Does Safari's cleartype text give you a headache?


Recommended Posts

We were also trying to have an intelligent discussion, but you can't seem to do so. We already established that Safari has no borders on the sides, whereas IE (and most other Windows apps, for that matter) does. You just seem to be going around in circles and we don't know what the hell is going on. You're still not making any sense.

Sorry you can't seem to follow a discussion properly.

Yes we already established that fact. So what point are you trying to make?

Well.

1) Neowin has no control over the border of the browser window.

2) Safari does not show a border on the left of the window and its users blame it on Neowin.

3) IE7 on Windows Vista does show a border on the left of the window.

4) Intelligent discussion is out-the-window (pun intended) when it comes to a Windows user trying to talk to a Mac user.

So, night-night.

Like I said,

night-night.

Somebody shoot me. Please. This is by far the most agonizing discussion I've ever participated in on Neowin. Or in my entire life.

Ya know, I don't remember you actually being party to the discussion. That is, until you invited yourself in.

Like I said,

night-night.

Ya know, I don't remember you actually being party to the discussion. That is, unless, you invited yourself in.

You must have a really bad memory then. Sorry you've been proven wrong, buddy, but you don't need to be all sore about it.

Well, this thread turned entertaining quite quickly. :rofl:

Anyway, font smoothing has never given me a headache (although some people do prefer their fonts to be pixelated), only time i've gotten a headache from my computer was from my old 17 inch CRT, it was blurry, so nothing was in focus)

Oh, there are settings for Font Smoothing. What do you know. Well the screenshots were set at the default, Medium, but I've just switch to Light.

post-22927-1181966231_thumb.png

IE 7 / Safari at Light / Safari at Medium

Light's much better.

I prefer the furthest right. For me, bolder is easier on the eyes.

Maybe it's because of my screen.

Well.

1) Neowin has no control over the border of the browser window.

2) Safari does not show a border on the left of the window and its users blame it on Neowin.

3) IE7 on Windows Vista does show a border on the left of the window.

4) Intelligent discussion is out-the-window (pun intended) when it comes to a Windows user trying to talk to a Mac user.

So, night-night.

Yeah, you do know you can change the theme of the forum? And what's that got to do with fonts anyway?

Is it normal to NOT be able to resize a window except in the bottom right corner of a window on the Mac OS? That would drive me nuts.

For us Windows users, yes. For them, they could have one argument against Windows's implementation of this behaviour:

Of course, having multiple resize locations (especially near other functions, such as the window's minimize/maximize/close buttons) makes it more likely that you will accidentally resize a window.

... and that has happened to me many times.

The lower-right resizing behaviour isn't the only annoying thing about Mac applications being ported over to Windows. Windows users typically flick their mouse to the top right corner to close a maximized window. For Safari that little 1x1 pixel area is transparent, so the window behind Safari is accidentally closed. (It isn't Apple developers that are guilty of this; Windows Media Player 11 for XP has that same idiotic problem.)

Windows users also sometimes drag their scrollbar more than 100 pixels to the left from its original position to "snap back" to its original location. This is useful for reading information located somewhere else on the page, while keeping a temporary bookmark on its original position to refer to thereafter. On Safari the scrollbar stays locked to the mouse's Y coordinate.

In any case, those guys arguing up there about Mac vs. Windows design philosophies should read up on the comparisons between both platforms. Also view this one for the differences between font rendering on both systems.

For us Windows users, yes. For them, they could have one argument against Windows's implementation of this behaviour:
Of course, having multiple resize locations (especially near other functions, such as the window's minimize/maximize/close buttons) makes it more likely that you will accidentally resize a window.

... and that has happened to me many times.

Sure, I've done it too, but that's just a question of being accurate in your movements. When I do it, I don't blame Bill Gates, I blame my hand.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft's fast coding model MAI-Code-1-Flash comes to Copilot Business and Enterprise by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft’s recently announced MAI-Code-1-Flash model is now generally available to GitHub Copilot Business and Copilot Enterprise customers. With this support, organizations can have more centralized policy controls and billing while finally being able to use Microsoft’s lightweight, first-party coding model. According to GitHub’s announcement, Business and Enterprise plan administrators must enable the MAI-Code-1-Flash policy in Copilot settings before developers can access the model. Microsoft says that MAI-Code-1-Flash is for fast, iterative coding work rather than the most demanding architectural or debugging tasks. GitHub’s official model comparison page says that the model is great for "general-purpose coding and writing," while it excels at fast, accurate code completions and explanations Microsoft introduced MAI-Code-1-Flash on June 2 as part of a broader collection of internally developed MAI models. GitHub subsequently expanded support to Copilot CLI, the Copilot cloud agent, GitHub.com chat, GitHub Mobile, Visual Studio, JetBrains IDEs, Eclipse, and Xcode, but said support for managed Business and Enterprise customers was still on the way. In Microsoft’s own benchmark testing, MAI-Code-1-Flash scored 51.2% on SWE-Bench Pro, compared with 35.2% for Anthropic’s Claude Haiku 4.5. Microsoft also claimed that the model used up to 60% fewer tokens on SWE-Bench Verified. Do note that these are vendor-run results rather than independent measurements. The model is billed at provider list pricing under GitHub’s usage-based system. GitHub currently lists MAI-Code-1-Flash at $0.75 per million input tokens, $0.075 per million cached input tokens, and $4.50 per million output tokens. For organizations, the main incentive to use MAI-Code-1-Flash is likely to be efficiency rather than maximum capability. A smaller model that responds quickly and limits unnecessary output is quite useful for repetitive agent tasks at scale, especially after GitHub Copilot’s move toward usage-based billing. The "Flash" model is recommended for fast work and not necessarily for huge repositories with loads of context. It's better if teams compare their output with other larger models, especially if they're working on security-sensitive changes and complex, multi-file work.
    • yes AND no the "original" or plain/normal Optiplex 7010 won't be getting any more new firmware updates BUT the Optiplex SFF/SFF Plus {small form factor}, Micro/Micro Plus & Tower/Tower Plus 7010 editions DO get new updates such as this new one   and here are similar guides from the Dell web site for Dell systems: https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000390990/secure-boot-transition-faq https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000347876/microsoft-2011-secure-boot-certificate-expiration
    • AT&T has been spying on US citizens with the NSA for decades.. they just know how to keep it more under wraps.. the evil level is still there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      449
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      203
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      155
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      71
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!