[Cancelled] Sarah Connor Chronicles (Terminator Series)


Recommended Posts

Wowzers. :omg:

She looks amazing in that.

I am ashamed that you didn't post that in the secret boobies thread going on. :shiftyninja:

Well there is one picture I could post there theres some bikini action going on.

Do you remember the episode when Cameron told Derek that sometimes the reprogrammed Terminators go bad and that they didn't know why? LOL! WTF would you allow nearly indestructible killing machines to roam freely in your bases with a "glitch" like that? Who in their right mind would be ok with that!? :p

Funny you should say that. Last year, they started deploying "robots" in Iraq. Obviously they don't look like terminators (they look more like Johnny 5 ffs), but they were delayed by about a year because of a problem they had that caused them to go out of control and fire wildly around them.

It gets better - a year later and you know how they've "fixed" them? They added a remote self destruct switch. I **** you not.

So pity the poor little coalition solider walking around beside his mechanical friend, only for it to suddenly go out of control and start firing rounds all over the place. That's not the worst of his problem, because if he doesn't get the **** out of the way soon, it's going to explode!

You couldn't make this stuff up.

Anyway, I gave in and watched the entire season and I have to say, it did indeed get better from the pilot and I quite enjoyed it. Couldn't help but feel annoyed every time something was done on the cheap, but I definitely loved the whole Johnny Cash ending part (that song came into my head the second that guy quoted the text from the bible).

Can't wait for season 2!

Those who are saying Terminator is nothing without Arnold, think about the actual storyline.

Constantly using Arnold's template for the Series 8xx Terminator's is a big mistake, they would be recognised right away, hence why each Terminator should look different when covered in the living tissue.

Using it a handful of times because of John's emotional attachment as a weakness helps, though.

Is this show good, I've been reluctant to start watching it because its counterpart; The Bionic women was quiet lacklustre.

Well for a start different network but yeah SCC is much more superior to Bionic Woman.

Acting = OK-Good sometimes, Not great

Plot = OK, Not great

Action/Suspense = BAD!!! <--- Main problem!!!

Coming from the person who thinks the acting and plot and Smallville are great?

Come on. Both are far superior on SCC when comparing to Smallville. For example. What is the current plot of Smallville?

As far as the 'action/suspense = bad'. This isn't really that type of a show. The action is purposely subdued, I think due to the 'age' of John. You can't really have a teen going around killing people or getting shot at all the time. Its not supposed to be a suspense based show though. Thats why you think its bad. The show is supposed to be different from 24 and Prison Break, something unique.

Take this for what you will he isn't usually wrong tho Dark UFO is reporting this...

My sources at Fox are telling me that The Sarah Connor Chronicles are being renewed for a 2nd season.

Source: SpoilerTV

  • 1 month later...

Sarah Connor Renewed

We interrupt your regularly-scheduled weekend activities to bring you this urgent public service announcement: She'll be back!

Allthough Fox declined comment, multiple sources confirm to me exclusively that Terminator: Sarah Connor Chronicles has been renewed for a second season.

You may now resume your regularly-scheduled weekend activities.

It's definately not the best show, but it does beat Bionic Woman. I do ever so much like Superman, but smallville needs to be re-titled to "sh8tVille" as the plots and scripting amount to a pile of crap.

It's definately not the best show, but it does beat Bionic Woman. I do ever so much like Superman, but smallville needs to be re-titled to "sh8tVille" as the plots and scripting amount to a pile of crap.

you take that back :p smallville keeps getting better and better!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
    • You could disable this "functionality/feature/whatever" with 2 registry keys, ages ago.
    • My Photos app is version 2026.11050.1001.0 and it remembers the window size and position. My Snipping Tool is version 11.2602.49.0 and it can capture the taskbar.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      184
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!