Recommended Posts

here is a script for headliens i got from this thread, u need to have the script running using runme in background, teh read the text file neowin.tmp or something like that in smaruize directory.

riggs that happens to me to, sometimes my weather scipt wont update for hours i just need to reload the config and it usually works

here's my samurize script along with rainlander...

http://www.stevofc.com/neowin/rainlanderan...andsamurize.jpg

Stevo, that's a nice script. Could you please post it?

Thanks.

yeah if i can find where i backed it up to i'll post it. i took samurize off my pc, i never really use it

Something definitely happened with judge's DesktopWeather script. It stopped working, now I'm getting "input past end of file" errors all over the place. I can't even edit the config file or ANY config file with this script in it. Any fixes yet? I know its not the "change www to w3" thing, because many of us have done that and nothing works anymore.

Guess we wait for judge to figure it out?

I have a few problems with my script, i have the needed scripts but on my config it says not been executed and i put htem in the "scripts" folder and have downloaded the needed ones but they still wont work any ideaS?

I had the same problem try to edit the config and if you get a ActiveX error you'll need to get your hands on these

Windows Script Control

Windows Script 5.6 for 2000 and XP

fixed me up right nice.

it appears to have eaten my attachemnt so here it is again

https://www.neowin.net/forum/uploads/post-4...-1057200431.jpg

Plesase,tell me.

Where can I get this Rainlendar Skin?

July desktops, on page 38 I think - or just search the threads for it, links have been put up dozens of times.

The fact is that Samurize looks great when it's running but it is not user friendly in terms of getting it running or customizing. As long as this remains the case, Samurize will remain a fringe program. I understand that scripts are independent of the program itself but I think it would be great if Samurize included some default scripts that worked when you fire it up for the first time.

In regards to your script question, there is a general FAQ on the Samurize site but the best way to figure it out is to fool around with it for a while.

Samurize weather has stopped working for me, too! I only noticed this yesterday when I saw that the temp and current conditions were obviously wrong. When I checked the html files, they were two weeks old! So, it hasn't been updating now for the last two weeks. I just didn't notice.

I followed the advice and changed "www." to "w3." but I still get "N/A" for everything now. When I open up the config file and click the test button, I still get N/A for everything.

I haven't changed any IE settings, or any of the samurize scripts, or any of the config files. I have two other samurize desktop objects (digital clock and performance monitor) and they continue to work just fine. I also checked and confirmed that I have .NET framework v1.1 installed.

Suspecting that the guys at weather.com changed the page layout again, I planned to save the web-page manually and do a compare of the new page to the old one saved by the script -- to see what they changed. So, I copied the URL from the script into an IE window, opened the Weather web page, and did a save as -- using the filename in the script. IE went through all the motions but at the end, gave me a popup saying it couldn't save the web page! I tried saving other web pages (not from the weather.com site) and they worked OK.

So now, if I can't save weather.com web pages, my guess is that none of the weather scripts will work any more.

I'm stumped! I have no idea what settings have to be changed in IE or Win XP Pro (if those are the culprits) to allow me to save weather.com web-pages.

I suspect I'm not alone in this because I've seen postings lately from others whose weather scripts no longer work. Perhaps it's something the weather.com site has done to disallow web-page saves now.

Anyone have any ideas on this??

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Louis Rossmann suing Samsung over "990 Pro SSD warranty scam" by Sayan Sen Back in 2023, if you recall, Neowin reviewer Robbie Khan had a dispute with Samsung over his 990 Pro SSD, which was rapidly losing its health. After significant back and forth, the tech giant had finally released firmware to "stop" the issue. Interestingly, its previous flagship at the time, the 980 Pro was also facing problems leading to two consecutive sets of firmware fixes. Three years later, it looks like a similar conflict has now broken out between tech repair entrepreneur YouTuber Louis Rossmann and Samsung, as it has escalated into a threatened lawsuit after the company allegedly refused to appropriately replace a failing 990 Pro SSD that remained under warranty. According to Rossmann, a 4TB Samsung 990 Pro NVMe SSD purchased for approximately $330 less than two years ago, began experiencing major hiccups and issues, even though he claims it had been operated under ideal cooling conditions. It was installed in a RAID 1 array and cooled by a heatsink and dual high-speed fans. However the drive reportedly started dropping out of the array, exhibiting controller-level failures that eventually became not useable in any meaningful way. Rossmann said Samsung’s support process was marked by delays and confusion from the very start. After initially contacting the wrong regional support channel, he was redirected to Samsung’s memory support division where he submitted detailed diagnostics, logs, and proof of purchase. Rossmann runs a repair company and owns an ACE Lab PC-3000 machine, which is a professional-grade data recovery equipment. As such, he had been confident in his diagnostics. Samsung even seemingly acknowledged that later. Regardless, Rossmann claims that his initial support ticket was automatically closed before a full 24-hour response window had elapsed, forcing him to reopen the case and resubmit documentation. The controversy however intensified further from here after Samsung accepted the drive for warranty evaluation but later returned it with a repair report stating that the drive had passed its testing and that the SSD had been verified as functional. Rossmann strongly disputed those claims citing that his own independent testing on PC-3000 showed write speeds reducing to as low as 40–60 MB/s before the drive failed entirely. Samsung subsequently informed him that the SSD had been reset and reflashed, passing internal stress tests. However, the company also stated that replacement units were unavailable due to an industry-wide memory shortage and suggested that a refund process could be initiated if further testing confirmed the fault. Thus, to settle, the company offered a refund of $330, the amount that was initially paid by him to make the purchase. Here, Rossmann pointed out the seeming hypocrisy of the tech giant as in how no Samsung drive was apparently allocated for warranty replacements, but they were abundantly available for retail sales especially when using business accounts. As you can see, Rossmann is indeed right, there are Samsung 990 Pro 4TB SSDs on Amazon currently for $950 (shipped and sold by first-party Amazon US itself), and they are also available on Samsung's own store too, albeit for an even higher price of $1100. Thus Rossmann argues that Samsung’s inability or unwillingness to provide a replacement while the same model remains available for purchase at significantly higher market prices reflects a failure to honor its warranty obligations. He has issued a formal 60-day notice and says he intends to file suit in Texas small claims court, asserting that companies should face greater costs for denying legitimate warranty claims than for fulfilling them. You can check out the full video titled "Samsung's 990 Pro SSD warranty policy is a scam; I'm taking them to court," at the link below. Source and image: Louis Rossmann (YouTube) As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases
    • Was it too much to ask to show the icon in this article?
    • Frankly, I blame whoever is writing such articles. "A big improvement/update and/or new feature is now available to everyone! Also, use this unofficial tweak tool to enable it because it actually isn't available to you yet officially and might not in fact even be entirely ready or whatever, hence why it is perhaps not enabled for you*. But it's great and you should enable it!" I mean there's nothing wrong with sharing info about some feature you might need to enable via unofficial means, of course. It's just that these articles tend to essentially end up being two news pieces in one, and one of them tends to be a bit misleading. (*Yes, yes, the "it's a controlled rollout!" thing. Not a fan of that one either. The argument, not the actual rollout.)
    • Thank you. Will do. I read in the release notes that editor config might be at play here.
    • Actually, I think even Microsoft doesn't know how to control it
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      185
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!