[Official] Doctor Who Thread


Recommended Posts

i am not afraid to admit My wife and I both cried at the end of this episode.

I had a tear running down my face at the end of the episode which was replaced with laughter straight away when Capaldi appeared!

I must be a cold person, I honestly didn't cry with Matt Smith. I cried like a baby with both Donna, David Tennant and Amy Pond, but I don't know, I didn't feel anything with this episode. I honestly thought it was a crap episode compared to so many other gems. Actually, I haven't felt anything between the relationship of the 11th Doctor and Clara. She's cute, but that's honestly the extent of my feelings for her, pure vanity, no real care for the character.

 

And so far, not at all impressed with the new doctor. I want Tennant back :(

  • Like 2

This  really got to me tword the end   made  me  cry allot because  my father passed away   january the 8th this  year  and so all this did make me cry allot   and being that it is Christmas  it was really hard to enjoy   he had  just started to watch Doctor who with me  and  was to what i could tell enjoying it and asking me questions  this  image of him was a few years ago before  he got  ill 

 

 

vgjd.jpg

 

 

 

i do not want to sound to critical however, i honestly thought the episode was rather boring. and Moffet kept promising to close story loops and not really much of anything happened in the episode.

 

 

I agree. I grew quite annoyed 1/2 way threw. Was very blah. 

 

It felt like the writer took random crap from the past and threw it in there just because. 

Well, I thought it was absolute rubbish. Who has gotten progressively more cheap looking and more nonsensical under Moffat's tutelage.

 

Tonight's episode was a good example of this, lots of flowery language that ultimately makes no sense, plots that went absolutely nowhere and the damn daleks again, is it possible for Moffat to write an episode now where the daleks don't make an appearance?

 

I can't wait for Moffat to leave and someone else with more imagination to take over because Moffat is just churning over the same stories now.

 

Moffat isn't leaving with Matt's exit so you will have to wait longer.

Well, I thought it was absolute rubbish. Who has gotten progressively more cheap looking and more nonsensical under Moffat's tutelage.

 

Tonight's episode was a good example of this, lots of flowery language that ultimately makes no sense, plots that went absolutely nowhere and the damn daleks again, is it possible for Moffat to write an episode now where the daleks don't make an appearance?

 

I can't wait for Moffat to leave and someone else with more imagination to take over because Moffat is just churning over the same stories now.

 

Agree 100% I just hope in a last act Moff brings back the Time Lords good and proper (and it's kind of the only way for the show to go on given the doc is out of regens). It will be the final raised finger to Davies in the complete reset of his

stupid from the first word time war" plot!

I watched the follow up show which was a reenactment of the innovation of the original series and how it was nearly cut with excellent portrayal of William Hartnell

 

d516db98ab7c6790e5df8e347d0c59db.png

 

Dr Who An adventure in Space and Time

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/p01kqt9x/An_Adventure_in_Space_and_Time/

I thought the episode was fine, the way he handled them at the end wasn't really out of nowhere when you think about it.  

Getting a super boost of energy which exploded out and also through some scifi magic gave him a new regen cycle.  Two birds with one stone.

I thought the episode was fine, the way he handled them at the end wasn't really out of nowhere when you think about it.  

Getting a super boost of energy which exploded out and also through some scifi magic gave him a new regen cycle.  Two birds with one stone.

 

I thought that was the biggest let down.  Another deus ex machina on a show that already relies on them way too much.

 

And the feeble explanation for why the Daleks didn't just shoot him was even more ridiculous.  They're supposed to be terrifying, brutal killing machines but time after time they don't bother to kill the Doctor when they have him right where they want him.   The best explanation the writers can come up with is that they're afraid that he might have another trick up his sleeve :rolleyes:   It's weak, even for a show that claims to be written for children.

 

It's disappointing to see such dross in a classic show on a station that was once renowned for intelligent, well written programming.

I felt the loss of the cyberman head was done a little better than the loss of the doctor. Though to give credit, the Daleks are known to fear the Doctor as they won't shoot him down even when he's surrounded by them on their own ship, though this time they at least tried. :D

was anyone else hoping that the

timelords would return and we would get a whole new arc of timelord stories?

 

Yeah but that would cost too much, much better to just keep regurgitating Dalek stories and saving money until they finally bore everyone away from the programme.

Ok, I cried when you know who showed up at the end. Though when 11 was giving his "eulogy" I teared up also. Reminded me of Tennant saying goodbye as well. I enjoyed the episode quite a bit. It did tie up loose ends (though not all of them obviously) and closed up Matt Smith's run well I think. Not sure why everyone is freaking about Capaldi being a quack after 3 seconds of air time :|

 

Rather enjoyed the fact that the Doctor teamed up with the Silence dudes at the end of it all. Makes sense if you think about it

Agree 100% I just hope in a last act Moff brings back the Time Lords good and proper (and it's kind of the only way for the show to go on given the doc is out of regens). It will be the final raised finger to Davies in the complete reset of his

stupid from the first word time war" plot!

except he got a whole new set of regens....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Gotenks98 is right... Outlook (new) is absolute trash. Doesn't Mozilla have an Enterprise Version of Firebird?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!