download that movie? Its a good idea, but I dunno if its worth investing millions of dollars into to implement this in stores.. :/

This technology isn't so foolproof as they think, if I understood the article correctly:

A thin coating that blocks a DVD player from reading critical information on the disc must also be added along with the chip

I think it means that only the index, ie, the inner circle of the disc is covered with the material, not the entire disc. So it means that a hardware player won't know what's in the disk, the file, their names, sizes, location, etc. Yes, that information is indeed critical, because without it the player won't be able to see the disc. But remember, the actual data part of the disc is still readable.

If you're playing it in a PC, all you have to do is open IsoBuster, and use the "Search for lost files" option :)

Trust me, it works. I purchased a few, really cheap discs and burned them. After a couple of weeks, a part of the inner circle actually got peeled away, but the rest of the disc was still intact. Windows wouldn't read the disc of course, but IsoBuster was able to! The only loss was that I lost my file names, but for a DVD this shouldn't be problem - we all know what the files are named anyways :)

Why, you wouldn't even need IsoBuster. One could modify a drive to ignore the index and just get the raw data off the disc. Then you could run a simple signature-based file recovery software and extract the files :p

I'll give you 24 hours before somebody write a program that will bypass/disable that chip :pinch:

a program couldn't disable the chip, it would have to be something that physically altered the disc. it's not software protection.

and this makes me wonder why they haven't put some sort of chip ( something like the style of a SIM card or the like ) on the inner circle of DVD's that a DVD player would read and verify that the disc is a legal copy? you'd think companies would be much more worried about digital copies being made than copies actually being stolen from retail stores...

All it takes is two people to circumvent this technology, and no hardware, no cracks:

1. A cashier with a friend.

2. The cashier's friend.

Friend goes to purchase some stuff from the store, along with some CD's. Or just CD's. If no one is around to see, he/she just "activates" the CD. Done. Sure, they better need to know each other, but it only takes one stolen DVD to hand out millions of copies on the Internet, Chinese streets, whatever. I'm not even sure why they bother anymore. What did this copy protection thing with custom chips cost to research and implement? As afhunaki said above, the problem isn't with the stealing -- that's neglible in comparison.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The useful lapdogs  
    • Nobody is buying a PS5 only for playing Until Dawn 2. Their loss.
    • If you actually used it instead of responding like a petulant child you might be surprised. I switched from Google some time ago and have been very satisfied.
    • I am one of the first people to use the DXVK technology. In the channel below you can see some videos that I have made using this technology, including Assassin's Creed Odyssey. https://www.youtube.com/@nahum7995/videos Assassin's Creed Odyssey experienced several bugs and technical issues during its first months after release. It launched with its own fair share of funny but frustrating glitches. I ran it on DXVK 9 days after its release and I played it for many hours but didn't see a single significant bug on Linux. Assassin's Creed Odyssey is widely celebrated for pushing the franchise in bold new directions and specifically for nailing several elements better than any other title in the AC series: Player Choice & Branching Narrative, The Mercenary & Cultist System, Mythological Integration, Overpowered Combat Abilities, Open World Exploration But what I'm trying to point out is that this game wasn't quite playable on most windows systems, until a few months after its release when most of the bugs were fixed. However, on Linux it ran completely flawless from day one, although DXVK had seen little development and refinement at the time. What do you think the situation will be in 2026 now that most bugs and glitches of DXVK have been completely eliminated? This is information from Google about these situations that I am quoting. In many cases, using DXVK (a translation layer that converts DirectX 9, 10, or 11 into Vulkan) can result in more stable frame times and higher performance than native Windows rendering. This happens primarily by bypassing driver overhead and multithreading draw calls that were previously restricted to a single CPU core. Older APIs (like DirectX 9 and 11) are largely single-threaded on the CPU side. DXVK translates these calls to Vulkan, which is highly multi-threaded. This reduces CPU-bound stuttering on weaker processors. In certain cases, GPU manufacturers (especially AMD) have significantly better and more modern Vulkan drivers than they do for legacy DirectX. Vulkan gives developers—and in this case, the translation layer—closer control over how resources are held in VRAM. This can prevent micro-stutters and sudden frame drops during chaotic gameplay. Yes, certain games, particularly older DirectX 9 to 11 titles, can run with fewer crashes on DXVK than on native Windows. By intercepting DirectX draw calls and translating them into the modern, highly efficient Vulkan API, DXVK bypasses the limitations and poor driver support that cause instability in aging game engines. PlayStation 1, PlayStation 2 and PlayStation 3 can be easily and perfectly emulated on Linux. In fact, modern Linux emulators offer high-performance upscaling, widescreen patches, and automatic controller mapping out of the box.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 PlayStation 1/2/3 games look drastically better on Linux thanks to resolution upscaling. Furthermore, it is also a fact that you cannot play many fun games on Windows either, isn't it? - The Nintendo Switch has an extensive library of exclusive games. - PlayStation has an extensive library of exclusive games - Android has "mobile-exclusive" games, meaning they are exclusive to mobile devices (iOS and Android) and aren't available on PC or consoles. And finally, it is also the case that in the next five years there will be games that millions of people will say you absolutely must play and that they want to play this specific game that released a few days ago. However, the other side of this story is that currently, absolutely no one cares that they cannot play these upcoming games right now.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      490
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      232
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      68
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      58
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!