[Cancelled] Sarah Connor Chronicles (Terminator Series)


Recommended Posts

Both are science fiction shows, they're far more related than Terminator and Prison Break or Lost and 24. The type of show doesn't matter, the point is one show had much, much more going for it (fan base) than Terminator, and it still got the axe. Fortunately they allowed the creator to make a movie out of it to conclude it.

Uhm, Firefly's MAX rating was a 4.0. Ever. And that was the premiere. It mostly did in the high 2s. That is absolutely pitiful for something on network TV, even if its Fox. The general rule of thumb is to add 1.5 to a Fox rating to get an ABC/NBC/CBS equivalent, and a low 4 on those networks would result in the person who put the show on the air being fired.

Now, it had a vocal base of devotees, but it didn't draw in the mass market. SCC has at least somewhat pulled in the mass market.

You can love Firefly all you want, lots of people did. But to say it had 'more going for it' is just downright incorrect.

I wasn't referring to the numbers but to the quality of the show. In regards to ratings, FOX royally screwed Firefly, and with Terminator, they've given it far more exposure and tender loving care. The "premiere" of Firefly was the second episode, which was supposed to have aired following the true two hour premiere. I strongly doubt Terminator will see the same outpouring that Jericho had with it's revival and the mass buying of the Firefly series on DVD that lead to it getting a movie. Terminator was never aired out of order, preempted, or shoved to the deathly Friday timeslot.

IMHO, Terminator has been so-so at best. It's a great idea that worked well for the movies, but not for TV. None of what they have done would be suitable for a movie because it's below par anyhow, and of course, if it were a movie they could've stepped it up a notch, but I couldn't see that being done well with its current writers. While it is somewhat serialized, it has gone more the route of a show like Chuck (and Firefly) where each episode is "today's new adventure." That style doesn't work well with the Terminator universe, there just isn't that much to tell to justify a full dedicated TV series. There have been three movies, with three more coming, so assuming that all six end up being two hours each, that's 12 hours of a large story to tell that spans over many years with none of this day to day, "this is how we survived and lived" nonsense. Half of the movies are going to be about the war against the machines, while the series' whole premise is to prevent the war completely, so just how many versions SkyNet's will they destroy before the series would ultimately end? Yawn-tastic material there.

Alright, now that I've given my input, back to what I originally said. The stories and characters of Firefly were more entertaining and interesting; oh, and it had that one great element: it was unique. SCC lacks everything Firefly had, so in that regard, I say it had more going for it. Unfortunately for Firefly, the special effects quality, while great for a TV show, gave it a hefty price tag, another reason FOX ditched it so quickly.

I wasn't referring to the numbers but to the quality of the show. In regards to ratings, FOX royally screwed Firefly, and with Terminator, they've given it far more exposure and tender loving care. The "premiere" of Firefly was the second episode, which was supposed to have aired following the true two hour premiere. I strongly doubt Terminator will see the same outpouring that Jericho had with it's revival and the mass buying of the Firefly series on DVD that lead to it getting a movie. Terminator was never aired out of order, preempted, or shoved to the deathly Friday timeslot.

IMHO, Terminator has been so-so at best. It's a great idea that worked well for the movies, but not for TV. None of what they have done would be suitable for a movie because it's below par anyhow, and of course, if it were a movie they could've stepped it up a notch, but I couldn't see that being done well with its current writers. While it is somewhat serialized, it has gone more the route of a show like Chuck (and Firefly) where each episode is "today's new adventure." That style doesn't work well with the Terminator universe, there just isn't that much to tell to justify a full dedicated TV series. There have been three movies, with three more coming, so assuming that all six end up being two hours each, that's 12 hours of a large story to tell that spans over many years with none of this day to day, "this is how we survived and lived" nonsense. Half of the movies are going to be about the war against the machines, while the series' whole premise is to prevent the war completely, so just how many versions SkyNet's will they destroy before the series would ultimately end? Yawn-tastic material there.

Alright, now that I've given my input, back to what I originally said. The stories and characters of Firefly were more entertaining and interesting; oh, and it had that one great element: it was unique. SCC lacks everything Firefly had, so in that regard, I say it had more going for it.

Terminator isn't going to get canceled. Its going to be renewed.

You may think that Firefly was more interesting, and other fans may feel the same way. I never watched it, so I can't say. But the general public obviously didn't view it that way. The public loves things they already know. Thats why SCC, despite all the things you mentioned, still pulls 7+ million viewers. Thats why there are 14 different versions of CSI and L&O, and thats why you see things like the Family Guy and Prison Break spinoffs.

I by no means think SCC is anything great. Its just an average show. But its definitely more popular than Firefly ever was. Serenity didn't even make back its production budget in theaters - even including worldwide, which is undoubtedly a failure.

Jericho was never any good either, but it had a much larger audience than Firefly, at least. Bringing it back was a huge mistake by CBS, thats what they get for listening to online petitions.

SCC will get a second 13 or so episode season, and then be ended at the end of that run.

.............

You can love Firefly all you want, lots of people did. But to say it had 'more going for it' is just downright incorrect.

Thats from someone who admitted that they have never seen the show. You'd be surprised. FireFly had a HUGE fan base, had A LOT going for it, DVD sales are very high, and speaking of serenity the movie, they are rumors going around between the actors and creator Josh of another movie. Its very true, fox "did" screw over Fire Fly from the get go, but there is nothing we can do about it. I find Terminator and fire fly different shows to compare, so its useless arguing.

Thats from someone who admitted that they have never seen the show. You'd be surprised. FireFly had a HUGE fan base, had A LOT going for it, DVD sales are very high, and speaking of serenity the movie, they are rumors going around between the actors and creator Josh of another movie. Its very true, fox "did" screw over Fire Fly from the get go, but there is nothing we can do about it. I find Terminator and fire fly different shows to compare, so its useless arguing.

I'm not comparing the shows at all. Just the facts. Firefly had NO audience. 4.0 max on Fox is downright terrible, no matter how badly they 'screwed' it. A completely awful show like K-Ville did much better than that 4.0 on every show, and it was canceled right away.

I'll take your word for it that the DVD sales were very high, even though it doesn't make sense.

You have three separate things with Firefly. The TV show, the DVDs, and the movie. The TV show did terrible, as I have been saying. The movie also did terrible. Not making even $30 million is a downright disgrace in this day and age. Thats Gigli type of money. Now, you are saying despite those two that the DVD sales were good. Thats fine, maybe every person who ever watched the show bought a DVD set. It still doesn't make up for the other two, and 'every person who watched the show' isn't that high.

But again, there is a difference between a 'dedicated fan' and mass appeal. Firefly had dedicated fans. SCC has mass appeal. SCC therefore has more going for it.

I'm not comparing the shows at all. Just the facts. Firefly had NO audience. 4.0 max on Fox is downright terrible, no matter how badly they 'screwed' it. A completely awful show like K-Ville did much better than that 4.0 on every show, and it was canceled right away.

I'll take your word for it that the DVD sales were very high, even though it doesn't make sense.

You have three separate things with Firefly. The TV show, the DVDs, and the movie. The TV show did terrible, as I have been saying. The movie also did terrible. Not making even $30 million is a downright disgrace in this day and age. Thats Gigli type of money. Now, you are saying despite those two that the DVD sales were good. Thats fine, maybe every person who ever watched the show bought a DVD set. It still doesn't make up for the other two, and 'every person who watched the show' isn't that high.

But again, there is a difference between a 'dedicated fan' and mass appeal. Firefly had dedicated fans. SCC has mass appeal. SCC therefore has more going for it.

A completely awful show? you're basing that on what exactly? You havn't even watched it as you admitted yourself? What makes you think that Terrible ratings = Terrible Show. I explained already WHY it had terrible ratings.. and ill explain it again.

You're right, the show *did* have a low rating. But that doesn't mean the show was terrible, because it did terrible on the ratings. Like its been mentioned many times before, just as Creator Josh whedon explains many times. Fox did things to the show that caused its down fall. Fox aired shows out of order. It caused people to be confused, having to take in too much information at once, as well as trying to figure things out on their own. People don't like to do that. The pilot episode which explains everything for the viewers was aired 2nd to last. COME ON! Thats rediculous. The show had no advertising, and what people saw on air, had no idea what the Eff was going on.

But when people buy DVD's, Word gets spread around, you'd be surprised. People advise other people to check things out, and thats why it has done *very* well on DVD (both the series and the movie serenity).. basically by word of mouth, because that gave people to actually SEE IT IN ORDER and understand what was going on.

Saying a show *is* terrible, because it did terrible on ratings is not very fair at all. Thanks to DVD sales, things are going well for the movie/series.

I discovered the show by word of mouth. I watched the pilot, and was instantly hooked, i went out and bought the DVD box set/ series and movie, just as a small example.

A completely awful show? you're basing that on what exactly? You havn't even watched it as you admitted yourself? What makes you think that Terrible ratings = Terrible Show. I explained already WHY it had terrible ratings.. and ill explain it again.

You're right, the show *did* have a low rating. But that doesn't mean the show was terrible, because it did terrible on the ratings. Like its been mentioned many times before, just as Creator Josh whedon explains many times. Fox did things to the show that caused its down fall. Fox aired shows out of order. It caused people to be confused, having to take in too much information at once, as well as trying to figure things out on their own. People don't like to do that. The pilot episode which explains everything for the viewers was aired 2nd to last. COME ON! Thats rediculous. The show had no advertising, and what people saw on air, had no idea what the Eff was going on.

But when people buy DVD's, Word gets spread around, you'd be surprised. People advise other people to check things out, and thats why it has done *very* well on DVD (both the series and the movie serenity).. basically by word of mouth, because that gave people to actually SEE IT IN ORDER and understand what was going on.

Saying a show *is* terrible, because it did terrible on ratings is not very fair at all. Thanks to DVD sales, things are going well for the movie/series.

I discovered the show by word of mouth. I watched the pilot, and was instantly hooked, i went out and bought the DVD box set/ series and movie, just as a small example.

The 'completely awful show' that I referred to was K-Ville. Which was an absolutely atrocious show that should never have aired. But still had a bigger audience that Firefly.

Saying that something DID terrible is not the same as saying it WAS terrible.

It might have been the greatest show of all time.

But in ratings, and in box office, it did terrible. You cannot dispute that.

Nothing else matters but those things, in this argument, because it was based on 'what it had going for it'. SCC has more going for it in those regards.

You can say Fox screwed it on purpose or whatever. Thats fine. Maybe they did. But that means thats just another thing SCC has going for it. That Fox isn't out to kill it.

You also cannot deny that no matter what order the episodes were in or anything like it, the first episode didn't even do well.

http://home.insightbb.com/~wahoskem/firefly1.html

If the audience had started high and dropped, you can say they were confusing everyone. But it started low and just went lower. Did some people of that audience get confused? Maybe, but it never was a draw to begin with.

The 'completely awful show' that I referred to was K-Ville. Which was an absolutely atrocious show that should never have aired. But still had a bigger audience that Firefly.

Saying that something DID terrible is not the same as saying it WAS terrible.

It might have been the greatest show of all time.

But in ratings, and in box office, it did terrible. You cannot dispute that.

Nothing else matters but those things, in this argument, because it was based on 'what it had going for it'. SCC has more going for it in those regards.

You can say Fox screwed it on purpose or whatever. Thats fine. Maybe they did. But that means thats just another thing SCC has going for it. That Fox isn't out to kill it.

You also cannot deny that no matter what order the episodes were in or anything like it, the first episode didn't even do well.

http://home.insightbb.com/~wahoskem/firefly1.html

If the audience had started high and dropped, you can say they were confusing everyone. But it started low and just went lower. Did some people of that audience get confused? Maybe, but it never was a draw to begin with.

I don't know about the marketing history of Firefly, but I imagine with such a low rating that it likely got minimal ad times hyping its premier, whereas the horrific Eli Stone pulled incredible numbers on the night of Lost's premiere, only because of the non-stop barrage of advertising done, and the tie-in to Lost viral marketing. The same can be applied to SCC, it was one of the only new TV shows to watch because of the strike and even had SuperBowl commercials in its favor. I had never heard of Firefly until a year after the movie was released on DVD, and I imagine that is was the same for a large number of fans that it has today. The whole point of this is that Firefly was never given a chance from the get go, with likely pathetic marketing and non-existant support from FOX to even get the word out about it, but this is all ancient history now and has been discussed to death, over and over.... and over.

SCC will likely live for at least another season, but I would wager that DVD sales for both shows would show Firefly having a significantly higher sale margin. However, this is a mute point because it's not on TV, while SCC, unfortunately, is.

Edited by Mathachew
if you're gonna defend Firefly could you at least spell Joss right? his name is not Josh....

ahahah you're right, i noticed that about 30min after i posted :laugh:

Respond to Episode: I don't feel like responding to much of what you wrote. But what you had it sound like from the begining of your argument is that firefly *is* a terrible show, not terrible based on ratings. Wee *both* agree that it did terrible on ratings, but thats not what im arguing about. I did agree with you there. Finally, to argue about the pilot episode. Of course its going to have horrible ratings after the fact that the viewer base is gone to even get a chance to see the pilot. it wasn't given a fair chance. It did horrible on ratings from the get go, but if things were planned out better for it, i believe it could of made it.

@Mathachew above:

I also never heard of firefly until a year or so AFTER the movie. Another example. The general fan base that fire fly has now probably never watched it when it aired. It was simply never given great advertising or chances that many shows have been given. Its a shame really.

Edited by bolerodan

Honestly, I'm glad SCC is just an alternate reality of Terminator. I hope the next Terminator movie doesn't invovle the SCC in it at all. Yes I stil watch SCC, even though I haven't thought of it highly.

Honestly, I'm glad SCC is just an alternate reality of Terminator. I hope the next Terminator movie doesn't invovle the SCC in it at all. Yes I stil watch SCC, even though I haven't thought of it highly.

Well SCC is all about stopping SkyNet. The next Terminator movies are about the war. They can't coincide.

I would think a finale would be big? or am I missing something?...the staff over at TV Guide said on their podcast that they wouldn't be shocked if they didn't renew the series.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!