Xmen Origins : Wolverine

By Rappy
in The Media Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

The_Observer

Posted
Posted
I have read all the comics and if the spoilers I read are true then it will blow. The spoilers I read of people have seen it already it definitely has problems which is to bad cause it could be way better.

they needed to keep to the true storie... and make it R rated!

Community Regular

Nemo Live

Posted
Posted (edited)
I've come to the conclusion that most bad comments about the leaked movie are from people who probably haven't read any of the Wolverine Origin comics, or ANY Wolverine comic for that matter.

The movie is made for people who actually know stuff about Wolverine etc. If you have no idea about the past from Wolverine (he didnt get his claws from Weapon X. Weapon X only gave him the Adamantium layer on his bones, etc, etc), and only saw the X-Men movies/cartoons, then you dont know enough.

I saw a comment about Sabertooth, where someone said it's wrong that he's wearing clothes and that he doesn't have all if his body hair (that sounded wrong :p). This guy obviously doesn't know how Sabertooth looked in the past.

Gotta love fanboys. It's a friggin movie not a spiritual experience. They're simply stating their opinion. None of these movies have been made for the die hard comic fans if you wanna truly be honest...not a single one of them because they need to mass market it for that $100 million dollar floor. I can point ridiculous inconsistencies from the origin comic as well but whats the point, in the end it has to be sufficiently entertaining. This cut was decent and I'm hoping the final cut will make it great.

Edited by Nemo Live
Grand Master

Rappy Veteran

Posted
  • Author
  • Veteran
Posted
I've come to the conclusion that most bad comments about the leaked movie are from people who probably haven't read any of the Wolverine Origin comics, or ANY Wolverine comic for that matter.

The movie is made for people who actually know stuff about Wolverine etc. If you have no idea about the past from Wolverine (he didnt get his claws from Weapon X. Weapon X only gave him the Adamantium layer on his bones, etc, etc), and only saw the X-Men movies/cartoons, then you dont know enough.

I saw a comment about Sabertooth, where someone said it's wrong that he's wearing clothes and that he doesn't have all if his body hair (that sounded wrong :p). This guy obviously doesn't know how Sabertooth looked in the past.

Yeah Hugh Jackman also is a big fan of the comics so he will always try and keep it faithful.

Grand Master

Jamushroom Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

^Which he pretty much did :p

@Nemo Live: Then for starters, they shouldn't compare Sabertooth with the one from the first X-Men movie. I think that it's pretty much common knowledge that the characters are looking totally different then there present comic versions.

I just stated all the things in my previous post just because the leaked version is already getting bad comments. Bad comments that aren't even righteous imo. They want to see the new movie because they want to know about Wolverine's past. Then why can't they accept that the characters looked like that in the past?

@lflashl: It would've been awesome if the movie was as dark as the Wolverine comics. Then it could've competed with The Dark Knight. Tod McFarlane is trying to make a new Spawn movie based on Sam and Twitch. He IS planning on making it as dark as the comic books. I don't know if you read Spawn, but it's a pretty dark comic book at some times.

Proficient

darkmanx21

Posted
Posted

Yeah, I kind of figured some people who get irritated that it's not like the Cartoon or main stream Comic...whatever though. The movie still has to be good, and from what I've heard it's not really going to be so hot. Like I said, I'll still watch it, but kind of makes you think..

Also, if something too far out of the realm of norm for the masses..people have a tendency to not like it. That means less money..last I checked, that's all this is really about for Studios. I hope I'm wrong..

The movie is based on this for those who care: Origin (Comics)

Grand Master

nomis_nehc

Posted
Posted

While I can understand people wanting the movie to stick to the comic, I don't understand why they're so adamant about it. Think about it this way, reading the comic, you already know what everything is going to happen. Additionally, it's a great possibility that you will be disappointed because the movie does not live up what the comic has built up in your mind.

On the other hand, if you simply discard the whole true to comic idea, you get surprises, and have no unattainable expectations.

Personally, I don't know the exact history of Wolverine, and I enjoyed it.

Grand Master

Xero

Posted
Posted

One of the main reasons I wanted to watch it was for Reynolds. Guy is hilarious. From what I've heard he doesn't even speak in the leaked version. As much as I want to see it early I'll just wait and hope the final one isn't nearly as bad as everyone makes it out to be. Although effects and reshoots don't make up for bad acting :(

Community Regular

Nemo Live

Posted
Posted
One of the main reasons I wanted to watch it was for Reynolds. Guy is hilarious. From what I've heard he doesn't even speak in the leaked version. As much as I want to see it early I'll just wait and hope the final one isn't nearly as bad as everyone makes it out to be. Although effects and reshoots don't make up for bad acting :(

Yeah, he's featured in one of the story arcs for about 5mins and then suddenly reappears in the end. I heard the re-shoots done in January primarily involved his character so that we can get more background on how he ends up as Weapon XI.

Grand Master

Rappy Veteran

Posted
  • Author
  • Veteran
Posted
My concern is now with it out and all the bad reviews it will bomb in theaters. Granted if its not any better it probably should. But not fair to everyone involved.

These people who are giving reviews on a movie minus key sfx, soundtrack and even key moments, I mean the film even recently refilmed alot of what was poor from the screening and the screening that was released or leaked is the original print so its not even got the refilmed stuff in it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Ocenaudio 3.19.4

      By Copernic · Posted

      Ocenaudio 3.19.4 by Razvan Serea  Ocenaudio is a full featured, fast and easy to use audio and music editor. It is the ideal software for people who need to edit and analyze audio files without complications. Ocenaudio also has powerful features that will please more advanced users. To assist ocenaudio development, a powerful toolset of audio editing, analysis and manipulation called Ocen Framework was created. ocenaudio is also based on Qt framework, a well known library for cross-platform development. Cross-platform support ocenaudio is available for all major operating systems: Microsoft Windows, Mac OS X and Linux. Native applications are generated for each platform from a common source, in order to achieve excelent performance and seamless integration with the operating system. All versions of ocenaudio have a uniform set of features and the same graphical interface, so the skills you learn in one platform can be used in the others. VST plugins support Ocenaudio supports VST (Virtual Studio Technology) plugins, giving its users access to numerous effects. Like the native effects, VST effects can use real-time preview to aide configuration. Real-time preview of effects Applying effects such as EQ, gain and filtering is an important part of audio editing. However, it is very tricky to get the desired result by adjusting the controls configuration alone: you must listen the processed audio. To ease the configuration of audio effects, ocenaudio has a real time preview feature: you hear the processed signal while adjusting the controls. The effect configuration window also includes a miniature view of the selected audio signal. You can navigate on this miniature view in the same way as you do on the main interface, selecting parts that interest you and listening to the effect result in real time. Multiselection for delicate editions To speed up complex audio files editing, ocenaudio includes multi-selection. With this amazing tool, you can simultaneously select different portions of an audio file and listen, edit or even apply an effect to them. For example, if you want to normalize only the excerpts of an interview where the interviewee is talking, just select them and apply the effect. Eficient edition of large files With ocenaudio, there is no limit to the length or the quantity of the audio files you can edit. Using an advanced memory management system, the application keeps your files open without wasting any of your computer's memory. Even in files several hours long, common editing operations such as copy, cut or paste happen almost instantly. Fully featured spectrogram Besides offering an incredible waveform view of your audio files, ocenaudio has a powerful and complete spectrogram view. In this view, you can analyze the spectral content of your audio signal with maximum clarity. Advanced users will be surprised to find that the spectrogram settings are applied in real time. The display is updated immediately when altering features such as the number of frequency bands, window type and size and dynamic range of the display. Ocenaudio 3.19.4 changelog: Adds fallback fonts so every language and symbol displays correctly Improves autosave and session recovery stability Improves region navigation and display Fixes a crash when the level meter is used on displays with a scaling greater than 200% Fixes memory corruption when using the silence selection tools Fixes crashes when closing a file while effects are still being processed Fixes a freeze when applying effects to many files at once (macOS) Fixes crashes related to audio devices on Windows Fixes invalid file names when exporting regions whose label is used as the file name Other bug fixes and improvements Download: Ocenaudio 64-bit | Portable | ~40.0 MB (Freeware) Download: Ocenaudio for Linux and Mac OS View: Ocenaudio Homepage | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1

      By Copernic · Posted

      Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 by Razvan Serea Hasleo Disk Clone is a free and all-in-one disk cloning software for Windows 11/10/8/7/Vista and Windows Server that can help you migrate Windows OS to another disk, clone one disk to another disk or clone one partition to another location quickly and efficiently. Completely Free Windows Migration and Disk/Partition Cloning Software Migrate Windows from one disk to another without reinstalling Windows, apps. Clone one disk to another and makes the data on 2 disks are exactly the same. Clone a partition to another location without losing any data. Easily adjust the size and location of the destination partition. Convert MBR to GPT or convert GPT to MBR by cloning. Creation of Windows PE emergency disk. Extremely fast cloning speed and multi-language support. Supported OS: Windows Vista/Server 2008 or later, fully compatible with GPT and UEFI. Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 changelog: Fixed an issue that caused disk enumeration to fail Fixed an issue where WinPE created under Windows ARM64 26H1 did not work properly Download: Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 | 32.3 MB (Freeware) Link: Hasleo Disk Clone Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Waymo recalls self-driving software after cars enter closed freeway work zones

      By ExecutiveFunction404 · Posted

      This got me thinking, would you rather a self driving car prioritise protecting its passengers or everyone else? I'd choose the one that keeps me and my kids safest. At some point, these cars have to make those choices already, don't they? Wonder if we have a way to find out what way they lean.
    • Google is opening the world's first AI museum in Los Angeles

      By excalpius · Posted

      The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Windows 11 gets new audio improvements in the latest builds

      By wingliston · Posted

      Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      555
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      78
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!