TorrentSpy Ordered By Judge to Become MPAA Spy


Recommended Posts

We are not flaming him, we are only pointing out the obvious that he is not as innocent as he tries to sound. No one is, and they really need to stop with this perfect "I'm Better than You, I do no wrong" Attitude. At least someone has or will have pirated at least once in their lives that uses a computer, and all of you can deny it all you want. It takes a man to admit something, and we are not as stupid or easily fooled and belittled as you'd like to think.

This or any of my post's were not meant to flame, only for mere information and factual claims. All we were doing is explaining something, and I doubt you are even so innocent yourself Neowin Moderator. No one is perfect, so all we are saying is stop acting like you are, admit it, move on and enjoy your life.

I go through enough of this "I'm so perfect and better than you, never doing any wrong" Attitude in real life enough, and it is as annoying if not more visiting a forum and putting up with the same bull.

Yes I may be Banned or Restricted from posting, but I am only stating my point of view and opinion I was given in conjunction with free speech and freedom of expression as an American Citizen and am merely expressing myself. If I'm going to be penalized or threatened with a posting restriction for merely expressing myself as a given right, I guess by all means do what is necessary in your eyes and restrict me ;)

Some people just choose not to illegally download content. He, nor anyone else in the thread exhibited the 'I am better than you because I don't do that' aire, so stop accusing. It's simply a disagreement. I think it is illegal and wrong to be downloading content, while somehow other people justify breaking the law. This may come as a shock to you, but there are millions out there that haven't even thought about downloading something illegally.

When I was younger and didn't understand the legailties of it, I downloaded one or two things but never really got into it. I quickly found out that it really was against the law. So yeah I can say that I've never gone to torrentspy, or any other warez site for that matter.

Stop thinking everyone else does it simply because you do. And yes, people were flaming him so the posts were removed.

Finally...as Neowin is a private website, you have zero rights here. Simiarly, the companies that you buy software, movies, and music from determine your usage rights. They tell you what you can and cannot do with their product. If they say you can't back up the product, you can't. By all means, keep trying to justify it if you need to.

^ And those millions download music and have burned music cd's all around their house and car dashboards. I can't remember the last time I saw a legit music cd and there's no way that all these people have burned music cds for backup purposes, my ass that's what I think.

I wasn't justifying anything and neither do I think piracy is right. What I don't get is that most seem to forget about Fair Use Laws. Granted it is wrong to pirate copyrighted material, however these companies want to make it a living hell for a legit consumer to back up their media with ridiculous copy protections that do nothing in reality to stop piracy, and will eventually be cracked.

I mean I'd like to extend the life of My CD's DVD's, make a backup and not have to worry about inserting the CD/DVD everytime I want to play a game. I mean after all, I paid for it in full and gained their company revenue, why shouldn't I be able to and why should I have to deal with painstaking, potentially damaging copy protection schemes (StarForce?) and risk system failure just to back up my game to prolong the life of my CD's. Companies make this impossible with these ridiculous copy protections which do absolutely nothing to stop, delay or prevent piracy.

I don't want to Keep spending mega money I don't have to keep re-purchasing these things when they get damaged, and thus is why a backup is necessary for me or most people.

At least I know in the US, that you are entitled to make one Backup of any software you own under the Fair Use Laws granted the original is still in your possession and the backup is not distributed online. Emulation is also not illegal in the United States, granted that you dump your own Bios, and use your original game or a Backup of your original game. While Emulation is not illegal, the downloading of copyright material is which is why you have to make a backup yourself. However I see people screaming piracy when someone mentions emulation even though it's not illegal in itself. Daemon-Tools is also not illegal, and I've seen a fair amount of threads closed on it claiming it is illegal when it was indeed not and only intended for backup purposes to prolong the life of the actual media.

Same goes for torrents, everyone is always screaming the typical piracy excuse claiming pirates are the only ones affected, when in actuality it is not just the pirates and is everyone.

Also, I see this in threads where people are screaming piracy just because a game was released in another country before theirs, they automatically think and scream "OMG, It's Piracy!" right away.

Torrents can be used for both illegal and Legal activities, and I'm sure there is an abundance of Legal, Unlicensed, and Non-Copyrighted Torrents on TorrentSpy as well.

Even the Downloading of Copyrighted material isn't illegal in some countries. Just because it is in the US, doesn't mean the same laws apply to everyone else because the USA says so.

The MPAA or RIAA won't just stop with TorrentSpy, oh no they won't. They will go after every one they can until P2P is stamped out completely. I just want to get something straight. I don't think or agree that piracy is OK. I am against this for one reason, and why I think the MPAA and RIAA are wrong:

Only the torrents are stored on the actual server in a database and not the actual data. A torrent once downloaded can contain anything: A Virus or something completely different than what was described or in the name if the torrent. No one has any way of knowing until it is downloaded, and I seriously doubt the MPAA and RIAA are sitting in front of a computer or computers all day long downloading every single torrent, extracting it if necessary and playing it to actually see if it's a Hollywood movies as they claim. If all they had to go on were torrents and the names of torrents and not actual data, they shouldn't of had a leg to stand on in court and should of lost. Furthermore they should of lost anyways regardless if the torrents were actual movies, because of the fact that no actual data is stored on their servers and is only transmitted via peers or seeds using the protocol.

Need I also mention the hell this will cause not only just for the pirates , but for everyone? Have you not heard the MPAA, RIAA Horror stories of the Prosecutions of the long deceased, those who never used a PC let alone a file sharing program, or people not engaged in file sharing ever?

This affects everyone, not just the pirates. If the MPAA/RIAA can get a hold of this data and Torrent Spy complies there is no end to who they can sue that they think is engaged in file sharing and possibly win regardless if the defendant is guilty or innocent.

In actuality I honestly hope TorrentSpy doesn't comply and moves base off shores on a server in a different country. That does not mean I think Piracy is right, so you can keep from posting your comments on it. It only means I am hoping that TS does the right thing and not fall Prey or Victim to Monopolistic Greedy Bullies like the MPAA/RIAA. And the right thing to begin with would of been TorrentSpy winning the court case to begin with instead of running loops with the MPAA/RIAA.

If you are having trouble with understanding why TorrentSpy should of won the Court Case, I give a detailed explanation above as to why they should of, so pleae read it please before posting one of your anti-piracy rants. I'm asking you nicely to :)

Edited by Xtreme2damax

It's not about people downloading stuff over torrents it's about the fact that some corporate firms have on pay role the MPAA to do the dirty stuff for them. Privacy is a damn right and MPAA wants to take it off us. What's next? Each Internet user should download a monitoring program off MPAA's website to let them know when you browse over the Internet? A web cam pointed at our monitor and keyboard? Pfff... so f****g lame.

ive never used torrent spy so im not sure how much of there content is legit or illegal, and i was talking to bonzai buddy, and his "im better then you, your gonna burn in hell" attitude.

hey look who's the hypocrite! you dont like his "your gonna burn in hell" attitude yet you have the same attitude in your sig. Seriously, your sig is 10 times worse than this MPAA crap, which is already awful.

All that this would result in is people not using TorrentSpy and switching to a different site. Rinse and repeat.. it's been like this for the past few years.. (cry suprnova)

hey look who's the hypocrite! you dont like his "your gonna burn in hell" attitude yet you have the same attitude in your sig. Seriously, your sig is 10 times worse than this MPAA crap, which is already awful.

+1 (ad-blocked his sig, if it offends you just do the same or ignore it i guess..)

I may be wrong, but isn't the MPAA trying to get the information so they can track what people download? Yes, they know the full-sized file isn't stored on the severs, but the .torrent file DOES lead to file. By tracking even what .torrent files are downloaded, shouldn't the MPAA be able to track who's (possibly) downloading what movie/show/whatever?

I guess it's a bit of a fear tactic. 'Download something from TorrentSpy and we'll see you!'

If such a ruling does pass, I wouldn't be surprised if more sites are ordered to reveal the identity of its users/downloaders.

Finally...as Neowin is a private website, you have zero rights here.

damn. I feel so naked. :p

btw, if you have a product that you cant backup, is very restrictive, and the releasing company controls you all your movements (a dictatorship like "company") that product is condemnded... ;)

I may be wrong, but isn't the MPAA trying to get the information so they can track what people download? Yes, they know the full-sized file isn't stored on the severs, but the .torrent file DOES lead to file. By tracking even what .torrent files are downloaded, shouldn't the MPAA be able to track who's (possibly) downloading what movie/show/whatever?

I guess it's a bit of a fear tactic. 'Download something from TorrentSpy and we'll see you!'

If such a ruling does pass, I wouldn't be surprised if more sites are ordered to reveal the identity of its users/downloaders.

Thing is, the MPAA shouldn't have ground to stand on. All a torrent is, is a metafile or basically a text file. The actual data comes from the seeds/peers and does not reside on the TorrentSpy Server. That alone should of been enough so the MPAA didn't have a leg or ground to stand on.

Also a torrent file can contain any kind of data once downloaded. Just because the torrent says ZOMG! Spider Man 3, doesn't mean it is. It could in fact be distributed malware, or something completely different or maybe a fan made impression or impersonation of the movie or a fan made comic.

Thing is that makes this more wrong, is they have no way of differentiating between so called Illegal and Legal files or Bogus files so in the end your privacy or identity will be compromised so the MPAA can get what they want but in reality there is nothing they can do to stop piracy.

Also as mentioned, no one has any way of knowing what the file is until it is downloaded, extracted if it's compressed with an archiver and played to analyze it's contents. So even the Legal or Bogus files that even slightly hint at a reference of a Hollywood movie will be tagged. I doubt people at the MPAA/RIAA are sitting in front of there PC's 24 hours a day all week long Downloading every single file available via P2P or the Web, extracting it if compressed, playing it and analyzing it contents to determine if the file is in fact an illegally distributed movie or music.

This is not only bad for pirates, but for everyone as well as the MPAA/RIAA have filed some pretty bogus and frivolous lawsuits in the past against the long deceased, children who don't use computers or know what a P2P App is, People who have never used a computer or even engaged in any type of P2P Activity and the list goes on.

Edited by Xtreme2damax
Some people just choose not to illegally download content. He, nor anyone else in the thread exhibited the 'I am better than you because I don't do that' aire, so stop accusing. It's simply a disagreement. I think it is illegal and wrong to be downloading content, while somehow other people justify breaking the law. This may come as a shock to you, but there are millions out there that haven't even thought about downloading something illegally.

When I was younger and didn't understand the legailties of it, I downloaded one or two things but never really got into it. I quickly found out that it really was against the law. So yeah I can say that I've never gone to torrentspy, or any other warez site for that matter.

Stop thinking everyone else does it simply because you do. And yes, people were flaming him so the posts were removed.

Finally...as Neowin is a private website, you have zero rights here. Simiarly, the companies that you buy software, movies, and music from determine your usage rights. They tell you what you can and cannot do with their product. If they say you can't back up the product, you can't. By all means, keep trying to justify it if you need to.

Okay, honestly, why does everyone care so much about illegal downloading these day?? We should just move on and accept it as a part of life now. It will never stop so they better quit wasting my tax money away on an issue that won't go away! I hate paying taxes as it is, try not to make it harder for me to swallow it. G**damn....people should get out more.

People should note that most pirates only do it in order to stick it to the RIAA or MPAA so for that reason it isn't a bad thing. For any other reason, it is. If the RIAA were to back off, piracy would drop almost certainly. It only affects the honest people anyway, do you actually think that pirates are even slowed down by DRM or any other means like that? People that pay money for the content are the ones kicked in the face....

Anyone who uses BT please load up a file in your favorite client and look at the peers who are uploading to you and downloading from you. See all those IP addresses? How do you think people get caught on bittorrent? This discussion on TorrentSpy is totally ludicrous. If a US federal judge can execute this order on a off-shore entity and it is enforced then the implications are staggering. It won't matter what torrent index site you use, maybe except of course TPB. Oh on a private torrent index site. Who cares. Hand over the logs of those uploading .torrent files public or private. The stepping stone towards going after the trackers next for the logs.

I think we should just forget about piracy and let it unfold itself. If pirates see that no one is forcing their hand anymore, most of them will stop or drastically reduce what they are doing. The law is like fuel for these people....Piracy is perhaps the best way to have power over the wealthy and authority. It is like a voice for people. Through piracy, they run the show and cost the countries billions of dollars. Many people enjoy this. From my point of view it is like watching morons fight idiots, morons being the people that oppose piracy (like the RIAA) and idiots being the pirates themselves. There are more important things in life besides going after people that are porbably 10 times smarter than you are. Just stop trying to fight a battle you can't win!

Thing is, the MPAA shouldn't have ground to stand on. All a torrent is, is a metafile or basically a text file. The actual data comes from the seeds/peers and does not reside on the TorrentSpy Server. That alone should of been enough so the MPAA didn't have a leg or ground to stand on.

Thats just it, in this case the mpaa isnt going after torrentspy, it went after the information that TS can and has the power to log, ie ip addresses and the names of movies being d/l. it seems to be a different tactic than going after the actual tracker as in the piratebay case.

If I say lieing is wrong, it doensnt mean that i have never lied or will never lie. It still is wrong and it doenst make me a hypocrite.

Its is just as hypocritical to say that companies are greedy and evil and to be illegally d/l movies/games/software.

Can anyone honestly say that they have never recorded something on tv with their vcr or dubbed an audio cassette? Technically it is the same thing as using pirated stuff. I just think they need to just leave torrentspy alone. **AA does not realize that they actually get some sales due to piracy. I know for some software, I download it just to see if it worthwhile to buy later. Samething goes with movies, and games. Some artists actually get their start by having their stuff on various P2P programs. The truth is that most people do not want to take a chance on buying crap. Being able to sample music, movies and games that way can help some sales.

If your like me, you download music just to hear a sneak peak at the music, if it's good or not.

Then, if it's good, I go buy the CD. Nothing wrong about that is there? It may not be legal, but atleast I can prove that I have bought the music.

If your like me, you download music just to hear a sneak peak at the music, if it's good or not.

That's pretty much the main reason why people download torrents. To have a sneak peek at a movie, game or song. As far as I know, most people who download something from a torrent rush out and buy the legit version if they like it :rolleyes:

Also, I have some magic beans I would love to sell you, please PM me for more details.

That's pretty much the main reason why people download torrents. To have a sneak peek at a movie, game or song. As far as I know, most people who download something from a torrent rush out and buy the legit version if they like it :rolleyes:

Also, I have some magic beans I would love to sell you, please PM me for more details.

If you download 30GB of music on OiNK you are not getting a sneak peak at your music. :rolleyes:

If your like me, you download music just to hear a sneak peak at the music, if it's good or not.

Indeed. I own many albums that I would not have bought if I hadn't downloaded it first.

Actually Torrents are NOT illegial. It's what you download throught it that is. These websites like TorrentSpy, have nothing "illegial" on their servers. Just a "bookmark" file directing you to the actual files. Therefore Torrentspy should not be to blame, but the user who created the torrent. For example, some one could create a torrent for OpenOffice.org, a FREE office suite which can be shared. That person is in the right, and if someone creates a torrent for example like a full version of Photoshop, then that person should be punished, not TorrentSpy.

Not siding with **AA but...

Here in the U.S. if you see a torrent that has the name of Gone.In.60.Seconds.torrent and you think because of the name that it is in fact the movie and you download it, you can be busted for it even though it wasn't the movie. A friend of mine was busted over the very same thing. The judge ruled that he thought he was getting the legit movie so that makes him guilty.

Indeed. I own many albums that I would not have bought if I hadn't downloaded it first.

I own many as well. I "sample" 3 or 4 songs and if I like it enough to think the rest of the album is just as good, I buy the CD and remove the downloads. If I don't like it, I don't buy the CD, and I remove the downloads. My 1st copy of Photoshop was obtained that way as well. At the time I had just started doing paid photography work I evaluated several apps before hand. I ended up purchasing PS and have purchased every single version after that.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Uninstalr 3.1 by Razvan Serea Introducing Uninstalr: Easy to use and very accurate software uninstaller for Windows. It can uninstall multiple apps at the same time and we think it’s pretty cool. Developed with expertise by Macecraft Software - the minds behind jv16 PowerTools. Key Features Batch uninstall many apps at the same time. Supports unattended uninstallation of apps. Supports monitoring of new software installations. Also detects portable apps and previously uninstalled software leftovers. Shows all the data added to your system by installed software on a file by file basis. Shows all the data it will remove before starting the uninstallation. Filter and search the list of installed software. According to our benchmark, Uninstalr is the most accurate software uninstaller by leaving the least amount of leftovers when uninstalling apps. Supports detection and uninstallation of Microsoft Store, Steam, Big Fish Game System, Chocolatey, NuGet and Ninite installed software. Supports Windows Dark Mode. Supports Windows 11, 10, 8 and 7. Comes with these translations builtin: Chinese Simplified, Chinese Traditional, Czech, Danish, English, Filipino, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hindi, Hungarian, Indonesian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Malay, Norwegian, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovak, Spanish, Swedish, Thai, Turkish, Ukrainian and Vietnamese. Has a single executable file portable version and a normal setup version. Uninstalr is freeware, lightweight and easy to use. No bells and whistles, no nonsense. Uninstalr’s custom uninstallation engine has a dedicated support for the detection and uninstallation of 15 types of apps: Normal Windows apps Microsoft Store apps Portable apps Chocolatey apps Ninite apps PortableApps.com apps Steam games EA App games Epic Games Store games Riot platform games GOG Galaxy games WarGaming.net games Battle.net games itch.io games Big Fish platform games Uninstalr 3.1 changelog: Key Changes Uninstalr now starts and shows the list of installed apps faster after the initial scan has been completed, and with much smaller memory usage. Uninstalr now detects and highlights apps that automatically start with Windows. Greatly improved the detection of portable apps. Improvements New feature: Uninstalr now detects and highlights apps that automatically start with Windows. New feature: Uninstalr now highlights possible leftovers and apps from Russia and China. This can be disabled from the Settings. New feature: A new filter that allows you to show only software that is installed to other than the system drive. New feature: Users can now select to always do the deepest and the most accurate scan for installed apps, at the cost of the analysis taking a longer time. Greatly improved the detection of portable apps, such as added dedicated support for MiTeC, EZ Tools and SysInternals tools. Improved support for portable apps installed via Windows System Control Center (WSCC). NirSoft portable apps are now listed with "NirSoft" prefix for easier identification. Improved the speed of uninstalling apps. The main installed software listing search will now find "Xbox GameBar" if you search for "Game bar" and vice versa. The tooltip now displays more detailed information of the installed apps, such as its registry key and uninstaller path. The links in the About section now look more like clickable links. The main menu is now more clearly indicated in the main user interface. Microsoft Teams Meeting Add-in for Microsoft Office ships with some Windows 11 installations and is now considered a builtin Windows app and only listed if builtin Windows apps filter is enabled. Added a Help button to the main user interface that opens the help section of the website. Added an option not to close Uninstalr after uninstallation. If you open the Uninstalr website from the app, the website now receives the version number of your current Uninstalr version and warns you if you are using anything but the latest version. Improved the accuracy of the New Software Monitor. Improved confirmation messages for Steam and other platform related uninstalls. Improved the uninstallation performance of Steam games. Fixes: Known bug fixed: Some installed app names are capitalized incorrectly, such as "CCleaner Portable" is listed as "ccleaner portable". Known bug fixed: Some apps can be listed twice, for example, Smart Defrag can be listed once as Smart Defrag and then Smart Defrag Home. Known bug fixed: On the pre-uninstallation screen, the Scripts checkbox can be checked by default on Dark Mode but not on the normal mode. Known bug fixed: Perform Deep Analysis can be started only by clicking the button, not via the Right Click menu, main menu or F4 keyboard shortcut. Muse Hub could be incorrectly listed as Adobe Muse. SyncTrayzor was incorrectly detected as two unrelated software, SyncTrayzor and Syncthing. Smart Defrag was incorrectly listed twice as Smart Defrag 11 and Smart Defrag Home. It was possible to enter non-printable characters to the search input boxes of the main screen, and the path listing screen, which caused the UI to look funny. Changing the translation from Settings, especially many times in a row, caused the UI to distort. If you had multiple instances of portable apps on your system, such as the 64b and 32b versions of the same portable app, typically only one of them was detected, not both. In some very rare cases, Uninstalr UI could start with random characters in its search input boxes, which could make the UI look rather confusing. This was a rare issue, only reported by two users. The pre-uninstallation screen could display non-existing paths for example as the software's installation directory or main exe file. This was a cosmetic issue. New Software Monitor cannot detect the installation of Claude. Selecting all the found software made the UI look funny with the top panel covering everything else (because the names of all the selected software were listed there). Sometimes a Steam game could be listed a normal app instead of a Steam game. If the system restart after an uninstallation is delayed, e.g. because of Windows Updates being installed, this additional delay is incorrectly added to the time how long the uninstallation process took. This cosmetic bug could cause the program incorrectly report an uninstallation time longer than the actual uninstallation time. Uninstalling Minecraft could simply fail. The Only scan the system drive for installed apps setting does not fully work. If some apps are installed to a non system drive and this setting is enabled, the app could still be detected and listed on the main user interface. Changing any settings could also incorrectly alter the Only Scan The System Drive For Installed Apps setting. Microsoft OneDrive and Copilot are not always detected. If you enter something to the search filter field, then select the text and press the Delete key, this triggers the Uninstall button click even if your intent was to delete the text input. If you press the F5 key to refresh the screen during the uninstallation loading screen, the program will crash. If you enabled some setting, such as "Do not analyze installed app installation sizes", it could automatically be unchecked later. Uninstalr doesn't warn you if you try to remove Fortec antivirus. There should be a warning if user attempts to remove any antivirus or antimalware type program. Such programs should not be uninstalled using a third party uninstaller, as they are typically protected against automated uninstallation, for security reasons. With "Do not analyze installed app installation sizes" option checked from the Settings, Uninstalr could still display some installation size related elements in the UI which was confusing. The "Only scan the system drive" option moved under Improve Scan Speed from the General settings. If two software have the exact same name and version number, selecting both of them for uninstallation fails because only one is actually selected. Sorting the installed apps by size sometimes fails and the order is incorrect. The "Don't show which paths are currently analyzed" did not work correctly - some parts of the UI still show the currently analyzed path with this setting checked. The "Don't list software less than 10 MB" filter did not work correctly - some apps smaller than 10 MB could still be listed. Uninstalr could start very quickly and display an empty list of detected apps. Restarting the app usually fixed the issue and the list of installed apps was properly displayed. If you placed portable Uninstalr to a same folder with other portable apps, those were not detected because Uninstalr automatically added its installation folder to the ignore list. When trying to uninstall some specific software, Uninstalr could get stuck on the Searching for more data relating to the app phase. Uninstalr could sometimes do a silent uninstallation even if user had unchecked the Perform a silent uninstallation option. Known issues: Uninstalr can fail to run with an Out Of Memory error in systems that have a lot of installed apps. Using the New Software Monitor tool multiple times during one session can cause the program to get stuck on the Scanning stage. The "uninstallation completed" message box sometimes closes when the user moves the mouse cursor over the button before user clicks it. There is no feedback for the user after Fix Information feature has been used. The Right Click menu's Select by publisher option can display the number of apps per each publisher without correct vertical alignment. The default user interface might not display all of the found installed apps if you have over 600 installed apps. If you do, using the Screen Reader Compatible Interface solves the issue. Leftover apptype filter checkbox is shown in red font only in Dark Mode. Clicking the app's icon from the Windows Taskbar doesn't minimize/restore the app like other apps. The warning about an app that user wishes to uninstall being related to some other app user did not select can sometimes be inaccurate. If app's language is changed without restarting Uninstalr, the list of installed software might not automatically refresh. When software is being uninstalled, the UI can say it is processing paths unrelating to the uninstalled app. This is purely cosmetic and does not mean these paths are removed. Uninstalr might not properly detect and/or uninstall Steam games if they are installed to a drive different than Steam's default location in C:\. You might see "This action is only valid for products that are currently installed" error message from Windows Installer during uninstallation. This is a cosmetic issue. Download: Uninstalr 3.1 | 7.1 MB (Free, paid version available) Download: Uninstalr Setup 3.1 View: Uninstalr Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • I and many others did not vote to get out of the E.u because of Putin or Farage, we did so for our own reasons. You don't have to tel me what my own did or did not do when it comes to the E.U. The EEC is or was the European Economic Community, a different beast to what the E.U is now.The EEC was a mainly about trading, the E.U have gone far beyond that and as I have said before, is now more of a United States of Europe. The U.K did not vote to join a United States of Europe. Anyway, they did not want us in there in the first place, Charles de Gaulle stopped us joining as he claimed we didn’t agree with the core ideas of integration. He was not wrong and that is why we voted out of the E.U when the time came. I was not old enough to vote the first time. My only regret is that we did not have the referendum years ago and got out years ago. If we rejoined, we would have to agree to join the Euro and no doubt Schengen, agree with freedom of movement, we have enough problem with people coming over here as it is. i have no problem with people coming over here if they work and don't try to push their way of life onto us. The E.U has a currency, freedom of movement, an anthem a flag, a parliament, well they are there, not sure if they do anything. Don't sound like something that is just for trading. Oh yeah, also wanted a euro Army. How many stupid rules have the E.U made that we had to follow? I doubt I will see the Uk rejoin the E.U, which suits me. Oh yeah, my partner is Polish, she came over here before Poland joined the E.U and she got fed up of people just coming over here with ease, while she had to struggle. She is now a British citizen and have been for a fair few years
    • Hello, Paul. Thanks for the editorial. It was interesting. I'm going research more into the app and its concept. Of course, if you know me at all, you know that I'd say your articles needs some editing! I always do, don't I? For instance, the article occasionally mentions relays before defining it.
    • Screamer is 50% off on Steam, making it £24.99 here in the UK: https://store.steampowered.com/app/2814990/Screamer/ You might remember the series from the mid 90s / early 2000s, this new game is also by Milestone who created the older games.
    • U.S. partially reverses Anthropic AI ban for Mythos but keeps Fable 5 off the market by Karthik Mudaliar Anthropic says that the U.S. government has finally allowed it to restore Claude Mythos 5. But of course, there's a catch. The rollout is again for a limited set of U.S. organizations that operate and defend critical infrastructure. The company announced this in a post on X (formerly Twitter). This does not mean that Anthropic's latest frontier models are back to normal availability. Fable 5, which was a tuned version of Mythos 5 for public release, remains unavailable. Anthropic said that it is still working with the government to expand Mythos 5 access and make Fable 5 available again, but there's no timeline. Reports from Bloomberg and Reuters say that this decision actually came through a letter from the U.S. Commerce Department. According to Reuters, this would allow more than 100 companies and institutions access to Mythos 5. Reuters also reported that Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick’s letter removes the need for export licenses for approved companies’ non-US citizen employees, as well as Anthropic’s own non-US citizen employees, while restrictions remain for organizations outside the approved list. Anthropic isn't alone with this kind of controlled rollout. OpenAI's newest model family, GPT 5.6, was announced just yesterday, but isn't available for everyone yet. In its announcement, OpenAI also said that access to these models is initially limited to a select group of trusted partners and organizations, with broader access planned later this year. Both of these cases show that frontier AI launches are no longer just ordinary product releases and more like slow and vetted deployments shaped heavily by the U.S. government.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      495
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      154
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!