[Official] Doctor Who Thread


Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...

 As much as I like Capaldi's take on the doctor especially over some childish antics previous generation provided a complete refresh might be for the best. I really hope they will be cleaning out the writers room for season 11

Yeah, I'm not surprised either. I hope the production value doesn't go down, like it did with the Seventh Doctor's tenure. Don't get me wrong, I like Sylvester -- he's a lovely fellow -- but the "Office stuff" going on at that time was just plain garbage and the show suffered because of it. :( 

I guess he got sick and tired of the dreadful writing he's been getting...

 

Oh well! Time to start the search for a new Doctor!  My nomination, Richard E Grant

 

Reasons:

 

1. He's been in Dr Who before, in the Snowmen, The Belles of St John and The Name of the Doctor.  There is plenty of precedent for former Who actors taking on the main role.

2. He's actually played the Doctor before! In a comedy sketch and also in an animated episode as the 9th Doctor.

3. He has the "look".  The high forehead often visually associated with great intelligence, a piercing look, and the cultured accent that all go together with forming his overall look.

4. He's quite capable of the physical stuff needed in the role, but doesn't come across as an action hero. That's important to the Dr as he defeats his enemies with his mind, not his muscles! An idiot friend of mine suggested Idris Elba, seriously!  

 

 

11 hours ago, Unobscured Vision said:

Yeah, I'm not surprised either. I hope the production value doesn't go down, like it did with the Seventh Doctor's tenure. Don't get me wrong, I like Sylvester -- he's a lovely fellow -- but the "Office stuff" going on at that time was just plain garbage and the show suffered because of it. :( 

Down? The writing at least has already hit bottom. I'm hugely disappointed in this news because I wanted to see what Peter could do without the impediment of Moffat as showrunner. The most perfect actor for the role since Tom Baker, and he's been stuck with lousy scripts.

 

It's possibly down to the scripts but I've never enjoyed Capaldi's Doctor anywhere near as much as the others in recent years so this doesn't overly disappoint me.

 

Apparently, Olivia Coleman (supporting the already in an episode part) is one name thrown into the hat to have that eventual women doctor as well as Rupert Grint. Personally, I'm not a big fan over either of those but ultimately they need to get better scripts for it to work regardless.

10 minutes ago, Skiver said:

It's possibly down to the scripts but I've never enjoyed Capaldi's Doctor anywhere near as much as the others in recent years so this doesn't overly disappoint me.

 

Apparently, Olivia Coleman (supporting the already in an episode part) is one name thrown into the hat to have that eventual women doctor as well as Rupert Grint. Personally, I'm not a big fan over either of those but ultimately they need to get better scripts for it to work regardless.

Cheesus christ, Rupert Grint?

 

That said, it does make sense they are going to go with a youngin.

  • Like 1
11 minutes ago, Skiver said:

It's possibly down to the scripts but I've never enjoyed Capaldi's Doctor anywhere near as much as the others in recent years so this doesn't overly disappoint me.

 

Apparently, Olivia Coleman (supporting the already in an episode part) is one name thrown into the hat to have that eventual women doctor as well as Rupert Grint. Personally, I'm not a big fan over either of those but ultimately they need to get better scripts for it to work regardless.

The best woman I can think of in the role of Doctor Who, if we really must have one, is Carole Ann Ford, who played the Doctor's original companion and granddaughter. If we have to have a female Doctor, make her a badass granny version of Susan!

 

Or Maggie Smith. But if it happens, let it be handled by someone more skilled than Moffat, otherwise the show is toast. Just look at how poorly received the Ghostbusters reboot was.

 

Grint? No. I'm tired of younger actors in a role that's traditionally been a paternal/grandpaternal/crazy uncle figure. I want more actors like Capaldi in the role. And definitely no more kids like Matt Smith!

Just now, margrave said:

Ah, a female doctor would match the current female master... mistress.... whatever it calls itself. lol

I still think that's the Rani messing with the Doctor's head. :laugh: Not that the writing fits either character. Michelle Gomez is an excellent actress, and in the few good moments "Missy" has had, reminds me of a female version of Roger Delgado. The trouble is, those moments are very very few and far between. Like Peter, the scripts have not done Michelle justice. To be fair, Simms was a terrible Master as well.

 

Missy is a far better argument against a female Doctor than in support of the idea. At least while Moffat remains at the helm.

6 minutes ago, DConnell said:

The best woman I can think of in the role of Doctor Who, if we really must have one, is Carole Ann Ford, who played the Doctor's original companion and granddaughter. If we have to have a female Doctor, make her a badass granny version of Susan!

 

Or Maggie Smith. But if it happens, let it be handled by someone more skilled than Moffat, otherwise the show is toast. Just look at how poorly received the Ghostbusters reboot was.

 

Grint? No. I'm tired of younger actors in a role that's traditionally been a paternal/grandpaternal/crazy uncle figure. I want more actors like Capaldi in the role. And definitely no more kids like Matt Smith!

 

Someone like tennant replacing capaldi might be good. Tennant was really good so  I think someone like him could do a good job as the next doctor

31 minutes ago, wendy oltman said:

Someone like tennant replacing capaldi might be good. Tennant was really good so  I think someone like him could do a good job as the next doctor

Possibly, but I'd prefer they get away from the romantic elements in the Doctor-companion relationship. It only ever worked at all with 12 and River, and makes the Doctor look like a real creep, being over 2000 years old and all.

 

Still, Ten was the 2nd best NewWho Doctor, once they got rid of Rose. Just pair the new Doctor with a companion like Sarah Jane or Donna.

  • Like 2
1 hour ago, DConnell said:

Missy is a far better argument against a female Doctor than in support of the idea. At least while Moffat remains at the helm.

This. The feminist lobby got what they wanted with Missy. To do the same with the Doctor would just be daft.

 

Grint?  Might as well cancel the show now if he's in the running...

 

I still say Robert E Grant is the best choice so far. He has the look AND the screen presence needed for the role.

  • Like 2

Has Tennant said anything about coming back to play the Doctor again? I feel with him doing Marvel now and finally getting his foot in the door in Hollywood over the past few years he'd have to obviously not do Doctor Who again. Plus, that would be really weird having him come back as the NEXT Doctor (imo). How would they explain that one? I'm sure they could obviously, but eh.

 

I still say a younger Doctor is better at this point, simply because of the physical requirements of the role these days. Plus, a ton of kids are into the show now and having an older guy (or gal) in the role might turn them off a bit. Of course if the writing is good, it shouldn't matter who the Doctor is. Moffat used to write amazing stuff, even when he took over as the main producer he still wrote decent stuff. But over the years, not so much anymore.

  • Like 2

If a woman is out, how about a different race?

 

How about a black man?

 

OOooooo Peter Dinklage would be awesome!!!!

 

Maybe Ralph Fiennes? He's a great actor.

 

Mads Mikkelsen would be good,

 

Taron Egerton would be great for a younger one.. 'Matt Smith' time-ish....

 

Edited by margrave

Valid points, everyone.

 

6 hours ago, DConnell said:

Down? The writing at least has already hit bottom. I'm hugely disappointed in this news because I wanted to see what Peter could do without the impediment of Moffat as showrunner. The most perfect actor for the role since Tom Baker, and he's been stuck with lousy scripts.

 

That's what I'm saying. It doesn't need to slip further down the drain. The writing -- and don't get me wrong, there have been some decent concepts toward the second half of the last series -- has been sub-par and the concepts weren't that well thought-out. It wasn't "cerebral" enough for me. Or maybe it was too cerebral and wasn't executed well. Capaldi himself is likely not happy with the writing either, and rather than ride it out with a new Staff he's chosen to just sign off. I can't blame him, if that's the case.

 

Concerning Michelle Gomez -- bless her for making lemonade from lemons. She took a truly mediocre part and made it shine. Nobody had been able to portray The Master with such personality and give it life like she has. I hope we see her again, she's fun.

  • Like 2

Doctor Who’: Bond actor the favorite to replace Peter Capaldi

 

U.K.-based bookmakers William Hill have made Bond actor Ben Whishaw the favorite to replace Peter Capaldi in the long-running science fiction show Doctor Who. The company is offering odds of 6/1 that the Skyfall star will become the next Doctor, a two-hearted alien who periodically changes his physical form.

Capaldi announced Monday that he would leave the show later this year. BBC America has confirmed that the Doctor’s “regeneration” would occur on the special Christmas episode.

Whishaw plays the character of armaments expert Q in the Bond franchise. His other credits include Cloud Atlas, the Oscar-nominated The Lobster, and voicing the role of the titular bear in 2014’s Paddington, which featured Capaldi in its cast.

 

http://www.msn.com/en-us/tv/news/‘doctor-who’-bond-actor-the-favorite-to-replace-peter-capaldi/ar-AAmsAQI?li=BBnb4R7&ocid=iehp

4 minutes ago, DoctorD said:

Doctor Who’: Bond actor the favorite to replace Peter Capaldi

 

U.K.-based bookmakers William Hill have made Bond actor Ben Whishaw the favorite to replace Peter Capaldi in the long-running science fiction show Doctor Who. The company is offering odds of 6/1 that the Skyfall star will become the next Doctor, a two-hearted alien who periodically changes his physical form.

Capaldi announced Monday that he would leave the show later this year. BBC America has confirmed that the Doctor’s “regeneration” would occur on the special Christmas episode.

Whishaw plays the character of armaments expert Q in the Bond franchise. His other credits include Cloud Atlas, the Oscar-nominated The Lobster, and voicing the role of the titular bear in 2014’s Paddington, which featured Capaldi in its cast.

 

http://www.msn.com/en-us/tv/news/‘doctor-who’-bond-actor-the-favorite-to-replace-peter-capaldi/ar-AAmsAQI?li=BBnb4R7&ocid=iehp

He's ok but I prefer Doctor Who's actor to be at least 40.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      66
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!