[Cancelled] Sarah Connor Chronicles (Terminator Series)


Recommended Posts

good last 2 eps.

except for the part that a ki who knows nothing about computers can can connect future cpu to PS4 :D and has incredible hacking skills without prior experiance...back in ep 1 he was amazed at vista :p

why do the writers even think of that :/

other than that entertaining episodes :)

Please for the love of GOD do not cancel the TSCC ... i like this show a lot ... don't really like the other ones, but this one is really cool (as imperfect with the physics and time travel as it may be) it is still cool, like it a lot

Smallville is a MUCH better show, BUT alright I do NOT gonna derail this thread about it! This is about Terminator, NOT Smallville...

Just making my point... we NEED to keep what's interest us & hope it gets better, instead of instantly yell "IT SUCKS! CANCEL IT!!!"

Maybe KEEP faith in the show, in the writers, or the actors will ENCOURAGE them to do better?

You can't be serious, ok maybe for prepubescent teens Smallville is better but otherwise it is a very cheesy show with nothing but rehashed storylines. Every episode some random person or main character gets super powers from some freak accident or experiment involving kryptonite and goes on a rampage. That got old after the fifth episode.

good last 2 eps.

except for the part that a ki who knows nothing about computers can can connect future cpu to PS4 :D and has incredible hacking skills without prior experiance...back in ep 1 he was amazed at vista :p

why do the writers even think of that :/

other than that entertaining episodes :)

John's always had "hacking" skills. They just didn't show it much in the show. In Terminator 2 he was hacking into ATM's and building security locks at 13, or whatever age he was back then.

You can't be serious, ok maybe for prepubescent teens Smallville is better but otherwise it is a very cheesy show with nothing but rehashed storylines. Every episode some random person or main character gets super powers from some freak accident or experiment involving kryptonite and goes on a rampage. That got old after the fifth episode.

OK I DON'T want to derail this thread any further on Smallville, but See your reply here - https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?show...amp;p=589250288 !

John won't because what existed of him in 99 (or whatever year it was) was sent forward to 2007. Anyone coming from the future to the past could, because they've removed themselves from the future, not the past.

John won't because what existed of him in 99 (or whatever year it was) was sent forward to 2007. Anyone coming from the future to the past could, because they've removed themselves from the future, not the past.

God my brain hurts trying to work that one out haha :D

Talking about timeline confusion, since the series splits after T2, why is Judgment Day in T3 in 2007 and in SCC it's in 2011? Other than Sarah and John jumping to future with Cameron, no other events occured (that we know of) between T2 and T3/SCC continuities ?

SCC ignores T3

SCC skips T3 because the timeline branches, I don't know if it "ignores" it. Maybe they'll write in an explanation one day... but the diminishing canon of the franchise is as revolting as the Knight Rider pilot. I like the show but I hate it at the same time for these reasons.

sweet jebus those last two episodes were fantastic. I loved the slo mo FBI synchronised swimming team. I'd give 'em a 9.5

I actually shouted at the telly "no... you bastards can't leave it there!" It will be a long wait for Season 2.

They better give us MORE action, and Thrills 24 style in Season 2!

The Finale was disappointing but still better than Majority of crap on TV these days I would like to give it another season !

Edited by JediXAngel
They better give us MORE action, and Thrills 24 style in Season 2!

The Finale was disappointing but still better than Majority of crap on TV these days !

It isn't a 24 style show. Its more like Prison Break. Some action, but more of a suspense/thriller.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have a Motorola, one of the lower end ones, it works fine. It is possible to get rid of the Gemini app and also to disable googles assistant , but A.i is still apps. I try to avoid all LLM A.I, is i can, I use no Ai duck duck go.
    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!