[Cancelled] Sarah Connor Chronicles (Terminator Series)


Recommended Posts

Both are science fiction shows, they're far more related than Terminator and Prison Break or Lost and 24. The type of show doesn't matter, the point is one show had much, much more going for it (fan base) than Terminator, and it still got the axe. Fortunately they allowed the creator to make a movie out of it to conclude it.

Uhm, Firefly's MAX rating was a 4.0. Ever. And that was the premiere. It mostly did in the high 2s. That is absolutely pitiful for something on network TV, even if its Fox. The general rule of thumb is to add 1.5 to a Fox rating to get an ABC/NBC/CBS equivalent, and a low 4 on those networks would result in the person who put the show on the air being fired.

Now, it had a vocal base of devotees, but it didn't draw in the mass market. SCC has at least somewhat pulled in the mass market.

You can love Firefly all you want, lots of people did. But to say it had 'more going for it' is just downright incorrect.

I wasn't referring to the numbers but to the quality of the show. In regards to ratings, FOX royally screwed Firefly, and with Terminator, they've given it far more exposure and tender loving care. The "premiere" of Firefly was the second episode, which was supposed to have aired following the true two hour premiere. I strongly doubt Terminator will see the same outpouring that Jericho had with it's revival and the mass buying of the Firefly series on DVD that lead to it getting a movie. Terminator was never aired out of order, preempted, or shoved to the deathly Friday timeslot.

IMHO, Terminator has been so-so at best. It's a great idea that worked well for the movies, but not for TV. None of what they have done would be suitable for a movie because it's below par anyhow, and of course, if it were a movie they could've stepped it up a notch, but I couldn't see that being done well with its current writers. While it is somewhat serialized, it has gone more the route of a show like Chuck (and Firefly) where each episode is "today's new adventure." That style doesn't work well with the Terminator universe, there just isn't that much to tell to justify a full dedicated TV series. There have been three movies, with three more coming, so assuming that all six end up being two hours each, that's 12 hours of a large story to tell that spans over many years with none of this day to day, "this is how we survived and lived" nonsense. Half of the movies are going to be about the war against the machines, while the series' whole premise is to prevent the war completely, so just how many versions SkyNet's will they destroy before the series would ultimately end? Yawn-tastic material there.

Alright, now that I've given my input, back to what I originally said. The stories and characters of Firefly were more entertaining and interesting; oh, and it had that one great element: it was unique. SCC lacks everything Firefly had, so in that regard, I say it had more going for it. Unfortunately for Firefly, the special effects quality, while great for a TV show, gave it a hefty price tag, another reason FOX ditched it so quickly.

I wasn't referring to the numbers but to the quality of the show. In regards to ratings, FOX royally screwed Firefly, and with Terminator, they've given it far more exposure and tender loving care. The "premiere" of Firefly was the second episode, which was supposed to have aired following the true two hour premiere. I strongly doubt Terminator will see the same outpouring that Jericho had with it's revival and the mass buying of the Firefly series on DVD that lead to it getting a movie. Terminator was never aired out of order, preempted, or shoved to the deathly Friday timeslot.

IMHO, Terminator has been so-so at best. It's a great idea that worked well for the movies, but not for TV. None of what they have done would be suitable for a movie because it's below par anyhow, and of course, if it were a movie they could've stepped it up a notch, but I couldn't see that being done well with its current writers. While it is somewhat serialized, it has gone more the route of a show like Chuck (and Firefly) where each episode is "today's new adventure." That style doesn't work well with the Terminator universe, there just isn't that much to tell to justify a full dedicated TV series. There have been three movies, with three more coming, so assuming that all six end up being two hours each, that's 12 hours of a large story to tell that spans over many years with none of this day to day, "this is how we survived and lived" nonsense. Half of the movies are going to be about the war against the machines, while the series' whole premise is to prevent the war completely, so just how many versions SkyNet's will they destroy before the series would ultimately end? Yawn-tastic material there.

Alright, now that I've given my input, back to what I originally said. The stories and characters of Firefly were more entertaining and interesting; oh, and it had that one great element: it was unique. SCC lacks everything Firefly had, so in that regard, I say it had more going for it.

Terminator isn't going to get canceled. Its going to be renewed.

You may think that Firefly was more interesting, and other fans may feel the same way. I never watched it, so I can't say. But the general public obviously didn't view it that way. The public loves things they already know. Thats why SCC, despite all the things you mentioned, still pulls 7+ million viewers. Thats why there are 14 different versions of CSI and L&O, and thats why you see things like the Family Guy and Prison Break spinoffs.

I by no means think SCC is anything great. Its just an average show. But its definitely more popular than Firefly ever was. Serenity didn't even make back its production budget in theaters - even including worldwide, which is undoubtedly a failure.

Jericho was never any good either, but it had a much larger audience than Firefly, at least. Bringing it back was a huge mistake by CBS, thats what they get for listening to online petitions.

SCC will get a second 13 or so episode season, and then be ended at the end of that run.

.............

You can love Firefly all you want, lots of people did. But to say it had 'more going for it' is just downright incorrect.

Thats from someone who admitted that they have never seen the show. You'd be surprised. FireFly had a HUGE fan base, had A LOT going for it, DVD sales are very high, and speaking of serenity the movie, they are rumors going around between the actors and creator Josh of another movie. Its very true, fox "did" screw over Fire Fly from the get go, but there is nothing we can do about it. I find Terminator and fire fly different shows to compare, so its useless arguing.

Thats from someone who admitted that they have never seen the show. You'd be surprised. FireFly had a HUGE fan base, had A LOT going for it, DVD sales are very high, and speaking of serenity the movie, they are rumors going around between the actors and creator Josh of another movie. Its very true, fox "did" screw over Fire Fly from the get go, but there is nothing we can do about it. I find Terminator and fire fly different shows to compare, so its useless arguing.

I'm not comparing the shows at all. Just the facts. Firefly had NO audience. 4.0 max on Fox is downright terrible, no matter how badly they 'screwed' it. A completely awful show like K-Ville did much better than that 4.0 on every show, and it was canceled right away.

I'll take your word for it that the DVD sales were very high, even though it doesn't make sense.

You have three separate things with Firefly. The TV show, the DVDs, and the movie. The TV show did terrible, as I have been saying. The movie also did terrible. Not making even $30 million is a downright disgrace in this day and age. Thats Gigli type of money. Now, you are saying despite those two that the DVD sales were good. Thats fine, maybe every person who ever watched the show bought a DVD set. It still doesn't make up for the other two, and 'every person who watched the show' isn't that high.

But again, there is a difference between a 'dedicated fan' and mass appeal. Firefly had dedicated fans. SCC has mass appeal. SCC therefore has more going for it.

I'm not comparing the shows at all. Just the facts. Firefly had NO audience. 4.0 max on Fox is downright terrible, no matter how badly they 'screwed' it. A completely awful show like K-Ville did much better than that 4.0 on every show, and it was canceled right away.

I'll take your word for it that the DVD sales were very high, even though it doesn't make sense.

You have three separate things with Firefly. The TV show, the DVDs, and the movie. The TV show did terrible, as I have been saying. The movie also did terrible. Not making even $30 million is a downright disgrace in this day and age. Thats Gigli type of money. Now, you are saying despite those two that the DVD sales were good. Thats fine, maybe every person who ever watched the show bought a DVD set. It still doesn't make up for the other two, and 'every person who watched the show' isn't that high.

But again, there is a difference between a 'dedicated fan' and mass appeal. Firefly had dedicated fans. SCC has mass appeal. SCC therefore has more going for it.

A completely awful show? you're basing that on what exactly? You havn't even watched it as you admitted yourself? What makes you think that Terrible ratings = Terrible Show. I explained already WHY it had terrible ratings.. and ill explain it again.

You're right, the show *did* have a low rating. But that doesn't mean the show was terrible, because it did terrible on the ratings. Like its been mentioned many times before, just as Creator Josh whedon explains many times. Fox did things to the show that caused its down fall. Fox aired shows out of order. It caused people to be confused, having to take in too much information at once, as well as trying to figure things out on their own. People don't like to do that. The pilot episode which explains everything for the viewers was aired 2nd to last. COME ON! Thats rediculous. The show had no advertising, and what people saw on air, had no idea what the Eff was going on.

But when people buy DVD's, Word gets spread around, you'd be surprised. People advise other people to check things out, and thats why it has done *very* well on DVD (both the series and the movie serenity).. basically by word of mouth, because that gave people to actually SEE IT IN ORDER and understand what was going on.

Saying a show *is* terrible, because it did terrible on ratings is not very fair at all. Thanks to DVD sales, things are going well for the movie/series.

I discovered the show by word of mouth. I watched the pilot, and was instantly hooked, i went out and bought the DVD box set/ series and movie, just as a small example.

A completely awful show? you're basing that on what exactly? You havn't even watched it as you admitted yourself? What makes you think that Terrible ratings = Terrible Show. I explained already WHY it had terrible ratings.. and ill explain it again.

You're right, the show *did* have a low rating. But that doesn't mean the show was terrible, because it did terrible on the ratings. Like its been mentioned many times before, just as Creator Josh whedon explains many times. Fox did things to the show that caused its down fall. Fox aired shows out of order. It caused people to be confused, having to take in too much information at once, as well as trying to figure things out on their own. People don't like to do that. The pilot episode which explains everything for the viewers was aired 2nd to last. COME ON! Thats rediculous. The show had no advertising, and what people saw on air, had no idea what the Eff was going on.

But when people buy DVD's, Word gets spread around, you'd be surprised. People advise other people to check things out, and thats why it has done *very* well on DVD (both the series and the movie serenity).. basically by word of mouth, because that gave people to actually SEE IT IN ORDER and understand what was going on.

Saying a show *is* terrible, because it did terrible on ratings is not very fair at all. Thanks to DVD sales, things are going well for the movie/series.

I discovered the show by word of mouth. I watched the pilot, and was instantly hooked, i went out and bought the DVD box set/ series and movie, just as a small example.

The 'completely awful show' that I referred to was K-Ville. Which was an absolutely atrocious show that should never have aired. But still had a bigger audience that Firefly.

Saying that something DID terrible is not the same as saying it WAS terrible.

It might have been the greatest show of all time.

But in ratings, and in box office, it did terrible. You cannot dispute that.

Nothing else matters but those things, in this argument, because it was based on 'what it had going for it'. SCC has more going for it in those regards.

You can say Fox screwed it on purpose or whatever. Thats fine. Maybe they did. But that means thats just another thing SCC has going for it. That Fox isn't out to kill it.

You also cannot deny that no matter what order the episodes were in or anything like it, the first episode didn't even do well.

http://home.insightbb.com/~wahoskem/firefly1.html

If the audience had started high and dropped, you can say they were confusing everyone. But it started low and just went lower. Did some people of that audience get confused? Maybe, but it never was a draw to begin with.

The 'completely awful show' that I referred to was K-Ville. Which was an absolutely atrocious show that should never have aired. But still had a bigger audience that Firefly.

Saying that something DID terrible is not the same as saying it WAS terrible.

It might have been the greatest show of all time.

But in ratings, and in box office, it did terrible. You cannot dispute that.

Nothing else matters but those things, in this argument, because it was based on 'what it had going for it'. SCC has more going for it in those regards.

You can say Fox screwed it on purpose or whatever. Thats fine. Maybe they did. But that means thats just another thing SCC has going for it. That Fox isn't out to kill it.

You also cannot deny that no matter what order the episodes were in or anything like it, the first episode didn't even do well.

http://home.insightbb.com/~wahoskem/firefly1.html

If the audience had started high and dropped, you can say they were confusing everyone. But it started low and just went lower. Did some people of that audience get confused? Maybe, but it never was a draw to begin with.

I don't know about the marketing history of Firefly, but I imagine with such a low rating that it likely got minimal ad times hyping its premier, whereas the horrific Eli Stone pulled incredible numbers on the night of Lost's premiere, only because of the non-stop barrage of advertising done, and the tie-in to Lost viral marketing. The same can be applied to SCC, it was one of the only new TV shows to watch because of the strike and even had SuperBowl commercials in its favor. I had never heard of Firefly until a year after the movie was released on DVD, and I imagine that is was the same for a large number of fans that it has today. The whole point of this is that Firefly was never given a chance from the get go, with likely pathetic marketing and non-existant support from FOX to even get the word out about it, but this is all ancient history now and has been discussed to death, over and over.... and over.

SCC will likely live for at least another season, but I would wager that DVD sales for both shows would show Firefly having a significantly higher sale margin. However, this is a mute point because it's not on TV, while SCC, unfortunately, is.

Edited by Mathachew
if you're gonna defend Firefly could you at least spell Joss right? his name is not Josh....

ahahah you're right, i noticed that about 30min after i posted :laugh:

Respond to Episode: I don't feel like responding to much of what you wrote. But what you had it sound like from the begining of your argument is that firefly *is* a terrible show, not terrible based on ratings. Wee *both* agree that it did terrible on ratings, but thats not what im arguing about. I did agree with you there. Finally, to argue about the pilot episode. Of course its going to have horrible ratings after the fact that the viewer base is gone to even get a chance to see the pilot. it wasn't given a fair chance. It did horrible on ratings from the get go, but if things were planned out better for it, i believe it could of made it.

@Mathachew above:

I also never heard of firefly until a year or so AFTER the movie. Another example. The general fan base that fire fly has now probably never watched it when it aired. It was simply never given great advertising or chances that many shows have been given. Its a shame really.

Edited by bolerodan

Honestly, I'm glad SCC is just an alternate reality of Terminator. I hope the next Terminator movie doesn't invovle the SCC in it at all. Yes I stil watch SCC, even though I haven't thought of it highly.

Honestly, I'm glad SCC is just an alternate reality of Terminator. I hope the next Terminator movie doesn't invovle the SCC in it at all. Yes I stil watch SCC, even though I haven't thought of it highly.

Well SCC is all about stopping SkyNet. The next Terminator movies are about the war. They can't coincide.

I would think a finale would be big? or am I missing something?...the staff over at TV Guide said on their podcast that they wouldn't be shocked if they didn't renew the series.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Thanks
    • I actually got to use one of those so called "backup codes" once. It was for a customer, I choose the backup code option, and by the grace of god, they actually hade them printed out. Imagine my surprise, when after using the backup code, Google then told use we had to enter a code they just sent to the gmail address we currently did not have access to. I was not amused, Google backup codes should be the end all get out of jail free card, because you had to have access to the account to even get them.
    • On the topic of being locked out of a service. Recently two different friends of mine got locked out of their Google accounts. Both were hack attempts and one of them is waiting 30 days before he can get back in. He had backup codes and MFA but not a passkey. It was a browser token hack. Anyhow he has to wait 30 days for the dispute or whatever to end. The other person only had a password and is screwed losing all of the email, docs and years of photos. Google won’t help her at all. Her fault because she had no backup/recovery setup. Enable passkeys if possible. Also do NOT use browser based password managers. If using a cloud service make sure it is one you can fully sync to one of your devices so you can back it up. Like a PC or Mac with some backup drive plugged into it. Google is the worst to use IMHO. You can’t sync your photos at all. You have to use the “Take Out” service which is manual and takes days. That service strips the meta data from your photos. Also Google Docs synced to a device are useless without a Google accounts. MS Office/Libre Office is not going to open a link to a Google doc to a dead account.
    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!