Halo 03 |News & General| OFFICIAL


Recommended Posts

Good boy :)

The whole point of the Halo 3 News & General thread, is to keep everything together. Not only are you posting news twice, you aren't doing what DirtyLarry set the thread up for either (N)

You forgot to put a link where you bolded "Halo 3 News & General thread" ;)

I beleive this topic is important enough to warrant its own thread instead of being buried in the ###### of a thread that is general discussion.

Its pretty important with some gamers I know "betrayed" that Bungie didn't provide the 1080p native resolution and 60 fps that rumors claimed H3 would run at. It gets the word out that much faster that the issue has been addressed.

You forgot to put a link where you bolded "Halo 3 News & General thread" ;)

No I didn't :)

I beleive this topic is important enough to warrant its own thread instead of being buried in the ###### of a thread that is general discussion.

The MS community voted and decided to have these topics in place for news and discussion. It makes things a hell of a lot easier for DirtyLarry.

The only complaint I have of the HDR was when using the flame thrower. It's way too much on the eyes imo

But the only time it's too much is when you're on fire, which is just to show you that, well, you're on fire.

But the only time it's too much is when you're on fire, which is just to show you that, well, you're on fire.

Is it? Haha I never noticed. I thought I was being shot at and it was just the glow from the fire whilest using the flame thrower :laugh:

Is it? Haha I never noticed. I thought I was being shot at and it was just the glow from the fire whilest using the flame thrower :laugh:

It took me a while to figure out but I was flaming floods and then running through them. Why do I keep dying? :rolleyes:

As for HDR, I think it looks very realistic when you go from a dark area to a light area. That's the point of it being too bright. I guess you don't experience that much from your parent's basement, though... ;) j/k Ayepecks :p

I'm sorry, but where'd that come from?

I'm not usually too fond of HDR and bloom effects, since they are always used with light hand. But there's something about it here, it looks awesome! Specially when opening a big gate going from the inside to a big outdoor area that extremely bright white looks so amazing.

After beating the single-player game, I have to say, it was probably Halo's best single-player experience to date.

While the level design still lacks in comparison to most PC first-person shooters, it was actually pretty good as far as Halo goes. There were actually some more atmospheric design elements in a few levels (for example, some of the humans that were dead in cafeterias in one of the levels), but they were still mostly lacking a lot of atmospheric elements. And how are you going to end with the same technique that the original Halo had, that was almost just as bad? Areas were still repeated ad nauseum a few times, specifically later in the game.

The game was just the right length, I thought. Any longer would have been too long, and much shorter would've left a lot of people complaining. One area actually seemed like filler, though, and I wish that had been changed (the eighth level, the Flood level where you have to rescue Cortana, while essential to the story, had horrid level design and seemed like they tried to extend it out).

A.I. was pretty good for the enemy, but the human A.I. was rather bad at times. Also, it seemed like the enemy A.I. got better when the difficulty was increased, but that your human companions didn't get any better at all.

I still haven't played online yet because my dorm's internet access sucks (sorry to those who invited me to play online... but around Thanksgiving and Christmas I want to play four-player co-op on Legendary if anyone's interested), but I have been playing with my roomate, and it seems crazy fun for Slayer. The other game types still stink, though, I thought. I prefer team-based stuff, and I just didn't find Halo 3's team-based stuff that fun.

Graphics were probably the biggest letdown. I always expected Halo 3 would look good, and it doesn't really look bad, but it looks average. The lack of AA is really noticeable, and the texture work is pathetic at times. Models looked good on the plus side. While they're only average, for some reason, I somewhat like them. They remind me of some older PC game graphics.

Overall, while their were some cheap and lame instances (for example, the level design, having the cliche 10 snipers in a row thing on the first level), it was pretty good. Halo's worked pretty well on consoles but has always sucked when they get ported to the PC because there are some minor details that most PC gamers expect (save anywhere, enhanced textures when it gets ported, etc), this one's probably the best so far.

4.5/5 from me for the overall game; if it was just single-player, I'd give it a 4. If and when it gets ported to the PC, though, I'll probably hate it. Best leave it where it is if you're not going to try and enhance it in any way, Microsoft.

Woot, called it :p jk

What do you think of the story so far?

Good so far I am only starting on Floodgates. Though I feel Diaolgue is a little weak in the cut scenes, but I do love the stuff characters say while your playing, some of it is hilarious; I was sneaking up behind a grunt and he said, "please don't be behind me." he turned around and then started screaming. :laugh:

Does anyone know why Forge has weapon limits on some maps?? For example, I wanted to put a flame thrower on Sandtrap, I can't, is there a technical reason for this??

A.I. was pretty good for the enemy, but the human A.I. was rather bad at times. Also, it seemed like the enemy A.I. got better when the difficulty was increased, but that your human companions didn't get any better at all.

That would be because it's supposed to be harder for you =P... not increase the skill of everyone around you.

I'm a little late, but I'm guessing the "640p" is why the game doesn't fill my whole screen? I thought it was because I was playing in split-screen. I never got the chance to play full screen (my DVD drive died on me) but I'm guessing it would be the same way there? (I hope not)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!