[Cancelled] Sarah Connor Chronicles (Terminator Series)


Recommended Posts

Aw? More like ewwww... it's a robot

Correction! Cyborg! There is a difference!

I personally liked it. Huge cliff hanger i felt, but of course their supposed to do that so you come back for the next season and see where it left off. All and all i thought it was pretty cool. John is becoming attached to Cameron it sees. But who wouldnt? People become attached to inanimate so why not a cyborg? I mean this thing is here to protect you and sticks around you like a personal body guard. Hell id be devastated if my cyborg blew up and got destroyed!

Correction! Cyborg! There is a difference!

I personally liked it. Huge cliff hanger i felt, but of course their supposed to do that so you come back for the next season and see where it left off. All and all i thought it was pretty cool. John is becoming attached to Cameron it sees. But who wouldnt? People become attached to inanimate so why not a cyborg? I mean this thing is here to protect you and sticks around you like a personal body guard. Hell id be devastated if my cyborg blew up and got destroyed!

An explosion wouldn't be enough to destroy the machine, John knows this :)

An explosion wouldn't be enough to destroy the machine, John knows this :)

Haha oh yeah definitely. Shes definitely not killed (killed a correct term here?). But she'll for sure come out all mangled looking (well the organic part of her anyways).

Did anyone else notice the Hunch Cameron had before she turned on the vehicle? Squinted her eyes like, a voice in the back of her head is saying somethings wrong, but she did it anyways. Perhaps she is learning too well to become human? Interesting end of that episode towards Cameron .

Or different strokes for different folks.

Oh yeah? More people prefer Comedy, not a Serious Drama. Is that True?

Again, last night's Terminator:SCC was Beaten by CBS Two and Half men REPEAT!

But earned a respectable 7.98 million viewers (#4)

FOX tied ABC for the lead among adults 18-49, with each network drawing a 3.1 rating. NBC earned a 2.8 in the demographic, followed by CBS at 2.6. The CW once again fell below the 1.0 mark.

The Barbara Walters-hosted documentary "The Royal Family" scored a 9.9/15 for ABC at 8 p.m. FOX took second with the season finale of "Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles," 4.7/7. "My Dad Is Better Than Your Dad" scored a 4.3/7 for NBC, topping a "How I Met Your Mother" rerun, 4.4/7, and "Welcome to the Captain," 3.6/5, on CBS. The CW went with a "Gossip Girl" rerun.

I wouldn't see them cancelling this show just cuz it's beat by a Comedy...

Totally different genres. They need to have DIFFERENT strokes for different folks, not everybody watch those MINDLESS Comedies!!!

You think FOX will say, "Well, we did ok, but we were only beaten by a comedy, and since there's nothing else on at that time, we're going to keep pushing because they're two different shows." No, that's not how it's going to be looked at.

The rating on Terminator:SCC WAS respectable, not Horrible. But when 24 comes back, there is the 9pm Monday night slot taken care of, SCC gonna need to move to 8 or another night. Putting it on Friday nights not a bad idea!

so this season only has 9 episodes right ?

Yes, this season is over.

You think FOX will say, "Well, we did ok, but we were only beaten by a comedy, and since there's nothing else on at that time, we're going to keep pushing because they're two different shows." No, that's not how it's going to be looked at.

They don't compare the two. They don't beat 'Men' no matter what they put against it.

The rating on Terminator:SCC WAS respectable, not Horrible. But when 24 comes back, there is the 9pm Monday night slot taken care of, SCC gonna need to move to 8 or another night. Putting it on Friday nights not a bad idea!

Shows on Fridays generally don't do well. Not a good idea.

omg! sarah connor is a pedophile now!

Huh? I don't understand what gave you that conclusion.

I'd hit her! :p

:hump: I second that, and Cameron too, provided they were interested (the actresses, i mean). So not likely... :cry:

Haha oh yeah definitely. Shes definitely not killed (killed a correct term here?). But she'll for sure come out all mangled looking (well the organic part of her anyways).

Did anyone else notice the Hunch Cameron had before she turned on the vehicle? Squinted her eyes like, a voice in the back of her head is saying somethings wrong, but she did it anyways. Perhaps she is learning too well to become human? Interesting end of that episode towards Cameron .

Yes I noticed that too. Maybe she thought that the only way to get that Armenian guy off their backs was to appear to be dead.

I have to say that the Johnny Cash song was a nice touch. When the FBI dude quoted Revelations, i just thought to myself, hey that is the exact quote that Johnny used in a song that he sang (before they played it in the episode). And then when they actually played the song, i was very surprised that they would put a real Country song on primetime television nowadays, but was nonetheless pleased.

I'm in the USA for a couple of days on a flight layover, and I finally got a chance to see the show last night in my hotel room.

Wow, Summer Glau looks like a completely different person since "Firefly". Is it just because she gained weight? Puberty?

I had to Google to make sure she was the same person I thought she was!

I'm in the USA for a couple of days on a flight layover, and I finally got a chance to see the show last night in my hotel room.

Wow, Summer Glau looks like a completely different person since "Firefly". Is it just because she gained weight? Puberty?

I had to Google to make sure she was the same person I thought she was!

I looked at the some pictures of her in Firefly and she does look a lot different. She's 26 now so I don't think it was puberty. I think they are doing her makeup different so she looks young. I think she looks wayyyy better now.

I think it will be given another season but the ratings arent that great to be honest but still it has a cult following.

Same ratings as the rest of Fox's Monday night shows. They are bringing back PB, and this has higher ratings, so it will be back.

Oh yeah? More people prefer Comedy, not a Serious Drama. Is that True?

Again, last night's Terminator:SCC was Beaten by CBS Two and Half men REPEAT!

But earned a respectable 7.98 million viewers (#4)

I wouldn't see them cancelling this show just cuz it's beat by a Comedy...

Totally different genres. They need to have DIFFERENT strokes for different folks, not everybody watch those MINDLESS Comedies!!!

guys thats bad ratings they need alot more to survive season 2 not just show up for a season finale or a season premiere.

guys thats bad ratings they need alot more to survive season 2 not just show up for a season finale or a season premiere.

Really Depend on the Genre it's Losing against... And they Networks better also Realize that. Different Strokes for different people like you SAID yourself!!!

Sitcoms? I just usually ain't into that! What's so great about those? There are so many people enjoy it, well to each their own, I guess... :rolleyes:

A crime/Law/Cop/Doctor/Politics type of show? We had PLENTY of those. ENOUGH!!! :|

Reality shows - Unless you either put up some HOT chicks (And in HD man! :drool:) or something really interesting whatever! I mean the concept of American Idol is FINE, BUT the problem is MAJORITY of people CAN NOT sing! :( I rather just catch the Finale to go straight to the GOOD ones instead. I got BETTER things to do than listening to people singing like monkeys and people guessing numbers (Yes, I'm referring to Deal or No Deal!)

A show like 24? COOL I'd Take that! :cool:

A show like Lost? Awesome the Smarter the Better!!! :woot:

A show like X-files? Definitely Oh YES! :yes:

Edited by JediXAngel

Like I argued before in Smallville thread, if they cancel that show, guess what? That's just another LOSS in the SuperHeroes TV series department, and there AREN'T ALOT of those, so something else that would interest the FANS of 'Superheroes' has to replace it, so Superhero fans like me got Something to WATCH.

But I digress I still think Smallville is A GREAT SHOW (I TOTALLY DISAGREE with those like episode think it sucks now), SAME with my feeling on X-files last couple years - BETTER than MOST of crap on TV these days!

WE DON'T NEED TO want stuff cancelled, then regret it years later... (as I was with the X-files)

Now we end up with MORE Reality shows, More sitcoms, and MORE Craps than before!!!

Edited by JediXAngel
Like I argued before in Smallville thread, if they cancel that show, guess what? That's just another LOSS in the SuperHeroes TV series department, and there AREN'T ALOT of those, so something else that would interest the FANS of 'Superheroes' has to replace it, so Superhero fans like me got Something to WATCH.

But I digress I still think Smallville is A GREAT SHOW (I TOTALLY DISAGREE with those like episode think it sucks now), SAME with my feeling on X-files last couple years - BETTER than MOST of crap on TV these days!

Well they have renewed it for a new series the Smallville so they obviously hope it will keep the fans.

Smallville is a MUCH better show, BUT alright I do NOT gonna derail this thread about it! This is about Terminator, NOT Smallville...

Just making my point... we NEED to keep what's interest us & hope it gets better, instead of instantly yell "IT SUCKS! CANCEL IT!!!"

Maybe KEEP faith in the show, in the writers, or the actors will ENCOURAGE them to do better?

I looked at the some pictures of her in Firefly and she does look a lot different. She's 26 now so I don't think it was puberty. I think they are doing her makeup different so she looks young. I think she looks wayyyy better now.

Yes, shes really cute :blush:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This is why science is the only path to truth. It isn't rigid in its beliefs, rather it changes its views based on scientific discoveries.
    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      164
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      92
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!