Halo 03 |News & General| OFFICIAL


Recommended Posts

I'm sorry Mr. Gamer! the fact that you know how to play every game on earth doesn't newcomers should know that "by default". when you design a game you most create the game with every level of the food chain in mind, that's why you have different levels of difficulty and all that crap. :rolleyes:

I'm sorry Mr. Gamer! the fact that you know how to play every game on earth doesn't newcomers should know that "by default". when you design a game you most create the game with every level of the food chain in mind, that's why you have different levels of difficulty and all that crap. :rolleyes:

Easy Spartan! I'm far from a gamer, I'm just a casual player. And it's ok for me or anyone else to have an opinion on this. My comments won't keep people away from it, there's nothing to worry about. I agree with you, newcomers to the game should be shown the basic workings. I'm not debating that. Hell, I haven't played Halo since the initial release on Xbox, I'm a newcomer myself. My comments were such that the game just didn't pull me in during my initial run of it. I'll go back to it tonight and see how it goes but I can easily see myself sticking with only MP.

Game on! :)

Edited by soLoredd

I'm not trying to change your mind buddy... I'm just pointing out things on a general level, you know how people around here love to twist other people words and that's why I was trying to set the record strait as to why the first chapter is not as challenging as many would have expected. :happy: :yes:

after all we're on the same side of the boat... :rofl:

enjoy your MP tonight! :yes:

First level was ok. I think the game really becomes fun when you get your hands on some vehicles and the levels open up later on. If I was you I'd stick to it until then at least.

I also found in some places, just as with other halos, if you really try you can force vehicles into buildings where your probably shouldn't have them by squeezing through door ways. Leads to some very sad covenant when your driving down a narrow corridoor with a gunner behind you.

OK, I know I said I wasn't going to respond until I beat the game, but some of you I strongly disagree with...

The first level is just a training level? Are we talking about the entire first mission where you have to rescue the guys? Because I don't really consider the cheap 10 snipers in a row trick "easing" gamers in. I'm on the second level now (on the hardcore mode, or whatever it's called, from the advice of others), and it's far easier than the first mission so far. That's not "easing" players in.

Sorry, but while the campaign isn't bad so far (again: so far; and I'm not saying it's bad, not saying it's great), but it suffers from the same problem of the other two Halo games -- it seems like it's about 5 years behind where it should be, similar to Quake 4 or Unreal II (both games that I liked, so don't think I'm slamming Halo 3 here). The level design still needs work, and it just gives you what you except from a shooter 5 years ago.

The graphics need work, to be blunt. I always thought they looked pretty good, but this being a AAA title, in the second year of the 360's lifespan, I expected better. It doesn't even hold a candle to Bioshock, Gears of War, or even the GRAW games. It's not horrible, but it just isn't good. It really does look Halo 2.5, honestly.

The multiplayer's really fun if you're looking for deathmatch (or slayer, whatever you want to call it). The team-based stuff like Capture the Flag still suffer, IMO, because they still play like deathmatch. Halo's a fun deathmatch game, but I prefer team-based, myself. Still a good multiplayer component, however.

That said, SO FAR, I'd give it a 4/5 score. Like I said, it's not bad, but let's not make things up about the game. It doesn't feel unique in any way, or even like an evolution in the Halo gameplay in any way. It's definitely the best game so far in the Halo series, IMO. It's more fun than the first two because the level design -- while still bad -- has improved a bit.

(AGAIN: SO FAR. I'm reserving judgment for until I beat the game, which may be a while due to exams and track.)

I have questions.

1. Why is it when I am playing the game I am seeing the game in the middle half of the screen and not the full half (I am using HDMI)?

2. In Halo 3 why am I (1st player) the Elite instead 2nd player is MC?

3. I love this game. :D

I have questions.

1. Why is it when I am playing the game I am seeing the game in the middle half of the screen and not the full half (I am using HDMI)?

2. In Halo 3 why am I (1st player) the Elite instead 2nd player is MC?

3. I love this game. :D

1. are you playing with otgher people on the same tv cause that happens with everybody, no widescreen support for two people multiplayer, it's stupid.

2. Yeah i was confused about that too, my buddy and i were playing he was player 2 and was like... why am i master cheif? (i didn't care cause i LOOVVVVVVEEEEE the arbiter)

3. me too :)

Quick question, guys: if you go to the campaign screen (as only one player, and you're still on a campaign), can you change the current mission difficulty setting to "legendary" or "normal" if you're on "heroic" at the moment? Will it overwrite current saves?

1. are you playing with otgher people on the same tv cause that happens with everybody, no widescreen support for two people multiplayer, it's stupid.

Actually, it's not stupid. It's much better than having full widescreen when you're playing two players. Have you ever played Halo 2 widscreen split horizontally? You can't see anything above or below you, it was a mess. This way it's much clearer and not 'out of view'.

Quick question, guys: if you go to the campaign screen (as only one player, and you're still on a campaign), can you change the current mission difficulty setting to "legendary" or "normal" if you're on "heroic" at the moment? Will it overwrite current saves?

You will lose your checkpoints at what Mission you're currently on, but you won't lose your progress in the whole campaign. So it's best to switch after completing a mission (when you get the blue Halo loading screen).

Actually, it's not stupid. It's much better than having full widescreen when you're playing two players. Have you ever played Halo 2 widscreen split horizontally? You can't see anything above or below you, it was a mess. This way it's much clearer and not 'out of view'.

Have yet to play the game, but Joystiq looked into it and wallah:

http://xbox360.joystiq.com/2007/09/25/halo...6-9-hdtv-edges/

Bungie may have gotten this one right after all :yes:

Actually, it's not stupid. It's much better than having full widescreen when you're playing two players. Have you ever played Halo 2 widscreen split horizontally? You can't see anything above or below you, it was a mess. This way it's much clearer and not 'out of view'.

...

But now you cant see anything at all because the screen is too small :s

next time lets try to play a more than 1 chapter before you say the game is a let down. :no:

According to my achivements, I've just passed level 4, I'm not seeing the SP improving unfortunately. It still feels like a CC console shooter. :(

Well I'm just going by the fun we had in the beta :p

Aye, well we need to get some forge matches this weekend. I was giggling like an idiot when I dropped a Warthog on someones head, accidently, last night. :D

Actually, it's not stupid. It's much better than having full widescreen when you're playing two players. Have you ever played Halo 2 widscreen split horizontally? You can't see anything above or below you, it was a mess. This way it's much clearer and not 'out of view'.

I think I'm totally missing the logic here. By having the wider screen you wouldn't really have to change ANYTHING in relation to the amount you can see vertically, all it would mean is you can see more to the left and right.

using the link posted a few posts ago: http://xbox360.joystiq.com/2007/09/25/halo...6-9-hdtv-edges/

The 2nd pic shows how the bottom two players have the same vertical draw as the guy on the top, except he gets some extra viewing to the left and right.

You will lose your checkpoints at what Mission you're currently on, but you won't lose your progress in the whole campaign. So it's best to switch after completing a mission (when you get the blue Halo loading screen).

Awesome, thanks :)

While I don't need anyone to give me an explanation that "Chapter 1 is just a training level", I can say without equivocation that the first "chapter" of BioShock did not feel this way. I kind of laughed at the beginning of H3 when the guy tells you to look up then look down. I mean, come on, we are way passed that point in games. And maybe the comparison of BioShock to Halo 3 is not fair but I digress.

Uh, that's so you don't have to go into preferences and select "Invert Y Axis" like I have to do in Bioshock. I think this is a clever way to set that setting.

Awesome, thanks :)

Yep, it is nice to know. I think I may be using this at some point.

I have to admit, things have picked up since Chapter 1, they have. I am enjoying it more than I was, and I am only on Chapter 2.

With that said, I still think the overwhelming amount of hype and press is all because of the quality of MP, and not the SP campaign. I still feel the SP is very good at best, but nowhere near great.

You really must keep in mind I come from a PC background, and First Person Shooters are BY FAR my favorite genre, so I am very critical of them.

You also must keep in mind I never really thought Halo SP was anything special.

I also never really cared much about story. I know that may be a sin to say about gaming, but honestly it is true. I watch cut scenes most of the time, I just do not pay much attention to them. If I want a good story, I will read a book. If I want to shoot things and be entertained, I play games, so that is why story has never been high on my list for games actually.

I asked this earlier but got no response. How can I get the ads on my account? I am almost 20 and created the account when I was 18. I am confused and I would like to know whats going on. Thanks!

I asked this earlier but got no response. How can I get the ads on my account? I am almost 20 and created the account when I was 18. I am confused and I would like to know whats going on. Thanks!
i dont know but could you just make a 2nd account just for dloading? i did that to get the US/UK GoW stuff.

1st time in the history that people WANT to get ads rather than avoid them. haha.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!