Recommended Posts

After running AutoPatcher I still get the following two updates:

Update for Windows Media Format 11 SDK for Windows Vista (KB929399)

Update for .NET Framework 3.0: x86 (KB932471)

Checking the hotfix list in AP, KB929399 seems to be included but apparently it didnt install. So what about KB932471?

KB929399 this hotfix intall in my vista but: Attachments

Update for Windows Vista (KB930857)

post-119829-1185018086_thumb.png

Edited by Marcin.Riki

Are there any other mirrors that I could get the July core from? I keep on getting up to 200 out of 211mb and then the download crashes. This has occured on all of the mirrors that I have tried and every single one of them has had a very low download rate.

Is there anyway that you could also go back to the old Full-Package and Update-Package system? Downloading a 200mb+ file kinda sucks and wastes a lot of bandwidth.

Are there any other mirrors that I could get the July core from? I keep on getting up to 200 out of 211mb and then the download crashes. This has occured on all of the mirrors that I have tried and every single one of them has had a very low download rate.

Is there anyway that you could also go back to the old Full-Package and Update-Package system? Downloading a 200mb+ file kinda sucks and wastes a lot of bandwidth.

Have you tried using the torrents?

Have you tried using the torrents?

No, because I am unable to. I am one of the poor poor college students who's residential hall has put a frigging restriction on the proxies available for torrenting via their internet connection. What sucks even more is that they've somehow set it up so that even if I tunnel, it still takes 30 odd hours to download if I torrent it.

make sure your using a download manager so that you have resume support and then try again from another mirror.

btw, the vista release has never been released as full+updates, it's only ever been full releases. thats gandolas' choice.

Hi there

First of all, thanks for this great software...it really saved me a lot time :)

For some reason...I am getting an error when I run this month's AutoPatcher Vista release.

Here is the error message:

What AutoPatcher was trying to do

It appears that the error occured while AutoPatcher was trying to get a file's MD5 hash.

Where: mdlReleaseIntegrity.getMD5HashFromFile()

Error Code: 0x9: Subscript out of range

Complete log:

Attempting to initialize common controls.

Accessing filesystem...

AutoPatcher 5.6 loaded the filesystem.

Detected English (1033) Windows Vista Business 32-bit

System Components:

Internet Explorer: 7.0.6000.16481

Windows Media Player: 11.0.6000.6324

.NET Framework: 2.0.50727.312|2.0SP0|3.0.04506.26|3.0SP0

Windows Installer: 4.0.6000.16386

DirectX: 4.09.00.0904

MSN/Live Messenger: 8.1.178.0

Office Components:

Microsoft Word: 12.0.4518.1014

Microsoft Excel:

Microsoft PowerPoint: 12.0.4518.1014

Microsoft Outlook:

Microsoft Access:

Microsoft Project:

Microsoft Publisher:

Microsoft OneNote:

Microsoft FrontPage:

Microsoft InfoPath:

Microsoft Visio:

Microsoft SharePoint Designer:

Microsoft Groove:

I have tried AutoPatcher Vista on my friend's comp as well..we both got the same error message.

Just wondering does anyone know what is happening here? Thanks for your help in advance :laugh:

How come after I install this, when I go to install it again, it reinstalls all the updates (even though I already ran the program once?) Shouldn't it say "updates are already installed, and not install anything?

Seems like you can just keep running this, and it will keep installing updates even if they are already on your system =/

@ David Xie: delete the old folder (and all inside) and decompress AutoPatcher again.

Hi gandolas, thanks for your reply. Do you mean I should delete everything in the modules folder and run AutoPatcher again? If not, can you please explain it to me? Thanks in advance :D

P.S. I have uninstalled it (from D drive) and try to reinstall it on my C drive this time....still getting the same error :(

  • 4 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Nothing is stopping you from continuing with your testing cadence. If updates are released every 2 weeks instead of 4, and you test once every 4 weeks, the exact same amount of patches will still be available for you in those 4 weeks. For example: Before 4th week - patch 1, 2, 3, 4 After 2nd week - patch 1 and 2 4th week - patch 3 and 4 Still the same amount after 4.
    • Everyone else has said it. I'm gonna say it - you don't know what you're talking about. I do. I have two laptops. One work, one personal. I have access to two more laptops - both personal. At home I manually update my personal laptop when I see on Neowin that there is an update - I carry on and only apply the updates when I am ready. My work one only updates when my workplace decides to send it - I carry on and only apply the updates (when they actually arrive, which is usually days after the release) when I switch off the laptop at the end of the day as usual. The two other personal laptops only get updated when I get to it which is rarely - the people who own them carry on using them until I get to it and update them. All of the browsers on all laptops are configured to restore the tabs when launched. Google and Microsoft have changed from 6 weeks to 4, and it looks like it's going to move to 2. None of these changes affect how any of these browsers on the laptops are used. Not one jot. My advice to you is stop panicking whenever you see an update. Just carry on with what you're doing. This even benefits you in a way - from your comment you sound like you don't like the changes or the frivolous new features - great - then carry on as before!
    • AMAZON needs to take total accountability for this.
    • Server Summit had a heap of announcements, ADCS changes are baller.
    • Nice, hope they *finally* fixed the issue with the NTFS driver where the system would completely brick during large file copies using the built in driver. It's been broken for years requiring me to use the older, slower, NTFS-3G FUSE driver.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      197
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      138
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      90
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      80
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!