Nikon Announces D300 & D3 (FulFrame) + Lenses


Recommended Posts

51 point AF!?!? :o

D300 seems to be the better body compared to the D40 but it's also $500 more.

But still..

e5305aecaa10b390c76b.gif

922k pixel LCD. 6fp/8fps (battery/ac) buffer, 14 bit, 100% frame coverage!

Sad it's not a full frame like the D3 (though that's $5000 compared to the $2500 5D).

Competition is good though! :)

it seems like it nikon doesn't make camers w/ ISOs lower than 200? Correct me if i'm wrong.

HDMI output!? That's crazy.

So are all of nikon's new cameras having the AF motors put in the lens, so that the old lenses won't AF? Or was that just the D40/80?

Edited by crazzy88ss
it seems like it nikon doesn't make camers w/ ISOs lower than 200? Correct me if i'm wrong.

HDMI output!? That's crazy.

So are all of nikon's new cameras having the AF motors put in the lens, so that the old lenses won't AF? Or was that just the D40/80?

no, even the 80 can drive lenses without motors. It is just the D40 that can't.

eh, I'm only 5th on the D300 waiting list on my fav store ;)

And I'm happy that the D300 isnt full frame! FF's are way too tricky and cost you more since you have to change your lens. Plus, having the 1.5 factor is nice with tele lens :)

whoo /me sits and waits

D3;

'ISO 25600' expandable... !

11FPS

3" liveview screen

51 AF points... someone went crazy in the Nikon design shed.

I'm a 'canon man', and even i want one!

.

Nikon definitely have the upper hand at the moment.

Man I love the d300! I really really want to see what 256000 ISO looks like.

Just like we all pooed in our pants when we heard about the 10fps 1dmk3, I think I will wait until people have them in their hands before I make real judgements. I hope it doesn't have something like an AF issue.

  • 2 weeks later...
Man I love the d300! I really really want to see what 256000 ISO looks like.

Just like we all pooed in our pants when we heard about the 10fps 1dmk3, I think I will wait until people have them in their hands before I make real judgements. I hope it doesn't have something like an AF issue.

The D300 won't have ISO 256,000. Only the D3 will have it.

  • 1 month later...
it seems like it nikon doesn't make camers w/ ISOs lower than 200? Correct me if i'm wrong.

HDMI output!? That's crazy.

So are all of nikon's new cameras having the AF motors put in the lens, so that the old lenses won't AF? Or was that just the D40/80?

D200 goes down to 100 Iso....200 is more than fine tho, and its very smooth....so there you have it..I'm ****ed cuz i just got my d200 about 3 months ago....I would get the d3 for my model shooting, but I dont need all the features it has...will definately go for the d300 tho.

256k ISO? X-ray vision? o_O Does it emit radiation?

it's 25.6K iso...get it right...and do you know how much f'in noise thats gonna introduce? you're shots are gonna look like you took a picture in a radiation chamber.. better bust out neat image to clean that shot up

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • If you don't care to read what I said, then you prove my point. Maybe written media is beyond your attention span. Titles are not summaries my friend.
    • Nobody asked... in fact, I said "I don't care about political leanings"  
    • TLDR. Here is a far better title (just a basic example): Windows 11 26H2 to allow disabling Web search results
    • Restore will get my vote, only if to see if things are any different, doubt it though but Labour and Conservatives too out of touch and same thing over and over and over…, Lib Dem who?
    • There is nothing wrong with this title. You have completely missed the plot when it comes to "clickbait." The issue was never that a title tries to entice you to click, that is how titles have worked for over 100 years. The issue is when the title subverts expectations, getting you to click expecting something that isn't there. The classic clickbait example is "Boyfriend caught cheating, what happens next will shock you," then what happened next is the girlfriend was upset...which is probably the least shocking outcome imaginable. If sounds like what you want is for the titles to be a collection of 10-word summaries that you can skim, get the just of the story, and only click if you want more details. That is not, never has been, and never will be what titles are. You can go all the way back to print newspapers during the great depression and see the same thing. The newspaper was locked in a vending machine, all you can see is the headline, you choose to put in 5¢ to buy the paper and read the rest if you want. Those headlines were written in a way to sell the paper, not just to provide a summery. Here are two actual headlines from that time, "Wall Street Lays an Egg," or "Stocks Hit Bottom?" Maybe you'd say something like "it was wrong then and it's still wrong now." Okay, fine opinion to have, but it isn't like Neowin is doing something unjurnalistic, they are just following the age-old standards for written media.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      525
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      199
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      94
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      neufuse
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!