Recommended Posts

After running AutoPatcher I still get the following two updates:

Update for Windows Media Format 11 SDK for Windows Vista (KB929399)

Update for .NET Framework 3.0: x86 (KB932471)

Checking the hotfix list in AP, KB929399 seems to be included but apparently it didnt install. So what about KB932471?

KB929399 this hotfix intall in my vista but: Attachments

Update for Windows Vista (KB930857)

post-119829-1185018086_thumb.png

Edited by Marcin.Riki

Are there any other mirrors that I could get the July core from? I keep on getting up to 200 out of 211mb and then the download crashes. This has occured on all of the mirrors that I have tried and every single one of them has had a very low download rate.

Is there anyway that you could also go back to the old Full-Package and Update-Package system? Downloading a 200mb+ file kinda sucks and wastes a lot of bandwidth.

Are there any other mirrors that I could get the July core from? I keep on getting up to 200 out of 211mb and then the download crashes. This has occured on all of the mirrors that I have tried and every single one of them has had a very low download rate.

Is there anyway that you could also go back to the old Full-Package and Update-Package system? Downloading a 200mb+ file kinda sucks and wastes a lot of bandwidth.

Have you tried using the torrents?

Have you tried using the torrents?

No, because I am unable to. I am one of the poor poor college students who's residential hall has put a frigging restriction on the proxies available for torrenting via their internet connection. What sucks even more is that they've somehow set it up so that even if I tunnel, it still takes 30 odd hours to download if I torrent it.

make sure your using a download manager so that you have resume support and then try again from another mirror.

btw, the vista release has never been released as full+updates, it's only ever been full releases. thats gandolas' choice.

Hi there

First of all, thanks for this great software...it really saved me a lot time :)

For some reason...I am getting an error when I run this month's AutoPatcher Vista release.

Here is the error message:

What AutoPatcher was trying to do

It appears that the error occured while AutoPatcher was trying to get a file's MD5 hash.

Where: mdlReleaseIntegrity.getMD5HashFromFile()

Error Code: 0x9: Subscript out of range

Complete log:

Attempting to initialize common controls.

Accessing filesystem...

AutoPatcher 5.6 loaded the filesystem.

Detected English (1033) Windows Vista Business 32-bit

System Components:

Internet Explorer: 7.0.6000.16481

Windows Media Player: 11.0.6000.6324

.NET Framework: 2.0.50727.312|2.0SP0|3.0.04506.26|3.0SP0

Windows Installer: 4.0.6000.16386

DirectX: 4.09.00.0904

MSN/Live Messenger: 8.1.178.0

Office Components:

Microsoft Word: 12.0.4518.1014

Microsoft Excel:

Microsoft PowerPoint: 12.0.4518.1014

Microsoft Outlook:

Microsoft Access:

Microsoft Project:

Microsoft Publisher:

Microsoft OneNote:

Microsoft FrontPage:

Microsoft InfoPath:

Microsoft Visio:

Microsoft SharePoint Designer:

Microsoft Groove:

I have tried AutoPatcher Vista on my friend's comp as well..we both got the same error message.

Just wondering does anyone know what is happening here? Thanks for your help in advance :laugh:

How come after I install this, when I go to install it again, it reinstalls all the updates (even though I already ran the program once?) Shouldn't it say "updates are already installed, and not install anything?

Seems like you can just keep running this, and it will keep installing updates even if they are already on your system =/

@ David Xie: delete the old folder (and all inside) and decompress AutoPatcher again.

Hi gandolas, thanks for your reply. Do you mean I should delete everything in the modules folder and run AutoPatcher again? If not, can you please explain it to me? Thanks in advance :D

P.S. I have uninstalled it (from D drive) and try to reinstall it on my C drive this time....still getting the same error :(

  • 4 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Glad these prices are starting to come down, but that is still crazy. I bought the 2TB 9100 Pro (slightly more expensive version with PCIe 5.0) last year for $240.
    • The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months by Sayan Sen Yesterday, we covered a really good deal wherein you can get a 4TB TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 NVMe PCIe Gen4 SSD for a low price of just $400 with a special discount coupon. That's just $100 per TB, making it a very good offer during these hard times. The deal is still live, so you can check it out in its dedicated article here if you do not want to miss out. Meanwhile, if you don't have that kind of budget but still wish to buy an SSD for a good price, the 2TB variant of the TeamGroup SSD at $280 its lowest price in over three months. Meanwhile, those seeking 2TB but faster performance can check out Samsung's 990 PRO, which has hit the lowest price also in the last quarter or so, as it's on sale for $370 (purchase links under the specs table down below). Thus, you want a faster drive, get the 990 Pro, or you want more capacity, grab the TeamGroup 4TB linked in the first para. The 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $500. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The tech specs are given below: Specification TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 2TB Samsung 990 PRO 2TB Interface PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe 1.4 PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 Form Factor M.2 2280 M.2 2280 Controller InnoGrit Controller Samsung In-house Controller NAND Flash 3D TLC 3D TLC DRAM Cache None (HMB supported) 2GB LPDDR4 Sequential Read (Max) 5,000 MB/s 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write (Max) 4,500 MB/s 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4K) Up to 600,000 IOPS Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4K) Up to 700,000 IOPS Up to 1,550,000 IOPS TBW (Endurance) 1,300 TBW 1,200 TBW MTBF 3,000,000 hours 1,500,000 hours Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C 0°C to 70°C Storage Temperature -40°C to 85°C -40°C to 85°C Shock Resistance 1,500G / 0.5ms 1,500G / 0.5ms Heatsink Patented Graphene Heat Spreader No Get them at the links below: Samsung 990 PRO SSD 2TB (MZ-V9P2T0B/AM): $369.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 2TB SSD (TM8FFE002T0C129): $279.99 (Sold by TeamGroup, Shipped by Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • If you can't spell a simple word that 2nd graders learn, your entire argument is suspect.
    • And here goes the "Won't someone think of the children" brigade. Get stuffed mate. This has NOTHING to do with making the internet safe. It's about tracking adults, spying on your online activity, and sending the boys around when they don't like something you post. Also, again, parliament have voted TWICE against this, and Starmer is going ahead anyway. THAT is anti-democratic bullsh**. They will use this law to track you, they will use this law to control you, and they will use this law to punish you if they don't like what you do, even if it's legal. And your data? Say bye bye to that. It'll be on the darkweb in weeks. I'm not some rando online. I've been an IT professional for 40 years, many of it in security. I know exactly what this means and what will happen to your data. I do not consent and I will not comply.
    • "...but it may not be Microsoft's fault" seems like a reasonable way to tease what is going on without leaving the user with a false impression that an update is the problem. A title isn't a summery, it is meant to entice the user to read the article. It should not contain a misleading premise; which this title does not. You could maybe complain that the first paragraph should have included that detail. The writing style popularized over 100 years ago in newspapers will cover the most important information as soon as possible with details and nuance added later; the idea being that with each new paragraph you have less of the reader's focus.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      520
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!