[Official] Doctor Who Thread


Recommended Posts

No, IMDB is not and has rarely ever been reliable on casting for future episodes, just like everything it had for episode 7 of this series for the cast was complete crap.

I was going to post this a few days ago to rile up the Tennant lovers, but couldn't be bothered having to go through what we did with "The Doctors Wife" :p

It also has Peter Davison on there, not that anyone seems to care, lol, probably just a flash back.

:angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry:

Doctor 10 is in the space suit at the start of series, at the end he kills Doctor 11 and takes his place, all is well in the universe.

allonsy.jpg

damn my new mac and lack of gifs :(

another day! :p

No, IMDB is not and has rarely ever been reliable on casting for future episodes, just like everything it had for episode 7 of this series for the cast was complete crap.

I was going to post this a few days ago to rile up the Tennant lovers, but couldn't be bothered having to go through what we did with "The Doctors Wife" :p

It also has Peter Davison on there, not that anyone seems to care, lol, probably just a flash back.

Yeah but next series is the 50th isn't it, or is it the series after? I wouldn't doubt David Tennant coming back for the big episode, whichever that may be. Tom Baker as well. Don't know about anyone else though heh.

Yeah but next series is the 50th isn't it, or is it the series after? I wouldn't doubt David Tennant coming back for the big episode, whichever that may be. Tom Baker as well. Don't know about anyone else though heh.

Ecclestone said he wouldn't step foot back into Doctor Who...good riddance I say :p

Probably so. Didn't I read earlier than Amy and Rory would see the DT regeneration in one scene? Or was that just gossip?

that was from that promo we saw a regen which happened in the doctors wife episode

Yeah but next series is the 50th isn't it, or is it the series after? I wouldn't doubt David Tennant coming back for the big episode, whichever that may be. Tom Baker as well. Don't know about anyone else though heh.

2013 is the 50th Anniversary if I am remembering correctly.

I think it would be damn awesome to have a multi-doctor episode to celebrate it, especially if they can work it into the story in someway at the same time, but it will be a while till we get that to celebrate, so I don't think people should get too excited about what could happen, and definitely not get carried with some IMDB listing which have a habit of being pretty wrong.

As fun as it is, we jump to so many different conclusions so quickly and we probably have a pretty bad percentage of right guesses at this point, lol.

Well even if David Tennant is in the series finale, I'm going to agree that it's probably either in a flashback type thing, or maybe in some passing cameo set up role for any upcoming 50th special episode or arc they might do. I think it's pretty obvious that Tennant and at least Tom Baker or Peter Davison will be in that kind of story. Also, Paul McGann should be in it. I actually found his Doctor in the TV movie quite good, and would love to see him play the role again.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u9NROjAKwgU ;_;...

I want to see David as Doctor once more, along with Amy and Rory ;_;~ But... after rethinking whole case, i think it can't be possible because of David's "I don't wanna go" and some kind of final goodbye-destruction 9ths console room in Doctor's Wife :/

And by the way, i don't know how freely ordinary user can edit pages on IMDB, so-o...

2013 is the 50th Anniversary if I am remembering correctly.

I think it would be damn awesome to have a multi-doctor episode to celebrate it, especially if they can work it into the story in someway at the same time, but it will be a while till we get that to celebrate, so I don't think people should get too excited about what could happen, and definitely not get carried with some IMDB listing which have a habit of being pretty wrong.

As fun as it is, we jump to so many different conclusions so quickly and we probably have a pretty bad percentage of right guesses at this point, lol.

I don't know, I wouldn't expect them to do another Multi Doctor episode again, I can't remember which doctor it was with when they did it last time might have been Sylvester McCoy or Paul Mcgann. It was a while ago and it was quite cool as they all walked in to the TARDIS and then they dissapeared with the TARDIS still remaining.

However I guess that since multi-docter episodes have happened off screen more often it could happen. meh dunno...

I suspect from this point on any appearances of another Doctor will be flashbacks, not any kind of interaction between doctors

I don't know, I wouldn't expect them to do another Multi Doctor episode again, I can't remember which doctor it was with when they did it last time might have been Sylvester McCoy or Paul Mcgann. It was a while ago and it was quite cool as they all walked in to the TARDIS and then they dissapeared with the TARDIS still remaining.

However I guess that since multi-docter episodes have happened off screen more often it could happen. meh dunno...

I suspect from this point on any appearances of another Doctor will be flashbacks, not any kind of interaction between doctors

Well they already did a multi-doctor short with the 10th and 5th for a Children in Need special only a few years ago.

While I don't know how Cannon it is as it was a one off for the show and was only a few minutes long, it is entirely possible to do it again, the only problem being getting people back to do it, and their age seeing as we know what all of them besides one looked like when they regenerated, lol.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • add $200 and get DWARF 3 model add $2000 and visit scientists center in your town add $20000 and visit the biggest telescope in Chile
    • Guess it's one of those things best used by devs to thoroughly test stuff.
    • is it all upside down there? traffic lights reverted too?
    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!