Recommended Posts

Is there an option to disable the auto-resizing of images such as in the Monthly Desktops threads? If you're running a high resolution, it makes no sense to have images that would normally fit fine on your screen (at full resolution) scaled down to whatever it's being scaled down to. For example, if I'm running 1600x1200 and someone posts an image at 1280x1024, that would fit fine on my screen at 1280x1024, so there shouldn't be any reason to scale it down.

I looked in Board Settings within My Controls and didn't see anything.

Thanks!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/566513-option-to-disable-image-resizing/
Share on other sites

This is something I would be interested in, also. I use the Image Zoom extension in Firefox, and occasionally I change the size of a large picture before it has finished loading. Then, when it tries to resize the already resized picture, it makes Firefox crash. :/

  • 3 weeks later...

Remember that the majority of people out there are likely to have much lower screen resolutions. At work I'm on 1280x1024 and at home 1440x900. We want to make sure that there is a consistent look across the entire site for everybody. By disabling the "autoshrink" feature, you end up making the forum look b0rked for the vast majority that use lower resolutions.

I looked in My Control as well and couldn't see a setting for this so I assume it's a global thing, but one of our Dev's would need to confirm that!

  Neobond said:
Well we already set thumbnails at 640x480 for default, that breaks IE when the images aren't separated with a line break.

Most forums keep to 120x120 thumbnails :s We don't.

Right, and that's appreciated, but it seems like when the page is loading that it's loading the full version of the image rather than a thumbnail. It's only after the page is loaded that the images are resized down to the 640x480 versions. What I'm saying is, if it were a bandwidth issue, then I'd understand the exclusive use of thumbnails, but since the whole image seems to be loading anyways (unless I'm missing something), I'd think that it should be up to the user whether or not the full image is compressed down to a 640x480 thumbnail or not. You see what I mean?

  kylenalepa said:
Right, and that's appreciated, but it seems like when the page is loading that it's loading the full version of the image rather than a thumbnail. It's only after the page is loaded that the images are resized down to the 640x480 versions. What I'm saying is, if it were a bandwidth issue, then I'd understand the exclusive use of thumbnails, but since the whole image seems to be loading anyways (unless I'm missing something), I'd think that it should be up to the user whether or not the full image is compressed down to a 640x480 thumbnail or not. You see what I mean?

Yeah, and it's a bit annoying looking at a full scale image then boom it's shrunk down. It would make more sense if it loaded as a thumbnail.

  Neobond said:
Well we already set thumbnails at 640x480 for default, that breaks IE when the images aren't separated with a line break.

Most forums keep to 120x120 thumbnails :s We don't.

make it 1024 x 768

or AT LEAST 800 x 600 ----------> would be coolnessss :cool:

  • 4 weeks later...
  saachi said:
If you use Greasemonkey or Stylish, give this a jam. My first try at this so it might not work :/

Edit: Err, that crashes my browser when used as a GM userscript. Anyone know whats wrong?

Yeah, freezes my browser too, but thanks for the effort!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Because Apple has never discontinued Mac models before now?
    • I recall reading that they intend to synchronize the version numbers between iOS, tvOS and macOS, so we will also be getting macOS 26 up next.
    • every time.... why can't I install windows 11 on my 8088?
    • No word on how much of an ewaste apocalypse this will cause.
    • The list of Mac devices rumored to get macOS 26 by Hamid Ganji Apple will announce macOS 26 or macOS Tahoe at its Monday Worldwide Developers Conference. As has been reported multiple times over the past weeks, all Apple operating systems will receive a UI overhaul, a touch of AI, and new names at this year's WWDC. The logic behind the "26" in the new macOS version is that Apple aims to align its naming schedule with its 2025-2026 release cycle. The same version number will also appear across iOS, iPadOS, watchOS, and tvOS. While skipping multiple software versions raises many questions, it might help maintain consistency in the Apple ecosystem. With just two days away from the WWDC kick-off, many Mac owners might wonder if the upcoming macOS 26 is compatible with their devices. Here's the rumored list of compatible Mac devices with the macOS 26: MacBook Air (M1 and later) MacBook Pro (2019 and later) iMac (2020 and later) Mac Mini (M1 and later) Mac Studio (all models) Mac Pro (2019 and later) This report comes from MacRumors, which cites a private account on X as the source. However, the interesting thing about this list is that, according to the leaker, Apple might end software support for the MacBook Pro 13-inch (2020 model, two Thunderbolt 3 ports). For now, we should take this claim with a pinch of salt. The 2020 MacBook Pro 13-inch launched with both Intel and Apple Silicon M1 processors. It also comes with two port configurations. Apple is expected to end support for more Intel-based Mac devices this year, and this specific MacBook Pro variant might also be on Apple's kill list. WWDC 2025 kicks off on June 9, and Apple will unveil the latest version of its operating systems with an overhauled UI and a slew of AI-related features. So far, we know what Apple Watch models might get watchOS 26. Apple will announce the compatibility list of various devices at Monday's event.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      abortretryfail earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      Mr bot earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      Bkl211 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Year In
      Mido gaber earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      Vladimir Migunov earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      490
    2. 2
      +FloatingFatMan
      258
    3. 3
      snowy owl
      249
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      223
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      190
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!