[Cancelled] Sarah Connor Chronicles (Terminator Series)


Recommended Posts

HD Is the Future, Rappy!

So anyway, TV is getting better!

T:SCC is BACK Tonight.

Tomorrow night we have Fringe!!!

WOOT :woot: :woot:

Yep I know I just haven't got a hd player yet :p but I do have an hd telly!

I won't be watching the premiere :s I don't have an HDTV, so I'll wait until someone friendly "backs up" a copy to the interwebs so I can watch it in HD. However I will turn my tivo on to record it. Gotta give them ratings, make sure they don't cancel it on me.

It's BACK!!! :D

Argh, Stupid Song don't like that!!

WOW, this Season Premiere is Great!

It was good, but I didn't like the opening. 5 minutes worth of action slowed down to what felt like 20 minutes.

Also...

I liked when Cameron was telling Sarah "call to him...". IMO that scene really made the series feel like the movie.

Did anyone else feel like the it was painfully obvious that the executive chick was a Terminator? I realized that the first scene with her. Though I wasn't expecting her to be a T-1000.

It was good, but I didn't like the opening. 5 minutes worth of action slowed down to what felt like 20 minutes.

Also...

I liked when Cameron was telling Sarah "call to him...". IMO that scene really made the series feel like the movie.

Did anyone else feel like the it was painfully obvious that the executive chick was a Terminator? I realized that the first scene with her. Though I wasn't expecting her to be a T-1000.

Yeah, I was figuring she was.

I loved it when she started extending her finger out and then impaled the guy in the head like the one in T2

So now there's a T1000-like Terminator that, instead of hunting down John Connor, is involved in creating Skynet? And she has all the emotions and mannerisms that a human, unlike any previous models? Several plot holes in the story and the opening sequence was quite drawn out, and the guy asking the agent questions... why did he talk so funny?! :blink:

I think the previous season had more going than this episode did, so with that, I think I'm done watching it and will instead probably just read about what happens. At least Prison Break is more entertaining, but that's just me.

Edited by Mathachew

Great episode and a good start to the second season. I thought Shirley was a terminator, or had links to them, but feck me a T-1000

Then again great for the plot and season.

So now there's a T1000-like Terminator that, instead of hunting down John Connor, is involved in creating Skynet? And she has all the emotions and mannerisms that a human, unlike any previous models? Several plot holes in the story and the opening sequence was quite drawn out, and the guy asking the agent questions... why did he talk so funny?! :blink:

I think the previous season had more going than this episode did, so with that, I think I'm done watching it and will instead probably just read about what happens. At least Prison Break is more entertaining, but that's just me.

Whatever. Last season can't compare!

There is no need for her to hunt down John Connor with Cameron already doing that. BTW, the BIG plot of Terminator isn't just to kill John Connor, but to create Skynet!

ONLY thing I didn't like about last night was the Song, like I said. Horrible song choice!

Did week #2 of "Gossip Girl" live up to its strong season premiere? Was the return of "Sarah Connor" a success? And did FOX's "Prison Break" get better or worse after last week's dismal return? Monday night results are in.

Good news for The CW; not so good news for FOX. The 20th episode of the teen soap scored 3.16 million viewers, down from 3.38 million it lured to the netlet for last week's Hamptons-based premiere.

The episode was however 2nd best ever in key demos and it built its 18-49 audience from a year-ago telecast by as much as 45%. I'm sure Parents Television Council will be thrilled about that.

As for FOX's "Sarah Connor," the Terminator series was back with only 6.34 million viewers, down from 7.98 million it pulled in for the 2-hour 1st season finale on March 3.

The show did win its timeslot among adults 18-49. Will it do equally well when NBC's "Chuck" gets back into the prime time mix?

Finally, Terminator's lead-out "Prison Break" actually managed to build a little on these numbers and tie CBS sitcom repeats in adults 18-49.

But with only 6.48 million viewers tuning in, the show is still down a million from last year and down 3 million from season 1. This may indeed be the final year for "Prison Break", especially if "Fringe" and "Dollhouse" do well.

[Source]

this was just a good way to start (they continue the way they ended the series)... The end of the ep was lame.

Was a surprise at least to me to see the Garbage singer on the series.

EDIT

I only wish they dont screw (even more) the terminator movies. Would

be great they head to something that have nothing to do with terminators but the way they find to survive (like was the last ep of the 1st season and the beginning of this ep).

Thank God they cut that emo (crap) lookin of John. Seems like they are going to the right way this time. I hope.

I was only shocked because Cameron didn't sneak the "We're gonna have a baby, John!" line with her plea not to be deactivated. What's with the terminators picking up faith and qouting scripture now this season, did the writers think "Oh wow, that works out nicely for the cylons in BSG, lets give it a try!"... seriously. I though the idea of a terminator model was to blend in, the Shirley Manson character with her eye shadow and skanky looks just tosses that out the window. I could go for a little less Sarah and John episode reconciliations... it's like Stan and Kyle discussing whatever moral ambiguities they learned from an episode of South Park feel to it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I grew up a Star Trek fan and never watched Star Wars movies. To this days I've not watched most Star Wras movies. As a result I rarely get these references, I have no idea what this post means. Given the popular reactions these get I have to accept I missed out.  
    • Spotify really have turned in to a butthole of a company. Assuming this isn't a bug then this is a low act for Premium users. Honestly, YT Premium which includes YT Music is a genuine alternative. In any event, the internet enshitification continues unabated...next up, the banning of VPN's.
    • This is why science is the only path to truth. It isn't rigid in its beliefs, rather it changes its views based on scientific discoveries.
    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      92
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!