Starcraft 2 - Official!


Recommended Posts

I think there's a small chance that it could be released this year. If not, then I guess we can expect it to be released sometime in Q2/Q3 2010. After all, the other two campaigns (Protoss & Zerg) will each take a year to be released after the game. That's right, a year. That means we won't be seeing those campaigns until 2011, at the earliest.

http://www.starcraftwire.net/blog/comments...ft-ii-for-2009/

But we all know Blizzard and their delays.....

http://www.starcraftwire.net/blog/comments...ft-ii-for-2009/

But we all know Blizzard and their delays.....

As much as we want the game to be released early, we really have to consider the daunting task of balancing the units, structures, and abilities. That alone could delay the game well into 2010. But, I'm optimistic so I expect the game to be released in 2009 (even if it's released on the 31st of December).

As much as we want the game to be released early, we really have to consider the daunting task of balancing the units, structures, and abilities. That alone could delay the game well into 2010. But, I'm optimistic so I expect the game to be released in 2009 (even if it's released on the 31st of December).

Your missing the point of that link, it is confirmed for 2009.....but as I said, knowing Blizzard, delays will arise and chances are it wont be out in 2009. Based on whats been confirmed, releasing in 2009 would not be "released early".....it would be released on time.

Your missing the point of that link, it is confirmed for 2009.....but as I said, knowing Blizzard, delays will arise and chances are it wont be out in 2009. Based on whats been confirmed, releasing in 2009 would not be "released early".....it would be released on time.

Am I really missing the point?

Next year's offerings from Activision Blizzard should include highly anticipated PC strategy title StarCraft II, the sequel to one of the world's most enduringly popular games.

The keyword there is "should". It doesn't say "will", now does it? A 2009 release date is highly unlikely but not entirely impossible. Knowing Blizzard though, they're going to release the game when they feel its ready. Unlike some video game developers, Blizzard isn't bound by strict release dates. In any case, it's nearly half-way through 2009 and Blizzard is yet to release a public beta for StarCraft II or Battlenet 2.0.

I see the word should as a word meaning that it will happen unless something, like a delay, arises before it happens.

We'll just wait and see. Mmm'k? :)

It's ok if Blizzard delays games, why are we arguing over this? Delays are actually good things when it's by Blizzard.

I can wait. In fact, I prefer waiting because that means the game will be even more polished.

I'd say there's like 5 employees working on SC2... seriously, this game will never be released. They started Diablo 3 too early and they deployed too many forces on this game. And people are still working on WOW.

Delays are never bad because it gives you time to polish a few things and all, but delaying it like one or two years is abusive. The proof : they had to re-do all of the graphics because they were expired... Even the graphics they have right now will be expired in like a year lol

Anyway I still can't wait to try it or buy it, but IMO they don't take this game seriously anymore.

I'd say there's like 5 employees working on SC2... seriously, this game will never be released. They started Diablo 3 too early and they deployed too many forces on this game. And people are still working on WOW.

And they have people working on two other games (one, for sure), I think. They're kinda busy. :) But this is Blizzard, nothing unexpected. Nevertheless, better to wait than to be sorry for getting it early with lower quality.

StarCraft II was announced on May 19, 2007. It's April 21, 2009. That's 1 year, 11 months, and 3 days (including today) since the announcement of the game. We don't know how long they've been working on the game. Anyway, Blizzard already has a number of contests for beta keys (see here). I'm all for a 2009 release but from what we know, it's unlikely. Unless of course Blizzard rolls out a beta for StarCraft II and Battle.net 2.0 in the summer or something. Only then would a 2009 release seem likely.

In the meantime, we can enjoy the slow but eventual Battle Reports. Haven't seen them yet? Check out #1 and #2!

EDIT: Turns out that StarCraft II was in development since 2003, shortly after the release of Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne. I doubt they started any "real" development until 2007.

I can't believe you guys are complaining about how long it is taking, Blizzard releases nothing but top quality games for a reason. People are way too used to yearly game releases ala Call of Duty that are nothing more than a glorified expansion pack or total conversion mod running on the same engine. If you want the quality, depth, and innovation that Blizzard always delivers, it takes time. I'm so glad they are making a ton of money of WoW so we don't have to worry about them selling out to a lame publisher like EA, Blizzard has consistently been one of the best game studios in the world, and they have made a joke of all the other studios who whine about the PC gaming market being unworkable.

I can't believe you guys are complaining about how long it is taking, Blizzard releases nothing but top quality games for a reason. People are way too used to yearly game releases ala Call of Duty that are nothing more than a glorified expansion pack or total conversion mod running on the same engine. If you want the quality, depth, and innovation that Blizzard always delivers, it takes time. I'm so glad they are making a ton of money of WoW so we don't have to worry about them selling out to a lame publisher like EA, Blizzard has consistently been one of the best game studios in the world, and they have made a joke of all the other studios who whine about the PC gaming market being unworkable.

True, Blizzard is one of the most respectable and prestigious PC game developers around. They're known for releasing top-quality games. But it doesn't hurt to "hope" for a late-2009 release date for StarCraft II. :)

True, Blizzard is one of the most respectable and prestigious PC game developers around. They're known for releasing top-quality games. But it doesn't hurt to "hope" for a late-2009 release date for StarCraft II. :)

Oh yeah of course. :D I cannot wait to get my hands on this game.

I wonder how many of you are aware of the professional scene.

Professional and semi-pro/elite level players have been worried about the MBS/Automine feature making the game easier. I don't think this is the case anymore, but any delays Blizzard makes in SC2's release is to work unit and mechanic balances.

Blizzard probably wants to do everything in their power to make sure progamers/viewers will be happy with SC2's ability to be a competitive game.

Anyway, can't wait for SC2

ooV

I wonder how many of you are aware of the professional scene.

Professional and semi-pro/elite level players have been worried about the MBS/Automine feature making the game easier. I don't think this is the case anymore, but any delays Blizzard makes in SC2's release is to work unit and mechanic balances.

Blizzard probably wants to do everything in their power to make sure progamers/viewers will be happy with SC2's ability to be a competitive game.

Anyway, can't wait for SC2

ooV

I always get a good laugh out of gamers who think their skill in the game gives them some credibility on how the next game should be made, when they don't have a clue as to how to make a game. Professional and gaming do not belong in the same sentence.

I wonder how many of you are aware of the professional scene.

Professional and semi-pro/elite level players have been worried about the MBS/Automine feature making the game easier. I don't think this is the case anymore, but any delays Blizzard makes in SC2's release is to work unit and mechanic balances.

Blizzard probably wants to do everything in their power to make sure progamers/viewers will be happy with SC2's ability to be a competitive game.

Anyway, can't wait for SC2

ooV

I'm definitely aware of the professional StarCraft gaming scene. It's quite popular in Korea. However, I didn't know about that "auto-mine" feature. I think that's a bad idea. Hopefully, Blizzard will remove it. I'm sure most of the development work is on balancing and mission making.

I always get a good laugh out of gamers who think their skill in the game gives them some credibility on how the next game should be made, when they don't have a clue as to how to make a game. Professional and gaming do not belong in the same sentence.

On a personal level, it doesn't give them credibility (so to speak). But on a whole, they do have an influence on the outcome of StarCraft II. In fact, Blizzard has worked closely with elite players to balance the game. And Blizzard themselves said that their main design goal was to cater to the demands of professional players.

  • 1 month later...

StarCraft II Battle Report #3!

http://www.gamez.nl/pc/nieuws/27329/nieuwe...p-gamez-nl.html

By far, it's the best one. It's 18 minutes long and we're shown some new units and game mechanics. Also, the StarCraft II beta is very close (see here).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • That reminds me. Now that i have Quest 3 I should go back and try the first one in VR. ... last time i did that I tried it in some janky VR setup which was still really good.
    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!