Take-Two Suspends Release Of Manhunt 2


Recommended Posts

( i really don't want to start this debate again, but there was an experiment here in the UK recently where several families had all media devices removed from their house for 2 weeks. This included games consoles TV's, PC's laptops e.t.c.

over that two week period all the childrens were much calmer and hardly any sibling rivalry compared with beforehand. Families were much calmer all round. These were children who watched about 3 hours or played 3 hours of games a day. )

yep saw that. But what I got from it, is that it wasn't really the TV/games that were affecting the kids, but it was the fact the parents weren't spending any time with the kids. As soon as the parents starting to do things with the kids, things started the change, and I'd be willing to bet you would have seen the same positive result even if you kept the TV's etc, and just made the parents spend more time with the kids.

They're supposed to be an independent board, but clearly they have been influenced by the the UK's unrestrained media on this issue, not just the games content.

Clearly? Right.

Where's the evidence for it? Or are you just defending a hobby?

Clearly? Right.

Where's the evidence for it? Or are you just defending a hobby?

They haven't refused to classify a game since Carmagedon in 1997, and I've seen some pretty violent games (and movies) since then. I really doubt there is anything in there an adult is not capable of viewing, or hasn't already been able to through other mediums already. So why would they attempt to ban the game? I severely doubt the decision was made purely on the content of the game alone, rather the media circus surrounding it. I'd be interested to see on what basis they made the decision though, perhaps their reasoning's should be made public under the Freedom of Information Act (after all they're independent).

I don't know exactly what your implying by hobby. If you mean Manhunt 2 then no. I have no intentions to buy it, as I've previously mentioned. If you mean gaming then again no. There are millions of gamers worldwide, and I highly doubt gaming is going to get banned some how anyway.

A lack of good old fashioned parenting and discipline is responsible for issues in society, not violent video games that are intended only for adults. Perhaps more parents should monitor what their kids do, watch and play these days. But its much easier to pass responsibility off onto a game instead.

I severely doubt the decision was made purely on the content of the game alone, rather the media circus surrounding it. I'd be interested to see on what basis they made the decision though, perhaps their reasoning's should be made public under the Freedom of Information Act (after all they're independent).

So why was it given a AO in the US then? They didn't have the same tabloid problems as the UK.

So why was it given a AO in the US then? They didn't have the same tabloid problems as the UK.

What does the US have to do with the UK? I'm talking about the BBFC's decision to effectively ban the game. The fact its out in the US but not here just proves my point even further. Typically Europe isn't anyway near as strict on violent content (except maybe Germany), so why a ban for the first time since 1997? It smacks of media and politics to me.

All they've done is made it the number one most wanted game this summer now. They need to stop deciding what adults can and cannot play, they're a classification board, its not their job to censor.

The fact its out in the US but not here just proves my point even further.

Out in the US? What? First of all, the game got an AO, meaning you practically can't buy it anywhere. Second of all, Nintendo and Sony already said the game isn't ever going to be released on their respective consoles in it's current form. I have no idea why you keep harping on this, because even if the game had been rated in the UK it still wouldn't be released for the exact same reason.

Out in the US? What? First of all, the game got an AO, meaning you practically can't buy it anywhere. Second of all, Nintendo and Sony already said the game isn't ever going to be released on their respective consoles in it's current form. I have no idea why you keep harping on this, because even if the game had been rated in the UK it still wouldn't be released for the exact same reason.

UK retailers will stock it, if it ever gets rated. Just like they stock and sell the original Manhunt. You also said yourself it won't be allowed in its current form. I highly doubt Rockstar will dump the game, especially when its probably cost them a lot of money and development time to produce. They'll make the necessary changes to have it released.

You've been harping on about Manhunt 2 in another thread. Pot, kettle, black?

UK retailers will stock it, if it ever gets rated. Just like they stock and sell the original Manhunt. You also said yourself it won't be allowed in its current form. I highly doubt Rockstar will dump the game, especially when its probably cost them a lot of money and development time to produce. They'll make the necessary changes to have it released.

Once the game is in a state that Nintendo and Sony will allow it to be published, it will be resubmitted to the BBFC, receive a rating, and be released in the UK. Simple as that, so I have no idea why you're still going on about some media-influenced conspiracy.

Once the game is in a state that Nintendo and Sony will allow it to be published, it will be resubmitted to the BBFC, receive a rating, and be released in the UK. Simple as that, so I have no idea why you're still going on about some media-influenced conspiracy.

Because they shouldn't have to, and surely that's the point. It should be rated adult only, and released. I also don't see where these console manufacturers get off telling people what games they can and cannot sell on their consoles. Its the games that keep their consoles selling, hence them in business. Not the other way around.

I also never said there was a conspiracy, but I seriously doubt the decision was made on the game content alone. Much worse things have received ratings from the BBFC before. Convenient a game that supposedly 'caused a murder' cannot get one though. Like I mentioned though, I feel their reasoning for such decisions should be made public under the FOI Act, then we would really know.

I also never said there was a conspiracy, but I seriously doubt the decision was made on the game content alone. Much worse things have received ratings from the BBFC before. Convenient a game that supposedly 'caused a murder' cannot get one though. Like I mentioned though, I feel their reasoning for such decisions should be made public under the FOI Act, then we would really know.

QFT.

Also, a little point here. I've heard and read that Manhunt 2 is actually a bit less violent than the orignal (with the exception of using the wiimote) and so how come the orignal was given and 18, but the sequel won't be given a rating? The Media Circus about violent games, and the BS about manhunt making someone kill another person. Thats why.

I also don't see where these console manufacturers get off telling people what games they can and cannot sell on their consoles. Its the games that keep their consoles selling, hence them in business. Not the other way around.

Well, you see, it's their console. As such, they can do whatever they damn well please. Everything has to be signed to run on the hardware, and if it's not signed and authorized by Nintendo or Sony, it doesn't run. Again, this is how it's always been. It's perfectly within their bounds to do so. And honestly, Manhunt 2 could never be released ever and I really doubt Sony or Nintendo would actually care.

Well, you see, it's their console. As such, they can do whatever they damn well please. Everything has to be signed to run on the hardware, and if it's not signed and authorized by Nintendo or Sony, it doesn't run. Again, this is how it's always been. It's perfectly within their bounds to do so. And honestly, Manhunt 2 could never be released ever and I really doubt Sony or Nintendo would actually care.

Perhaps. Either way, its still biting the hand that feeds them. You can bet if this were a game guaranteed to shift millions of units both Sony and Nintendo would gladly bend the 'rules' to make a profit though. They may pretend to be ethical and family orientated, but profit is always the bottom line.

Sony and Nintendo may not be bothered too, but many customers will be. Manhunt 2 may not be the most popular game about, but the sequel clearly insinuates there is a demand from gamers. Its just a shame they feel the need to block a game because of its adult rating and content. Consoles aren't purely for kids, and if they think they are they clearly don't have their demographics in check. What's more, grown adults are mature enough to decide for themselves what to play. They don't need the BBFC, Sony and Nintendo playing Nanny knows best.

I personally cannot see why people say using the wiimote makes it any worse than using a different controller, all you are doing is going to wave it up/down or left/right or some other motion, this is hardly what I would call mimicking the actions. I can't see how that is any worse than pressing a combination of buttons that require no waving movement at all.

Also I do agree with ziadoz, the original Manhunt was given an 18, but I think the media has hyped up that 'Manhunt muder' that now the BBFC will not classify the sequel.

cosine now here i have to digress...it's not "their console", it's ours, their design and hardwork, our money. never forget that if it weren't for us they wouldn't make those machines to begin with.

No, really, it's their console. They can impose any limits they see fit. Let's use Neowin Subscribers as an example. It's their account, technically. They even paid money for it. However, even though it's their account, they have to play by Neowin's rules. The Wii is Nintendo's console. Developers who want to publish titles on it have to play by Nintendo's rules. If they say your game isn't coming out, it sure as hell isn't coming out. For the millionth time, this is how it always has been and will be. It's not a hard concept to grasp.

you're taking the pargamtic view, i'm coming from a so-called moral aspect..there's no doubt consoles are more regulated than PC's, that's why we like them, for the law and order and knowing someone's looking over what goes on the playing field.

HOWEVER, we are stakeholders and the reason consoles exist, your viewpoint makes it seem like those guys are doing us a big huge favor by granting us (limited) rights to enjoy the blessed wonders of their machines...comon dude you know it's not like that.

this hostile attitude is totally out of place. i'm not arguing, just talking to you, you know, this being a forum for discussion. and i just gave up PC gaming eight months ago to "take up" consoles again, didn't you know?

it's fine you're towing the company line, but a bit more good will would go a long way from everyone, especially posters.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft launches Godot Sample to streamline Xbox PC game development on the engine by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Microsoft today announced a new endeavor that aims to make it simpler for Godot developers to get their products into the Xbox PC ecosystem. Dubbed the "XBOX Godot Sample," this is a new public reference for developers using the open-source engine. This is set to serve as an example of how Microsoft GDK, Xbox Services, and PlayFab can be integrated into their projects. The sample is available now on GitHub as a working example. This covers key features in gaming projects that developers may need to release their projects on Xbox PC, with everything from matchmaking and game sign-in to gamepad compatibility with Godot being covered. This release is being called the first step in giving Godot developers the tools to bring their games over to Xbox PC, with more changes to come based on feedback and issue reports. However, the company was clear that this is not related to bringing Godot projects to Xbox consoles. The engine's open development model stops it from accessing console SDKs due to the requirement of NDAs and legal contracts. Here's how it explained this Godot sample project's focus: This is a source-only sample, not a product. It's MIT-licensed at the wrapper layer; the GDK and PlayFab dependencies still require their own installs and license acceptance, consistent with our other XBOX samples. There is no set update cadence for support or maintenance. We’ll watch the repo, monitor issues, and iterate where it makes sense, but this isn't a commercial release. That said, we’re excited to hear your feedback and see any community PRs, as we evolve this together. This is the first step in bringing Godot for XBOX on PC. We plan to evolve it over time based on what the community tells us is most valuable. This sample is built specifically for XBOX on PC. It doesn’t include support for XBOX Series X|S or XBOX One. If you’re already building for XBOX Series X|S or XBOX One, please talk with your XBOX representative. If not, you can get started by signing up here. Game developers can find the XBOX Godot Sample by heading to GitHub over here. Documentation on how to get started with Godot for building an Xbox PC project can be seen here.
    • I don't understand the vision. Do people really want to buy a new computer from Dell with 6 browsers installed? We all keep asking for Microsoft to stop having so much junk on their OS, and adding a bunch of browsers seems to go against that. Ideally, we would just be asked what browser we want during OOBE but Google is just going to pay Dell a bunch of money to include Chrome. Additionally, would you want your phones to start including all the browsers too when you get them? The only thing I ever wanted was to be able to uninstall IE or edge and I believe you are now able to. I do agree that microsoft needs to chill with their "are you sure you don't want to try edge before you install chrome" ads when going to download chrome.
    • It is notable that around 70% of web browser users choose Google Chrome. However, it is puzzling why anyone on Windows would opt for Chrome when Microsoft Edge is often superior in many aspects and comes pre-installed. Edge collects less data, uses less RAM, and is more optimized for Windows as a native Microsoft product. While some may point to bloat in Edge, much of it can be removed with simple tools, requiring no more effort than installing Chrome. Meanwhile, Chrome reportedly downloads large amounts of AI data (4 GB) without explicit consent. I'm sure you Chrome users love that, or? Here is one example of a tool that doesn't even need to be installed to be able to use: https://github.com/TheBobPony/MSEdgeTweaker Although Microsoft’s aggressive promotion of Edge may be questionable, the browser’s current advantages make it a preferable choice over Chrome today, even if Chrome may have been better in the past.
    • JetBrains rolls out IntelliJ IDEA update with Markdown preview fixes and more by David Uzondu Image via JetBrains IntelliJ 2026.1.3 from JetBrains has landed, bringing several highly requested bug fixes that target common UI glitches and terminal rendering issues. If you run tmux inside the integrated terminal, the IDE no longer renders the cursor above the active line. The Markdown preview bug, which was fixed in this release, had annoyed developers for quite some time, as the preview pane failed to render images saved outside the project directory. Instead of displaying the actual image, the IDE simply showed a broken image icon, a problem that stuck around for two years before this update. Over on Windows, developers running WSL can now use wsl.exe to spin up their environments without losing terminal functionality. In previous builds, launching a terminal shell with something like wsl.exe -d ubuntu inside a Windows-based project broke both shell integration and active process detection. Other bug fixes in this release include: An issue where Gradle sync incorrectly reported success as a failure on WSL when using Gradle 9.5.0. A syntax highlighting bug that flagged valid Java for-loop initialization blocks with multiple statements as incorrect. A warning bug that triggered a false non-null local variable alert when using JSpecify annotations. A database generation bug that hid the option to use a DELETE statement instead of a TRUNCATE checkbox. A Kotlin highlighting failure where an assertion error in the Gradle redundant library inspection broke error highlighting. A UI bug where the ComboBox popup lacked a maximum height restriction. A Snowflake syntax error where DataGrip failed to support the "create temp" command. A Svelte syntax parsing failure that incorrectly flagged quotes inside inline expressions. A VCS repository manager deadlock that triggered thread pool exhaustion. A memory leak where the LazyTree component kept all previous versions of a tree in memory. IntelliJ 2026.1.3 is the third bug fix release for the IntelliJ 2026.1 series. The first one landed back in April with a fix for the WSL Python interpreter freeze, another fix for guest participants using Emmet abbreviations, and corrected WildFly server deployment errors.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      469
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      243
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      73
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!