Apple's "New" GUI  

725 members have voted

  1. 1. Yay or Nay?

    • Kicks Ass!
      294
    • Meh, Who Cares?
      249
    • Utter Piece of Garbage
      182


Recommended Posts

Apple's going to make people pay an obscene amount of money?

$129 barely buys a good pair of jeans. If you consider that an obscene amount of money then maybe it's time to ask for a raise. Even kids flipping burgers at McDonalds will make that in a weekend.

for an operating system that's not a whole heck of a lot different than Tiger?

If you want substantial changes every few months then go play with Linux. A relatively stable user experience is a feature for modern operating systems. Many people simply have no interest in radical changes to their workflow.

Those screen shots demonstrate well that the new Aqua (as far as we can still speak of "Aqua") still requires a lot of tweaking. The Menu Extras icons for example lack transparency, and the alignment of the arrows on navigational buttons like the ones of the Finder are way off.

Wow, that menu bar could have been soooo much better if they blurred it... But I can see all the kids bashing Leopard saying "ZOMG ITS A TOTAL VISTA RIPOFF HOW DARE THEY ZOMG" but then again they're probably right :whistle: lol

Yes, because it's not like the Dock (which resembles the Windows taskbar much more than the Menu Bar does) hasn't had transparency for ages now. ;) :p

Wow, that menu bar could have been soooo much better if they blurred it... But I can see all the kids bashing Leopard saying "ZOMG ITS A TOTAL VISTA RIPOFF HOW DARE THEY ZOMG" but then again they'd probably be right :whistle: lol

I dont see it that way. Apple had every right to copy microsoft. MS coppied apple, so that opened the door for apple to do the same. eirther way, leopard does look nice. (Y)

$129 barely buys a good pair of jeans. If you consider that an obscene amount of money then maybe it's time to ask for a raise. Even kids flipping burgers at McDonalds will make that in a weekend.

You forget one important point, and it really disappoints me. Steve specifically mentioned that we don't just get OS X basic with $129, but we also get the Premium, Business and Ultimate editions all on the same DVD!!!!!! :) :) How much better can it get than that?

I think most of us were expecting more from the top secret features and Apple has to be careful with this in the future. But, how much "change" is really necessary? Do we want to wait 5 years for each OS like MS does and pay more money? I was hoping for a way better Finder. But coverflow (assuming fast on 1.8 single G5) and the UI tweaks might be enough.

Why does every revision of an OS need a completely different GUI for people to see that it has been updated?!

Think Secret has some new screenshots of the WWDC Leopard build: http://www.thinksecret.com/archives/leopard9a466/

I'm public enemy number one with the new UI

But I must say. I like the screenshots (Y)

I fear...the inner fanboy is taking over. :|

Reading through the comments, it's clear Mac fanatics will praise Apple regardless of what Apple actually delivers.

Vista was criticised for ripping off OSX by the Mac fanatics, and for just being a pretty new UI. This was despite features such as gadgets turning up in Longhorn builds long before Apple got around to ripping off Konfabulator.

So now, somebody suggests Apple may be ripping off Microsoft. So what does some guy say? "Apple had every right to copy microsoft. MS coppied apple, so that opened the door for apple to do the same."

Unbelievable. Did guys like him extend the same courtesy to Microsoft when they were (wrongly) accused of ripping off Dashboard? I'd guess not.

By the way, I use both Vista and OSX.

Reading through the comments, it's clear Mac fanatics will praise Apple regardless of what Apple actually delivers.

Vista was criticised for ripping off OSX by the Mac fanatics, and for just being a pretty new UI. This was despite features such as gadgets turning up in Longhorn builds long before Apple got around to ripping off Konfabulator.

So now, somebody suggests Apple may be ripping off Microsoft. So what does some guy say? "Apple had every right to copy microsoft. MS coppied apple, so that opened the door for apple to do the same."

Unbelievable. Did guys like him extend the same courtesy to Microsoft when they were (wrongly) accused of ripping off Dashboard? I'd guess not.

By the way, I use both Vista and OSX.

I was refering to both as even. i'm on both sides. i like apple and MS.

Its true. Microsoft copied apple, but made their things their own. so apple had the right to do the same.

I agree is looks rushed. I think the icon doesnt look that good because if the poor use of lighting effects. With better lighting effect it would look better IMO
I wonder how the UI would look, if each icon was a 3D object (a plane/rectangle) that had per-pixel lighting, and stuff like normal maps and shaders?

Dynamically changing shadows in the icons would look nice, and magnifying glasses could really work, etc.

That's a job for a bored programmer over a weekend though.

I dont see it that way. Apple had every right to copy microsoft. MS coppied apple, so that opened the door for apple to do the same. eirther way, leopard does look nice. (Y)

Good, then I hope you also give full consent to Microsoft ripping off Leopard with its next OS. After all, now that Apple has copied Vista, Microsoft is allowed to copy Leopard again.

hey like i said, i'm not bashing apple nor ms.

enough with these attacks please. Someone can't say their opinions with out someone bashing them. How would you fell if someone bashes your comments?

you people need to chill. this is an internet forum. one persons opinion wont change what will really happen.

I'd describe myself as an Apple fanboy. But when I saw the new desktop (transparent menu bar & their choice of wallpaper) I thought it was made to look Vista-ish as a joke. And that they we're then going to reveal the 'real new desktop'.

Apple usually has a dig at Windows for copying OS X & their delays releasing the OS, but I think they need to give it a rest with what's going on there lately.

I gave the leaves wallpaper a try but it's way too busy & imposing. Nothing I place on the desktop stands out enough.

I guess the idea is that you use stacks & don't place anything on the desktop? But I still think they could have chosen a much nicer image (that doesn't make me think Vista) to use as their flagship for the desktop.

Apple still have up to 4 months before releasing a final build of Leopard. I'm guessing a few things will be changed by then.

We can only hope so, I know the later tiger builds had nothing new in it other than the Aqua Wallpapers up until it was released.

Apple still have up to 4 months before releasing a final build of Leopard. I'm guessing a few things will be changed by then.

We can only hope so, I know the later tiger builds had nothing new in it other than the Aqua Wallpapers up until it was released.

1. Dashboard is not a Konfabulator rip-off. It's a reincarnation of the Macintosh desk accessories (1984).

2. The Dock first appeared in NeXTStep (late 80's), so it's hard to consider it a rip-off of the Windows 95 taskbar.

3. Apple has been using transparency since Mac OS X Public Beta (2000). Microsoft introduced transparency in the Longhorn betas, which - no matter how you look at it - came after that.

The problem is most people (even on Neowin) don't know that. Hence, they consider Apple a copycat.

post-20672-1182331976.gif

post-20672-1182332006_thumb.jpg

post-20672-1182334291.jpg

Edited by Koyder
I'd describe myself as an Apple fanboy. But when I saw the new desktop (transparent menu bar & their choice of wallpaper) I thought it was made to look Vista-ish as a joke. And that they we're then going to reveal the 'real new desktop'.

Apple usually has a dig at Windows for copying OS X & their delays releasing the OS, but I think they need to give it a rest with what's going on there lately.

I gave the leaves wallpaper a try but it's way too busy & imposing. Nothing I place on the desktop stands out enough.

I guess the idea is that you use stacks & don't place anything on the desktop? But I still think they could have chosen a much nicer image (that doesn't make me think Vista) to use as their flagship for the desktop.

I really have no idea why you keep bring this up. You do realize that it's perfectly possible to change the default desktop picture as easily as it is today on Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger? Right now you act as if Apple hard-coded the thing into the OS. :/

Like I, among others, mentioned before, during the Mac OS X Tiger betas Apple didn't include a new Aqua desktop until only a few builds before GM.

10.1 was so ugly... Seems the Mail icon has never seen an update :/

The Mail icon changed when Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger was released. Not a gigantic change, but a nice tweak nonetheless.

Edited by .Neo
I'd like to see a nice Aqua version of the NeXTStep file browser though.

It's basically just Column view in the Finder, other than not having the "breadcrumb" bar above the other folders (which you don't need in the Finder since you can scroll left and right through the columns, which you couldn't do in the NeXT file browser). In 10.2 and earlier, Finder was even more like the NeXT version since it had the favorites at the top instead of at the left as in the current version (shown below).

I really have no idea why you keep bring this up. You do realize that it's perfectly possible to change the default desktop picture as easily as it is today on Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger? Right now you act as if Apple hard-coded the thing into the OS. :/

It just doesn't show off OS X in a good light to me. The current default desktop shows off OS X really well & still looks great (to me) even after a few years. I'll just change it if it remains the default. I guess I'm disappointed because the Tiger desktop has been my preferred one for so long I was hoping for a new one along similar lines. Maybe I'll grow to like it, I dunno?

Like I, among others, mentioned before, during the Mac OS X Tiger betas Apple didn't include a new Aqua desktop until only a few builds before GM.

I hope so.

I for one, find wallpapers that feature plants/a plant/leaves/not-too-busy wet greenery, quite soothing.

I do like wallpapers featuring plants, leaves etc. in general. It's just the one they chose.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      460
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!