[Official] Doctor Who Thread


Recommended Posts

No, IMDB is not and has rarely ever been reliable on casting for future episodes, just like everything it had for episode 7 of this series for the cast was complete crap.

I was going to post this a few days ago to rile up the Tennant lovers, but couldn't be bothered having to go through what we did with "The Doctors Wife" :p

It also has Peter Davison on there, not that anyone seems to care, lol, probably just a flash back.

:angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry:

Doctor 10 is in the space suit at the start of series, at the end he kills Doctor 11 and takes his place, all is well in the universe.

allonsy.jpg

damn my new mac and lack of gifs :(

another day! :p

No, IMDB is not and has rarely ever been reliable on casting for future episodes, just like everything it had for episode 7 of this series for the cast was complete crap.

I was going to post this a few days ago to rile up the Tennant lovers, but couldn't be bothered having to go through what we did with "The Doctors Wife" :p

It also has Peter Davison on there, not that anyone seems to care, lol, probably just a flash back.

Yeah but next series is the 50th isn't it, or is it the series after? I wouldn't doubt David Tennant coming back for the big episode, whichever that may be. Tom Baker as well. Don't know about anyone else though heh.

Yeah but next series is the 50th isn't it, or is it the series after? I wouldn't doubt David Tennant coming back for the big episode, whichever that may be. Tom Baker as well. Don't know about anyone else though heh.

Ecclestone said he wouldn't step foot back into Doctor Who...good riddance I say :p

Probably so. Didn't I read earlier than Amy and Rory would see the DT regeneration in one scene? Or was that just gossip?

that was from that promo we saw a regen which happened in the doctors wife episode

Yeah but next series is the 50th isn't it, or is it the series after? I wouldn't doubt David Tennant coming back for the big episode, whichever that may be. Tom Baker as well. Don't know about anyone else though heh.

2013 is the 50th Anniversary if I am remembering correctly.

I think it would be damn awesome to have a multi-doctor episode to celebrate it, especially if they can work it into the story in someway at the same time, but it will be a while till we get that to celebrate, so I don't think people should get too excited about what could happen, and definitely not get carried with some IMDB listing which have a habit of being pretty wrong.

As fun as it is, we jump to so many different conclusions so quickly and we probably have a pretty bad percentage of right guesses at this point, lol.

Well even if David Tennant is in the series finale, I'm going to agree that it's probably either in a flashback type thing, or maybe in some passing cameo set up role for any upcoming 50th special episode or arc they might do. I think it's pretty obvious that Tennant and at least Tom Baker or Peter Davison will be in that kind of story. Also, Paul McGann should be in it. I actually found his Doctor in the TV movie quite good, and would love to see him play the role again.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u9NROjAKwgU ;_;...

I want to see David as Doctor once more, along with Amy and Rory ;_;~ But... after rethinking whole case, i think it can't be possible because of David's "I don't wanna go" and some kind of final goodbye-destruction 9ths console room in Doctor's Wife :/

And by the way, i don't know how freely ordinary user can edit pages on IMDB, so-o...

2013 is the 50th Anniversary if I am remembering correctly.

I think it would be damn awesome to have a multi-doctor episode to celebrate it, especially if they can work it into the story in someway at the same time, but it will be a while till we get that to celebrate, so I don't think people should get too excited about what could happen, and definitely not get carried with some IMDB listing which have a habit of being pretty wrong.

As fun as it is, we jump to so many different conclusions so quickly and we probably have a pretty bad percentage of right guesses at this point, lol.

I don't know, I wouldn't expect them to do another Multi Doctor episode again, I can't remember which doctor it was with when they did it last time might have been Sylvester McCoy or Paul Mcgann. It was a while ago and it was quite cool as they all walked in to the TARDIS and then they dissapeared with the TARDIS still remaining.

However I guess that since multi-docter episodes have happened off screen more often it could happen. meh dunno...

I suspect from this point on any appearances of another Doctor will be flashbacks, not any kind of interaction between doctors

I don't know, I wouldn't expect them to do another Multi Doctor episode again, I can't remember which doctor it was with when they did it last time might have been Sylvester McCoy or Paul Mcgann. It was a while ago and it was quite cool as they all walked in to the TARDIS and then they dissapeared with the TARDIS still remaining.

However I guess that since multi-docter episodes have happened off screen more often it could happen. meh dunno...

I suspect from this point on any appearances of another Doctor will be flashbacks, not any kind of interaction between doctors

Well they already did a multi-doctor short with the 10th and 5th for a Children in Need special only a few years ago.

While I don't know how Cannon it is as it was a one off for the show and was only a few minutes long, it is entirely possible to do it again, the only problem being getting people back to do it, and their age seeing as we know what all of them besides one looked like when they regenerated, lol.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I sort of agree with you on that. I had a telescope - a real hefty thing, although only around 500CHF - that got me so fascinated about the stars and planets. I would stare for hours, amazed that I could see the craters of the moon or the rings of Saturn in "realtime" (quotations because, y'know, speed of light and whatnot). A friend of mine has a telescope like the one mentioned in the review, and the pictures are amazing to look at. But there is something missing for me. I may as well just go to NASA's website and look through their gallery.
    • As opposed to catching bad press because it's the engine's fault? You didn't really think this through did you? lol
    • I think it depends on what you're looking for to do, and the time you have to spare. With my Dwarf 3, I easily spend 3-4 hour sessions; half an hour driving to an un-light polluted place, another half hour unpacking and setting up the smart scope + tripod for equatorial tracking, then 15 more minutes mucking around with settings and shooting calibration frames, spending a few hours shooting, merging with past photo sessions, etc. It's crazy how time flies and I often get home later than I expected. It's something I still need to set aside a good part of an evening to do, all in all. For one session, where you often need like four for best results when it comes to deep space objects. Even with a smart scope like Dwarf 3, regular non-astro photography is still way more approachable to people getting into photography. I find this is a time consuming niche no matter how I go about it. With practice, I can probably begin cutting time here but I think where smart scopes find their home is among people who love to shoot the night sky but don't have the spare time to go deep with the "navigator level" attunement to the night sky itself in addition to everything else. Having said this, _if_ you have even more time to spend on this hobby, it will probably be even more rewarding to do it more by hand and learn the skies and the details of how it all works.
    • I misread the title and thought Teams itself would be redesigned. Imagine having this one as a native WinUI app.
    • Dell, HP PCs ran into endless reboot, BitLocker recovery loops but Windows 11 isn't to blame by Sayan Sen Last month Neowin reported on a major issue on Dell systems wherein a bug in its official support tool was leading to endless blue screen of death (BSOD) and restarts. Following our report, Dell officially acknowledged its SupportAssist-related crash issue, confirming that the culprit is not Microsoft's operating system but rather a faulty version of its own remediation software. In a newly published support advisory, Dell stated that version 5.5.16.0 of Dell SupportAssist Remediation and Alienware SupportAssist Remediation can trigger blue screen errors and unexpected system restarts. The company notes that the problematic component operates independently of the main SupportAssist application, meaning users should not remove the primary SupportAssist software when troubleshooting the issue. According to Dell, the crashes are linked specifically to the SupportAssist Remediation service, which is bundled with SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools, and as such it has since released an updated version, 5.5.16.1, which is said to resolve the problem. Affected users are advised to first verify whether version 5.5.16.0 is installed by checking the Installed Apps section in Windows Settings. If so, Dell recommends updating SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools through either SupportAssist's "Update Software" feature or Dell Command Update. Dell also advises users to back up important data before performing the update and to ensure systems remain connected to power throughout the installation process. If you are still having issues though make sure to report to the Dell support forum. As it turns out though Dell is not the only PC maker currently dealing with update-related headaches as HP is also facing a separate but probably equally frustrating issue involving recent Windows Secure Boot updates that were released with recent Windows 11 Patch Tuesdays. Similar to Dell, HP also put up its own support article where it explains the issue. The company says that affected devices could hit a brick wall when booting as they run into a BitLocker recovery loop after the April 2026 updates. The problem appears to affect systems wherein the new UEFI Secure Boot CA 2023 certificates fail to apply properly. As such affected users will find themselves entering their recovery key over and over again despite the system otherwise functioning normally. HP says such PCs should be updated to the latest available BIOS version and configured with the necessary Secure Boot certificates before installing Microsoft's Windows 11 Patch Tuesday updates. Systems that are already experiencing the problem may require BIOS configuration changes to restore normal boot behavior. Admins can find information regarding that in the support article here on HP's official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!